Development of the HPV 16 / 18 Cervical Cancer Vaccine

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Two dose Q-HPV Vaccine Study
Advertisements

The Future is Now: Understanding the HPV Vaccine Guidelines E.J. Mayeaux, Jr., M.D. Professor of Family Medicine Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Human Papillomaviruses (HPV): The Background, Current Status and Future of Vaccines to Prevent HPV Infection, Abnormal Genital Lesions and Cervical Cancer.
HPV-vaccines – a breakthrough in medicine Björn Strander Onkologiskt centrum Västra regionen and Kungsbacka Närsjukhus Sweden.
HPV Vaccines: What We Know and What We Should Expect Laura Koutsky, PhD Professor of Epidemiology University of Washington Seattle, WA.
Repositioning Prevention and Control of Cancers of Reproductive Organs in Kenya Repositioning Prevention and Control of Cancers of Reproductive Organs.
Clinical Use of HPV DNA Testing Thomas C. Wright, Jr. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University.
Cost Effectiveness of a Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in reducing the risk of cervical cancer in Ireland using a transmission dynamic model. Cara Usher.
Introduction of New vaccines Hib as an Example St. Petersburg Jun 2001.
HPV Vaccine Update Eileen Yamada, MD, MPH Immunization Branch California Department of Health Services.
Immune Responses to Human Papillomavirus Vaccines: What We Have Learned Ligia Pinto, PhD Senior Principal Investigator, HPV Immunology Laboratory October.
You are the Key to HPV Cancer Prevention Understanding the Burden of HPV Disease, the Importance of the HPV Vaccine Recommendation, and Communicating about.
Cervical Cancer and HPV Z Mike Chirenje MD FRCOG University of Zimbabwe, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harare, Zimbabwe.
ACCP Evidence base: Implications for policy and practice R. Sankaranarayanan MD Head, Screening Group World Health Organization (WHO) International Agency.
National Vaccine Advisory Committee November 29, 2005 Update on NIH H5N1 Vaccine Trials Linda C. Lambert Chief, Respiratory Diseases Branch Division of.
The HPV Vaccine: Protecting Girls from Cervical Cancer
The HPV Vaccine Our Best Shot to Prevent Cervical Cancer Harold C. Wiesenfeld, MD,CM Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences-University.
What is HPV? Estimated to be the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States.
Anticipated impact on HPV infection from HPV vaccination programs – cause for optimism Dr Paddy Horner.
Jennifer S. Smith University of North Carolina Cervical Cancer-Free America Initiative Overview Changing the Dialogue about Cervical.
Human Papillomavirus Heidi M. Bauer, MD MPH California Department of Health Services STD Control Branch.
HPV Vaccination - the end of the road for cervical cancer? Alison Fiander Wales College of Medicine Cardiff University.
HPV: How to prevent your patients from becoming my patients Katina Robison, MD Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Director of Colposcopy.
Cervical Cancer By:Marisela Esparza. Cervical Cancer is cancer in the cervix (the lower part of the cervix that connects to the vagina.)
GSK South Africa. “Our global quest is to improve the quality of human life by enabling people to do more, feel better and live longer” GlaxoSmithKline.
Poster template by ResearchPosters.co.za The efficacy of bivalent and tetravalent HPV vaccination against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and persistent.
APPMG BEAD meeting London, February 6, 2006 MALARIA VACCINES DEVELOPMENT: THE WAY AHEAD Joe Cohen, Ph.D. Vice President R&D Vaccines for Emerging Diseases.
The HCV vaccine: cooperation in the shadow of the pyramids Antonella Folgori.
HPV Related Disease Ginny Ryan. What Is HPV? The human papillomavirus is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the U.S. – 79 million Americans.
Combined paediatric vaccines for national immunization programmes
Herpes Papillomavirus (HPV) and Varicella-zoster Virus (VZV) Vaccination Ellen Barbouche, MD Primary Care Conference 18 April 2007.
Learning Objective  To know the results of the clinical trial, immune response and duration, and efficacy analysis for GARDASIL™. 1 GARDASIL is a trademark.
Burden of Disease Professor Xavier Bosch Institut Català d’Oncologia Barcelona, Spain.
Best first ? The ATAC completed treatment analysis Professor Jack Cuzick Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, UK.
The New HPV Vaccine Laura Zakowski, MD No conflicts of interest.
The HPV Vaccine: Protecting Your Daughter from Cervical Cancer Your questions deserve trusted answers.
S. Goto1, J. Zhu2, L. Lisheng2, BH. Oh3, D. Wojdyla4, M. Hanna5, J. Horowitz6, L. Wallentin7, D. Xavier8, JH. Alexander4 (1) Tokai University School of.
Effectiveness of Sub-capsular Meningococcal Vaccines An Approach to Evaluate Vaccines for the Prevention of Invasive Group B Meningococcal Disease VRBPAC.
. A Randomized Clinical Trial of Immunization With Combined Hepatitis A and B Versus Hepatitis B Alone for Hepatitis B Seroprotection in Hemodialysis Patients.
Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting Hepatitis B Vaccine (Recombinant), Adjuvanted (HEPLISAV): Review of Immunogenicity.
N Engl J Med 2010; 362: January 28, 2010 Presenters ; Dr Ngwenya/Dr Nchimba.
Microbicides The Population Council Experience and Future Directions Don E. Waldron Medical Director Don E. Waldron Medical Director.
Tailoring Intervention – Effectively Targeting the High-risk Population Cardiovascular Event Reduction in the Higher-Risk Primary Prevention Population.
2016 Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index. 2Deloitte and US Council on Competitiveness I 2016 Global Manufacturing Competitiveness IndexCopyright.
Cervical Cancer, HPV and Prophylactic Vaccines Paulo Naud.
Figure 1. PARTICIPATING STEM CELL DONOR REGISTRIES Number of registries Year ©BMDW.
Global Aluminium Pipe and Tube Market to 2018 (Market Size, Growth, and Forecasts in Nearly 60 Countries) Published Date: Jul-2014 Reports and Intelligence.
STUDY ABROAD TRENDS April 2009 Sara Dumont Director Abroad at AU American University.
Preventing Cervical Cancer: Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine
Cervical Cancer How We Can Prevent It Dr Quek Swee Chong Himalayan Women’s Health Project 30 August 2014.
Hadziyannis SJ et al. EASL Peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) (PEGASYS ® ) in combination with ribavirin (RBV): efficacy and safety results from a phase.
HPV Vaccines Update on ACIP Recommendations National Immunization Conference April 20, 2010 Lauri E. Markowitz, MD Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Chapter 29 Human Papilloma Virus Infection and Immunity.
Update on HPV vaccines and recommendations - Lauri Markowitz Plans for monitoring impact of HPV vaccine - Eileen Dunne Uptake of HPV vaccine, ISS Sentinel.
Update on HPV Vaccines National Immunization Conference April 1, 2009 Lauri E. Markowitz, MD Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Seroprevalence, prevalence, type and factors associated with HPV infection at multiple sites in young HIV-positive MSM On behalf of the HPV MAPS Research.
Presenter ITODO EWAOCHE
Principles of HPV vaccination Some derived from Phase III trials Some are based on clinical judgement / research HPV vaccines have no contraindications.
HPV Vaccines and Data Needed for Development of Recommendations in the United States Lauri E. Markowitz, MD Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Japan-USA Synergies: Academic View
HPV VACCINES Dr. Kirtan Krishna.
Electrification Products
Overview HPV and HPV Vaccines
Citi Virtual Card Accounts – Continued Global Expansion
Status of EQ-5D-5L Valuation Using Standardized Valuation Methodology
Research Update: The HPV Vaccines
Rotavirus Vaccines An Update
Presenter Disclosure Information
Electrification business
Approved Expansion of HPV Vaccination to Age 45: What Does It Mean?
Presentation transcript:

Development of the HPV 16 / 18 Cervical Cancer Vaccine James P. Tursi, MD Director – Medical Affairs – N.A. Cervical Cancer Vaccines August 3, 2006

Overview GSK Biologicals Search for a cervical cancer vaccine GSK HPV 16/18 candidate vaccine Novel adjuvant system resulting in strong and sustained immune responses Focus on cervical cancer prevention Clinical trial data Efficacy data Immunogenicity data Broad oncogenic protection Current status of the GSK HPV 16/18 candidate vaccine

GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals: One of the World’s Leaders in Vaccines Total market*: $8 billion Merck 19% AP/AP-MSD 26% Wyeth-Ayerst 12% Others 11% GSK 23% Chiron 9% *2003

Long History of Innovation World’s Firsts Varicella Vaccine 1984 Hepatitis A vaccine 1992 Combined Hepatitis A & B 1996 Combined Meningitis ACW135 2003 Rubella 1969 DTaP HBV IPV 2000 1976 Thermostable measles vaccine 1986 Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine 1996 Combined DTPw HBV & Hib 1997 Combined DTaP/Hib & DTaP IPV 2000 Combined Hepatitis A & Typhoid

Contributions to World’s Health In 2004, nearly one and a half billion GSK vaccines distributed Approximately 85% delivered to the developing world Nearly three million doses each day Primary Supplier to International Health Organizations UNICEF WHO PAHO GSK provides vaccines to developing world at affordable cost Introduce new vaccines where most needed, not where most financially advantageous

Cervical Cancer – The Scope of the Problem Every two minutes a woman dies of cervical cancer worldwide 10 women die every day in the U.S. All sexually active women are at risk of oncogenic HPV† Includes women over age 25 HPV-16 / 18 / 45 / 31 are responsible for ~80% of invasive cervical cancers worldwide° Adenocarcinoma of the cervix is increasing despite screening effortsX HPV 16 / 18 / 45 / 31 responsible for 98% of cervical adenocarcinoma † Koutsky 1997 Am J Med 1997; 102(5A): 3-8 °Munoz N et al. Int J Cancer 2004; 111: 278–85. XCastellsagué J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:303 – 15

Search for a Cervical Cancer Vaccine Safe Immunogenic Strong immune response against oncogenic HPV Provide high protective levels of antibody Broad protection against cervical cancer Protect women from oncogenic HPV Protect against the most common types Provide long lasting duration of protection Sustained immune response Long term protection Natural infection issues.

GSK’s HPV 16/18 Cervical Cancer Vaccine Novel GSK Adjuvant System AS04 (Al + MPL®) To enhance immune responses Vaccine composition 20 µg HPV 16 L1 VLP 20 µg HPV 18 L1 VLP Administration schedule – 0, 1, 6 months Focus on cervical cancer prevention Oncogenic HPV Directed to women Continuation of current cervical cancer screening methods 50 µg MPL® 500 µg AlOH3 AS04 Why we chose two types.

GSK’s HPV 16/18 Cervical Cancer Vaccine Novel GSK Adjuvant System AS04 (Al + MPL®) To enhance immune responses Vaccine composition 20 µg HPV 16 L1 VLP 20 µg HPV 18 L1 VLP Administration schedule – 0, 1, 6 months Focused on cervical cancer prevention Oncogenic HPV Directed to women Continuation of current cervical cancer screening methods 50 µg MPL® 500 µg AlOH3 AS04 Why we chose two types.

What is an Adjuvant? From latin ‘adjuvare’: to help An adjuvant can be an immunostimulant and/or a carrier carrier: a compound that transports the antigen: AlOH3 immunostimulant: a compound that acts directly or indirectly on the immuno competent cells to increase the immune response to a given antigen : MPL® It is designed to increase the specific immune response intensity, quality and breadth

Novel Adjuvant: Why AS04 for HPV? Prevention of HPV infection requires presence of neutralizing antibodies at the site of potential infection (cervix) High serum antibody concentrations that then transudate to the site of the infection AS04 versus traditional aluminum* Higher and more persistent humoral antibody response Higher frequency of memory B cells * Giannini S et al. Vaccine 2006

Enhanced and Sustained Immunogenicity Over 4 Years AS04 versus Aluminum Neutralizing Antibody * Anti-V5 (HPV-16) * Anti-J4 (HPV-18) Al(OH) 3 AS04 Al(OH) 3 AS04 * * * GMT (EU/ml) * * * * * * * Time (months) Enhanced and Sustained Immunogenicity Over 4 Years * Statistically significant Giannini SL et al. Vaccine 2006

Clinical Experience with AS04 Adjuvant AS04 used in several vaccines developed by GSK Superiority of immune profile induced by AS04 vs alum formulations 16,000 subjects received ~43,000 doses of AS04 in 40 completed and 4 ongoing studies gD-AS04 (genital HSV vaccine)- Now in large-scale phase III trials including NIH collaboration) FENDrix™- adjuvanted HBsAg for use in hemodialysis patients; recently approved in EU (2005) Generally well tolerated

GSK’s HPV 16/18 Cervical Cancer Vaccine Novel GSK Adjuvant System AS04 (Al + MPL®) To enhance immune responses Vaccine composition 20 µg HPV 16 L1 VLP 20 µg HPV 18 L1 VLP Administration schedule – 0, 1, 6 months Focused on cervical cancer prevention Oncogenic HPV Directed to women 50 µg MPL® 500 µg AlOH3 AS04

HPV Types in Cervical Cancer HPV genotype 16 53.5 53.5% Vaccine types 18 17.2 70.7% 45 6.7 77.4% 31 2.9 80.3% 33 2.6 52 2.3 58 2.2 35 1.4 59 1.3 56 1.2 51 1.0 39 0.7 68 0.6 73 Multiple types vs. two 0.5 82 0.3 Other 1.2 X 4.4 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Cancer cases attributed to the most frequent HPV genotypes (%) Munoz N et al. Int J Cancer 2004; 111: 278–85.

HPV Types in Cervical Adenocarcinoma HPV genotype 16 52.1 52.1% Vaccine types 18 39.0 91.1% 45 6.2 97.3% 31 0.7 98.0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Adenocarcinoma cases attributed to the listed HPV genotypes (%) Castellsague X et al. JNCI 2006; 98: 303–15.

HPV – The Disease Burden in Women 90.3% of cancers attributable to oncogenic HPV occur solely in women Cervix – 86.5% Vulva / Vagina – 3.8% This does not include other sites of cancer attributable to oncogenic HPV Anal Oro-pharyngeal Mouth Parkin DM et al. Int J Cancer 2006; 118: 3030–44.

Clinical Trial Data

Study HPV 001 HPV-16/18 associated Vaccine efficacy (%) 6M Persistent 92% 100% 100% 93% 100% ATP ATP ATP ITT ITT 6M Persistent Infection 12M Persistent Infection post hoc analysis Cytology CIN Incident Figure based on Harper et al. Lancet. 2004; 364: 1757

Study HPV 007 HPV-16/18 associated Vaccine efficacy (%) 6M Persistent 92% 100% 100% 93% 100% 97% 94% 100% 96% 100% Sustained Protection up to 4.5 years ATP ATP ATP ITT ITT ATP ATP ATP ITT ITT 6M Persistent Infx 12M Persistent Infection post hoc analysis Cytology CIN Incident Infection Figure based on Harper et al. Lancet. 2004; 364: 1757 Harper et al. Lancet. 2006; 367 : 124.

Sustained Seropositivity and High Antibody Levels up to 4.5 Years log (ELU/ml) HPV-16 10000 6% 100% 99% 99.7% % seropositive Vaccine HPV-16 IgG Placebo IgG 1000 100 17 fold higher Natural Infection 10 0% 17% 12% 11% 10% 1 month 0 month 7 month 12 month 18 [M25-M32] [M33-M38] [M39-M44] [M45-M50] [M51-M53] HPV-001 HPV-007 Months follow up time Figure based on Harper et al. Lancet. 2004; 364: 1757

Sustained Seropositivity and High Antibody Levels up to 4.5 Years log (ELU/ml) HPV-18 10000 % seropositive Vaccine HPV-18 IgG 100% 99% 99.7% 10% Placebo IgG 1000 100 14 fold higher Natural Infection 10 0% 17% 9% 13% 16% 12% 7% 1 month 0 month 7 month 12 month 18 [M25-M32] [M33-M38] [M39-M44] [M45-M50] [M51-M53] HPV-001 HPV-007 Months follow up time Figure based on Harper et al. Lancet. 2004; 364: 1757

Estimated prevalence of GSK studies 001 & 007 up to 4.5 years First Evidence of Broader Protection Independent of HPV DNA status Endpoint Vaccine Placebo Vaccine efficacy (%) (95% CI) p-values 50%2 25-30%1 20-30%1 Estimated prevalence of HPV-16/18 N n N n ASCUS 505 90 497 138 39.8 (20.9-54.4) <0.001 LSIL 505 41 497 70 44.6 (17.4-63.3) 0.003 CIN1+ 481 12 470 24 51.5 (-0.9-77.9) 0.042 CIN2+ 481 3 470 11 73.3 (-1.0-95.2) 0.033 Harper et al. Lancet. 2006; 367 : 124. ITT analysis, Conditional Exact method 1Clifford et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14(5). 2Muñoz et al. N Engl J Med 348;6

Incident infection with most common oncogenic types beyond 16 & 18 GSK studies 001 & 007 up to 4.5 years First evidence of cross protection types 45 & 31 Incident infection with most common oncogenic types beyond 16 & 18 HPV Type Vaccine Placebo Vaccine Efficacy (%) (95% CI) Event rate (rate per 100) (95% CI) Event rate (rate per 100) (95% CI) N n Rate N n Rate HPV-45 528 1 0.1 (0.0-0.4) 518 17 1.2 (0.7-1.9) 94.2 (63.3-99.9) HPV-31 528 14 0.9 (0.5-1.6) 516 30 2.1 (1.4-3.0) 54.5 (11.5-77.7) HPV-33 529 12 0.8 (0.4-1.4) 519 13 0.9 (0.5-1.5) 8.6 (-117.3-61.9) HPV-52 524 40 2.8 (2.0-3.8) 515 48 3.5 (2.6-4.6) 18.6 (-26.5-47.8) HPV-58 529 14 0.9 (0.5-1.6) 517 16 1.1 (0.6-1.8) 14.0 (-87.9-61.1) Study not powered to evaluate cross protection against all individual types Harper et al. Lancet. 2006; 367 : 124. Combined initial efficacy and extended follow up studies

GSK studies HPV-001 & 007 Major findings Duration of protection Sustained efficacy against HPV 16 / 18 infections and associated lesions for up to 4.5 years Longest peer-reviewed efficacy follow up for any commercial formulation Sustained immune response Persistent antibody levels in virtually 100% of patients over 4.5 years Broad oncogenic protection Efficacy beyond 16/18 (broader protection) largely due to cross protection against HPV types 31 and 45 Harper et al. Lancet. 2006; 367 : 124. *Harper April 6, 2006 Lancet Online

GSK study HPV-007 Safety Profile during Extended Follow Up Vaccine N (%) Placebo N (%) Adverse events Women with at least one adverse event reported 54 (15.4%) 81 (23.5%) Adverse events reported 65 98 New Onset Chronic Disease (NOCD)* Women with at least one NOCD event reported 10 (2.9%) 18 (5.2%) NOCD events reported 10 19 Serious adverse events Women with at least one SAE reported 16 (4.6%) 19 (5.5%) SAEs reported 21 19 Harper et al. Lancet. 2006; 367 : 124. *Including auto immune diseases ATP Safety analysis

Age Bridging Trials Pre-teen/adolescent girls HPV-012 Immunological bridge 10-14 yrs and 15-25 yrs Safety/reactogenicity Women >25 years HPV-014 Immunological bridge 15-25 yrs and 26-55 yrs Safety

HPV-012 Results HPV-16 and -18 ELISA GMTs (Month 7) Solicited symptoms within 7 days (ATP cohort) 15-25 yrs 10-14 yrs Geometric Mean Titer (EU/ml) % Doses followed by symptoms HPV-16 HPV-18 Any symptom General symptoms Local symptoms 100% of initially seronegative subjects seroconverted to both HPV- 16 and HPV-18 positive GMTs in 10-14 yr olds >2-fold higher than 15-25 yr olds Dubin G, et al. Poster 4042, ICAAC, 2005, Washington, D.C. ,USA

Age Bridging Trials Pre-teen/adolescent girls HPV-012 Immunological bridge 10-14 yrs and 15-25 yrs Safety/reactogenicity Women >25 years (HPV-014) HPV-014 Immunological bridge 15-25 yrs and 26-55 yrs Safety

HPV-014 - Results Month 7 100% of subjects were seropositive to both HPV-16 and HPV-18 with high GMTs at month 7 Age dependent decrease in GMTs but absolute values were high Of note: 100% seropositive one month after 2nd dose Of note: GMTs in 46 to 55 yr age group higher than those achieved during the plateau phase of HPV-001/007

HPV-16 Antibody Levels – Efficacy Study 001 / 007 10000 1000 HPV-16 GMC EU/ml 100 Natural Infection 15 – 25 y.o. 10 1 7 12 18 33-38 45-50 Month Harper et al. Lancet 2006; 367: 1247-55

HPV 16 Antibody Levels by Age Group Study 014 Efficacy study 10000 15-25y 1000 HPV-16 GMC EU/ml 100 Natural Infection 15 – 25 y.o. 10 1 7 12 18 33-38 45-50 Month Shwarz, T, et al. ASCO, 2006, Atlanta,USA Harper et al. Lancet 2006; 367: 1247-55

HPV 16 Antibody Levels by Age Group Study 014 Efficacy study 10000 15-25y 26-35y 1000 HPV-16 GMC EU/ml 100 Natural Infection 15 – 25 y.o. 10 1 7 12 18 33-38 45-50 Month Shwarz, T, et al. ASCO, 2006, Atlanta,USA Harper et al. Lancet 2006; 367: 1247-55

HPV 16 Antibody Levels by Age Group Study 014 Efficacy study 10000 15-25y 26-35y 36-45y 1000 HPV-16 GMC EU/ml 100 Natural Infection 15 – 25 y.o. 10 1 7 12 18 33-38 45-50 Month Shwarz, T, et al. ASCO, 2006, Atlanta,USA Harper et al. Lancet 2006; 367: 1247-55

HPV 16 Antibody Levels by Age Group Study 014 Efficacy study 10000 15-25y 26-35y 36-45y 46-55y 1000 HPV-16 GMC EU/ml 26 fold higher 100 Natural Infection 15 – 25 y.o. 10 1 7 12 18 33-38 45-50 Month Shwarz, T, et al. ASCO, 2006, Atlanta,USA Harper et al. Lancet 2006; 367: 1247-55

HPV 18 Antibody Levels by Age Group Study 014 10000 Efficacy study 15-25y 26-35y 36-45y 46-55y 1000 HPV-18 GMC EU/ml 16 fold higher 100 Natural Infection 15 – 25 y.o. 10 1 7 12 18 33-38 45-50 7 12 18 33-38 Month Shwarz, T, et al. ASCO, 2006, Atlanta,USA Harper et al. Lancet 2006; 367: 1247-55

Study HPV 014 - Conclusions In all age groups, the vaccine was: Generally well tolerated Highly immunogenic : Seroconversion : 100% for both antigens as early as the 2nd dose of vaccine Antibody levels at least 16-26 times higher than those associated with natural HPV infection ≥ levels of antibodies associated with protection against HPV infection and its associated outcomes 1 1 Harper et al. Lancet 2006; 367: 1247-55 Shwarz, T, et al. ASCO, 2006, Atlanta,USA

Safety profile in women 15-55 years of age 100 80 60 % participants overall dose 40 20 Pain Redness Swelling Myalgia Fever >95% study compliance Shwarz, T, et al. ASCO, 2006, Atlanta,USA

Phase III Efficacy Program GSK efficacy study (HPV 008) NCI supportive study (HPV 009) Double blind, randomised, controlled Multi-centre (90+) Population-based Multi-country (14) > 6 centres in Costa Rica 18,665 women aged 15–25 years 7465 women aged 18–25 years CIN II+

GSK HPV 16/18 Vaccine Global Clinical Development Plan Denmark Norway Sweden Finland Canada United Kingdom Estonia Russia The Netherlands China Lithuania Belgium Poland South Korea Germany Czech Republic Japan France Taiwan Spain Hong Kong Portugal USA Italy Greece Mexico Honduras The Philippines Panama GSK HPV 16/18 vaccine global development plan This slide shows the global development plan currently underway with the HPV 16/18 vaccine, including the phase III efficacy trials. Costa Rica India Senegal Colombia Thailand Nigeria Peru Malaysia Brazil Australia South Africa

Timings: Ongoing Trials 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Y2 Y3 HPV-007 Efficacy Y1* HPV-012 (immuno 10-25y) LT follow-up Y1 Y2 Y3 HPV-013 (adol. safety) LT follow-up Long term immunogenicity HPV-014 (immuno 15-55y) LT follow-up HPV-008: CIN2+ efficacy- global (N = 18,668) HPV-009: CIN2+ efficacy-Costa Rica (N = 7,467) >30,000 subjects enrolled in ongoing trials *4 yrs of follow-up

Conclusions GSK’s commitment to those in need Worldwide and the U.S. Search for a cervical cancer vaccine Novel adjuvant – AS04 Stronger immune response compared to our vaccine formulated with Al adjuvant Focused on cervical cancer HPV 16 / 18 Directed to women

Conclusions (Cont’d) Safety profile Immunogenic Well tolerated in clinical trials Immunogenic No evidence of waning immunity to HPV 16 / 18 through 4.5 years Broad protection against oncogenic HPV Efficacy beyond HPV 16 and 18 due to protection against HPV types 45 and 31 Long duration of protection Sustained efficacy against HPV 16 and 18 for up to 4.5 years Persistent antibody levels in nearly 100% of patients Harper et al. Lancet. 2006; 367 : 124.