Srdan (Serge) Verstovsek M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine Department of Leukemia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas, USA Therapy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6500.
Advertisements

Tiziano Barbui MD Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII Bergamo, Italy
Ongoing clinical trials with JAK2 inhibitors in MF
VS 洪英中 /R4 洪逸平 RUXOLINIB FOR MYELOFIBROSIS N Engl J Med 2012;366: N Engl J Med 2012;366: 財團法人台灣癌症臨床研究發展基金會.
Prolonged Low Dose Therapy with a Pan-Deacetylase Inhibitor, Panobinostat (LBH589), in Patients with Myelofibrosis1 Phase II Study of Low-Dose Pomalidomide.
Perspectives on defining ruxolitinib resistance/suboptimal response and therapeutic decision-making in this setting Claire Harrison, MD.
Srdan (Serge) Verstovsek M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine Department of Leukemia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas, USA JAK.
Case Study: An Older Man with PMF and Significant Cytopenias – How to Adjust Ruxolitinib Therapy? Srdan Verstovsek, MD, PhD Professor of Medicine Director,
Results of a Randomized Study of the JAK Inhibitor Ruxolitinib (INC424) versus Best Available Therapy (BAT) in Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post- Polycythemia.
Benefits of JAK2 Inhibitor Therapy: Why Do They Work in Patients With and Without JAK2 Mutation Alessandro M. Vannucchi Section of Hematology, University.
Prognostication in MF: From CBC to cytogenetics to molecular markers
Results of a Phase II Study of Pacritinib (SB1518), a Novel Oral JAK2 Inhibitor, in Patients with Primary, Post-Polycythemia Vera, and Post- Essential.
Semuloparin for Thromboprophylaxis in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy for Cancer Agnelli G et al. N Engl J Med 2012;366(7): George D et al. Proc.
Phase 2 Trial of PRM-151, an Anti-Fibrotic Agent, in Patients with Myelofibrosis: Stage 1 Results1 Imetelstat, a Telomerase Inhibitor, Therapy for Myelofibrosis:
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
The Efficacy and Safety of Continued Hydroxyurea Therapy versus Switching to Ruxolitinib in Patients with Polycythemia Vera: A Randomized, Double-Blind,
MLAB Hematology Keri Brophy-Martinez Unit 23: CHRONIC MYELOPROLIFERATIVE DISORDERS (MPD)
Real-World Assessment of Clinical Outcomes in Lower-Risk Myelofibrosis Patients Receiving Treatment with Ruxolitinib Davis KL et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract.
Risk Stratification of Patients with Myelofibrosis and the Role of Transplant Alessandro M. Vannucchi Section of Hematology, University of Florence, Italy.
Efficacy, Hematologic Effects and Dose of Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis Patients with Low Platelet Starting Counts ( x 10 9 /L): A Comparison to Patients.
11 One vs Three Years of Adjuvant Imatinib for Operable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor A Randomized Trial Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al.
ET vs. Prefibrotic myelofibrosis: Why does it matter
ASH 2012: New JAK Inhibitors for Myelofibrosis
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
Complete Hematological Molecular and Histological Remissions without Cytoreductive Treatment Lasting After Pegylated-Interferon -2a (peg-IFN-2a) Therapy.
Case Study: A Woman with Post-PV MF of Long Duration Ruben A. Mesa, MD, FACP Chair, Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology Deputy Director, Mayo Clinic.
Pei Lin Professor of Pathology Department of Hematopathology
Good morning… My presentation is about Calreticulin and PMF
Changes in Quality of Life and Disease- Related Symptoms in Patients with Polycythemia Vera Receiving Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy: RESPONSE Trial.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
Which Myelofibrosis Patients are Candidates for Upfront Stem Cell Transplantation? Vikas Gupta, MD, FRCP, FRCPath The Elizabeth and Tony Comper MPN Program.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Contemporary Review.
October 2014 Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Angela Fleischman Division of hematology/Oncology.
Nada Mohamed Ahmed, MD, MT (ASCP)i. Objectives chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) Haematopoietic malignancies Polycythemia vera (PV) Idiopathic myelofibrosis.
Results from the International, Randomized Phase 3 Study of Ibrutinib versus Chlorambucil in Patients 65 Years and Older with Treatment-Naïve CLL/SLL (RESONATE-2TM)1.
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) Clinical Trials Portfolio
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) Clinical Trials Portfolio
5-Azacytidine (AZA) in Combination with Ruxolitinib (RUX) as Therapy for Patients (pts) with Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MDS/MPNs)1  
Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 793.
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) Clinical Trials Portfolio
Harrison CN et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 59.
Ruxolitinib + Azacitidine in Newly Diagnosed or R/R, Intermediate- or High-Risk Myelofibrosis New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage.
Combination Ruxolitinib + Sonidegib in Myelofibrosis
PERSIST-1: Pacritinib Improved Spleen Volume Reductions in Myelofibrosis vs Best Available Therapy CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO.
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 ± SD
How Many Inhibitors for JAK2?
JAK2 inhibitors and new therapeutic approaches in PV and ET
Program Goals Case 1: Woman With MDS Risk: Cytogenetic Subgroups.
Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) Ph-negative
Pacritinib, a Dual JAK2/FLT3 Inhibitor: An Integrated Efficacy and Safety Analysis Of Phase II Trial Data In Patients With Primary and Secondary Myelofibrosis.
Kantarjian H et al. Cancer 2009;[Epub ahead of print].
Prognostic factors for thrombosis and survival in PV, revisited
Giovanni Barosi Center for the Study of Myelofibrosis.
Chronic Leukemia Kristine Krafts, M.D..
Fenaux P et al. Lancet Oncol 2009;10(3):
Whom should you refer for allogeneic stem cell transplantation?
Which mutations matter in myelofibrosis?
European Focus on MPN and MDS 2014
Whom should you refer for allogeneic transplantation?
Future Directions in Myelofibrosis: Implications of Emerging Approaches.
JAK2 INHIBITORS AND ALLOGRAFTING
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
Tips on using ruxolitinib
Kantarjian HM et al. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 635.
Ruxolitinib for Myelofibrosis–An Update of Its Clinical Effects
Current Treatment Landscape in MF
Presentation transcript:

Srdan (Serge) Verstovsek M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine Department of Leukemia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas, USA Therapy of early-stage MF: Are JAK inhibitors for everyone?

Passamonti F et al. Blood 2010;115:1703-8; Barbui T et al. Blood 2010; 115;778-82; Passamonti F et al. Blood 2010; 116: Main Clinical Problems in MF Clinical need Anemia (Hb <10 g/dL) Leukocytosis (>25x10 9 /L) Thrombocytopenia (<100x10 9 /L) Splenomegaly Hepatomegaly Extramedullary hematopoiesis Thrombosis Constitutional symptoms Leukemia transformation 65% 1-3% 7.2 % 27% 13% 36% 83% 16% 10%

Scherber R et al. Blood 201;118:401-8  «Constitutional Symptoms»  Splenomegaly  Myeloproliferation  Role / Functioning Symptomatic Burden in MF Symptoms related to:

Efficacy of ruxolitinib in patients with MF without clinically significant splenomegaly All pts were symptomatic Ruxolitinib was administered at the dose of 25mg BID Patients with MF n=6 Previously treated 5 Post splenectomy 3 Transfusion dependent 3 JAK2 V617F4 Patient dispositionEffects of ruxolitinib Patients with MF n=6 Fatigue improved 6 Resolution of night sweats 2 Itching2 Weight gain (up to 17%) 5 Improved performance status Reduction of liver size 50-68% No improvement in marrow fibrosis Benjamini et. al., Blood 2012; 120:

The approved indication is: “Ruxolitinib is indicated for the treatment of disease-related splenomegaly or symptoms in adult patients with primary myelofibrosis (also known as chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis), post polycythaemia vera myelofibrosis or post essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis.”

U.S. Food and Drug Administration On November 16, 2011, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ruxolitinib phosphate for the treatment of intermediate and high risk myelofibrosis, including primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis, and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. No contraindications

Cervantes et al., Blood 2009;113: Prognostic factors Age > 65 years Constitutional symptoms Hb < 10 g/dL Leukocytes > 25 x 10 9 /L Blood blasts > 1% Age > 65 years Constitutional symptoms Hb < 10 g/dL Leukocytes > 25 x 10 9 /L Blood blasts > 1% International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS): Risk classification of PMF at presentation Risk groups Low 0 Intermediate-11 Intermediate-22 High > 3 Low 0 Intermediate-11 Intermediate-22 High > 3

135 months 95 months 48 months 27 months International Prognostic Scoring System to predict survival (IPSS) 22% 29% 28% 21% Cervantes et al, Blood 2008

Overall Survival: ruxolitinib vs. placebo (int-2/high risk MF) Placebo Ruxolitinib Survival Probability Weeks Placebo Ruxolitinib No. at risk No. of deaths: Ruxolitinib = 27; Placebo = 41; HR = 0.58 (95% CI: 0.36, 0.95); P =.028 Median follow-up: 102 weeks. Most patient on placebo (n=111) were given ruxolitinib ( after average of 41 weeks )

Overall Survival: MDACC Phase 1-2 Study Cohort vs. Historical Control by IPSS Risk Category High Risk Intermediate-2 Hazard ratio= % CI: 0.31–0.81 p-value=0.006 Months Survival Probability Number of Patients at Risk—Historical Control Number of Patients at Risk—MDACC Study Hazard ratio= % CI: 0.43–1.71 p-value=0.71 Months Number of Patients at Risk—Historical Control Number of Patients at Risk—MDACC Study

Overall Survival in MDACC Phase 1-2 Study Cohort: Intermediate-2 vs. High Risk *Hazard ratio >1 favors intermediate-2 risk group. Number of Patients at Risk—Intermediate-2 Risk Number of Patients at Risk—High Risk Hazard ratio=1.36* 95% CI: 0.64–2.89 p-value=0.43

Ruxolitinib: Compassionate Use Program n = 1556* PMF, Post-ET/PV MF Irrespective of JAK2 mutation status High risk OR INT-1/INT-2 with an enlarged spleen PBC < 10% Adequate organ function ECOG 0, 1, or 2 Baseline platelet count of 100,000/µL to 200,000/µL will begin dosing at 15 mg BID FPFV = Feb 2011 * Approved Patients by 19 November 2012 Participating Countries: Australia, HK, India, Israel, Korea, Kuwait, Lebanon, Philippines, KSA, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, UAE Baseline platelet count >200,000/µL will begin dosing at 20 mg BID Korea: 43 patients Taiwan: 35 patients

Expanded Access Program Endpoints: Collect additional safety of INC424 in patients with PMF/PPVMF/PET-MF; QoL; MRU Participating Countries: Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Kuwait, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Thailand, Tunisia, UAE, Morocco Baseline platelet count of 100,000/µL to 200,000/µL will begin dosing at 15 mg BID Baseline platelet count > 200,000/µL will begin dosing at 20 mg BID FPFV = 16/08/2011 Baseline platelet count of 75,000/µL to 99,000/µL will begin dosing at 5 mg BID N = 1600 PMF, Post-ET/PV MF Irrespective of JAK2 mutation. High risk OR INT-1/INT-2 with an enlarged spleen PBC < 10% Adequate organ function ECOG 0, 1, or 2

Therapy of early-stage MF: Are JAK inhibitors for everyone? If defined as patients without splenomegaly or without disease related symptoms If defined as low-risk patients MY ANSWER: It deserves to be studied whether intervention in these patients, to prevent the development of clinically relevant disease related signs and symptoms, results in meaningful outcome (to be defined)

THANK YOU