9.Monitoring Plan + 10.Implementation Plan + 4. LAs* 5. WLAs* 6. MOS* 7.Seasonal Variation* 8.Reasonable Assurance + TMDL Process 1 Problem Understanding.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development Alternatives SOUTH ASIA E N V I R O N M E N T O U T L O O K.
Advertisements

2005 Stream Phosphorus TMDLs to be proposed in July 5th NJR The NJDEPs Division of Watershed Management is seeking stakeholder input on proposed phosphorus.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Lessons Learned from the Application of Risk Management in the Shipment of LNG.
TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Louisville, KY August 30, 2011.
Water Quality Standards-based Effluent Limitations: Fate versus Self-determination Bill Van Derveer.
Pathogen and Turbidity TMDLs and OKR04 Richard Smith, INCOG Oklahoma MS4 Conference Oklahoma City Zoo Education Center November 7-8, 2012.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
By: Carrie Turner Prepared for: New Jersey Association of Environmental Authorities Annual Conference March 12, 2013 Watershed Management Planning Provides.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Components of every Good Watershed Management Plan NDEQ – Planning Unit August 6 th, 2014 NDEQ – Planning Unit gust 6 th 2014.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
Recommendations to Inform Development of a Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for the Lake Watershed Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for the Lake Simcoe.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Jump to first page EIAMonitoring9.07(Gajaseni,20 07) 1 Monitoring Monitoring = check of actions Monitoring plan =environmental management plan.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
EPA’S WATERSHED PLANNING APPROACH FOR THE SECTION 319 PROGRAM Dov Weitman Chief, Nonpoint Source Control Branch October.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Risk and Resilience: A Canadian Perspective on Climate Change Adaptation Donald S. Lemmen, PhD Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Directorate Natural.
Adapting to Climate Change: Canada’s Experience and Approach Elizabeth Atkinson Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Directorate Natural Resources Canada.
Lecture(12) Risk & Uncertainty Definition “Risk” and “uncertainty” are two terms basic to any decision making framework. Risk can be defined.
Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessments Hands-On Training Workshop
Climate Futures and Oregon’s Coastal Communities A Survey and Strategy to Address the Effects of Climate Change on the Oregon Coast.
Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards rule-makings: human health-based criteria and implementation tools Cheryl Niemi Washington Department of Ecology.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Plan
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
UNDP-GEF Adaptation 0 0 Impact of National Communications on Process of Integrating Climate Change into National Development Policies UNFCCC Workshop on.
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Supporting LDCs to advance their National Adaptation Plans Asia Regional Training Workshop Marriott Resort and Spa, Pattaya, Thailand, February 2014.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Understanding TMDLs: A primer for permit writers
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
Second National Communication Anne Rasmussen National Climate Change Summit 2009.
Orange Creek Basin Management Action Plan Alachua County Commission December 11, 2007 Fred Calder, FL DEP (850)
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
SECTION IV: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF STEPS TAKEN OR ENVISAGED BY NON-ANNEX I PARTY TO IMPLEMENT THE CONVENTION Workshop on the Use of the Guidelines for.
Preparing for Regulatory Change WATER RESOURCES WORKSHOP February 20, 2004 Donald J. Brady, Ph.D.
Climate Change and Water Resources Planning Kim Shugar Department Director Intergovernmental Programs Kim Shugar Department Director Intergovernmental.
Climate Change teasing it apart Conservation Coaches Network New Coach Training.
Bacteria and Dissolved Oxygen Total Mass Daily Load Development for the Atascosa River Jessica L. Watts.
Region 2000 Local Government Council 828 Main Street, 12th Floor Lynchburg, VA March 4, :30 – 8:30 p.m.
1Adaptation From assessment to action UNFCCC compendium on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation methods Sonja Vidic Meteorological and Hydrological Service.
UNFCCC Workshop on the use of the guidelines, Mauritius, 8-11 april 2003 Part IV : General description of steps taken or envisaged to implement the Convention.
UNFCCC Workshop on the preparation of national communications from non-Annex I Parties General description of steps taken or envisaged by non-Annex I.
UNDP Guidance for National Communication Project Proposals UNFCCC Workshop on the Preparation of National Communications from non-Annex I Parties Manila,
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Chapter 92 – NPDES Permits Watershed Permits Issue: Some pollutants persist and accumulate in the watershed, resulting in a threat to water quality standards.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
1975 EPA Study  Extensive construction in 1950s -1970s  Poor canal flushing results in “stagnation, putrification, and excessive nutrient enrichment.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
1 1 The Project Description: Framing the CEQA Analysis Terry Rivasplata.
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
Air Quality Management Components
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
LA06 Assessment of Impacts and Adaptation Measures for the Water Resources Sector Due to Extreme Events Under Climate Change Conditions. REGIONAL PROJECT.
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
Incorporating metal bioavailability into permitting – UK experience
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
16MN056 - Public Hearing August 26 to 29, 2019 Baker Lake, Nunavut
Presentation transcript:

9.Monitoring Plan + 10.Implementation Plan + 4. LAs* 5. WLAs* 6. MOS* 7.Seasonal Variation* 8.Reasonable Assurance + TMDL Process 1 Problem Understanding Stakeholder Involvement & Public Participation Linkage between Loading and Waterbody Response Allocation Analysis TMDL Report and Submittal 1. Description of waterbody, pollutant of concern, pollutant sources, and priority ranking 2. WQS and numeric WQ target* 3.Loading Capacity* (including critical conditions*) 11. Public Participation* Elements in a TMDL Submittal * Required by regulation (40 CFR 130.7) + Recommended through guidance From Guidelines for Reviewing TMDLs under Existing Regulations issued in 1992 (May 20, 2002): Implementation and Monitoring Plan TMDL Target Identification Source Assessment

Climate Change Assessment Process 2 Elements in a Climate Change Assessment Adapted from Scanning the Conservation Horizon, A Guide to Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment (2011): 1. Determine element of concern 2. Downscaling approach 3.Emission scenario 4.Time horizon 5. Likelihood of event 6. Consequence of event 7.Reduce sensitivity 8.Reduce exposure 9.Increase adaptive capacity 10.Set priorities 11.Select targets 12.Adaptive management Identify Climate Trends Assess Vulnerability / Risk Identify Adaptation Options Problem Understanding Stakeholder Involvement & Public Participation Implementation and Monitoring

TMDL and Climate Change Process Linkages 3 Stakeholder Involvement & Public Participation TMDL Target Identification Problem Understanding Source Assessment Linkage between Loading and Waterbody Response Allocation Analysis TMDL Report and Submittal Implementation and Monitoring Plan Climate Change Process TMDL Process Problem Understanding Identify Climate Trends Assess Vulnerability / Risk Identify Adaptation Options Implementation and Monitoring

Focus on Steps 1 and 2 of TMDL Process: Water Temperature and Climate Change 4 Key TMDL Considerations: Could projected/anticipated climate change impacts affect : Pollutants of concern? Priority ranking of the waterbody? Projected land use distribution? Wildlife resources? If so, is it appropriate to consider climate change in the TMDL analysis? Will climate change affect/change criteria? What is the planning horizon of the TMDL? Downscaling Approach Emissions Scenario Time Horizon Climate Model Meteorological data Problem Understanding TMDL Target Identification Source Assessment Problem Understanding Identify Climate Trends Key Climate Considerations: What are the priority concerns related to water quality? What types of climate data are available? Is it necessary to model climate change?

Focus on Steps of TMDL Process: Water Temperature and Climate Change 5 Key TMDL Considerations: How could climate data/models be defensibly incorporated into watershed models? How might critical condition parameters change? Could climate change cause a use to become unattainable? Could climate change be addressed in MOS? Should there be an allocation for future climate impacts? How will impacts affect NPDES discharge permits? How will impacts affect MS4 permits? Air TempPrecipitation Likelihood of Climate Induced Changes Consequences of Climate Induced Changes (Stream Temp.) Natural background Levels Flow Seasonal Variability Land Use Allocation Analysis Assess Vulnerability / Risk Identify Adaptation Options Linkage between Loading and Waterbody Response

Focus on Steps of TMDL Process: Water Temperature and Climate Change 6 TMDL Report and Submittal Implementation and Monitoring Plan Implementation and Monitoring Key TMDL Considerations: Should climate change considerations be incorporated into monitoring plan? What time horizons should be used? What additional data might be needed? What happens if climate change causes a use to become unattainable? Key Climate Change Considerations: How to develop a comprehensive management plan for addressing waterbody health? What are the most appropriate subsidiary regulatory tools?

Focus on Stakeholder Participation: Water Temperature and Climate Change 7 Key TMDL Considerations: Climate change is a “charged” term, and stakeholders/public could be skeptical in discussing/considering climate change impacts. Climate change assessment includes significant uncertainty. How could climate change information be presented to the public in a way that acknowledges this inherent uncertainty? Climate change assessment requires additional data needs from the traditional TMDL process. How could stakeholders with relevant data and experience be identified and brought into the TMDL process?