Cefic model SIEF Agreement: benefits and practical aspects CEFIC Legal Aspects of REACH Issue Team (LARIT) June 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Echa.europa.eu/2013 ECHA Key Messages for REACH Engage actively in SIEF 2.Get used to the IT tools 3.Use the support tools before submitting your.
Advertisements

WG 2 (data exchange) During the transitional period and till the Single Authorisation electronic information and communication system is implemented,
Private and Public law lesson 11 T he power of the public Administration to enter into agreements, according to the Italian Civil Code; legal enforcement.
DME PANEL CONTRACTS John Fisher Program Manager – Procurement.
SIEF Management Panel Discussion Brussels, 30 January 2009 © 2009 Hunton & Williams LLP.
Azerbaijan Republic State Committee on Property İssues Unified State Cadastre of Real Estate is the Foundation for transparent registration in Azerbaijan.
EDUCATION Directive 2002/14/EC of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community.
Code of Corporate Governance for Listed Companies in China
“This workforce solution was funded by a grant awarded under Workforce Innovation in Regional Economic Development (WIRED) as implemented by the U.S. Department.
Irish Taxation Institute Presentation to Joint Committee on Economic and Regulatory Affairs Tax Administration Burden on Irish Business.
1 Municipal Ports Training Seminar: Board Governance Issues Prepared for DfT by Fisher Associates June 2007.
1 12 th Implementation Group Meeting 26 th March 2009 Establishing a SAO in the CS Region.
1. 2 CVM’s OBJECTIVES u to stimulate the creation of savings and their investment in securities; u to promote the expansion and regular and efficient.
3rd session: Corporate Governance
Access to Medicine Index 3 rd International Conference for Improving the Use of Medicines Poster 599 Tuesday 15 th November 2011.
Turning our REACH expertise into practical help for industry A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR THE 2013 REGISTRATION AND OTHER REACH ONGOING DUTIES On the REACH road.
TUTORIAL Grant Preparation & Project Management. Grant preparation What are the procedures during the grant preparations?  The coordinator - on behalf.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9.
Per Anders Eriksson
ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY IN GREECE THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK & THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL GUARANTEES/ INSURANCE PRODUCTS TO COVER OPERATORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER.
European payment order Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment.
What is the WCO? The WCO represents 179 Customs Administrations across the globe that collectively process approximately 98% of world trade. 3 Main Strengths.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Richard Philp New Zealand Inland Revenue Department Session No. 7 Conclusions for tax policy and revenue administration from compliance studies, perception.
Pre-registration, data-sharing and SIEFs Geert Dancet REACH Workshop – Brussels 18/09/2008.
Experiences with registrations - 5 years on the road On the REACH Road 23 November 2011 Kevin Pollard ECHA – Dossier Submission and Dissemination.
James Aiello PricewaterhouseCoopers Africa Utility Week 06 International Good Practice in Procurement.
1 The role of the only representative Simona Fajfar.
National Smartcard Project Work Package 8 – Corporate Structures Report.
Meeting with the Romanian Motor Insurers’ Bureau Bucharest 19 th August 2004 Ulf Lemor.
Accounting for Loss Contingencies Alison T. Spivey Associate Chief Accountant Office of the Chief Accountant.
Risk Assignment in The Delivery of a Project  RISK! –Construction projects have lot of it –Contractors manage it –Owners pay for it.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
Previous Lecture Kinds of Contract Formal, Simple Quasi Contract
An agency of the European Union Presented by: Emer Cooke and Truus Janse-de Hoog Update on Transparency Progress report from HMA/EMA TF on Transparency.
Part 3 RIP 3.4 – DATA SHARING Alan Eastwood, Economic Advisor, CIA.
1 WIPO – Geneva – April 2005 European Commission – Research DG D. Dambois European Patent Attorney IPR disputes in international.
1 Pre-registration and support to industry Doris Thiemann September 2008 Iceland.
UNDP Bangladesh Procurement Fair Objectives of the Fair; - UNDP Procurement principles; - Procurement plan ; - UNDP Procurement Roadmap;
CHEMSTEWARDS SOCMA COMPLIANCE MORE FOR MEMBERS - VISIT SIEF and Consortium Management Issues under REACH Dr. C. T. Helmes Senior Director.
Geographical Enlargement of CERN Associate membership Principles and criteria S. Intoudi / 8 July
First meeting of the south-south-eastern ENPI CBC NIPs networks Florence, 23 June 2009 WORKSHOP Promoting viable and effective trans-national partnerships.
Department of Education Race to the Top Assessment Program January 14, 2009 Public Meeting Procurement Issues Mark D. Colley 555 Twelfth Street, NW. Washington,
CSO Observer Member of the Evaluation Committee. Civil Society Organization May have representation in the Evaluation Committee As a member of the Evaluation.
HORIZON 2020 Amendments to the Grant Agreement. Consequences The amended provisions become an integral part of the GA All other provisions remain unchanged.
The WCO’s Role WTO Agreement on Trade Facilitation The WCO’s Role 12 March 2014.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign, Security and.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 9 – Financial Services Bilateral.
Licences for Europe Introductory meeting, 4 February WG 4 – Text and data mining.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 9– Financial Services Bilateral.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign and Security Policy.
ROMANIA NATIONAL NATURAL GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY Public Service Obligations in Romanian Gas Sector Ligia Medrea General Manager – Authorizing, Licensing,
2echa.europa.eu/reach-2018 Purpose of this presentation This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency, to assist.
National Standardization Secretariat ITU Regional Standardization Forum for Africa and SG5RG-ARF and SG5RG-AFR Meetings Livingstone, Zambia March.
Auditing & Investigations I
REACH 2018 Find your co-registrants and prepare to register jointly.
INTERCONNECTION GUIDELINES
Quality assurance in official statistics
National Contact Points (NCP) Training
UNCITRALThird International Colloquium on Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) October 2017, Vienna Experts for Chapter IV October 2017.
REACH 2018 Get organised with your co-registrants –
Analysis of the Proposed Sunshine Rule: Legal Considerations
Research Ethics Matthew Billington
The Global Privacy Enforcement Network Why does it matter? The Global Privacy Enforcement Network was established in 2008 The Network.
Current Privacy Issues That May Affect Your Credit Union
Institutional changes The role of Bilateral Oversight Boards
Joint Army-EPA Mitigation Rule
Posting of workers – new proposals
Evolution of Expenditure Controls
Presentation transcript:

Cefic model SIEF Agreement: benefits and practical aspects CEFIC Legal Aspects of REACH Issue Team (LARIT) June 2009

SIEF Leadership Team (Consortium/other cooperation) Passive Dormant SIEF LEAD Registrant Involved SIEF agreement: link between SIEF Leadership Team and other SIEF participants (potential registrants) = SIEF agreement: bilateral agreement between the SLT represented by LR and each SIEF participant.

SIEF agreement: starting point REACH: legal requirements of: cooperation and communication in the SIEF data sharing cost compensation joint submission (except opt-out claim) From a legal perspective, is this sufficient to initiate SIEF process? Large number of SIEF participants Many SIEF participants not really familiar with REACH requirements which will create a lot of legal uncertainty Therefore, SIEF Operating rules are strongly recommended According to ECHA Guidance, the SIEF Leadership Team (e.g. the consortium) cannot just work stand-alone but should regularly interact with other SIEF participants Enforceable contractual arrangement setting out rights and obligations will be required

Legal uncertainty in absence of SIEF legal framework Example of questions addressed by the SIEF agreement : What if a SIEF participant misuses the information he receives from the Lead Members and discloses it to another company? What if a non-consortium member files a claim against the consortium for not being properly informed on the preparatory process of the Dossier ? What is the basis for a Lead Registrant to communicate the completion of the joint registration dossier to the other SIEF members? As a SIEF participant, do I need bilateral data sharing agreements with all data owners ? What are the liabilities of the Lead Registrant if things “go wrong” with the registration?

Single solution It is highly recommended that the SIEF Leadership Team (the Lead Members) puts a structured SIEF process in place with the other SIEF participants. The SIEF agreement comprises : confidentiality obligations data sharing and costs compensation arrangement Arrangement on participation in the Joint Submission of the Dossier Quick adoption of the SIEF agreement is possible : Very few options in the SIEF agreement Standardised electronic process of signature (via the relevant SIEF IT-platform) Only to be submitted to the Involved and Passive SIEF Participants (members of category 2 & 3) which reduces the administrative burden

Collective benefit: contractual formalisation The SIEF agreement is the formalisation of : The appointment of the Lead Registrant The use of a particular IT-Platform for SIEF communication (e.g. SIEFReach), to be suggested by the SIEF Leadership Team The joint submission by the Lead Registrant Formalises the REACH-IT process of Joint Submission and establishes contractually the participation in the Joint Submission The agreement on the proposed cost sharing mechanism The choice of the governing national law for relationship between the Lead Members and the Non-Lead Members and the contractual agreement on dispute resolution The limitation of scope of use of data REACH purposes only

Collective benefits of the SIEF agreement standardised data sharing process avoiding the need of bilateral data sharing arrangements with each data owner Centralized approach through Lead Registrant Access to data required for individual submission Agreement on cost sharing principles and costs sharing mechanisms at the beginning of SIEF activities Facilitating cost calculation and allocation for the Lead Members SIEF agreement serves as evidence to the authorities of agreement within the SIEF Requirement of documentation of decisions in the SIEF

SIEF agreement: Benefits for Lead Members  Contractual rights and obligations : Confidentiality Emphasis on competition law compliance Structured communication and information flow -Pro-active behaviour of Non-Lead Members Cost sharing / compensation -Several options -Payment terms Limitation of liability -Facilitating nomination of a Lead Registrant

SIEF agreement: Benefits for Non-Lead Members  Contractual rights and obligations : Communication flow -Regular communication from Lead Members Assurance about Lead Registrant and Joint submission -Relevant registration due date Access to Data -Reach Token Number Cost allocation -Fair, transparent and non-discriminatory Liability

Comparison with a simple letter of access the SIEF agreement is a collective and standardised way for Lead Members (e.g. the consortium) to provide rights on data and to be compensated for the costs for the preparation of the dossier Since the SIEF agreement is also an agreement on the cost sharing principles, it means that the Lead Members have already set up and legally covered from the time of the SIEF agreement the costs sharing option discussion (no negotiation in 2010/2013/2018) the SIEF agreement covers already in a single agreement all kind of SIEF participants getting access to rights on data (TPR, OR representing several non-EU manufacturers, LE with affiliates in the same SIEF, etc)

Alignment with the consortium agreement In case of consortium in the SIEF, the consortium to propose preferably the SIEF agreement in accordance to the terms of the consortium agreement in particular in regard to terms on cost sharing For example, if the consortium agreement comprises an advance compensation payment, this is perfectly transferable into the SIEF agreement, respecting the principle of fair, transparent and non- discriminatory compensation. The 3 cost sharing options in the model are indicative and can be combined and mixed (e.g. no advance payment and no reimbursement as risk premium / all the registrants (2010/2013/2018) pay 50% of their cost in 2009/2010 to the LR and they compensate the LR for the remaining 50% just before their deadline, etc). Other cost sharing factors can legitimately be added.

Conclusions The SIEF Agreement provides a standardised framework for SIEF discussions and activities It has been developed by the Cefic Legal Aspects of REACH Issue Team where more than 50 legal experts from companies participate It is posted on the Cefic website and can be freely used as of today by SIEF leading companies For Cefic and its members: contact Vincent Navez,