Justin Mezetin and Meredith Massey NCHS Questionnaire Design Research Laboratory FedCASIC 2014: Survey Evaluation Methods March 19, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
"How's our impact?: Developing a survey toolkit to assess how health library services impact on patient care" Alison Weightman July 2008.
Advertisements

0 Progress Report on Work for Establishing Mechanisms for Feedback and Analysis on WOISAs /ISRs 9 February 2014 PCT/MIA Quality Subgroup Meeting.
AeRO IT User Support Project Developing a connected support community National Ticket Exchange and Incident Management Findings Hamish Holewa, IT User.
Preparing Data for Quantitative Analysis
Making the Case for Metadata at SRS-NSF National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics Jeri Mulrow, Geetha Srinivasarao, and John.
User Interface Design for Federated Searching Mike Visser, Product Manager Endeavor March 16, 2005.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Survey Design Steps in Conducting a survey.  There are two basic steps for conducting a survey  Design and Planning  Data Collection.
Analysing and interpreting cognitive interview data: a qualitative approach.
Analysing and Interpreting Data Chapter 11. O'Leary, Z. (2005) RESEARCHING REAL-WORLD PROBLEMS: A Guide to Methods of Inquiry. London: Sage. Chapter 11.2.
Data Analysis, Interpretation, and Reporting
IT Learning Programme The Evaluations Tool Pilot Project 19 th July 2010.
The Q-Bank Database of Question Evaluation Reports PHIN Vocabulary and Messaging Community of Practice July 21, 2009 Aaron Maitland, NCHS.
Kregg Aytes Professional Scholarship The road to making intellectual contributions to the Academy.
Inductive content analysis
MASTERS THESIS DEFENSE QBANK A Web-Based Dynamic Problem Authoring Tool BY ANN PAUL ADVISOR: PROFESSOR CLIFF SHAFFER JUNE 2013 Computer Science Department.
Training Course 2 User Module Training Course 3 Data Administration Module Session 1 Orientation Session 2 User Interface Session 3 Database Administration.
Data and Data Collection Questionnaire
Cognitive Interviewing for Question Evaluation Kristen Miller, Ph.D. National Center for Health Statistics
Impact assessment framework
Automated Data Analysis National Center for Immunization & Respiratory Diseases Influenza Division Nishan Ahmed Data Management Training Cairo, Egypt April.
Why Use MONAHRQ for Health Care Reporting? May 2014 Note: This is one of seven slide sets outlining MONAHRQ and its value, available at
Key steps in conducting survey research Decide if a survey is the best design to use Short time, economical, dispersed population, anonymity Report what.
OECD/INFE Tools for evaluating financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD Policy Analyst OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust.
Exploratory Research Design Week 02
QUICK OVERVIEW - REDUCING REOFFENDING EVALUATION PACK INTRODUCTION TO A 4 STEP EVALUATION APPROACH.
AMA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY BHARAIN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING PROJECT - SBI 302 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING PROJECT - SBI 302A SOFTWARE ENGINEERING PROJECT - SBI.
Research Design.
Why Use MONAHRQ for Health Care Reporting? March 2015 Note: This is one of eight slide sets outlining MONAHRQ and its value, available at
Thoughts on the Role of Surveys and Qualitative Methods in Evaluating Health IT National Resource Center for HIT 2005 AHRQ Annual Conference for Patient.
FOR 500 PRINCIPLES OF RESEARCH: PROPOSAL WRITING PROCESS
Synthesizing Mixed-methods Findings from Studies of Primary Care-based Interventions: Preliminary Insights from the Prescription for Health Evaluation.
1 Technical & Business Writing (ENG-315) Muhammad Bilal Bashir UIIT, Rawalpindi.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
555 Review. Chapter 2: Introduction The sequence of 8 types of research Differences between qualitative and quantitative research – Components of qualitative.
Review Presentation Wafaa Alsaggaf S May
Sonali Bhasin. Abstract  Software organizations that are transitioning from traditional method to Agile development methods.  Study various challenges.
Developing your Research Plan for FemNorthNet Community Case Studies 1.
Anatomy of a Research Article Five (or six) major sections Abstract Introduction (without a heading!) Method (and procedures) Results Discussion and conclusions.
Harvesting Social Knowledge from Folksonomies Harris Wu, Mohammad Zubair, Kurt Maly, Harvesting social knowledge from folksonomies, Proceedings of the.
3-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Three Research Design.
ICT Implementation in Students team 3 rd December, 2012 Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi Points for discussion Education Draft Document.
Paper III Qualitative research methodology.  Qualitative research is designed to reveal a specific target audience’s range of behavior and the perceptions.
Margaret Blake RESEARCH METHODS FESTIVAL: Evaluating questionnaires with cognitive testing.
Lesson 4.5 – Conducting a Survey to Collect Two-Variable Data.
Research Methodology II Term review. Theoretical framework  What is meant by a theory? It is a set of interrelated constructs, definitions and propositions.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
PSYCH 610 Entire Course (UOP) For more course tutorials visit  PSYCH 610 Week 1 Individual Assignment Research Studies Questionnaire.
PSYCH 610 guide / psych610guidedotcom.  PSYCH 610 Week 1 Individual Assignment Research Studies Questionnaire  PSYCH 610 Week 2 Individual Assignment.
Market Research Report on Global and Chinese Chain Conveyor Industry, By Prof Research Browse more reports on Manufacturing & Construction.
#SVscot Developing a Framework for Hearing the Voice of Citizens in Health and Social Care.
Content analysis Cornel Ban.
GCE Software Systems Development AS Agreement Trial November 2015.
For More Best A+ Tutorials PSYCH 610 Entire Course(UOP) PSYCH 610 Week 1 Individual Assignment  PSYCH 610 Week 1 Individual Assignment.
GCE Software Systems Development
2008 PHIN Conference August 25, 2008 Aaron Maitland, NCHS
Part Two.
The Five Secrets of Project Scheduling A PMO Approach
Implementation of Cognitive Interviewing Standards at NCHS
Understanding and Utilizing the ISP Analysis Process
Digital Learning Framework Evaluation Overview
PSYCH 610 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
PSYCH 610 GUIDE Experience Tradition / psych610guide.com.
PSYCH 610 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com.
PSYCH 610 GUIDE Lessons in Excellence - psych610guide.com.
PSYCH 610 Education for Service/tutorialrank.com.
PSYCH 610 GUIDE Perfect Education/ psych610guide.com.
Increased Efficiency and Effectiveness
Incorporating NVivo into a Large Qualitative Project
PSYCH 610 GUIDE best future education / psych610guide.com.
Presentation transcript:

Justin Mezetin and Meredith Massey NCHS Questionnaire Design Research Laboratory FedCASIC 2014: Survey Evaluation Methods March 19, 2014

Outline  Introduction  Analytical Framework  Q-Notes: Qualitative Analysis software  Q-Bank: Question Evaluation library and resource  Next Steps

Introduction  What is cognitive interviewing/question evaluation?  Benefits of Cognitive Interviewing  Validity studies showing all phenomena the question is capturing

Analytical Framework

Background Challenges  Time consuming to conduct a thorough analysis  Larger sample sizes (N > 20) Multiple projects with over interviews  Collaboration Multiple Interview Locations Researchers with varying levels of experience Testing in Multiple Languages

Level One: Conducting Interviews  Interview guide  Consistency  Pre-selected Themes  Multiple Languages  Raw data storage

Interview Guide

Question Translation

Level Two: Summarizing Interview Notes  Synthesizing raw data  Tagged videos  Researcher collaboration  Viewing data for a single respondent

Summarizing Interview Notes

Level Three: Comparing Across Respondents  Developing thematic schema  Project level themes  Question level themes  Flexibility  Consistency across coders  Cross interview comparison

Viewing one question across all respondents

Level Four: Comparing Across Groups  Development of Advanced Schema  Sub-group analysis  Comparative analysis

Subgroup Analysis

Subgroup Analysis Results

Comparative Analysis

Level Five: Drawing Conclusions  Report template  Summary tables  Thematic schema

Report Template

Q-Bank Users  Data Analysts  Questionnaire Designers  Survey Methodologists  Survey Managers

Q-Bank Benefits  Deeper understanding of what survey variables are capturing  Share/view findings from studies conducted at other organizations  Resource to learn more and dialog about Question Evaluation  Mechanism to compare different methods and findings

Searching Q-Bank

Q-Bank Search Results

Question Selection

Question Details

Q-Suite Features  Collaboration  Consistency  Transparency  Q-Notes: Qualitative Analysis Software  Q-Bank: Library of Evaluation studies Resource on Question Evaluation

Q-Suite Next Steps  Q-Notes Run a public beta test Summer 2014* Export feature to submit into Q-Bank  Q-Bank Continue increasing content Inclusion of all methods in Q-Bank Pilot test with NHIS to link key variables to Q-Bank testing reports

Questions or Feedback?  Contact Us:  Visit: