February 2012 Presentation to the Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Introduction to the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patent Prosecution June 2013 June 13, 2013.
Advertisements

Speeding It Up at the USPTO July 2013 July 23, 2013.
Antonios Farassopoulos Head of International Classifications and WIPO Standards Service Global IP Infrastructure Department Combined CPC/FI Introduction.
IPC REFORM Objectives and principal Features Antonios Farassopoulos World Intellectual Property Organization IPC Forum 2006 Geneva.
United States Patent and Trademark Office – IP5 Foundation Projects: why are they necessary for work sharing and what challenges are IP5.
Organization of IP5 Meeting
WIPO Patent Information Services
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) IPC Committee of Experts
The IP5 view on the future of classification IPC Committee of Experts March 2009.
Global Business Solutions for Patent Prosecution Niclas Morey Geneva, 22 September 2011 Director International Organisations, Trilateral and IP5 European.
Third IPC Workshop (WIPO)
PDG IMPACT, Kallas, Frers/ WIPO_IPC_8_User view.ppt PDG IMPACT IPC Reform – User‘s view PDG IMPACT Working Group IPC Forum Open Day, February.
Overview of PubWEST Patent and Trademark Depository Library Training Seminar April 2006.
Searching for Prior Art: Moving From the Search Room to the World Wide Web Larry Tarazano Primary Examiner Technology Center 1700 U.S. Patent and Trademark.
The SLING project is funded by the European Commission within Research Infrastructures of the FP7 Capacities Specific Programme, grant agreement number.
Using patent classification, in particular the International Patent Classification, for searching Jerusalem 21 June 2010 Andrew Czajkowski Head, Innovation.
SDO and Patent Offices : EPO view on cooperation Dr Michel Goudelis, Director Telecommunications, EPO GSC-15, August 2010 Beijing, China.
1 Substantive Patent Harmonization and Japan’s Stance Shinjiro ONO Deputy Commissioner Japan Patent Office 2002 High Technology Protection Summit.
STEPS TO SUCCESSFUL PRELIMINARY PATENT SEARCHING Karen M. Kitchens Patent and Trademark Resource Center Wyoming State.
1 United States Patent and Trademark Office Revised PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination Guidelines Biotech/ChemPharm Customer Partnership.
Prosecution Luncheon Patent July Calendar AIPLA –PCT Seminar  July San Francisco  July Alexandria IPO Annual Meeting –Sept
PATENT SEARCH Patent Awareness Seminar, Mumbai Andreya Fernandes Gopakumar Nair Associates Url:
The SLING project is funded by the European Commission within Research Infrastructures of the FP7 Capacities Specific Programme, grant agreement number.
Biological Sequences and Patents Chemical compounds and Patents Agenda Acknowledgements: FELICS is funded by the European.
11 IP Section Colorado Bar Association Robert Stoll Commissioner for Patents United States Patent and Trademark Office.
1 Patent Quality Initiatives Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Tuesday, April 7, 2015 Valencia Martin-Wallace Deputy Commissioner.
AIPLA 2012 Annual Meeting Washington 25 October 2012 Worksharing, utilisation and the CPC Niclas Morey Director, International Organisations, Trilateral.
Competitive Sourcing of Classification at the United States Patent and Trademark Office Terrence Mackey International Liaison Staff U.S. Patent and Trademark.
The IPC development plan for the next five years IPC Workshop February 2013 Geneva Antonios Farassopoulos Director, International Classifications and Standards.
8. Annual WIPO Forum on Intellectual Property and SMEs for Intellectual Property Offices and Other Relevant Institutions in the OECD Countries 04-05/10/2010,
Espacenet and Patent Searching Dr Karen Ryan Patent Examiner 22 September 2011.
Implementation of the reformed IPC: Slovenia Janez Kukec Mezek Head of Information and Promotion Department Slovenian Intellectual Property Office.
Patent Information System of Georgia: Activities and Challenges David Gabunia Director General National Intellectual Property Centre of Georgia “SAKPATENTI”
Promotion of Innovation: Usefulness and value of Patent Information Andrew Czajkowski Head, Innovation and Technology Support Section Ulaanbaatar March.
1 IP Infrastructure for Promotion of Work Sharing - Japan’s Perspective - Koichi MINAMI Deputy Commissioner Japan Patent Office WIPO Global Symposium of.
Consideration Towards Development of Intellectual Property System Dr. Li Yuguang Deputy Commissioner the State Intellectual Property Office of P. R. China.
SDOs and Patent Offices : Towards a better interface Dr Michel Goudelis, Director Telecommunications, EPO GSC-14, July 2009 Geneva, Switserland.
Patent Searching Basics Patrick M. Torre, Ph.D. November 18, 2015.
Espacenet and Patent Searching Dr Dolores Cassidy Patent Examiner 09 October 2015.
IPC Working Group 34 - Updates on IT support to the IPC Geneva November 6, 2015 Patrick Fiévet Head of IT Systems Section.
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Pierre Held, EPO & John Salotto, USPTO 14th February 2011 IPC Committee of Experts.
Harmonization! Biotech/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting December 9, Mark R. Powell Special Advisor to the Commissioner for Patents.
Koichi Matsushita International Patent Classification Section Global Infrastructure Sector Common publication platform for the IPC, CPC and FI February.
Niclas Morey23 October 2015Director, International Organisations, Trilateral and IP5 Technical Harmonization in the IP5 EPO’s Global Dossier, CCD and CPC.
Global Dossier Mr. Mark Powell Deputy Commissioner
1 Worksharing n Facilitated in the long-term by: –Legal harmonization –Systems harmonization n Current programs, projects and pilots aimed at worksharing:
Introducing EPO PATSTAT EPO Worldwide Patent Statistical Database James Rollinson.
Patent search using Espacenet Practical example Andrew Czajkowski Head, Innovation and Technology Support Section.
2 Jesus J. Hernandez Patent Attorney Office of Policy and International Affairs The INPI-USPTO Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program Seminario Sobre.
International Telecommunication Union New Delhi, India, December 2011 ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Issues Antoine.
Recent developments at the EPO and its co-operation in Africa Nicholas Körnig August 2016Administrator International Relations.
Searching for Prior Art: Moving From the Search Room
WIPO Fourth IPC WORKSHOP
Registering your brand
Fig. 2.Ratio of patents for influenza vaccine technology according to each animal species in six major intellectual property offices. United States leads.
February 2017 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
ASEAN PATENTSCOPE Service
Speed of prosecution at the EPO Andy Harding – October 20th, 2017
Accelerating your Patent Prosecution in Mexico
Head, IT Systems Section
IPC & PATENTSCOPE Sandrine Ammann Marketing & Communications Officer
February 2018 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE
Questions/concerns
9.a Report on IPC-related IT systems IPC Committee of Experts 50
Overview of Electronic Lifecycle of USPTO Reclassification Projects
CLAIMS CLassification Automated InforMation System
IPC Workshop Geneva, February 8 and 9, 2010
February 2019 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE
Wide World of Espacenet
Presentation transcript:

February 2012 Presentation to the Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Introduction to the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) EPO and USPTO bi-lateral classification system

2  By the end of this overview, you should understand  General features of the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) System  Why the USPTO is pursuing this initiative  Draft CPC timeline  General look and feel of CPC Objectives

33  General features of Cooperative Patent Classification System (CPC)  Why the USPTO is pursuing this initiative  Draft CPC timeline  General look and feel of CPC Objectives

44 General Features of CPC  CPC is a joint USPTO/EPO classification system  CPC will be kept up to date  Ability to search a unified classification system  Reduces searching redundancy by providing a comprehensive patent document database  Merges PGPub and U.S. Patent databases  Patent documents classified by patent family  Permits search of foreign language document collection  Seamless integration of CPC symbols into current examination search tools o US and EP patent documents are already classified in ECLA and this backfile will be used as a basis for CPC

55  Ability to search a unified classification system (Continued)  More refined breakdowns in many art areas yield more focused results  155,000 breakdowns in USPC vs. 200,000 breakdowns in CPC, initially  Collaborative maintenance of CPC Classification  EPO and USPTO will jointly undertake revision (reclassification) projects  EPO and USPTO will work together with our counterparts  More frequent and timely updates  Greater examiner involvement in revision projects General Features of CPC

66  General features of Cooperative Patent Classification System (CPC)  Why the USPTO is pursuing this initiative  Draft CPC timeline  General look and feel of CPC Objectives

7 7 Major Intellectual Property Offices and Patent Classification Systems IPC Based Classification Systems Non-IPC based Classification Systems European Patent Office (EPO) World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO) State Intellectual Property Office of China (SIPO) Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) Japan Patent Office (JPO) United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

8 200, ,000145,00069,000150,000 Number of Subdivisions IPC Guide + Art Specific Rules IPC Guide + Deep Indexing with F- Terms IPC Guide + Art Specific Rules IPC Guide U.S. Classification Guidelines Rules for classification Invention Information 2 Standards for Classification * Classification CPC is an extension of IPC FI is an extension of IPC ECLA is an extension of IPC ----NoneRelationship to IPC USPTO/EPOJapan Patent OfficeEPO, member states IPC Union Members (61) USPTO Documents classified into system by CPCFIECLAIPCUSPC Comparison of Patent Classification Systems 8 PG Publication – Invention Information (i.e., Disclosed Invention or Inventive Concept) Routing/Docketing & U.S. Patent Grant – Claim Scope *

9 Why the USPTO is pursuing this initiative  Provides the examination corps and stakeholders with:  International classification system based on International Patent Classification (IPC) standards  More comprehensive access to prior art  A classification scheme/system that is adaptive and more actively maintained  A single classification symbol set for all USPTO and EPO documents

10  Aligns with USPTO strategic goals  Implement IPC-based classification system at USPTO  Accelerate classification harmonization efforts with other major IP offices  Promote resource sharing  Improves global harmonization for examination and search  Classification is the foundation for all global harmonization efforts  Increases document coverage for classified search  A single classification search yields results from the USPTO, EPO and EPO member states Note: USPTO is currently the only major IP office not using an IPC-based primary classification system Why the USPTO is pursuing this initiative

11  General features of Cooperative Patent Classification System (CPC)  Why the USPTO is pursuing this initiative  Draft CPC timeline  General look and feel of CPC Objectives

12 High Level CPC Time Line CPC MilestoneTimeframe Introduction to CPC for all examiners.2012 Develop and deliver detailed examiner training in concert with EPO Contractor applies CPC symbols to PGPUB pipeline documents.January 1, 2013 USPC and CPC symbols will be searchable in EAST/WEST, while routing remains based on USPC CPC symbols will propagate from PGPUB to Grants2013 Examiners will begin to add CPC symbols as needed on issued applications, with voluntary search capability of CPC symbols in EAST/WEST Final stage of CPC implementation. 2015

13  General features of Cooperative Patent Classification System (CPC)  Why the USPTO is pursuing this initiative  Draft CPC timeline  General look and feel of CPC Objectives

14 ► Sections: 8 Sections CPC Sections 14

15 A23G 9/0202 ► complete group symbol; consists of different components A Section (A, B,... H) A23 Class (any 2 digits) A23G Subclass (any letter) A23G9/00 Main Group A23G 9/0202 Subgroup Format of CPC Symbols Note: Documents are classified with main group and/or subgroup symbols

16 Example of a CPC classification symbol C Section 07 Class D Subclass 203/00 or 203/0214 Group Main Group (always /00) Subgroup Nomenclature: CPC Symbols

17 Website:

18  General features of Cooperative Patent Classification System (CPC)  Why the USPTO is pursuing this initiative  Draft CPC timeline  General look and feel of CPC Objectives

19  General features of Cooperative Patent Classification System (CPC)  Why the USPTO is pursuing this initiative  Draft CPC timeline  General look and feel of CPC Objectives

20  Collaborate with POPA throughout the development and implementation phases  Provide opportunities for examiners to participate and share feedback  Develop CPC training  Finalize IT requirements to accommodate CPC Conclusion: Next Steps

21 o CPC General Website: o Link to Classification Homepage:  Until CPC is available, ECLA searches can be conducted online using ESPACENET, the EPO’s public search tool:   Look for EIC/STIC Demos on ESPACENET & ECLA  Feedback  Conclusion: CPC Resources

22 Thank you!