Henry C. Ginsberg, MD College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York For The ACCORD Study Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
Advertisements

1 SECOND AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL BLOOD PRESSURE STUDY (ANBP-2) Enalapril/ACEI vs. HCTZ, n = 6,083 Randomized, open-label (blinded endpoint review) All CV events.
1. 2 The primary Objective of IDEAL LDL-C Simvastatin mg/d Atorvastatin 80 mg/d risk CHD In stable CHD patients IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease.
HPS2-THRIVE: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ER niacin and laropiprant in 25,673 patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Jane Armitage.
Robert K Huff PharmD. Candidate May Objectives The study was designed to examine 3 main aspects Biochemical effects Safety Tolerability Evacetrapib.
Lipid Disorders and Management in Diabetes
Presenter Disclosure Information Paul M Ridker, MD, FACC Dr Ridker is listed as a co-inventor on patents held by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital that.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT): Design Cannon CP.
Cholesterol and Lipids TIPS Wokefield Park 15/5/2013.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
Primary Prevention of Acute Coronary Events with Lovastatin in Men and Women with Average Cholesterol Levels Results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS John R. Downs, Michael.
Facts and Fiction about Type 2 Diabetes Michael L. Parchman, MD Department of Family & Community Medicine September 2004.
Simvastatin Increases HDL-C and Apolipoprotein A-1 Levels Significantly More Than Atorvastatin John P. Kastelein, Evan A. Stein, Michael A. Davidson, John.
(N=488) Simvastatin in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: HPS *29% RRR, p=0.001 Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2004;363:
Diabetes Trials Unit University of Oxford WebSite: Lipids in Diabetes Study.
Henry N. Ginsberg, MD College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York For The ACCORD Study Group.
Are We Nearing the Limits of Office-Based CV Prevention? Thomas G. Allison, PhD, MPH.
Effect of High-dose Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) Monotherapy versus ARB plus Calcium Channel Blocker Combination on Cardiovascular Events in Japanese.
Statins for the Primary Prevention of CVD in Women with Elevated hsCRP or Dyslipidemia: Results from JUPITER and Meta-Analysis of Women from Primary Prevention.
Lipid-Modulating Effects of Evacetrapib, a Novel CETP Inhibitor, Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination with the Most Commonly-Used Statins SJ.
 High density lipoproteins (HDL) protect against cardiovascular disease  A novel mechanism for raising HDL levels is to inhibit a protein known as CETP.
Results of Monotherapy in ALLHAT: On-treatment Analyses ALLHAT Outcomes for participants who received no step-up drugs.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT-LLT)
on behalf of the INVEST Investigators
0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist.
1 NHLBI/NEI National Institutes of Health NHLBI/NEI National Institutes of Health.
Downloaded from Slide 1 Dual Inhibition of Two Sources of Cholesterol: Absorption and Production in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes FIELDFIELD Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November 2005 Presented.
Role of Fenofibrate in Diabetic Dyslipidemia. Diabetic Dyslipidaemia Occurs in type 2 diabetes mellitus High levels of triglycerides Low levels of HDL-C.
Slide 1 EZT 2002-W-6022-SS Ezetimibe Co-administered with Statins: Efficacy and Tolerability Copyright © 2003 MSP Singapore Company, LLC. All rights reserved.
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) Type 2 diabetes mellitus Men and women.
Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention Trial (BIP) Results Presented at the European Society of Cardiology Meeting Vienna, Austria 1998.
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
William C. Cushman, MD, FACP, FAHA Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, TN For The ACCORD Study Group.
Incremental Decrease in Clinical Endpoints Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) Trial IDEAL Trial Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project L I P I D CARECARE PPP Project Investigators Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:899–905.
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
VBWG PROactive: Study design Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366: Charbonnel B et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27: Objective: Assess the effects.
A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
ALLHAT 6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)
C-1 Efficacy of the Combination: Meta-Analyses Donald A. Berry, Ph.D. Frank T. McGraw Memorial Chair of Cancer Research University of Texas M.D. Anderson.
4S: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) Design Sever PS et al. J Hypertens 2001;19:1139–1147.
Tailoring Intervention – Effectively Targeting the High-risk Population Cardiovascular Event Reduction in the Higher-Risk Primary Prevention Population.
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (4 GROUPS by GFR) ALLHAT.
Downloaded from Slide 1 Dual Inhibition of Two Sources of Cholesterol: Absorption and Production Results of a Clinical Trial.
DIABETES INSTITUTE JOURNAL CLUB CARINA SIGNORI, D.O., M.P.H. DECEMBER 15, 2011 Atherothrombosis intervention in metabolic syndrome with low HDL/High Triglycerides:
The MICRO-HOPE. Microalbuminuria, Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Reference Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation.
The JUPITER Trial Reference Ridker PM. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207.
Circulation. 2014;129: Association Between Plasma Triglycerides and High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Microvascular Kidney Disease and Retinopathy.
ACCORD Eye Study Results
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
The ACCORD Trial: Review of Design and Results
US cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in 20,536 people at different levels of vascular disease risk: randomised placebo-controlled trial UK Medical Research.
ACCORD Design and Baseline Characteristics
Title slide.
Vanguard Phase Results for the Blood Pressure Component
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes.
Rational Order of Laboratory Tests in Cardiovascular Diseases
Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): Results in the Subgroup of Patients with Diabetes Peter S. Sever, Bjorn Dahlöf, Neil Poulter, Hans Wedel, for the.
PROSPER: trial design                                                                                                                                                                 
Simvastatin in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: HPS
Presentation transcript:

Henry C. Ginsberg, MD College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York For The ACCORD Study Group

Dr. Ginsberg reports receiving ◦ Consulting fees from Merck, Merck Schering Plough, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Roche, Isis/Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, and Regeneron/ SanofiAventis. ◦ Grant support from Merck, ISIS/Genzyme, Roche, and AstraZeneca.

ACCORD Study Design Designed to independently test three medical strategies to reduce cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients Lipid Trial question: whether combination therapy with a statin plus a fibrate would reduce cardiovascular disease compared to statin monotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high risk for cardiovascular disease. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial conducted in 77 clinical sites in the U.S. and Canada

ACCORD Study Design Overall ACCORD Glycemia Trial: 10,251 participants Lipid Trial: 5,518 in Lipid Trial 2765 randomized to fenofibrate 2753 randomized to placebo Primary Outcome: First occurrence of a major cardiovascular event (nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, cardiovascular death) 87% power to detect a 20% reduction in event rate, assuming placebo rate of 2.4%/yr and 5.6 yrs follow-up in participants without events.

ACCORD Lipid Trial Eligibility Stable Type 2 Diabetes >3 months HbA1c 7.5% to 11% High risk of CVD events = clinical or subclinical disease or 2+ risk factors Age (limited to <80 years after Vanguard) ≥ 40 yrs with history of clinical CVD (secondary prevention) ≥ 55 yrs otherwise Lipids 60 < LDL-C < 180 mg/dl HDL-C < 55 mg/dl for women/Blacks; < 50 mg/dl otherwise Triglycerides < 750 mg/dl if on no therapy; < 400 mg/dl otherwise No contraindication to either fenofibrate or simvastatin

 All participants on open-labeled simvastatin, 20 to 40 mg/day ◦ Simvastatin dose complied with lipid guidelines  Patients randomized to double-blind placebo or fenofibrate, 54 to 160mg/day ◦ Dosing based upon eGFR level  Only blinded ACCORD trial  Observed Follow-up: 4 to 8 years (mean 4.7 years)

CharacteristicMean or %CharacteristicMean or % Age (yrs)62Total Cholesterol (mg/dl)175 Women %31LDL-C (mg/dl)101 Race / EthnicityHDL-C (mg/dl)38 White %68Triglyceride (mg/dl)*162 Black %15Blood pressure (mm Hg)134/74 Hispanic %7Serum creatinine (mg/dl)0.9 Secondary prevent %37Current smoking %15 DM duration (yrs) * 9On a statin %60 A1c (%) * 8.3On another LLA %8 BMI (kg/m 2 )32On Insulin %33 * Median values

Adverse Experiences During Follow-up

Lab Measures During Follow-up FenofibratePlacebo Laboratory Measures (no. (%))(N=2765)(N=2753)P value ALT ever > 3X ULN52 (1.9%)40 (1.5%)0.21 ALT ever > 5X ULN16 (0.6%)6 (0.2%)0.03 CK ever > 5X ULN51 (1.9%)59 (2.2%)0.43 CK ever > 10X ULN10 (0.4%)9 (0.3%)0.83

Lab Measures During Follow-up FenofibratePlacebo Laboratory Measures (no. (%))(N=2765)(N=2753)P value ALT ever > 3X ULN52 (1.9%)40 (1.5%)0.21 ALT ever > 5X ULN16 (0.6%)6 (0.2%)0.03 CK ever > 5X ULN51 (1.9%)59 (2.2%)0.43 CK ever > 10X ULN10 (0.4%)9 (0.3%)0.83 Serum creatinine elevation 235 (27.9%)157 (18.7%)< (36.7%)350 (18.5%)<0.001 Post-randomization incidence of microalbuminuria (> 30 to < 300 mg/g*)1050 (38.2%)1137 (41.6%)0.01 Post-randomization incidence of macroalbuminuria (> 300 mg/g*)289 (10.5%)337 (12.3%)0.03

Primary Outcome Rate (%/yr) Primary Outcome: Major Fatal or Nonfatal Cardiovascular Event Placebo (N=2753) N of Events

Primary Outcome Rate (%/yr) Primary Outcome: Major Fatal or Nonfatal Cardiovascular Event FenofibratePlacebo (N=2765)(N=2753) N of Events N of Events

Primary Outcome Rate (%/yr) HR (95% CI)P Value Primary Outcome: Major Fatal or Nonfatal Cardiovascular Event ( ) 0.32 FenofibratePlacebo (N=2765)(N=2753) N of Events N of Events

Prespecified Secondary Outcomes

Primary Outcome By Treatment Group and Baseline Subgroups

Comparison of ACCORD subgroup results with those from prior fibrate studies Trial (Drug) Primary Endpoint: Entire Cohort (P-value) Lipid Subgroup Criterion Primary Endpoint: Subgroup HHS (Gemfibrozil) -34% (0.02) TG > 200 mg/dl LDL-C/HDL-C > % BIP (Bezafibrate) -7.3% (0.24) TG > 200 mg/dl -39.5% FIELD (Fenofibrate) -11% (0.16) TG > 204 mg/dl HDL-C < 42 mg/dl -27% ACCORD (Fenofibrate) -8% (0.32) TG > 204 mg/dl HDL-C < 34 mg/dl -31%

Conclusion (1) ACCORD Lipid does not support use of the combination of fenofibrate and simvastatin compared to simvastatin alone to reduce CVD events in the majority of patients with T2DM who have HDL- C and TG levels that are close to the normal range

Conclusion (2) Subgroup analyses suggesting heterogeneity in response to combination therapy by gender and by the presence of significant dyslipidemia require further investigation