Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Force Core Functions
Advertisements

Physical Attack IW-140 College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education.
InformationInWarfareIW-100 College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education.
Airpower: the Industry Vision
INTRODUCTION TO SPECIAL OPERATIONSUnclassified Special Operations Overview Click arrow below to continue WARNING - This document contains technical data.
BGen George J. Allen, Director C4 & CIO of the Marine Corps 5 May 2009
Sensors and location technologies – the front end of ISR
Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below (FBCB2) Communications System
1 The NIAG - “Supporting Alliance Capability Development and Enhancing Interoperability” AFCEA Europe – June 2010 “Interoperability Revisited” “NATO Industrial.
Space Power Delivering Space & Missile capabilities to America and its warfighting commands.
Defense Transformation: Concepts and Affordability Jack Treddenick George C. Marshall Center DRESMARA 16 October 2006.
Addressing Terrorist Use of the Internet, Cyber Crime and Other Threats: National Expert Workshop Forging a Comprehensive Approach to Cyber Security Richard.
Australia and Cyber Warfare by Ian Dudgeon A presentation to the AIIA Queensland Branch 14 June 2011.
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited. 1 Electronic Warfare Information Operations 29 MAR 2011 Val O’Brien.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Meeting Strategic Challenges: Balancing Capabilities With Priorities.
NATO Network Enabled Capabilities
Commodity Architectures and Army Research Challenges Workshop on Edge Computing Using New Commodity Architectures (EDGE) 24 May 2006 J. Michael Coyle Program.
C4ISR and Information Warfare
Navy International Program Office
MARINE AVIATION APW / LtCol Beach 05 May 2009 Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the Connected Battlespace.
Deliberative Working Document - Predecisional FOUO Supporting the Secretary’s Top Priorities Eric Coulter, Deputy Director OSD Program Analysis and Evaluation.
SERIT Contributo per la preparazione di HORIZON 2020 Mission 5.
Information Dominance Anytime, Anywhere… PEOC4I.NAVY.MIL 2 December 2009 Terry Simpson Principal Deputy PEO for Intelligence
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Lt Gen Bill Lord, SAF/CIO A6 Chief of Warfighting Integration and.
Air Force ISR Reach Back Distributed Common Ground Systems
Force Packaging. Overview Principles of War Process of Force Packaging Developing Packages.
MILITARY SIMULATIONS Note: inclusion of particular simulation models in this discussion is based solely on the availability of information on the internet.
SD Regional Security Conference Division Chief Kelly Good September 15, 2010.
Precision Strike Association Annual Programs Review 20 April 2005 LtGen Michael A. Hough Deputy Commandant for Aviation.
Delivering innovative ISTAR solutions SG.E
FLTC Perspective Focused Long Term Challenges (FLTCs) are an innovative approach to match user requirements with relevant technology development, while.
Import of New Security Environment Keys to Transformation: Exploit Technology Exploit DOD ability to integrate processes Result: JV2010 Vision shall.
C4ISR and Information Warfare Naval Weapons Systems.
1. 2 USAF CONOPS & AIR AND SPACE POWER REVIEW Chap 23 & 24.
Air Force Strategy to Resources
Understanding the Human Network Martin Kruger LCDR Jodie Gooby November 2008.
Strategic Implications of Virtual Warfare: by Captain Terry C. Pierce USN Explaining Virtual Warfare as a Strategic Disruptive Innovation Explaining Virtual.
United States Air Force: Air Doctrine – Provide Global Capability
© Copyright 2009 All Rights Reserved 1 Measuring DLoD impacts in trials David Hathaway 26 th ISMOR.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force Warfighting Integration & XMSF Allen Murashige HQ USAF/XIW 6 Sep 2002.
PM UA Networks System Integration 2004 Combat Vehicles Conference
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY National Reconnaissance Office Overview UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY.
C4ISR for the Military: Development and Implementation Presentation to the Security Network’s C4ISR, Robot Platforms, and Sensor Conference Greg Collins,
BAE Systems Small Business Program
Mine Warfare - A Total Force Approach for the Future
Program Executive Officer Strike Weapons and Unmanned Aviation
Sensors Directorate and ATR Overview for Integrated Fusion, Performance Prediction, and Sensor Management for ATE MURI 21 July 2006 Lori Westerkamp Sensor.
1 Power to the Edge Agility Focus and Convergence Adapting C2 to the 21 st Century presented to the Focus, Agility and Convergence Team Inaugural Meeting.
Latest Strategies for IT Security Margaret Myers Principal Director, Deputy CIO United States Department of Defense North American Day 2006.
Force Packaging >. Overview  Force Packaging  Process of Force Packaging  Detached Support  Developing Packages.
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 10/7/09 Autonomous Systems Sensors – The Front End of ISR Mr. Patrick M. Sullivan SPAWAR ISR/IO.
PROPRIETARY —Do not distribute Presented to: Date: OPTIMIZING DATA LINK PERFORMANCE FOR UNMANNED SYSTEM PAYLOADS C4 Robot Platforms & Sensors Exposition.
Persistent Surveillance – Aerostats for Border Security
Winning the Next War 1 Winning the Next War: Institutionalizing Lessons Learned from Today’s Regional Conflicts The American Institute of Engineers Conference.
As of Sep 121 “The ultimate determinant in war is a man on the scene with a gun. This man is the final power in war. He is control, he determines.
Strengthen Naval Power At and From Sea Sea-Air-Space 17 May 2016.
Surveillance and Security Systems Cyber Security Integration.
Air Force Operations.
“Existing world order is being redefined.” Henry Kissinger Jan 2015
2003 National Fire Control Symposium NIST/Raytheon Joint Paper
Fires Conceptual Framework Supporting Multi-Domain Battle
Air Force Operations.
Joint Protection of the Sea Base
Force Packaging.
NDIA Targets, UAVs and Range Operations
Force Packaging.
Bush/Rumsfeld Defense Priorities/Objectives A Mandate For Change
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited. 1 Customer Advocate Airborne Electronic Warfare Systems 29 MAR 2011 Tim.
DDR&E Advanced Capabilities Overview
Presentation transcript:

Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Presentation Title April 15, 2017 Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Analyzing and Reacting to Threats 2nd annual C4ISR, CyberSecurity, Robots Platforms & Sensors Conference Speaker Name

ISR – A Working Definition Presentation Title April 15, 2017 ISR – A Working Definition Technologies, Information, and Systems Solutions that provide intelligence data, and the rationale for taking offensive action or countering force directed against National and/or Military assets Speaker Name

Current Strategic Challenges Traditional challenges - force on force conventional war (PRC, DPRK) Must be prepared, but will likely be the exception Irregular challenges - “unconventional” methods to counter traditional advantages of stronger opponents Will likely be preferred method to target US interests Catastrophic challenges – WMD or WMD-like effects Disruptive challenges – breakthrough technologies to negate current US advantages in key operational domains Confront challenges earlier and more comprehensively, before they are allowed to mature

Targeting Cycle Improvements Detection-Identification-tracking-engagement-assessment cycle New Technologies Digital Film, Internet, Email New Tactics Persistent Bombing “Swiss Army Knife” weapons loads Predictive Battlespace Awareness Coherent Change Detection Real Time Integration of crypto/language experts Compression of Kill Chain *NATO reviewed air targets

Current ISR Operations Planning, Analysis and Targeting Predictive of emerging, future enemy actions and threats Accurate, precise information Information Gathering Builds a “pattern of life” Characterize enemy behaviors Local Support Convoy Overwatch, Route Surveys Humanitarian mission support

Increasing Multi-Mission Capability Buddy Lase Convoy Overwatch CAS Precision Strike CSAR Support Raid Overwatch TAC-A Target Development Talking Points: Harnessing the full capabilities of our future UAS force requires an operational concept that will optimize the employment of these assets to provide the right support, to the right warfighter at the right time As this chart highlights, our current UAS force has multi-role / multi-mission capability These capabilities will only increase as UAS platform, sensor and weapons technology continues to rapidly improve

ISR Fusion Requirements Asymmetrical Warfare Broader areas for surveillance Less time to locate Requires more accuracy Dominant SA Rapid, expert analysis and information fusing Synthesis with existing contextual knowledge Multi-Sensor Layered sensing requires robust processing Sophisticated analytical tools to integrate data

Evolving ISR Capabilities Presentation Title April 15, 2017 Evolving ISR Capabilities AEHF Existing Today Tomorrow Objective Stove-piped Platforms Sensors Processing Ground Stations U2, JSTARS Integrated Sensor Systems Integrated Sensors & Processing Integrated Ground Stations Unmanned Platforms Multi-Mission Systems E-10A/MC2A Space Based Radar USAF C2C Multi-INT Information Fusion Multi-Mission aircraft (MMA) DD(X) Network Centric Warfare Fully Interoperable Global Grid Real-Time, Interactive Multi-INT Achieve Rapid Global Engagement of strategic targets Goal – Integrated Air, Space, and Ground C2ISR Speaker Name

Operational Challenges to ISR Insufficient ISR capacity and capability All ISR is Low Density/High Demand Balancing rapid acquisition with sustainment (“boutique” systems) Developing a fully interoperable, interdependent ISR structure (including NTISR and NTM) Eliminating multiple stove-piped architectures and complicated C2 infrastructures that slow information dissemination Developing capabilities to provide adequate predictive awareness of adversary intentions and reactions Developing capabilities to identify, monitor, track, and engage specific individuals, small groups, and mobile, concealed, and buried targets

Obstacles for Global ISR Permissive vs Non-permissive environment Air Space for UAS Sensors optimized for varied terrain Breakaway from FMV = persistence paradigm No silver bullet sensors/platform coming down the pipe Global ISR capability visibility OEF/OIF May Not Be The Template