1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Advertisements

Introducing ……. Policy 2419: Regulations for the Education of Students with Exceptionalities.
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series IDEA and the Multi-level Prevention System.
I dentification of Children with S pecific L earning D isabilities July 17, 2014 Presented at MEGA Conference 2014 By Clare Ward, Billie Thompson and Christine.
1 Third Annual Massachusetts Summit on Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment December 7 th and 8 th, 2010 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support –
Independent Educational Evaluations Developed by Contra Costa SELPA As Recommended for LEA Board Policy
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Response To Intervention and Early Intervening Services Louis Danielson Research to Practice.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Current Status – RtI in NYS Matthew Giugno Program Manager for RtI VESID (518)
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
The Criteria for Determining SLD When Using an RTI-based Process Part I In the previous session you were presented the main components of RtI, given a.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February.
The SOPM Standard Operating Procedures Manual Highlights.
Function ~ Process ~ Responsibilities
Determine if Referral Information Supports a Suspected Disability and Need for a Full and Complete Individual Evaluation.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Students with Disabilities Outcomes and Improvement Strategies Patricia J. Geary Coordinator, Special Education Policy and Professional Development Higher.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Interventions ARC Chairperson Training Special Education Regulation 1997 Special Education Regulations …providing incentives for whole-school.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Response To Intervention and Early Intervening Services.
Evaluation & Reevaluation. How do you and your staff determine whether to waive reevaluation?
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Owingsville Elementary School September 9, 2012.
Educable Mental Retardation as a Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University.
Implementing IDEA 2004: 2007 Changes to NYS’ Special Education Laws and Regulations Developed by the Office of Vocational and Educational Services, Special.
Matthew Giugno Barbara Miller New York State Education Dept. VESID (518) Implications of RtI Implementation.
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network The Reevaluation Report Procedural Safeguards Webinar Series December 15, 2011 Amy R. Smith PaTTAN.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Under 34 CFR , the public agency must conduct a full and individual evaluation Under 34 CFR , the public agency must ensure: The child is.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
Referral Made Like any other disability determination under IDEA, can’t be based on any single criterion – meaning a single test, assessment, observation,
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Amendments to the District ESE Policy and Procedures that outline Virtual education guidelines appear in blue. "The noblest pleasure is the joy of understanding."
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Response To Intervention and Early Intervening Services
Specific Learning Disability: Guidelines
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Special Education Process
Implications of RtI Implementation for NYS Schools
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12
Presentation transcript:

1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education Policy Update Session Fall 2007

2 1.Referrals for Initial Evaluation

3 Who may initiate a referral? Referral for initial evaluations  Parent  School District or Commissioner or designee of public agency responsible for providing education to students with disabilities Request for referrals  Professional staff members of the district the student resides in or private school student attends  Physician  Judicial officer  Student, age 18 or emancipated minor

4 2.Individual Evaluations and Reevaluations

5 60 calendar days to complete evaluation Parent and district can agree to another timeline if:  Child moves into new district and evaluation was initiated in prior district  Agree to determine how student responds to research-based intervention (response to intervention)

6 Observation §200.4(b)(1)(v)(ii) Required component of the initial evaluation Observation in the student’s learning environment ( including regular classroom setting) For student less than school age or out of school – environment appropriate for student that age

7 Independent educational evaluations (IEE)  parent right to one IEE for each district evaluation parent disagrees with Reevaluation every three years  unless parent and district agree, in writing, the reevaluation is not necessary

8 3.Eligibility Determinations

9 Sources of information Variety of sources  Aptitude and achievement tests  Parent input  Teacher recommendations  Physical condition  Social or cultural background  Adaptive behavior Ensure information from all sources is:  documented and  carefully considered.

10 Board of Education Responsibilities §200.2(b)(7) BOE written policy  establishes practices and procedures for implementing schoolwide approaches to remediate a student’s performance prior to referral for special education may include a response to intervention (RtI) process

11 RtI Programs §100.2(ii) Minimum requirements  Appropriate instruction in general education class Appropriate instruction in reading means scientific research- based reading programs that include instruction in:  Phonemic awareness  Phonics  Vocabulary development  Reading fluency and  Reading comprehension strategies  Screenings  Levels of targeted intervention

12  Repeated assessments  Application of information to make educational decisions  Written notification to parents Student performance data collected and general education services to be provided Strategies for increasing rate of learning Parents’ right to request an evaluation

13  School selects structure and components Criteria for determining levels of intervention Types of interventions Amount and nature of performance data to be collected Manner and frequency for progress monitoring  Ensure fidelity of implementation Staff knowledge and skills to implement RtI Program is implemented consistent with the RtI structure and components selected

14 Referrals when using RtI School district must initiate a referral and promptly request parent consent to evaluate a student who:  has not made adequate progress after an appropriate period of time when provided instruction in a “response-to-intervention” process (§100.2(ii))

15 Learning Disabilities (LD) May not rely on any single procedure Must include observation of student’s academic performance in the regular classroom  Before referral  With parent consent, after the referral  Must be conducted by CSE member Q: If you use an RtI process, must you still conduct a complete individual evaluation? A: Yes

16 Are learning problems the result of lack of appropriate instruction in math and reading? Data that demonstrates that prior to, or as part of, the referral process, the student was provided appropriate instruction in regular education settings, delivered by qualified personnel; Data-based documentation of repeated assessments of achievement at reasonable intervals, reflecting formal assessment of student progress during instruction  Information must have been provided to parents prior to referral

17 Who makes the LD determination? CSE  Must include student’s regular education teacher; and  At least one person qualified to conduct individual diagnostic examinations (e.g., school psychologist, speech/language pathologist, reading teacher)

18 State Criteria for LD 1. Student does not achieve adequately for age or standards; and 2. Student either:  does not make progress (RtI) or  exhibits a pattern of strengths and weaknesses in: performance, achievement, or both relative to age, standards or intellectual development; and

19 3. Not result of:  visual, hearing or motor disability;  mental retardation;  emotional disturbance;  cultural factors;  environmental or economic disadvantage; or  limited English proficiency

20 Use of significant discrepancy State does not prohibit its use Except that effective on or after July 1, 2012 (5 years), a school district shall not use the severe discrepancy criteria for:  LD determination in reading for students in grades K-4.

21 Written report of LD Determination 1. Does student have a LD? 2. Basis for making the determination? 3. Relevant behavior noted during the observation and the relationship of the behavior to the student’s academic functioning 4. Educationally relevant medical findings 5. Does the student meet the State’s criteria?

22 6. Determination of the CSE regarding exclusionary factors 7. If student participated in RtI:  Instructional strategies used and the student centered data collected; and  Documentation that parents were notified amount and nature of student performance data, general education strategies used for increasing the student’s rate of learning; and right to request a special education evaluation.

23 Proposals to Advance RtI Implementation RtI Technical Assistance Center (RtI-TAC)  Connect to new federally-funded National RtI Center Grants to schools to implement RtI  Selected schools throughout NYS

24 RtI Resources/Links