City of Pittsburgh – Department of City Planning The Pittsburgh and Philadelphia Stories John Carpenter REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY of the CITY OF PHILADELPHIA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary Themes RUTLAND NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION STUDY.
Advertisements

Richland County Land Reutilization Corporation.
The demolition-foreclosure-equity connection Michael Schramm Research Associate, Center on Urban Poverty and Community Development, Case Western Reserve.
A Michigan Nonprofit Association Affiliate DETROIT PARCEL SURVEY: APRIL 2014.
Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC) Philadelphia Data & Resident Engagement: A Fair and Balanced Approach to Neighborhood Growth.
Update on Foreclosure and Vacant Property Frank Ford Senior Vice President for Research and Development Neighborhood Progress, Inc. October 26, 2012.
Targeting NSP Funds Todd Richardson HUD Office of Policy Development and Research.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Orange County, Florida.
City of Muncie Community Development Department
Maximizing the impact of the neighborhood stabilization program Alan Mallach Non-Resident Senior Fellow The Brookings Institution.
Land Recycling Task Force June 3, City of Pittsburgh – Department of City Planning Agenda City of Pittsburgh – Department of Neighborhood InitiativesCity.
WHY CHANGE?. “Detroit is at a crossroads. I have said it before and I will say it again --we cannot operate the way we did 50 years ago or even 10 years.
City of Pittsburgh – Department of City Planning Mayor’s Land Recycling Taskforce Meeting II Thursday, June 3, a.m. – 12 p.m. Luke Ravenstahl Mayor,
City of Pittsburgh 2015 Budget and Five-Year Plan September 22,
Smart Growth Saves Costs of Abandoned and Vacant Properties.
Vacant Property Working Group (VPWG) Pittsburgh Community Reinvestment Group 1901Centre Avenue, Suite 200 Pittsburgh, PA (412) Staff Contact:
Neighborhood Stabilization Program Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Property Management Companies November 4, 2009.
A New Future for Our Old Places Liz Hersh, Executive Director, Housing Alliance of PA.
Bro. Scott Benson Candidate Michigan State Representative, 2 nd District.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program October 23, 2008.
CUYAHOGA COUNTY HOUSING ISSUES IN THE SHADOW OF THE FORECLOSURE CRISIS Prepared for the Fair Lending and Vital Communities Conference Frank Ford Senior.
Boston’s Payment in Lieu of Tax Program: A Review of the Program’s Development, Implementation and Results Ronald W. Rakow, Commissioner City of Boston.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Quarterly Report August 25, 2009.
Delaware Community Investment Fund Committee of 100 Economic Roundtable June 26, 2015.
Addressing the Foreclosure Crisis: Action Oriented Research in the Greater Atlanta Area Michael J. Rich Emory University.
Foreclosure Impacts and Strategies Alan Mallach Nonresident Senior Fellow The Brookings Institution.
Citi REO Strategy & Community Relations September 15, 2009.
We’ve Done It Our Way Carolyn Rice County Treasurer & Board Chair Montgomery County Land Reutilization Corporation.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania October 6, 2011 The Partnership Potential of Municipal Land Banks and Community Land Trusts: Land Banks 101 Dan Kildee, Center.
New Takes on Old Issues: Housing and Community Development South Central Assembly April 15, 2015 Theresa Y. Singleton Vice President, Community Development.
City of Pittsburgh – Department of City Planning Mayor’s Land Recycling Task Force Meeting IV Thursday, December 2, a.m. – 12 p.m.
City of Pittsburgh – Department of City Planning Mayor’s Land Recycling Task Force Meeting III Thursday, September 30, p.m. – 4 p.m. Luke Ravenstahl.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Orange County, Florida.
Orange County Business Council Work Force Housing Committee March 18, 2009 A Regional Response to the Foreclosure Crisis Foreclosures.
Tri-COG Collaborative on Blight A Plan for the Place.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Update February 16, 2010.
City of Pittsburgh – Department of City Planning Mayor’s Land Recycling Taskforce Kick-off Meeting Thursday, March 4, :30 am – 12:30 pm Luke Ravenstahl.
The First Suburbs Consortium of Greater Cleveland Bedford, Bedford Heights, Berea, Brook Park, Brooklyn, Brooklyn Heights, Cleveland Heights, East Cleveland,
Vacant Property Working Group (VPWG) The City of Pittsburgh Property Reserve: A Guide for Community Development Corporations Pittsburgh Community Reinvestment.
New York State HALT Task Force (“Halt Abusive Lending Transactions”) 1.Since 2007, the Governor’s HALT Task Force has led the coordination of foreclosure.
Milwaukee’s Efforts to Respond to the Foreclosure Crisis.
ECONOMIC IMPACT OF HOUSING Kate Little Georgia State Trade Association of Nonprofit Developers.
Thriving Communities Institute From Vacancy to Vitality A Program of Western Reserve Land Conservancy Thriving Communities Institute From Vacancy to Vitality.
2010 Budget Bill Peduto, Finance Chair City Council Budget Office Bill Urbanic, Director December 21, 2009.
Swissvale – A Community Revitalization Case Study
Presentation Outline Background NSP Plan Requirements Orange County NSP Plan NSP Implementation Strategies Timeline Action Requested.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program Redevelopment of Abandoned and Foreclosed Homes.
City of Pittsburgh – Department of City Planning Mayor’s Land Recycling Task Force Meeting VIII Final Meeting Friday, December 2, AM – 12noon Luke.
Housing Trends In Cuyahoga County __________ Is The Foreclosure Crisis Over? It Depends On Where You’re Standing. Frank Ford Senior Policy Advisor, Thriving.
Land Banking Breakout HUD Housing Summit October 7, 2008 Salvatore Sclafani.
COUNTY LAND UTILIZATION CORPORATIONS: LAND BANKS Perrysburg, Ohio September 17, 2015.
Victoria Place Redevelopment Area Paradise Park Downtown Commercial Corridor Professional / Medical Office School Government Offices HOUSING RESOURCE.
Community Stabilization in the Wake of the Foreclosure Crisis Ali Solis, Vice President, Public Policy & Industry Relations Enterprise Community Partners.
Best Practices for Neighborhood Stabilization Ken Wade, CEO NeighborWorks ® America.
February 17, 2009 Orange County Neighborhood Stabilization Program Update.
Land Bank Program A Briefing to the Housing Committee Housing/Community Services Department September 21, 2015.
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DATA SYSTEMS Mike Stone, Oregon Dept. of Transportation.
County Land Utilization Corporations, aka Land Banks Ildi Pallos Piqua, Ohio October 20, 2015.
Housing Trends In Cuyahoga County __________ Is The Foreclosure Crisis Over? It Depends On Where You’re Standing. Analysis by Frank Ford Senior Policy.
From Information to Action: Lessons from NNIP for Place-based Initiatives National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership Better Data. Better Decisions. Better.
Rethinking Revitalization: A Data Driven Approach to Addressing the Foreclosure Crisis Jeff Matson CIC Impact Summit Nov. 16, 2012.
Who is ProvPlan? Mission to promote the economic and social well-being of the city, its people, and its neighborhoods. 501(c)3 non-profit created in 1992.
This is the type so far. This is bullet size What’s the problem? Tax collection system flawed Contagious Blight Regional Inequity Land Use and Tax Policy.
Tax Tactics for Brownfields TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Brownfields 2004 September 21, 2004 presented by: Lisa Lyon URS Corporation Chicago, IL.
CITY OF MENIFEE, CA. FY General Fund Mid-year Review Other Funds Mid-year Review National, State and Local economic conditions FY Budget Planning.
Urban Property Abandonment: From Blight to Opportunity KnowledgePlex/Government Innovators Network Tuesday, March 15, 2005 Alan Mallach, FAICP Research.
Housing Production Plan: Meeting Local Needs
Housing Policy Meeting #2
Partnerships in Neighborhood Revitalization
COMMUNITIES A PARTNER TO 2020 Levy Request County Board Workshop
Presentation transcript:

City of Pittsburgh – Department of City Planning The Pittsburgh and Philadelphia Stories John Carpenter REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY of the CITY OF PHILADELPHIA Kim Graziani OFFICE OF THE MAYOR of the CITY OF PITTSBURGH

PittsburghPhiladelphia Total Miles55.42 sq mi sq mi Total Neighborhoods90 neighborhoods155 neighborhoods Total Population 333,5271,540,351 Population Loss over 50 Years343,278 or 50 %452,703 or 23% * Median Sales Prices for Single Family Homes $66,562$130,400 Percent of Homeownership52%59.3% Approx. Total Taxable Parcels126,732570,000 Amount of Tax Delinquency (total parcels ≥ 2 Years Tax Delinquent ) 17,780 or 14 %100,000 or 18% Abandonment (total parcels ≥ 5 Years Tax Delinquent ) 8,690 or 6.8% ? Foreclosures 20081,199 (0.7%)≈ 5,500 (1%) 7430 (2009) Vacancy (lots and structures) 14,000 vacant lots (9,826 parcels publicly-owned) 6,000 or12% vacant buildings 40-60,000 vacant properties (10,000 publicly-owned)

 It’s Everywhere 40-60,000 Vacant Properties (estimates vary)  It’s Expensive  Jumbled Ownership Hard to Assemble Parcels  Private vs. Public Ownership Philadelphia Vacant Land Story DEFINITION OF THE PROBLEM

City-Wide Vacancies Philadelphia Vacancy Density

 IT’S EXPENSIVE $69.4 Million (to date) $11.3 Million (L&I FY2008) Blighted properties reduce the value of nearby properties by up to 20% Lost revenue from failed real estate tax collection Maintenance of vacant properties by City Diminished value resulting from vacant properties Philadelphia: Definition of the Problem

Jumbled Ownership

Philadelphia: Definition of the Problem  Private Ownership  Tax-Delinquent  Public Ownership  Fragmented  Private Ownership vs. Public Ownership 1 out of 5: Publicly Owned Public 4 out of 5: Privately owned Private

 Private Ownership = 4 out of 5 1 year = $1.4 Million years = $6.2 Million 11 + years = $61.8 Million Most of the older delinquencies are considered uncollectable. Total Private Ownership = 4 out of 5 Vacant Properties Over half are tax delinquent, a total of $69.4 million Private Philadelphia: Definition of the Problem

Fragmented Public Ownership Total Public Ownership = 1 out of 5 Vacant Properties 50% 27% 15% 8% Public Philadelphia: Definition of the Problem

Philadelphia: Goal Unified system of:  Tax foreclosure  Property maintenance  Effective marketing for reuse

Websites with property lists Broker Sale Pilot Coordinated RFPs Simplified Documents More Predictability Recent Progress

City-Wide Vacant Land Work Group Convened by the Mayor How We’re Fixing the Problem

Lessons Learned  Key Linkage Between: Tax Collection Policy Land Re-use Opportunity  Everyone is a Stakeholder: Homeowners Landlords Non-profits Government  Differing Interests

Pittsburgh: Definition of the Problem

Pittsburgh: Definition of the Problem

Pittsburgh: Definition of the Problem

Pittsburgh: Definition of the Problem

City of Pittsburgh – Department of City Planning Pittsburgh: Definition of the Problem

Pittsburgh: Definition of Problem

City of Pittsburgh – Department of City Planning Pittsburgh: Definition of the Problem  Scale and effect of decline in certain neighborhoods  Cost to acquire, maintain and responsibly reuse  Local community capacity

Current Resources to Address the Problem  Pittsburgh Land Reserve  Mayor’s Green Up Pittsburgh Program  Comprehensive and Local Plans  Increased demolitions

Goal Create a more comprehensive system to recycle tax delinquent and abandoned parcels by:  improving the current system that works if there is an end user/market;  creating a system to deal with properties with no market; and  develop a sustainable funding mechanism

Larimer 45% of neighborhood is tax delinquent (1,977 out of 4,348 taxable parcels)

Larimer Green Zone Total Costs Total Public Acquisitions$123,379$148,232$19,250$290,861 Private Acquisitions$196,108$110,837$306,945 Holding Costs$500$532$2,578$272$3,882 Demolition$133,067$2,945$136,012 Community Support Greening$27,175$30,000 $87,175 Organizational/Programmatic ELCCC/Kingsley$67,825$15,000$82,825 Hosanna Industries Homeface Program$100,000 Total$123,879$243,764$496,003$144,054$1,007,700  Total Cost: $1Million Total Acreage Under Public Control: 7.85 (13.5 acre zone)

Larimer 45% of neighborhood is tax delinquent (1,977 out of 4,348 taxable parcels) Before After

Process to Achieve Our Goal  Mayor Ravenstahl is leading the charge via the Land Recycling Task Force  Members of the Task Force include:  City Representatives  County Representatives  State Representatives  School Representatives  Local Authorities  Community Development Professionals  Real Estate Attorneys  Advocates  Task Force meets quarterly  Pilot projects

Lessons Learned  Focus on tax policy  Costs of blight  Benefits of stabilizing communities  Involve community  Support creative reuse strategies

Comments/Questions? Cindy Daley: Dan Kildee: John Carpenter: Kim Graziani: GO STEELERS! Thank you.