Waitlist Process Review Board Meeting April 8, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Update Board of Early Education and Care June 9, 2009.
Advertisements

1 Advisory Council April 1, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
1 Income Eligible Re-Procurement Board of Early Education and Care January 14, 2009.
1 IMPROVING TRANSPORTATION SERVICES IN EARLY EDUCATION AND CARE SETTINGS EEC Board Meeting – November 8, 2011.
1 EEC Board Meeting May 10, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Income Eligible Surplus Spending Plan Fiscal Committee April 7, 2014
1 Our priorities for the next three years Close Critical Service Gaps Increase availability of culturally appropriate services and serve more children.
Monitoring Local GSRPs Linda Stachowiak Preschool Services Supervisor.
Campus Improvement Plans
Waitlist Cleanup Update Fiscal Committee May 5, 2014.
FY14 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee February 3, 2014.
0 FY14 State Budget Discussion EEC Board Meeting May 13, 2013.
FY14 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee January 6, 2014.
 Who is Involved in Decision Making?  Governing Bodies Roles and Responsibilities  Specific Points for Success  Systems and Services  Policy Council.
ERSEA Training April 17, /17/2015
1 Public Hearings: May , 2013 Child Care Development Fund Massachusetts State Plan Federal Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015.
IMPROVING TRANSPORTATION SERVICES IN EARLY EDUCATION AND CARE SETTINGS EEC Board Meeting - December 13, 2011.
FY 2012 Budget Update Policy and Fiscal Committee July 25, 2011.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
FY12 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee June 4, 2012.
FY14 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee March 3, 2014.
Voucher Reassessment Management Project Fiscal Committee October 3, 2011.
Finance: Three Proposals for ARRA Funding to Increase Access to Financial Assistance for Early Education and Care December 8, 2009.
FY15 Maintenance Plan Discussion Fiscal Committee October 2, 2013.
QRIS Quality Improvement Grants Board of Early Education and Care March 9, 2010.
No Recourse to Public Funds 30 April The Scheme –The scheme is intended for victims of Domestic Violence (DV) who were previously admitted to,
Impact of Elimination of non-QRIS Programs Fiscal Committee March 4, 2013.
Budget and Caseload Update Policy and Fiscal Committee November 1, 2010.
SPECIAL EDUCATION MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT (MOE). MOE REQUIREMENT Federal law requires that each local education agency (LEA) receiving federal funds pursuant.
ARRA Update Policy and Fiscal Committee April 4, 2011.
10/22/2015 5:20:08 PM EEC IT Strategic Plan June Board Meeting June 12, 2007 Quinsigamond Community College Harrington Learning Center 670 West Boylston.
1 EEC Financial Assistance Regulations and Policies Reform EEC Subsidy Regulations last updated in November 2006 Policy Guide developed and released in.
EEC Financial Assistance Regulation and Policy Reform November
FY 2010 Data Collections Workshop Follow Up Q & A Session.
Finance: Three Proposals for ARRA Funding to Increase Access to Financial Assistance for Early Education and Care December 8, 2009.
1 June 11, 2013 Board Meeting Child Care Development Fund Massachusetts State Plan Federal Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015.
University of Minnesota Internal\External Sales “The Internal Sales Review Process” An Overview of What Happens During the Review.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
SENJIT Code of Practice update and SEND Support Plans.
MCKINNEY-VENTO HOMELESS EDUCATION GRANT AWARDEE TRAINING Division of Performance and Accountability September 30, :00AM(MDT)
Warren Township Study To Examine Enrollment Project (STEEP) Project Plan & Criteria High Level Timeline Sub-Committee Goals & Deliverables Revised October.
Intersection of Fostering Connections and McKinney-Vento What is the connection? How do we connect? Susie Greenfelder, Education Planner MI Department.
Budget and Caseload Update Policy and Fiscal Committee April 4, 2011.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
FY 2010 Coordinated Family and Community Engagement Grant Application.
FY12 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee April 2, 2012.
FY14 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee November 4, 2013.
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
FY14 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee December 2, 2013.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
West Virginia Department of Education Introducing ……. Policy 2419: Regulations for the Education of Students with Exceptionalities.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
Budget and Caseload Update Policy and Fiscal Committee January 3, 2011.
Budget and Caseload Update EEC Policy and Fiscal Committee April 14, 2011.
FY14 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee April 7, 2014.
Chapter 5 5 Planning C H A P T E R. Outcomes Differentiate between strategic planning and master planning. Understand the strategic and master planning.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
Board of Early Education and Care
Board of Early Education and Care Planning and Evaluation Committee
Alaska Citizen Review Panel
FY14 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee May 5, 2014
Quality Workshop The Local Council Award Scheme is a great guide for good practice in our sector and a way for councils to build confidence in their.
Table of Contents FY2010 “9C” Budget Reductions Fiscal Year 2011 Maintenance Spending Plan; and FY2011 Caps – EEC Targeted Caps.
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act: New Opportunities for Federal Funding for Child Welfare Key Questions and Considerations.
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Guide to the Single Plan for Student Achievement
Strategy
Stronger Economies Together (SET)
Stronger Economies Together (SET)
Presentation transcript:

Waitlist Process Review Board Meeting April 8, 2014

Outline Waitlist Process Overview Analysis and proposals Short term actions Waitlist cleanup proposal 2

Waitlist Process Analysis EEC began a review and analysis of the Waitlist process in Fall of 2013 in order to identify any improvements and address any existing issues Inputs to this review include: Financial Assistance Policy Guide Feedback from the field Examination of day to day waitlist process activities 3 The goal of this review was to identify opportunities to streamline our Waitlist Process, improve communication, and ensure adherence to policies

Waitlist Process Overview Chapter 1 in the Financial Assistance Policy Guide (2013) outlines the following: 1.1 Placing Families on the Waitlist (WL) How to access the WL and requirements prior to enrollment 1.2 Waitlist Status Codes All children placed on the WL are categorized by a series of status codes 1.3 Communicating with Families Letters sent to confirm placement on WL, renewal of continued placement on WL, removal from WL and funding available 1.4 Removing Families from W aitlist Voluntary removal from WL Failure to maintain/update contact information for WL Over age (13 unless special needs) 1.5 Reinstating Waitlist Records Allow reinstatement within 6 months of their removal date 4

Short Term Actions To improve Waitlist data quality, EEC proposes the following short term enhancements: 1. Reduce the number of Waitlist Agents 2. Use standard terminology in policy and Waitlist applications 3. Revise and streamline written communications to families 4. Define families eligible to be placed on Waitlist: Verification at intake Children enrolled, but seeking other options 5

Short Term Actions To improve Waitlist data quality, EEC proposes the following short term enhancements (continued): 5. Create “slick sheet” for families 6. Remove families from waitlist if no response to funding letters 7. Provide training to ensure consistent use of Waitlist, including use of notes 8. Shorten reinstatement period from 6 months to 30 days – aligns with subsidy appeals 9. Establish consistent process for “blocking access” to families terminated for cause 6

Waitlist Cleanup Proposal EEC recently presented a plan to ANF for how to reduce the surplus funds in the Income Eligible account. This plan has not yet received final approval from ANF. One part of the surplus plan is to provide funds to the CCRRs for waitlist cleanup – an idea that stemmed from feedback received from CCRRs and contract providers that the weekly archiving process for the waitlist, although effective in decreasing the waitlist numbers, requires more than a systemic process to ensure accuracy. The waitlist has been identified by many providers and CCRRs as a principle barrier for timely placement of children in contracted slots and providing vouchers. Waitlist issues include invalid contact information, families no longer financially eligible, and families on a waitlist even though they are already enrolled in a program. In our proposal, the CCRRs will review the waitlist for accuracy, continued interest, potential eligibility, and communication of fees. They will also provide guidance to the families on their role in maintaining accurate information. Completing this effort during this fiscal year will continue EEC’s efforts to ensure the waitlist is kept current and more precise for FY2015. It will facilitate efficient maintenance of the current voucher allotments and future voucher expansion. 7

Waitlist Cleanup Proposal Each CCRR will be given funds to hire temporary staff that will be responsible for contacting all families on the waitlist prior to a particular date using a standard script created by EEC. EEC will also provide a 3-day training session for all staff on the process. The first priority for CCRRs will be to use existing functionality to remove all duplicate families and to ensure that all information in KinderWait is accurate and complete for each family. After completing the questions, assessing potential eligibility, and confirming the family's interest and ability to pay the parent fee, the family and the worker will together decide if the family remains on the waitlist or is removed from the waitlist. Families will receive follow-up letters based on the decision made during the call. Families not reached after 2 calls will receive letters asking for a return call. A note will be made in KinderWait every time contact is attempted. Families who do not respond within 10 days will be terminated and will be sent a letter informing them of their removal and detailing the reinstatement process. EEC will set benchmarks for this work and monitor CCRR progress through weekly reports provided by the CCRRs as well as reports pulled directly from KinderWait. 8

Additional Policy Considerations The proposal provided to ANF does not address any changes to waitlist policies. In order to ensure that all funds are spent in the most productive manner, we think that we would receive the best outcomes if some of the proposed changes were implemented in coordination with these cleanup efforts. Specifically, we feel that the implementation of the following short term actions would be beneficial to the success of this cleanup effort: The ability to terminate families from the waitlist who do not respond to inquiries (similar to families not responding to funding availability letters as mentioned on slide 6). Existing policy only allows the removal of families who have invalid contact information. Shortening of the grace period that a family has to be reinstated on the waitlist after their removal (grace period is currently 6 months; pending proposal would shorten it to 30 days). Creation of an information sheet that would be sent to families who choose to remain on the waitlist to inform the family of its responsibilities and expectations (similar to proposed marketing materials). 9

Next Steps Finalize and implement FY14 activities under IE surplus (April-June) Work with Commissioner to update Waitlist Policies (April-June) Communicate changes with stakeholders and Waitlist agencies 10