 Debating the Case Mikaela Malsin, Univ. of Georgia DUDA 2012

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to Give an Effective 2ar. 1. Think About the Big Picture  Remember: focus on offense – defend your house  Isolate 1 or 2 Impacts  Decide on impacts.
Advertisements

Matt Gomez Debating the Disadvantage (DA). 4 Part One: What is a Disadvantage?
By Mark Veeder-SCFI How to properly construct an AC and NC -Getting the most out of cross-ex -How to structure a rebuttal.
A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I) A N INTRODUCTION TO P OLICY D EBATE - The Minnesota Urban Debate League -
Mike Shackelford. Factors that make a good counterplan Does it solve the aff better? Is it competitive Does it solve the aff or a portion of the aff.
Advanced cp competition exercises
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
Anatomy of a debate Austin Layton.
PICs….. In spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace!.  Cp text  Net benefit  Must be competitive ◦ Uniquely beneficial ◦ Mutually exclusive.
Debate Judges Orientation. Volunteers make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. YOU are making an investment. YOU are performing a teaching role.
DISADVANTAGES. What is a Disadvantage?  Disadvantages are offcase positions that the negative advances to prove that the costs of the plan outweigh its.
Debating Case and Disadvantages CODI 2014 Lecture 1.
AUDL Middle School Debate Team Tournament Handbook Debate Tournament Schedule Arrive at tournament & wait in cafeteria. Round 1 Round 2 Lunch Break in.
The 1ar: Debate’s Paramedic Get the patient to the hospital…alive.
Matt Gomez Ph.D in Theoretical Objections to Negative and Affirmative argumentation (Bingham Campus) SCFI 2011 THEORY.
What is Debate? A debater’s guide to the argumentative universe…
POLICY DEBATE Will look like CX on the sign up sheet.
Counterplans CODI 2014 Lecture 2. What is a counterplan? A plan offered by the negative to solve some or all of the affirmative’s advantages The negative.
How to Debate Disadvantages. Selecting disadvantages to run  Be strategic in selecting them—a few things to remember—  Don’t run multiple disadvantages.
Constructive Speeches (1AC)- 6 MINUTES CX 1A to 2N- 3 MINUTES (1NC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 1N to 1A- 3 MINUTES (2AC)- 6 MINUTES CX- 2A to 1N- 3 MINUTES (2NC)-
Most important things Keep your personal views outside the room Debaters must adapt to you Be honest about your judging experience.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
4 minute Affirmative Constructive This speech is prepared ahead, rehearsed and should be perfectly timed. It is a presentation of the affirmative's position.
Three Different Debates Cross Examination or Policy (team) Focus is on depth of research, 1 topic/ year, governmental policy. Topic : Resolved:
The Stock Issues of Debate 5 Things Every Debater Needs, and Needs to Know!
Lincoln-Douglas Debate RefutationRefutation. Step One: Briefly restate your opponent’s argument. The purpose of restating is to provide geographic marker.
Week 1. Q. From where did LD debate come? Q. Where policy debate involves federal policy, what does LD involve? Q. LD involves which civilization?
LINCOLN DOUGLAS DEBATE. Table of Contents  What is it  LD Debate Structure  Terms to Know  Constructive Arguments  Affirmative  Negative  Cross.
Advanced Debate Friday, August 21,  Speaking Drills  Counterplans  Work on cases  Exam 1: Next Friday Preview.
Getting Started in CX Debate Julian Erdmann. What is CX debate? Team debate made up by two students from the same school. They will defend either Affirmative.
Debating the Case GDI Glossary Aff case Advantage Offense Defense Card Analytic.
How to Flow And why you should do it – always, all the time, in every round.
Debating the case.
Affirmative Strategy Austin Layton. Overview At least, take two things from this lecture Main Advantage of Being Aff: Familiarity – Preparation Matters.
SCFI 2011 SJK. Understand how to structure and write basic LD constructives Understand the basic components of contention-level argumentation Begin to.
How to Debate Disadvantages. DA Uniqueness: Status of a key issue in the SQ – Example: The economy is improving Link: how the plan disrupts the SQ – Example:
How to Flow And why you should do it – always, all the time, in every round.
Individual Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
GDI 2015 THE NEGATIVE.  The counter to the Affirmative  Negates the course of action proposed  So much variety! Many ways to negate  What makes someone.
 If you can convince the judge that passing your affirmative plan is a good idea, you will win the debate. Essentially, you need to prove that the affirmative.
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
Beginning Policy Debate: I ain’t scared ! NSDA Nationals 2014 Jane Boyd Grapevine HS, TEXAS.
Hays Watson Head Debate Coach UGA.  It is the counterpoint to the Affirmative – instead of Affirming a particular course of action (i.e. the resolution),
Topicality “That sounds good. That’s a good skill to have.” –Julia Marshall “Naw. Advantages don’t matter when it comes to Topicality.” –Humza Tahir.
Basic Strategies Dallas Urban Debate League December, 2007.
Affirmative Casing Strategies. Characteristics of Great ACs 1.Argument Quality 2.Persuasive Rhetoric 3.Strategic vision.
Matt Gomez.  What will occur in the status quo  Factors for good uniqueness  Post-dating – things change  Brink – why is the squo good but not guaranteed.
FILING BASICS Staying organized is crucial.
BASICS OF BEING AFFIRMATIVE
Affirmative vs. negative
Introduction to the Negative
Policy Debate Speaker Duties
WELCOME TO DEBATE! Negative Basics.
8th Annual Great Corporate Debate
Basics of Debate Damien Debate.
What is Policy Debate Pam have other suggestions for this?
How to be negative Gabi Yamout.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Speaker Responsibilities
The Affirmative Adapted from:.
Beginning Strategies Novice Debate Henrichsen
Introduction to the aff
Wining the DA Casey Parsons.
Debate What is Debate?.
POLICY DEBATE An Introduction by Rich Edwards Baylor University.
Introduction to Policy Debate
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
Welcome to Debate! Cross-examination
Informative, Persuasive, and Impromptu Speaking all rolled into one!
A Firm Foundation: CX Debate Basics (Part I)
Presentation transcript:

 Debating the Case Mikaela Malsin, Univ. of Georgia DUDA

Partner kitties Work together! Partner kitties Work together!

Glossary  Case – Arguments presented by the affirmative in favor of a particular plan of action  Advantage – a benefit to doing the plan, or set of reasons the plan is a good idea  Offense – why something is actively good or bad  Aff offense vs. neg offense  Defense – minimization of the other team’s offense  Card – piece of evidence read in support of an argument  Analytic – argument made by the debater without written evidence

The Stock Issues  S – Solvency  H – Harms  I – Inherency  T – Topicality  (S) – Significance  Debating the case usually means debating the first 3, often mostly the first 2

Stock issues kitty Needs all 4 legs of the table

What is the goal? – AFF  For the Aff, the case is…  DEFEND THE HOUSE  Stock issues  Defeat negative objections  Outweigh the negative’s arguments (offense)  Debating the case begins in what speech?  Importance of the flow (Pre-flow!)

Watermelon helmet kitty Knows how to defend the house

What is the goal? – NEG  Stock issues in reverse – try to create doubt on every level  Minimize AFF to maximize your arguments (make NEG offense outweigh)  Diversity [HSR example – competitiveness advantage)  Give yourself many options – then collapse  One option – turning the case (impact turning or link turning)  Debating the case begins…  Importance of the flow

Laser eyes kitty Sees his opponent’s arguments in advance

Importance of the Case  “Policy” debate – what is the policy?  Foundation of the debate  All arguments trace back to the case – is it a good or bad idea?  Point of comparison

1AC – 1AC CX  What does the 1AC say? What is the goal?  1AC has built-in responses to the 1NC [HSR – climate change example]  All 4 debaters working during this time  1AC CX – goals for the 2N, 1N

1NC – 1NC CX  How much time on case?  Structure – alternate evidence with analytics  Arguments from 1AC cross-ex  Cover every advantage + solvency  Diversity – various types of ways to answer S, H  Again, all 4 debaters working  Cross-ex – goal of the 1A?

2AC – 2AC CX  Case goes ON TOP – why?  Answer 1NC arguments in order; keep flow organized  Use the 1AC – built-in answers!  2AC blocks – not just for off-case  Time allocation; efficiency  Add-ons  What are all 4 debaters doing?  Job of the 1N in 2AC CX

2NC/1NR  Extending 1NC arguments  Answering 2AC responses  Begin making choices, both strategic and substantive  Reading more evidence – when? Why?  Discussion of impacts  Block division  Making the 1AR difficult

1AR  Order – still first  Difficulty of the 1AR  Job of the 1AR – DEFEND THE HOUSE  Make choices – this doesn’t mean drop arguments  The beauty of cross-application  Time allocation, efficiency  Goal = give the 2AR the tools they need

2NR  This speech is all about making choices  What case arguments to extend?  Depth vs. breadth  Covering advantages, solvency  Why still important in the 2NR?

2AR  Order – still first  Most important part of the 2AR  Assess the threat  Choose your route to victory – which impact(s)?  Assessment  Write the ballot for the judge (“the case outweighs because…”)

Jumping kitten Is running off to write blocks