HOW MIGHT WE SUPPORT TEACHERS AS THEY DEEPEN THEIR OWN UNDERSTANDING AND EXPLORE STUDENT THINKING RELATED TO THE K-6 GEOMETRY PROGRESSION? GINI STIMPSON.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Advertisements

Elko County School District CCSS Math Professional Development Module 3, Week 2 Digging into the CCSS, part 1.
Grade 1 – Module 5 Module Focus Session
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
Agenda. Mathematical Practices 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3. Construct viable arguments.
Empowering Young Learners through the Standards for Mathematical Practice Juli K. Dixon, Ph.D. University of Central Florida
Transforming Teaching & Learning Grades May 22, 2014 Transition To The Common Core.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
©2001 CBMS Math Preparation of Teachers Teachers need to study the mathematics of a cluster of grade levels, both to be ready for the various ways in which.
Tools for Teachers Linking Assessment and Learning “Assessment should be an integral part of teaching. It is the mechanism whereby teachers can learn how.
K-6 Geometry Progression In Practice Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Transforming Geometric Instruction Part 1 Understanding the Instructional Shifts in the Iowa Core Mathematics Standards Grades 6-8.
Calculators Not! Why Not? Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE SDCTM Feb.8, 2014.
Elementary Mathematics
Identify & Describe 3-D Shapes Unit of Study: 3-Dimentional Geometry Global Concept Guide: 1 of 3.
Developing Geometric Reasoning Mary Jane Schmitt August 22–24, 2006 Washington, DC.
Developing Geometric Reasoning K-2 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class March 14, 2011 Paige Richards and Dana Thome.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Ratios Grade 6 – Module 5.
Valerie Mills NCSM President Oakland Schools, Waterford MI.
Grade 2 – Module 8 Module Focus Session
Math in Focus Singapore Math By Marshall Cavendish
Geometry Grades 3-5. Goals:  Build an understanding of the mathematical concepts within Geometry, Measurement, and NBT Domains  Analyze and describe.
Geometry Grades K-2. Goals:  Build an understanding of the mathematical concepts within the Geometry Domain  Analyze how concepts of Geometry progress.
How to read the grade level standards Standards Clusters Domains define what students should understand and be able to do. are groups of related standards.
EMSE 3123 Math and Science in Education
Shape Group 1 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
TIPM3 Second and Third Grade Geometry November 3, 2010.
Are We Ready to Implement the Common Core Standards in Mathematics ? Katy White based on a presentation by DR. WESLEY BIRD
Lunch and Learn: A Collaborative Time for North Carolina Teachers Your Presenter Information.
1 Exploring Focus in the 2011 MA Curriculum Framework for Mathematics Exploration Activity : Examining the Critical Areas in Mathematics April 2011.
6.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 6 29 JUNE 2015 SEQUENCING BASIC RIGID MOTIONS; THE KOU-KU THEOREM.
Math 5 Unit Review Instructor: Mrs. Tew Turner. In this lesson we will review for the unit assessment and learn test taking strategies.
T1PM3 4 th and 5 th grade Math Institute Focus on Geometry, Measurement and Data & The Eight Mathematical Practice September 27, 2011.
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
Class 4: Part 1 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class April 4, 2011.
The Art of Questioning: Implementing the Mathematical Practice Standards Grades 6-12 Created by: ISBE Math Content Area Specialist Content contained is.
Overview of CCSS Statistics and Probability Math Alliance September 2011.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Understanding Shape in Kindergarten and Grade 1 Common Core.
Instructional Planning Model Getting Started -- Materials and Resources Planning the Mathematics Correlating Resources Putting It All Together Review and.
Beyond Slope and Points David Harris, Escondido USD/K12 Alliance Susan Gomez Zwiep, CSU Long Beach/K12 Alliance CMC Palm Springs Oct, 2013 Lesson Available:
Professional Growth Systems And Nevada Academic Content Standards Strengthening teacher capacity through powerful feedback March 20, 2015.
Module 3 January, 2009 Sponsored by The Kentucky Department of Education And The University of Kentucky (PIMSER)
Explorations in Geometry Group 3: Theresa Abromitis Stephen Kish Kimberly Kozar.
Alaska Measures of Progress (AMP) Summative Assessment Framework 1.
C ALL FOR C HANGE K-5 Math Presenter: JoAnn Coleman.
USING VIDEO TO THINK ABOUT WHAT THE MATH PRACTICES LOOK LIKE IN K-5 CLASSROOMS.
College and Career Readiness Conference Middle School Geometry Summer 2015.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Geometry 1 st Grade Geometry Lesson. Content Strand Addressed Geometry Strand Students will: use visualization and spatial reasoning to analyze characteristics.
TIPM3 March 2, 2011 Kindergarten and First Grade.
Geometry, Quarter 2, Unit 2.3 Proving Theorems About Parallelograms Days: 11.
PUTTING THE COMMON CORE MATH STANDARDS INTO ACTION Sandy Christie Craig Bowman 2012.
Using Geoboards. Identify and describe shapes (squares, circles, triangles, rectangles, hexagons, cubes, cones, cylinders, and spheres). This entire cluster.
Geometry standards MATH 124. Kindergarten Identify and describe shapes. CCSS.Math.Content.K.G.A.1 Describe objects in the environment using names of shapes,
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Transitioning to the Common Core for Mathematics February 24 th, 2012.
CHAPTER 20 Geometric Thinking and Geometric Concepts
K-6 Geometry Progression In Practice
Grade 6 – Module 5 Module Focus Session
Connecting Two- and Three-Dimensional Figures
The National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics
Presented by: Angela J. Williams
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
Progression of Geometry
K-6 Geometry Progression In Practice
Mathematical Practice Standards
Ginny Bohme Sam Buhler Linda Mannhardt
Presentation transcript:

HOW MIGHT WE SUPPORT TEACHERS AS THEY DEEPEN THEIR OWN UNDERSTANDING AND EXPLORE STUDENT THINKING RELATED TO THE K-6 GEOMETRY PROGRESSION? GINI STIMPSON

GOAL  What? We will analyze the K-6 Geometry Progression  How? By learning about its structure, developing a shared understanding of the vocabulary, and then reading the progressions document  Why? So that we can anticipate experiences and resources that teachers may need in order to implement the Common Core State Standards in the K-6 Geometry strand.

KEY FOCUS FOR WORK WITH TEACHERS AND STUDENTS From the Mathematics Teaching Practices Support productive struggle in learning mathematics. From the TDG Math Habits of Mind I explore MISTAKES and STUCK POINTS to start new lines of reasoning and new math learning. From the Common Core Standards for Mathematical Practice Math Practice 3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.

BACKGROUND  Developing Mathematical Ideas (DMI): Measuring Space in 1, 2, & 3 Dimensions & Examining Features of Shape  K-8 Work Teams that focused on mistakes and stuck points related to multiplication  Working with representative teachers from each elementary school in a large school district who worked to make sense of each K-5 progression and related work from the Illustrative Mathematics website and then identified necessary work that all teachers at their grade level would need to prepare them for addressing the Common Core Content and Practice Standards.

READ THE IMPORTANCE OF SPATIAL STRUCTURING IN GEOMETRIC REASONING Be prepared to share:  How would you describe “spatial structuring” in your own words?  What are you curious about in terms of how students’ you work with would do some of these problems?  How might teachers use ideas from this article to find more about their own students thinking?

ANTICIPATING STUDENTS CONFUSIONS Read Case 19: A Big Clump of Cake from DMI: MS123.  What does Kalil understand at the end of this case that he did not understand when his teacher first conferred with him?  How does reading this case impact how you are thinking about introducing and working with arrays or supporting students who do not recognize why arrays are a model for multiplication?

PREPARE TO READ THE K-6 GEOMETRY PROGRESSION The Geometry Progression discusses the most important goals for elementary geometry according to three categories.  Geometric shapes, their components (e.g., sides, angles, faces), their properties, and their categorization based on those properties  Composing and decomposing geometric shapes  Spatial relations and spatial structuring

LEVELS OF GEOMETRIC THINKING (SEE NOTE IN PAGE 3 MARGIN)  Visual. Students recognize shapes, e.g., a rectangle “looks like a door.”  Descriptive. Students perceive properties of shapes, e.g., a rectangle has four sides, all its sides are straight, and opposite sides have equal length.  Analytic. Students characterize shapes by their properties, e.g., a rectangle has opposite sides of equal length and four right angles.  Abstract. Students understand that a rectangle is a parallelogram because it has all the properties of parallelograms

IDENTIFY THE GRADE LEVEL THAT WILL BE YOUR FOCUS Within your group, identify a person that will responsible for providing a detailed description of the work at a particular grade level, K, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6. Read the details for the three grade levels, the one immediately before your focus grade, your focus grade, and the one following your focus grade. Summarize the three or four key points that you want to share with the whole group. As time permits, read pages 2-5 and page 20.

QUIET READING TIME  What ideas and/or words are you puzzling about so you want to discuss with others in your table group?  What seems new or different?  What connections are made between the geometry strand and other mathematics at a particular grade level?

SHARE INSIGHTS AND QUESTIONS WITH YOUR GROUP  Each person should share their key points including what you noticed in terms of what may be new or different including connections with other strands within a grade level.  Identify ideas and/or words that are puzzling.

WHY LITTLE GEOMETRY MAY BE TAUGHT K Additional Clusters  Describe and compare measurable atributes  Identify and decribe shapes  Analyze, compare, create, and compare shapes Grades 1 and 2 Additional Cluster  Reason with shapes and their attributes Grade 3 Supporting Cluster  Reason with shapes and their attributes

Grade 4 Additional Clusters  Geometric measurement: understand concepts of angle and angle measure  Draw and identify lines, and angles, and classify shapes by properties of their lines and angles Grade 5 Major Cluster  Geometric measurement: understand concepts of volume and relate volume to multiplication and to addition Grade 5 Additional Cluster  Graph points on the coordinate plane to solve real-world and mathematical problems Grade 6 Supporting Cluster  Solve real-world problems involving area, surface area, and volume.

QUICK IMAGES FROM DMI: MS123 Gather interlocking cubes. After seeing an image for 3 seconds, you will build it. You will be given a second 3-second look at the image so that you can revise your structure, if needed.

SHARE YOUR THINKING  What aspects of the figure did you note as you worked to hold an image of it in your mind?  In other words, how did you remember the structure?

HOW DID YOU REVISE YOUR APPROACH? Talk with your elbow partner about how you changed the way you looked at the shapes after hearing from other participants or reflecting on your own thinking.

DO SOME GEOMETRY ASSESSMENT TASKS FROM ILLUSTRATIVE MATHEMATICS What additional questions or insights do you have as a result of working through these assessment tasks?

FEEDBACK