Austin Troy, PhD, And Brian Voigt, University of Vermont Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jackson Community Comprehensive Plan – Big Picture Planning for Natural Resources Keeping it Green: Conserving Your Future Through Land Use Planning Presented.
Advertisements

Concurrent Plan Updates?. Plan Update Requirements Cost-Affordable Transportation Plan Horizon Year Due December 2014 Hillsborough County Comprehensive.
WELCOME URBAN AND RURAL SERVICE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE.
Fiscal Neutrality Methodology Development Public Information | January 16 th, 2015 Sarasota 2050 Resource Management Area (RMA) Policy.
Modeling Land Use Change in Chittenden County, VT Austin Troy*, Associate Professor, Brian Voigt*, PhD Candidate,
Using HIA on Climate Change Policy: A Training Course for Public Health Professionals Chapter 4: Scoping.
Evaluating the future: forecasting urban development using the urbansim land use model in el paso, tx. Quinn P. Korbulic.
 Matt Gates.  Forecast sprawl  Guide long-range population and employment forecasts o For the region o For individual counties  Allocate growth to.
Community Planning Land Use Education Project Charlotte P. Burckhardt, AICP, PCP Principal Planner.
City Planner Career Information Copyright Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Role of Economics in W&W Project and in Climate Change Projects Explain how land use patterns evolve over time Forecast future land use change Determine.
Using the Land Use in Central Indiana (LUCI) Models in Transportation Planning John R. Ottensmann Center for Urban Policy and the Environment Indiana University.
Modeling Land Use Change in Chittenden County, VT Using UrbanSim Austin R. Troy, PhD Brian Voigt, Research Assistant
Luci2 Urban Simulation Model John R. Ottensmann Center for Urban Policy and the Environment Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
Lec 15 LU, Part 1: Basics and simple LU models (ch6.1 & 2 (A), ch (C1) Get a general idea of urban planning theories (from rading p (A)
Transportation Planning CE 573 Lecture 2. Issues for Today Transportation planning and decision making Multimodal transportation planning Travel behavior.
CE 573 Transportation Planning1 Societal Changes and Transportation Planning CE 573 Transportation Planning Lecture 8.
Integrated Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Modeling Alan Borning, University of Washington Mark Simonson, Puget Sound Regional Council NSF.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group presented by Ron West Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Fourth Meeting June 26, 2012 "The Cleaner Greener Lincoln initiative will make the City of Lincoln an active leader in the area of sustainability, building.
Third Meeting May 22, 2012 "The Cleaner Greener Lincoln initiative will make the City of Lincoln an active leader in the area of sustainability, building.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
1 Multi-Sector Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Metropolitan Washington Region Land Use and Transportation Strategies Prepared for:
Collaboration Collaboration Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Housing choices and opportunities Housing choices and.
Sprawl Dynamics Prof. Philip C. Emmi College of Architecture + Planning University of Utah RailVolution 2005.
ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.
E151U: Housing and Urban Development Policy Housing Planning.
UW Cooperative Extension Land Use Education Programs Comprehensive Planning Overview March 15th Osceola WI Polk County UWEX-Cooperative Extension.
Florida Department of Transportation District 5 Regional Commuter Assistance Program Courtney Miller Program Manager.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Land Use Sustainable Development Environmental Justice.
Chittenden County Land Use - Transportation Decision Support System November 19, 2003 Chittenden County Metropolitan.
Planning for Smart Growth in Rural New Hampshire SWRPC Southwest Region Planning Commission.
QGET -- Scenarios Analysis Quality Growth Efficiency ToolsNovember 14, 1998 November 15, 1999 Strategy Analysis Prepared for: Envision Utah Prepared by:
Briefing on Comprehensive Value Analysis Framework for Transit Investments HDR|Decision Economics National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
Chapter 8 – The Comprehensive Plan 10/3/ The Goals of Comprehensive Planning  Comprehensive plans are usually prepared for a period of 20 years.
Smart Growth Implementation Assistance Montgomery County, MD Fact Sheet More about Smart Growth at Preliminary Project.
1 CITY DEVELOPMENT WORLD AFRICA 2006 Johannesburg, South Africa November 6-9, 2006 TEAMWORK: WHY METROPOLITAN ECONOMIC STRATEGY IS THE KEY TO GENERATING.
Modeling in the “Real World” John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council April 19, 2005.
A model-based approach towards assessing landscape restoration activities in Watershed 263, Baltimore, MD Brian Voigt University of Vermont - Spatial Analysis.
UPlan: How It Works and How to Get Started A description for the rest of us Nathaniel Roth Information Center for the Environment University of California,
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
1 DESTINATION 2030 Update KRCC TransPol and TransTac Meeting Scoping Results Criteria Alternatives May 22, 2008.
TRANSPORTATION ECONOMIC AND LAND USE SYSTEM (TELUS) TELUM – Interactive Software for Evaluating Land Use Implications of Transportation Projects 11th TRB.
SELMA Fifth Project Management Committee Meeting WP-9 Scenario Testing UrbanSim Scenarios Eyal Ashbel.
UrbanSim: Informing Public Deliberation about Land Use and Transportation Decisions using Urban Simulations Alan Borning Dept of Computer Science & Engineering.
 The SNC’s mission is to initiate, encourage and support efforts that improve the environmental, economic and social well- being of the Sierra Nevada.
4.0 Understanding the Local Economy Exploring the Human Resources/Economic Development Connection Community Choices: Public Policy Education Program 8.
Urban & Regional Infrastructure: Its Effect on the Development of Local Economies Moscow, 23 April 2008 Darrell Stanaford, Managing Director, Russia &
The Landuse Evolution and Impact Assessment Model L E A M Brian Deal LEAM Laboratory Department of Urban and Regional Planning University of Illinois.
Alternative Growth Futures Studio University of Colorado at Denver Sponsors: Custer Heritage Committee San Isabel Foundation Sonoran Institute.
Vital Signs 11: Development and Results of Sustainability Indicators 1 Presentation to NNIP Columbus, Ohio June 21, 2013 Matthew Kachura Research Associate.
The Smart Growth Strategy/ Regional Livability Footprint Project… Policies Shape Reality Alex Amoroso Principal Planner Association of Bay Area Governments.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 17 Transportation Planning Overview.
Comprehensive Plan Update. General, far-reaching vision to benefit the whole community Takes a long term view of issues Focuses on physical development.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
Centre for Transport Studies Imperial College 1 Congestion Mitigation Strategies: Which Produces the Most Environmental Benefit and/or the Least Environmental.
SWOT Strengths, Weakness, Opportunity, Threats BOCC Workshop February 1, 2011 BOCC Workshop February 1, 2011 Strategic Planning Group, Inc. 1.
Strategic Options for Integrating Transportation Innovations and Urban Revitalization (SOTUR) Stakeholder Scenario Building: Imagining Urban Futures Simulation.
Urban Institute Ireland/University College Dublin School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Policy, Dublin, Ireland Eda Ustaoglu.
Public Sector Leverages on Land Management in the Present Land Development Process in Asia Paul Baross Regional Development Dialogue 13, no. 1 (1992)
Overview of Sustainability Policy Issues CMAP Board of Directors October 10, 2007.
Monica Bansal Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the TPB CAC November 13, 2008 Progress on “CLRP Aspirations” & “What Would it Take?”
Chapter 10 The Urban World
Marriott-Slaterville, Utah March 2018
Chapter 13 Spatial Distribution of Employment and residence
2009 Minnesota MPO Conference August 11, 2009
MPO Board Presentation
Southwest Urban Growth Area Boundary Planning Study
Land Use 101: The Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

Austin Troy, PhD, And Brian Voigt, University of Vermont Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources Modeling the Future of Land Use in Chittenden County, VT Part 2: Scenarios

Alternative Scenarios Baseline vs. alternative Tool for evaluating potential effects of policies and for preparing for possible future contingencies Does not predict likelihood of policy adoption How does it work? Simulate conditions of that scenario by changing one or more of the model’s inputs, adding or subtracting a model variable, or encoding behaviors

Categories 1.Zoning 2.Ground Transportation Investments 3.State and Regional Policy 4.Economic and Demographic Changes 5.Non-transportation Capital Investments One breakout group for each category

Zoning Hypothetical changes to zoning district boundaries and rules that planners and other stakeholders might be interested in modeling. Examples: upzoning, downzoning or use changes for specific areas where there is an interest in promoting growth, preservation, etc.

Ground transportation investments Hypothetical transportation infrastructure investments that planners and other stakeholders are interested in modeling the effects of. Examples: new roads/highways, exits, interchanges, lane additions, new rail systems, more mass transit, carpooling, etc.

State and Regional Policy Hypothetical state and county level policies, or changes to existing policies, that are expected to affect land use or transportation Examples: Tax policies –property tax, current use, gas tax, speculation tax, etc. State land use policies –growth centers, Act 250, urban service boundary, changes to current use development penalties, etc. Transportation policies –tolls, congestion pricing, etc. Environmental conservation policies –wetlands and shoreline protection, etc Out of attainment with air quality standards

Economic and Demographic Change Economic and demographic changes to the county, some of which are planned other of which are not Economic Examples: –loss or gain of a major employer, significant increases or decreases in business taxes, increased telecommuting, spike in the price of energy, energy shortages, new federal requirements for fuel economy or tailpipe emissions, changes in prices of raw materials, changes to the economy due to global warming Demographic Examples: –regional baby boom, a regional influx of residents from other states due to global warming, changes in household characteristics

Non-Transportation Capital Investments All capital investments not covered by the ground transportation group Examples: –Utilities: water, sewer, power, telecomm –Schools –Public facilities (libraries, post offices, courthouses) –Airports/Ports/Ferries –Parks/Open Space –Joint public/private developments –Major public institutions

Implementation methods depend on what is being modeled: 1.Changes to control totals 2.Changes to base year dbase tables 3.Change to spatial inputs (GIS editing) 4.Adding/changing variables to UrbanSim 5.Adding/changing variables to TransCAD 6.Combination of above 7.Programming new behaviors/ processes

Difficulty level 1.Changes to control totals 2.Changes to base year dbase tables 3.Change to spatial inputs (GIS editing) 4.Adding/changing variables to UrbanSim 5.Adding/changing variables to TransCAD 6.Combination of above 7.Programming new behaviors ? = increased level of uncertainty due to lack of prior trends or data to analyze or lack of knowledge of behavioral responses ? ? ? ?

Zoning difficulty examples Zoning density or use changes Zoning district merges Minor zoning boundary edits Major zoning boundary changes

Ground transportation investments difficulty examples Proposed features with GIS available Digitizing –Single road/highway feature –New intersections –New interchanges/exits –New rail routes Coding –New speed limits –Extra lanes/ new widths ?

State and Regional Policy difficulty examples Wetlands / riparian protection, etc. Urban service boundary Gas tax change Property tax policy change Growth Centers (if boundaries available) Act 250 change Tolls, congestion pricing, etc. Out of attainment with air quality standards ? ? ? ? ? ?

Economic and demographic change difficulty examples Regional baby boom Influx of residents from other states Changes in household sizes Loss or gain of a major employer Change in business taxes Increased telecommuting Spike in the price of energy/ shortage Fuel economy/ emissions standards Raw materials price spike ? ? ? ? ? ?

Non-transportation capital investments difficulty examples Water/ sewer Power/telecomm Parks/Open Space Major public institutions Public facilities Airports/Ports/Ferries Schools Joint public/private developments ? ? ? ? ? ?

Next steps 1.Your feedback on scenarios (15 min) Questions Suggestions for content and process 2.Break (10 min) 3.Breakout Groups (~50 min) 4.Dot voting on results 5.Wrap-up

Breakout Groups Goals: –Produce no more than four ranked scenarios –Give each a name and as much specification as possible Process –2 Facilitators per table –Generate and “aggregate” ideas –Rank, reduce and describe –Present to group, using poster paper –Use drawings on maps if necessary