HSAG Performance Improvement Training Statistical Testing Presented by Donald Grostic, MS Health Services Advisory Group, Inc. February 14, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HSAG Performance Improvement Projects Using Data to Develop Interventions and Statistical Testing to Evaluate Results Breakout Session #1 Florida EQR.
Advertisements

Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs) Technical Assistance for Florida Medicaid PMHPs August 21 st, 2007 Christy Hormann, MSW PIP Review Team Project.
WELCOME to the PIP Technical Assistance Training for Florida HMOs/PSNs We will begin shortly. Please place your phone on mute, unless you are speaking.
MCO Participation in External Quality Review Mandatory Activities During the SMMC Transition October 30, 2013 Presenter: Mary Wiley, BSW, RN, M.Ed. Project.
Four girls soccer teams took a random sample of players regarding the number of goals scored per game. The results are below. Use a significance level.
Health Services Advisory Group, Inc. Performance Improvement Projects Nursing Home Diversion Program Where Are We Now? Concurrent Breakout Session #2 Florida.
Welcome to the EQR Quarterly Meeting! Wednesday, March 26, :00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. (EDT) We will begin shortly. Call-in information is ,
Introduction to Basic Statistical Methodology. CHAPTER 1 ~ Introduction ~
1 Finding the Sample Mean  Given: The times, in seconds, required for a sample of students to perform a required task were: 6,  Find the sample mean.
Causal / Barrier Analysis Florida EQR Quarterly Meeting
External Quality Review Organization (EQRO) Kick-Off Meeting
Section 4.2: How to Look for Differences. Cross-Tabulations College student binge drinkers experienced many personal and social problems, the researchers.
SADC Course in Statistics Comparing Means from Independent Samples (Session 12)
Inferential Statistics
INFERENTIAL STATISTICS – Samples are only estimates of the population – Sample statistics will be slightly off from the true values of its population’s.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 11 Analyzing the Association Between Categorical Variables Section 11.5 Small Sample.
Difference Two Groups 1. Content Experimental Research Methods: Prospective Randomization, Manipulation Control Research designs Validity Construct Internal.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter 10 Inferring Population Means.
Division of Emergency Medicine Cincinnati Children’s Hospital
Slide 1 Long-Term Care (LTC) Collaborative PIP: Medication Review Tuesday, October 29, 2013 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP.
1 The retention rate is a measure of employment duration and answers the question, “How well do workforce development participants sustain employment?”
Chi-Square Test of Independence Practice Problem – 1
Performance Improvement Projects: Validating Process, Tips, and Hints Eric Jackson, MA Research Analyst October 19, 2009.
Slide 1 Florida SIPP Quarterly Meeting Presenter: Jolene Rasmussen, MS Healthcare Analyst, PIP Review Team March 23, 2011.
Copyright © 2013, 2010 and 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section Inference about Two Means: Independent Samples 11.3.
Chapter 12 Analysis of Variance. An Overview We know how to test a hypothesis about two population means, but what if we have more than two? Example:
NHDP Quarterly Meeting Performance Improvement Projects September 30th, 2010 Presenters: Don Grostic, MS Associate Director, Research and Analysis Yolanda.
Statistical Significance for a two-way table Inference for a two-way table We often gather data and arrange them in a two-way table to see if two categorical.
HSAG Performance Improvement Training Statistical Testing Presented by Donald Grostic, MS Health Services Advisory Group, Inc. January 11, 2011.
Section 3.3: The Story of Statistical Inference Section 4.1: Testing Where a Proportion Is.
Page 1 Current and Upcoming EQR Activities for Contract Year Four FY 2009 – 2010 Yolanda Strozier, MBA Project Manager, State & Corporate Services.
to accompany Introduction to Business Statistics
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance Prepaid Mental Health Plans Thursday, March 29, :30 a.m. – 12:15 p.m. Cheryl L. Neel, RN,
Logic and Vocabulary of Hypothesis Tests Chapter 13.
Slide 1 HMO/PSN Quarterly Meeting Performance Improvement Projects September 26, 2011 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Project Manager, PIP Review.
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance – PIP 101 Monday, June 18, :30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. David Mabb, MS, CHCA Sr. Director of Statistical.
Testing Hypotheses about a Population Proportion Lecture 29 Sections 9.1 – 9.3 Fri, Nov 12, 2004.
Testing Hypotheses about a Population Proportion Lecture 31 Sections 9.1 – 9.3 Wed, Mar 22, 2006.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting PMHP Collaborative PIP Follow-up Within Seven Days After Acute Care Discharge for a Mental Health Diagnosis January 11, 2012 Presenter:
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Database Training & Provider Briefing July 25, 2014.
NHDP Plans Quarterly Meeting Performance Improvement Projects September 13, 2011 Presenter: Don Grostic, MS Associate Director, State and Corporate Services.
Section 6.4 Inferences for Variances. Chi-square probability densities.
Chi-Square Goodness of Fit Test. In general, the chi-square test statistic is of the form If the computed test statistic is large, then the observed and.
Part of a set or part of a whole. 3 4 =Numerator the number of parts = Denominator the number that equals the whole.
Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP Review Team.
Chapter 11: Categorical Data n Chi-square goodness of fit test allows us to examine a single distribution of a categorical variable in a population. n.
Performance Improvement Projects: From Idea to PIP
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
One-Sample Inference for Proportions
Testing Hypotheses about a Population Proportion
Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Surveillance. Public Health Approach Surveillance What is the Problem ? Problem Risk Factor Identification : What Is the Cause ? Intervention Evaluation.
Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance Nursing Home Diversion Programs Thursday, March 29, :30 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Cheryl L. Neel,
Fractions VIII Subtracting Like Denominators
Project Name: Country:
Performance Improvement Projects Technical Assistance – PIP 101
Performance Improvement Project (PIP) Reviews
Summary of NHDP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings
Getting Started BPS 7e Chapter 0 © 2014 W. H. Freeman and Company.
Performance Improvement Projects: From Idea to PIP
STATISTICS IN A NUTSHELL
Fractions VIII Subtracting Like Denominators
Presenter: Kate Bell, MA PIP Reviewer
Testing Hypotheses about a Population Proportion
Fractions VIII Subtracting Like Denominators
Fractions VIII Subtracting Like Denominators
Presentation transcript:

HSAG Performance Improvement Training Statistical Testing Presented by Donald Grostic, MS Health Services Advisory Group, Inc. February 14, 2008

Agenda I.Background  Why do statistical testing?  When is statistical testing used?  Which PIP Activities and Evaluation Elements does statistical testing apply? II.What statistical test do I use?  Chi-square test of inference  How is the retention rate numerator and denominator used in a chi-square test?  Website recommendation for Chi-square test  How do I interpret the results of the Chi-square test? III.Question and answer session

Background Why do statistical Testing? –The CMS Protocols require that statistical testing be used to prove that any improvement in rates is real. –Without statistical testing, a PIP would not meet the CMS Protocols.

Background (continued) When is statistical testing used? –After collecting retention rate baseline data (four quarters of data equaling a year end roll up), completing a causal barrier analysis, implemented interventions and completing a first re-measurement (four more quarters of data equaling the second year end roll up). –At this point (after eight quarters of data has been collected and rolled up into two year end rates), statistical testing should be completed to compare the annual roll up baseline retention rate to the annual roll up first re-measurement rate. –Statistical testing would also need to be performed between the annual re-measurement 1 and re-measurement 2.

Background (continued) Which PIP Activities and Evaluation Elements does statistical testing apply? –Activity VIII Evaluation Element 7: Identifies statistical differences between initial measurement and re- measurement. –Activity IX Evaluation Element 4: There is statistical evidence that observed improvement is true improvement. –Activity X Evaluation Element 1: Repeated measurements over comparable time periods demonstrate sustained improvement, or that a decline in improvement is not statistically significant.

Chi-square Test What statistical test should I use? –Retention rate is calculated using a numerator and denominator. When a rate is calculated, the chi-square test is used. –For example if the annual roll up for the baseline year had 20 clients retained out of 42 total clients, the retention rate would be 20/42 = 0.47x100 = 47.6 %. –If in the annual roll up first re-measurement had 60 clients retained out of 78 total clients, the retention rate would be 60/78 = x100 = 76.9%.

Chi-square Test (continued) Hypothetical Retention Rate data showing chi-square test Time Frame (X) Retained Client (Y) Baseline R1 Total Yes (numerator) No Total (denominator) How is the retention rate numerator and denominator used in a chi-square test?

Chi-square Test (continued) Website recommendation for a chi-square test. – Time Frame (X) Retained Client (Y) Baseline R1 Total Yes (numerator) No Total (denominator) Note: Only enter numbers with arrows

Chi-square Test (continued) Chi-square value = P-value =

Chi-square Test (continued) How do I interpret the results of the statistical test? –If the p-value is less than 0.05, then the change in retention rates is statistically significant. –Since the p-value is equal to which is less than 0.05, the conclusions is that there is a statistically significant improvement in the annual roll up retention rates between the baseline (47.6%) and first re-measurement (76.9%).

Questions ?