Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Harm and Etiology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title of the journal club (Paper & authors; presenters)
Advertisements

Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Basic Statistics.
Step 5: Communication and Evaluation. Table of Contents Communication Communicate with Your Patients Video 1 Communicate with Health Professionals Evaluation.
Comparing Two Proportions (p1 vs. p2)
Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Diagnosis.
Evidence-Based Medicine Critical Appraisal of Therapy Department of Medicine - Residency Training Program Tuesdays, 9:30 a.m. - 12:00 p.m., UW Health Sciences.
Measures of Effect: An Introduction Epidemiology Supercourse Astana, July 2012 Philip la Fleur, RPh MSc(Epidem) Deputy Director, Center for Life Sciences.
Introduction to Critical Appraisal : Quantitative Research
Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews Douglas Newberry.
CRITICAL APPRAISAL Dr. Cristina Ana Stoian Resident Journal Club
Critical Appraisal of an Article on Therapy. Why critical appraisal? Why therapy?
Ghassan Fraij EBM Board Review 6/8/2009. Epidemiologic Measures ► Measures of disease occurrence:  Risk (the likelihood that and individual will contract.
1 The Odds Ratio (Relative Odds) In a case-control study, we do not know the incidence in the exposed population or the incidence in the nonexposed population.
Statistics for Health Care
Critical Appraisal of an Article on Therapy (2). Formulate Clinical Question Patient/ population Intervention Comparison Outcome (s) Women with IBS Alosetron.
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
Absolute, Relative and Attributable Risks. Outcomes or differences that we are interested in:  Differences in means or proportions  Odds ratio (OR)
 Mean: true average  Median: middle number once ranked  Mode: most repetitive  Range : difference between largest and smallest.
Statistics for clinical research An introductory course.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 14 Screening and Prevention of Illnesses and Injuries: Research Methods.
DEB BYNUM, MD AUGUST 2010 Evidence Based Medicine: Review of the basics.
CAT 2: Therapy Maribeth Chitkara, MD Rachel Boykan, MD Stony Brook Long Island Children’s Hospital.
FRAMING RESEARCH QUESTIONS The PICO Strategy. PICO P: Population of interest I: Intervention C: Control O: Outcome.
Research Skills Basic understanding of P values and Confidence limits CHE Level 5 March 2014 Sian Moss.
Risk Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and outcome.
Critiquing for Evidence-based Practice: Therapy or Prevention M8120 Columbia University Suzanne Bakken, RN, DNSc.
How to Analyze Therapy in the Medical Literature (part 2)
Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group.
CAT 3 Harm, Causation Maribeth Chitkara, MD Rachel Boykan, MD.
Understanding real research 4. Randomised controlled trials.
Measures of Association Professor Mobeen Iqbal Shifa College of Medicine.
Appraising Evidence into our Practice. Objectives Deciding the research result into practice in specific context Interpreting/calculating Number Needed.
EBCP. Random vs Systemic error Random error: errors in measurement that lead to measured values being inconsistent when repeated measures are taken. Ie:
CRITICAL READING ST HELIER VTS 2008 RCGP Curriculum Core Statement Domain 3 AS.
Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland Pharmacy Critical Appraisal Skills Basic I NHS Education Scotland Produced in collaboration with the Association.
November 5, 2014 Matthew Tuck, MD Hospitalist, Veterans Affairs Medical Center Assistant Professor of Medicine, George Washington University.
VSM CHAPTER 6: HARM Evidence-Based Medicine How to Practice and Teach EMB.
Literature Appraisal Effectiveness of Therapy. Measures of treatment effect Statistical significance Odds ratio Relative risk Absolute risk reduction.
Stats Facts Mark Halloran. Diagnostic Stats Disease present Disease absent TOTALS Test positive aba+b Test negative cdc+d TOTALSa+cb+da+b+c+d.
Measuring associations between exposures and outcomes
Risks & Odds Professor Kate O’Donnell. When talking about the chance of something happening, e.g. death, hip fracture, we can talk about: risk and relative.
Compliance Original Study Design Randomised Surgical care Medical care.
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
Vanderbilt Sports Medicine Evidence-Base Medicine How to Practice and Teach EBM Chapter 5 : Therapy.
/ 161 Saudi Diploma in Family Medicine Center of Post Graduate Studies in Family Medicine EBM Therapy Articles Dr. Zekeriya Aktürk
Course: Research in Biomedicine and Health III Seminar 4: Critical assessment of evidence.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
CRITICAL APPARAISAL OF A PAPER ON THERAPY 421 CORSE EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE (EBM)
Critical appraisals: Treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL = a prospective study comparing the effect and value of intervention(s) against a control in human beings.
Article Title Resident Name, MD SVCH6/13/2016 Journal Club.
Critical Appraisal of a Paper Feedback. Critical Appraisal Full Reference –Authors (Surname & Abbreviations) –Year of publication –Full Title –Journal.
Risk Different ways of assessing it. Objectives Be able to define and calculate: Absolute risk (reduction) Relative risk (reduction) Number needed to.
2 3 انواع مطالعات توصيفي (Descriptive) تحليلي (Analytic) مداخله اي (Interventional) مشاهده اي ( Observational ) كارآزمايي باليني كارآزمايي اجتماعي كارآزمايي.
Number Needed to Treat Alex Djuricich, MD Indiana University School of Medicine Department of Medicine Ambulatory Rotation
GP ST2 Group, 28/9/11 Tom Gamble
EBM R1張舜凱.
HelpDesk Answers Synthesizing the Evidence
Interventional trials
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE
Dabigatran vs Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation – Results
remember to round it to whole numbers
Evidence-based Medicine Curriculum
Improved Patient Outcomes Best Available Clinical Evidence Patient’s
Interpreting Basic Statistics
EBM – therapy Dr. Tina Dewi J , dr., SpOG
Associate Fellow, Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, Oxford
PICO model for developing EBM questions
Evidence Based Medicine 2019 A.Bornstein MD FACC Assistant Professor of Medicine Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine Hempstead, Long Island.
Risk Ratio A risk ratio, or relative risk, compares the risk of some health-related event such as disease or death in two groups. The two groups are typically.
Basic statistics.
Presentation transcript:

Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Harm and Etiology

Table of Contents Clinical Statistics Calculator (Excel) Statistics for: –Harm/Etiology & Prognosis Control Event Rate (CER) & Experimental Event Rate (EER) Number Needed to Harm (NNH) –Absolute Risk Increase (ARI)Absolute Risk Increase (ARI) Relative Risk (RR) Odds Odds Ratio (OR) Practice Exercises

Making It Easier If available, find the best evidence in secondary sources where analysis has already occurred. If not pre-assessed, use critical appraisal worksheets to help you through the process.

Importance of Critically Appraising the Evidence Understanding the Limitations of the Author’s Analyses and Interpretations of the Data Assessing Internal Validity Assessing External Validity Identifying Potential Confounding Variables –Simpson’s ParadoxSimpson’s Paradox

Critical Appraisal Basics View movie as: –QuickTime (.mov)QuickTime (.mov) –Flash (.swf)Flash (.swf) Double-click on video for full-screen mode.

Generalized 2x2 Clinical Table Target Outcome +- Intervention/ Comparison +a (True Positives) b (False Positives) -c (False Negatives) d (True Negatives)

Control Event Rate (CER) and Experimental Event Rate (EER) Experimental Event Rate (EER) –The proportion of patients (in the intervention) who experienced the target outcome Control Event Rate (CER) –The proportion of patients (in the comparison group) who experienced the target outcome

Calculating CER and EER Experimental Event Rate (EER) –a/(a+b) Control Event Rate (CER) –c/(c+d)

Number Needed to Harm (NNH) The estimated number of people treated for each patient the treatment harms beyond baseline/control risk. So smaller numbers indicate greater probability of harm as a result of the treatment

Calculating NNH The calculation of NNH is the same as that of NNT, but the interpretation is differentiated by the adverse outcomes present in harm studies. Here the term NNH effectively replaces NNT. Similarly Absolute Risk Increase (ARI) is calculated in the same way that ARR is calculated but the intervention increases the amount of harm instead of therapeutic gain. NNH = 1/ARI = 1/|CER – EER|

NNH Video View movie as: –QuickTime (.mov)QuickTime (.mov) –Flash (.swf)Flash (.swf) Double-click on video for full-screen mode.

Relative Risk (RR) The number of treated/exposed patients with the target outcome for every patients in the control with the target outcome –(Also used in therapy articles) RR = EER / CER = (a/(a+b)) / (c/(c+d))

Relative Risk Video View movie as: –QuickTime (.mov)QuickTime (.mov) –Flash (.swf)Flash (.swf) Double-click on video for full-screen mode.

Odds The number of times the target outcome occurred in patients exposed to the risk for each time the target outcome occurred in patients not exposed to the risk.

Odds Ratio (OR) OR = (a/b) / (c/d) = a*d / b*c A measure of association When large, there is greater association

Try it on your own. Critical Appraisal Practice Exercises –From CEBM

Links to Other Websites and Hands-On Activities EBM Glossary –From CEBM Critical Appraisal Practice Exercises –From CEBM

Congratulations! You have successfully completed Step 3. The End