Workshop 3a, Contracting in a eBusiness environment eChallenges e-2008 Copyright 2008 Atos Origin An SLA framework for the GT4 Grid middleware Igor Rosenberg.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On the Use of Service Level Agreements in AssessGrid.
Advertisements

4. May 2007 Workshop on Dynamic Service Level AgreementsPage 1 Dynamic SLA Negotiation in BREIN Bastian Koller High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart.
The SLA cluster OGF20, May 2007 Igor Rosenberg ATOS ORIGIN
Project Overview Daniel Mallmann, Research Centre Juelich Alistair Dunlop, University of Southampton.
©2006 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre and other members of the SIMDAT consortium A SIMDAT Perspective on Grid Standards and Specifications.
Multi-level SLA Management for Service-Oriented Infrastructures Wolfgang Theilmann, Ramin Yahyapour, Joe Butler, Patrik Spiess consortium / SAP.
Policy based Cloud Services on a VCL platform Karuna P Joshi, Yelena Yesha, Tim Finin, Anupam Joshi University of Maryland, Baltimore County.
GRIA SLA Service Stephen C Phillips IT Innovation Centre.
NGCWE Expert Group A Reference Architecture for Prof. Juan Quemada NGCWE Expert Group IST Call 5 Preparatory Workshop on CWEs 13th April.
Efficient Event-based Resource Discovery Wei Yan*, Songlin Hu*, Vinod Muthusamy +, Hans-Arno Jacobsen +, Li Zha* * Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing.
Eugen Volk High Performance Computing Center – HLRS University Stuttgart AgroGrid Composition and Monitoring of dynamic Supply Chains.
A SLA evaluation Methodology in Service Oriented Architectures V.Casola, A.Mazzeo, N.Mazzocca, M.Rak University of Naples “Federico II”, Italy Second University.
1 GRAAP: Why do we need SLAs? Omer Rana
Polish Infrastructure for Supporting Computational Science in the European Research Space EUROPEAN UNION Services and Operations in Polish NGI M. Radecki,
SmartER Semantic Cloud Sevices Karuna P Joshi University of Maryland, Baltimore County Advisors: Dr. Tim Finin, Dr. Yelena Yesha.
1 Part IV Capacity Planning Methodology © 1998 Menascé & Almeida. All Rights Reserved.
CoreGRID Workpackage 5 Virtual Institute on Grid Information and Monitoring Services Authorizing Grid Resource Access and Consumption Erik Elmroth, Michał.
A Service Platform for On-Line Games DebanJan Saha, Dambit Sahu, Anees Shaikh (IBM TJ Watson Research Center, NY) Presented by Gary Huang March 17, 2004.
Universität Dortmund Robotics Research Institute Information Technology Section Grid Metaschedulers An Overview and Up-to-date Solutions Christian.
Capability Maturity Model (CMM) Done By :Delayel Alhajeree.
W w w. h p c - e u r o p a. o r g Single Point of Access to Resources of HPC-Europa Krzysztof Kurowski, Jarek Nabrzyski, Ariel Oleksiak, Dawid Szejnfeld.
15/09/2015Semantic Week Page 1 Enhancing Service Selection by Semantic QoS Henar Muñoz Frutos Telefónica I+D.
Session, October 2008 eChallenges e-2008 Copyright 2008 Insert Org Logo in Master slide Software as a Service (SaaS) Through a Grid Network: Business and.
ASG - Towards the Adaptive Semantic Services Enterprise Harald Meyer WWW Service Composition with Semantic Web Services
Argumentation and Trust: Issues and New Challenges Jamal Bentahar Concordia University (Montreal, Canada) University of Namur, Belgium, June 26, 2007.
Semantic Interoperability Berlin, 25 March 2008 Semantically Enhanced Resource Allocator Marc de Palol Jorge Ejarque, Iñigo Goiri, Ferran Julià, Jordi.
AMPol-Q: Adaptive Middleware Policy to support QoS Raja Afandi, Jianqing Zhang, Carl A. Gunter Computer Science Department, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
SmartGRID Ongoing research work in Univ. Fribourg and Univ. Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland (HES-SO) SwiNG Grid Day, Bern, Nov. 26th, 2009 Ye HUANG.
Jarek Nabrzyski, Ariel Oleksiak Comparison of Grid Middleware in European Grid Projects Jarek Nabrzyski, Ariel Oleksiak Poznań Supercomputing and Networking.
Advanced Techniques for Scheduling, Reservation, and Access Management for Remote Laboratories Wolfgang Ziegler, Oliver Wäldrich Fraunhofer Institute SCAI.
Daniel Field Atos Origin. Overview What is Gridipedia? Contributing to Gridipedia Promotion of Gridipedia Grid Voices: Blogging about Grids and cloud.
Efficient Provisioning of Service Level Agreements for Service Oriented Applications Valeria Cardellini, Emiliano Casalicchio, Vincenzo Grassi, Francesco.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Semantic Web Services enabled B2B Integration Kotinurmi,Vitvar,
Holding slide prior to starting show. G-QoSM: Grid-aware Quality of Service Management by Rashid Al-Ali, Omer Rana, and David Walker.
IS Methodologies. Systems Development Life Cycle - SDLC Planning Planning define the system to be developed define the system to be developed Set the.
Middleware for Grid Computing and the relationship to Middleware at large ECE 1770 : Middleware Systems By: Sepehr (Sep) Seyedi Date: Thurs. January 23,
Cracow Grid Workshop ‘06 17 October 2006 Execution Management and SLA Enforcement in Akogrimo Antonios Litke Antonios Litke, Kleopatra Konstanteli, Vassiliki.
JRA Execution Plan 13 January JRA1 Execution Plan Frédéric Hemmer EGEE Middleware Manager EGEE is proposed as a project funded by the European.
Service Level Agreements for D- Grid Introducing Commercial Use Cases to an Academic e-Science Infrastructure Philipp Wieder,
Grid Business EGEE’07 business track Budapest, 2 October 2007 Csilla Zsigri
The BEinGrid SLA cluster Results and perspectives Igor Rosenberg, ATOS ORIGIN 20min talk at OGF23, June 2 nd 2008 Dynamic.
SOA-9: Implementing SOA in Financial Services Banco Comafi a Real Leading Case Hernan Aymard Sr Solution Architect Javier Betancourt Sr. Project Manager.
AN SLA-BASED RESOURCE VIRTUALIZATION APPROACH FOR ON-DEMAND SERVICE PROVISION Gabor Kecskemeti MTA SZTAKI International Workshop on Virtualization Technologies.
Workshop 12g, 26 October 2007 eChallenges e-2007 Copyright 2007 Commius consortium Commius: ISU via Michal Laclavík Institute of Informatics, Slovak.
BIS-Grid: Business Workflows for the Grid Stefan Gudenkauf 1, Felix Heine 2, André Höing 2, Guido Scherp 1 1 OFFIS Institute for Information Technology.
Seeking SC Feedback on Draft Technology Strategy and Roadmap for EarthCube Draft of 3 November 2015 The Technology and Architecture Committee (TAC) Chairs:
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. WSLA Language Specification
Software Project Management (SEWPZG622) BITS-WIPRO Collaborative Programme: MS in Software Engineering SECOND SEMESTER /1/ "The content of this.
Globus and PlanetLab Resource Management Solutions Compared M. Ripeanu, M. Bowman, J. Chase, I. Foster, M. Milenkovic Presented by Dionysis Logothetis.
Copyright © 2010, Performance and Power Management for Cloud Infrastructures Hien Nguyen Van; Tran, F.D.; Menaud, J.-M. Cloud Computing (CLOUD),
Daniel Field, Atos Spain Towards the European Open Science Cloud, Heidelberg, 20/01/2016.
The Service Monitoring and Control Toolkit 1 Protect your business with an effective alert management system and high service availability.
B2A Pharma Prototype Implementation of an industrial-strength pharmaceutical workflow in a Grid environment Falk Zimmermann NEC Europe Ltd. IT Research.
How is built a mOSAIC of Clouds Dana PETCU West University of Timisoara, Romania Research Institute –Austria Timisoara Advanced.
INSERT PROJECT ACRONYM HERE BY EDITING THE MASTER SLIDE (VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER) Using WS-Agreement for Risk Management in the Grid European Commission.
Web Services Quality Model Dugki Min Konkuk University.
ETICS, EU-OMII and the Software Repository Andrea Caltroni, INFN Padova ETICS 1 st All-Hands Meeting, Budapest - May 29-31, 2006.
Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Agreement-based Workload and Resource Management Tiziana Ferrari, Elisabetta Ronchieri Mar 30-31, 2006.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Grid Resource Allocation Agreement Protocol GRAAP-WG working session 1 Thursday, 5 March, 2009 Catania, Sicily.
Grid Middleware Questionnaire - GRIA EchoGRID Second Strategic Workshop, 31st October, 2007 CNIC, Beijing Rowland Watkins, IT Innovation Centre.
Bob Jones EGEE Technical Director
Regional Operations Centres Core infrastructure Centres
Managing Service Level Agreements in Service Oriented Product Lines
Gestione di Service Level Agreements (SLA) in sistemi Grid
Dugki Min Konkuk University
Software Quality Engineering
GRUBER: A Grid Resource Usage SLA Broker
On the Use of Service Level Agreements in AssessGrid
ESS.VIP Validation Item 5.1
Presentation transcript:

Workshop 3a, Contracting in a eBusiness environment eChallenges e-2008 Copyright 2008 Atos Origin An SLA framework for the GT4 Grid middleware Igor Rosenberg Atos Origin Spain In collaboration with René Heek (HLRS) Ana Juan (Atos Origin)

Workshop 3a, Contracting in a eBusiness environment eChallenges e-2008 Copyright 2008 Atos Origin Motivation, problem area Recognised problem of assuring a decent Quality of Service (QoS) Service Level Agreements (SLAs) are probably the most important documents in every business-aware framework – at least they should be. Existing implementations supporting full SLA management?

Workshop 3a, Contracting in a eBusiness environment eChallenges e-2008 Copyright 2008 Atos Origin Research Objectives State-of-the-art of SLA frameworks Discover business needs based on real experiences Define and implement the missing pieces.

Workshop 3a, Contracting in a eBusiness environment eChallenges e-2008 Copyright 2008 Atos Origin Research approach, Methodology Middleware 1 Middleware 2 Mdw -n BE1 BE2BE3... BE25 … Other projects BEinGrid SLA Cluster: horizontal look at SLA best practices and gap-analysis

Workshop 3a, Contracting in a eBusiness environment eChallenges e-2008 Copyright 2008 Atos Origin Extract SLA Common Technical Requirements Needs expressed in a given scenario Define Common Capabilities A functionality which answers this technical need Define Design Patterns The middleware-agnostic architecture needed to provide this functionality Define Components Middleware-specific implementations The BEinGRID Methodology

Workshop 3a, Contracting in a eBusiness environment eChallenges e-2008 Copyright 2008 Atos Origin SLA Common Technical Requirements Common Capabilities Design Patterns Components Major Outcomes/Results –SLA Template Specification –Publication and Discovery –Negotiation –Optimization of Resource Selection –Monitoring –Evaluation –Re-negotiation –Accounting –SLA Negotiation for GT4 –SLA Optimisation of Resource Selection for GRASP, and for GT4 –SLA Monitoring and Evaluation for GRASP, and for GT4 –SLA Accounting for GRIA and GT4 Results: Requirements for generic SLA frameworks A gap analysis A set of components Justified by business benefits

Workshop 3a, Contracting in a eBusiness environment eChallenges e-2008 Copyright 2008 Atos Origin BEinGrid SLA Software components ComponentsMiddlewareStatusStandard Negotiation GT4 WS-Core RELEASED http :// WS-Agreement Optimisation GRASP GT4 RELEASED http :// W-SLA Monitoring and Evaluation (based on ganglia metrics) GRIA GT4 WS-Core NET 3.0 / WSRF 2.0 RELEASED ct/slaevalgria/ Nov ´08 RELEASED http :// GRIA SLA WS-Agreement AccountingGT4 WS-Core 4.0.5Nov ´08 WS-Agreement

Workshop 3a, Contracting in a eBusiness environment eChallenges e-2008 Copyright 2008 Atos Origin Most BEinGrid capacities are in the SLA framework  Negotiation  Optimisation  Monitoring and Evaluation  Accounting included Not yet contemplated Ganglia + MDS Global view of the SLA Framework for GT4 v4.0.5

Workshop 3a, Contracting in a eBusiness environment eChallenges e-2008 Copyright 2008 Atos Origin Comparison of capabilities BEinGRID GTv4 Framework TrustCoM Contract Management Framework Akogrimo Subsystem Assesgrid Architecture BEinGRID identified capabilities SLA Template specification  Publication and Discovery  Negotiation Optimization of Resource Selection  Monitoring Evaluation Re-negotiation  Accounting  Implementation TechnologyGTv4.Net, WCF.NET, GTv4 Gap analysis, comparing various frameworks

Workshop 3a, Contracting in a eBusiness environment eChallenges e-2008 Copyright 2008 Atos Origin Conclusion and outlook Conclusion –generic technical requirements, common capabilities, design patterns, and components. –Justify a simple architecture based on components: a framework for SLAs for GT4 –Compared it to other existing frameworks Future work: –Finish implementation (November 2008?) and validate –Add extra capabilities Publication and Discovery (marketplace?) Brokering of templates/negotation –Propose examples for Negotiation strategies Crisis Handling (changing strategies based on violations) –Prove interoperability with other frameworks (GRASP, GRIA, UNICORE)

Workshop 3a, Contracting in a eBusiness environment eChallenges e-2008 Copyright 2008 Atos Origin Thank you for your attention Any questions? Game over