March 1, 2012 Data Driven Instruction: Rigorous Data Meetings- Support & Accountability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
Advertisements

Make It Happen Leadership in Teaching - March 20, 2013.
Through Instructional Rounds
The Principal’s Role in Leading College and Career Readiness September, 2013.
CONDUCT A DIFFICULT CONVERSATION MAKE NOTES ON WHAT OCCURRED YOU’LL BE ASKED TO SHARE AT A FUTURE SESSION/OR ADMINISTRATIVE MEETING – YOUR CHOICE Homework…
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
FEBRUARY 26, 2014 (ELEMENTARY) FEBRUARY 27, 2014 (SECONDARY) DCA – Session 2.
Teacher Leadership Initiative Trainings
Reading Apprenticeship Lori Ceremuga and Cristine Wagner-Deitch.
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Oregon Reading First IBR V - Cohort B Coaches and Teachers Working Together to Improve Student Outcomes.
Building a Data-Driven School Hilary Shea September 26, 2006.
Supporting Positive Behaviour in Alberta Schools Dwaine M Souveny Central Alberta Regional Consortium D.M. Souveny Action Planning.
K–8 Session 3: Exploring the Domain Progressions in Grades K–8 Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Case Study It’s January 17 th. Anthony Jackson’s mother just called and wants to know what his recent test scores mean. She’s very excited that he’s showing.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Middle School Leadership Teams February 6, 2014.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Tools for Instruction and Assessment for the Maryland College- and Career-Ready Standards Time to Revisit Tools that will Inform Instruction.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Broome-Tioga BOCES Network Team… the ENTIRE team! (Pat Walsh, Barb Phillips, Jennifer Dove)
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Diverse Learners CoP: Co-teaching Facilitator: Donna Lupatkin Guest: Anna McTigue & Emily Fagan Education Development Center Date: May 18, 2009.
Looking at Student Work Collaborative Teams Focus on Teaching and Learning School Leadership Team Meeting Waterfront Place Hotel October 22 – 24, 2012.
AiZ and FT&LQ project Teachers working collaboratively in teams (PLTs, Triads) Teachers developing a shared understanding of effective teaching (PoLT,
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing Educators for Rater Agreement and Sustainability: Planning for Professional Learning.
State Role in Supporting Educators C HRIS M INNICH M AY 2012 | SCEE M EETING.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
SRBI One-Day Basic Day, Date Location, City Co-Trainers:Name, Agency Name, Agency 1.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) “101”
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
WELCOME! 1. PLEASE GET A DOT – AND PLACE IT ON THE KNOWLEDGE OF ELP STANDARDS CONTINUUM 2. HAVE A SEAT AT THE APPROPRIATE TABLE GROUP 1 GROUP 2 3. TURN.
February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership in the Common Core February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership for the Common Core NYSED Principal.
An Introduction to the Revised IPGs A Look at Structure & Alignment Elementary Mathematics Department for Elementary Principals September 16, 2009.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
EngageNY.org Session 1: Building a Change-Focused Culture November, 2013 Network Teams Institute.
Professional Learning Communities Session 2 Tenino High School December 15, 2009.
Tier I: Implementing Learning Walks & Instructional Rounds OrRTI Conference Tara M. Black, M.Ed. May 9,
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Instructional Coaching February 1, Welcome! Please Do Now: Take 2 minutes to write 3 lines: How would you define Instructional Coaching? What is.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
DATA INQUIRY TO IMPROVE TEACHING AND LEARNING DAY 1: GETTING STARTED WITH DATA Putnam/Northern Westchester BOCES Race to the Top Series December 8, 2011.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
Middle School Social Studies September 19, 2007 Department Meeting.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
PSRC FOCUSED INTERVENTION T EAM P ROCESS January 17, 2013 HAPPY NEW YEAR.
Data Driven Instruction & School-Based Inquiry What we know to this point…
Mid-year Professional Conversations 1. JESA Preparation Process 2 Learn—Engage with the content as a participant and surface questions/hot spots. Internalize—Identify.
Developed by Earl W. Hughes, KLA Regional Facilitator and PGES Integrated Design Team Member.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
P1. P2 P3 OFF-RAMPS ON THE ACHIEVEMENT HIGHWAY Unaligned interim assessments No structured time in school day Infrequent interim assessments Externally.
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
Data Driven Instruction It’s not….. What did the Teacher Teach? It’s ………. What did the Student Learn? Prepared by Robin Hecht.
1 Session #1 Superintendent’s Network January 7, & 28, 2009 “I wanted to change the world. But I have found out that the only thing one can be sure of.
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Teacher Based Teams Facilitating School Improvement in
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
SIR Observation Preparation and Report Examples
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

March 1, 2012 Data Driven Instruction: Rigorous Data Meetings- Support & Accountability

Man on Fire First Race So what do I do? Training  What makes his analysis effective?  How does this lead to effective action planning? Handout pg.2

Today’s Outcomes:  Identify the preparation steps for the data analysis meeting  Describe the components of effective one-on- one data meetings & team data meetings

Common Assessments Analysis Leadership (Facilitation & Accountability) Data Driven Culture Action Handout pg. 3

 Individual Teacher Analysis  Teacher- Principal Analysis Meeting  Grade Level or Team Level Analysis Meeting The process of identifying patterns of strengths and weaknesses that need to be addressed as well as students at the high and low ends that need small group and/ or individual support as well

IMMEDIATE: Ideal 48 hrs, max 1 wk turnaround BOTTOM LINE: Includes analysis at question level, standards level and overall—how well did the students do as a whole TEST-IN-HAND analysis: Teacher & instructional leader together TEACHER-OWNED analysis DEEP: Moves beyond “what” to “why” ANALYSIS: Taken from Driven By Data Handout pg.4

 Review the assessment given:  What content and skills did the assessment measure?  What common core standards are measured?  Determine how you can represent the data easily for others to view it as well:  How can you quantify the results?  What specific skills will you report?  How can you show how each student scored? Handout pg.5

 I dentify patterns of strengths & weaknesses  Identify standards that students are meeting & standards (or elements of standards) for which students need more targeted instruction & support  Identify whole group needs, small group needs, and individual needs (low & high) Handout pg.4

Review Sample Analysis Plans  What do you see?  How easy are these to complete?  What would teachers need support with? Handout pg.7

Kenyatta outperformed her peers on the first part of the test. She finished with the lowest score in the class because of her performance on the second half of the test. If we just looked at her overall score, a conclusion we might make is that she is the weakest academically in the class.

Time to Practice Choose:  ELA data chart Use Assessment Analysis Questions (pg 9) Handout pg.9

Preparing for the Data Analysis Meeting  What are the steps?  What is essential for the meeting to be time well spent?  What support with teachers & leaders need to prepare for data analysis meetings? Handout pg.8

Principal/Teacher Data Meetings  What are you noticing?  The Principal?  The Teacher?

Time to Practice Use: ◦ Tips for Effective Analysis Meetings (pg. 10) ◦ Note-taking sheet for the observer (pg.11) Taken from Driven By Data Handout s pgs.10 & 11

Principal/Teacher Data Meetings Role-Play Procedure (ABC)*  A- Principal (facilitate the meeting)  B- Teacher ( sharing data analysis & action plan thoughts)  C- Observer (takes notes to give feedback) *(ABC=Rotate roles) Handout s pgs. 10 & 11

Let’s debrief…  What happened?  What support would you need?  What support would the teacher need?

 Where are you now?  What could be next steps?  What support is needed? Common Assessments Analysis Leadership (Facilitation & Accountability) Data Driven Culture Action Handout pg.12

Man on Fire The Swim Meet How do we get this for every student? (Keep the focus on student learning…) Handout pg.2

 Where are you now?  What could be next steps?  What support is needed? Common Assessments Analysis Leadership (Facilitation & Accountability) Data Driven Culture Action

 March 27 – Analysis Into Action: Using (JCLC) Common Assessment Results  Connecting Common Core with DDI  Norms for collaborative data meetings  Protocols for team data meetings  Developing instructional action plans  Tips for follow-up & support of action plan implementation  On-going follow-up support with regional cluster groups and/ or in-districts

Take a few minutes to respond to the questions on your “Ticket Out the Door.” The thinking you share will help to guide our next sessions together. Thank you!