Total Monte Carlo and related applications of the TALYS code system Arjan Koning NRG Petten, the Netherlands Technical Meeting on Neutron Cross- Section.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Combined evaluation of PFNS for 235 U(n th,f), 239 Pu(n th,f), 233 U(n th,f) and 252 Cf(sf) (in progress) V.G. Pronyaev Institute of Physics.
Advertisements

EMERALD1: A Systematic Study of Cross Section Library Based Discrepancies in LWR Criticality Calculations Jaakko Leppänen Technical Research Centre of.
Modern nuclear data evaluation: straight from nuclear physics to applications Arjan Koning and Dimitri Rochman NRG Petten, the Netherlands ND-2010 April.
Modeling of Photonuclear Reactions & Transmutation of Long-lived Nuclear Waste in High Photon Fluxes M.-L. GIACRI-MAUBORGNE, D. RIDIKAS, J.-C.
Status of Fusion Nuclear Data Development Mohamed Sawan Tim Bohm U. Wisconsin-Madison Fusion Neutronics Team.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Simulation of βn Emission From Fission Using Evaluated Nuclear Decay Data Ian Gauld Marco Pigni.
Evaluation and Use of the Prompt Fission Neutron Spectrum and Spectra Covariance Matrices in Criticality and Shielding I. Kodeli1, A. Trkov1, R. Capote2,
U N C L A S S I F I E D LA-UR Current Status of the NJOY Nuclear Data Processing Code System and Initial ENDF/B-VII Data Testing Results Presented.
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Inventory Uncertainty Quantification using TENDL Covariance Data in Fispact-II.
Report on The Study of (α,n) Neutron Yield and Energy Spectrum Dongming Mei for the AARM collaboration 1.
Nuclear Data for ADS and Transmutation Joint TREND/SANDAT proposal for FP6 ADOPT- Meeting, Dec E. Gonzalez-Romero (CIEMAT) Introduction Sensitivity.
Status and needs of activation data for fusion Robin Forrest 1 and Jura Kopecky 2 1 Euratom/UKAEA Fusion Association Culham Science Centre, UK 2 JUKO Research,
MA and LLFP Transmutation Performance Assessment in the MYRRHA eXperimental ADS P&T: 8th IEM, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 9-11, 2004 E. Malambu, W.
Beta Delayed Neutron Covariances Tim Johnson, Libby McCutchan, Alejandro Sonzogni National Nuclear Data Center.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Association FZK-Euratom Status of Neutronics Tools & Data for IFMIF-EVEDA U. Fischer, S. Simakov.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's NNSA UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED | 1 LA-UR LANL Experience using.
Status of particle_hp Pedro Arce Emilio Mendoza Daniel Cano-Ott (CIEMAT, Madrid)
© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 1 Compensating Effects due.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory PREPRO Accomplishments Dermott “Red” Cullen Presented at the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program Technical Conference.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholz-Gemeinschaft Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Nuclear Data Library for Advanced Systems – Fusion Devices (FENDL-3)
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle
LLNL-PRES-?????? This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.
Current Status of Nuclear Data Processing Activities at KAERI Do Heon KIM Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute Consultants’ Meeting on “The New Evaluated.
Lesson 4: Computer method overview
Update of uncertainty file in the EAF project J. Kopecky 1 and R.A. Forrest 2 1 JUKO Research, the Netherlands 2 EURATOM/UKAEA Association, Culham, UK.
TENDL for FENDL Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands FENDL-3 meeting December 6-9, 2011, IAEA, Vienna.
Nuclear Data for Fission and Fusion Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands Post-FISA Workshop Synergy between Fission and Fusion research June ,
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency On the Compensating Effects in the Evaluated Cross Sections of 235 U A. Trkov, R. Capote International Atomic Energy.
Filling up FENDL with an all-in-one nuclear data evaluation and validation system around TALYS Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands FENDL-3 meeting.
Applied Nuclear Physics Group The final meeting of IAEA CRP – 6. 2 Calculation and Evaluation of (n,  ) Cross Sections for Producing 32 P,
Experimental Studies of Spatial Distributions of Neutrons Produced by Set-ups with Thick Lead Target Irradiated by Relativistic Protons Vladimír Wagner.
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority EAF-2010 – the best of a generation Jean-Christophe Sublet, Lee Packer Euratom/CCFE.
Luiz Leal, Wim Haeck, GAIA : Nuclear data processing for transport and criticality safety calculations at IRSN Luiz.
Benchmarks for Data Testing of Iron China Nuclear Data Center(CNDC) China Institute of Atomic Energy(CIAE) P.O.Box ,Beijing , P.R.China.
Activities Nuclear Data Service Yolanda Rugama OECD/NEA.
Workshop On Nuclear Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies, ICTP , A. Borella1 Monte Carlo methods.
Plans for Validation and General Observations Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute The University of Wisconsin-Madison 3 rd RCM on FENDL December.
Status of particle_hp Pedro Arce Emilio Mendoza Daniel Cano-Ott (CIEMAT, Madrid)
ANITA workshop, Uppsala, december 2008 ANITA neutron source Monte Carlo simulations and comparison with experimental data Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics.
Ondřej Svoboda Nuclear Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic Department of Nuclear Reactors, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical.
© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 1 WPEC/SG39 Short updates on.
1 FRENCH ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISION (CEA) - NUCLEAR ENERGY DIVISION Nuclear Data Needs, SG26, NEA data bank, 3 May 2006CEA/DER Cadarache Centre Gérald Rimpault.
Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Techniques in Monte Carlo Codes for Multi-Region Criticality Calculations Bradley T. Rearden Douglas E. Peplow Oak Ridge.
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Modern , d, p, n-Induced Activation Transmutation Systems EURATOM/CCFE.
Data Needs in Nuclear Astrophysics, Basel, June 23-25, 2006 Nuclear Astrophysics Resources of the National Nuclear Data Center B. Pritychenko*, M.W. Herman,
KIT – The cooperation of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology Evaluation.
Pavel Oblozinsky NSDD’07, St. Petersburg June 11-15, 2007 ENDF/B-VII.0 Library and Use of ENSDF Pavel Oblozinsky National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven.
School of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering North-West University
IFMIF d-Li neutron source: Status of codes and nuclear data S.P. Simakov Institut für Reaktorsicherheit, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe IEA Neutronics Meeting,
9 th session of the AER Working Group “f “ - Spent Fuel Transmutations Simulations of experimental “ADS” Mitja Majerle, Gael de Cargouet Nuclear Physics.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Association FZK-Euratom Review of IEAF-2001 Cross Section Data Libraries for IFMIF Activation.
RESULTS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW PROMPT FISSION NEUTRON SPECTRA DATA IN ROSFOND Gennady Manturov, IPPE 2nd RCM Prompt Fission Neutron Spectra, December.
Modern nuclear data evaluation: straight from nuclear physics to applications Arjan Koning NRG Petten, the Netherlands April , CIAE, Beijing.
1 Alushta 2016 CROSS SECTION OF THE 66 Zn(n,α) 63 Ni REACTION at CROSS SECTION OF THE 66 Zn(n, α) 63 Ni REACTION at E n = 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 MeV I. Chuprakov,
Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Evaluated neutron cross section.
E. Mendoza, D.Cano-Ott Nuclear Innovation Unit (CIEMAT)
1. Nuclear Data Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning1,2
Bayesian Monte-Carlo and Experimental Uncertainties
3. The optical model Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning1,2
Paul Scherrer Institut
JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH
Pebble Bed Reactors for Once Trough Nuclear Transmutation
Status of Vertical Neutron Camera Integration
Safety Demonstration of Advanced Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants
Nuclear Data for Reactor Fluxes
Improvements of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Simulation System (NFCSS) at IAEA
I.Hill, J.Dyrda, N.Soppera, M.Bossant
Performed experiments Nuclotron – set up ENERGY PLUS TRANSMUTATION
TALYS exercises I Arjan Koning Nuclear Data Section, NAPC
The TALYS nuclear model code II
Presentation transcript:

Total Monte Carlo and related applications of the TALYS code system Arjan Koning NRG Petten, the Netherlands Technical Meeting on Neutron Cross- Section Covariances September , IAEA, Vienna

2 Contents Introduction: TALYS code system Implications and possibilities: -Large scale nuclear data library production (TENDL) -“Total” Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation -Random search for the best data library Conclusions

3 TALYS code system A loop over nuclear physics, data libraries, processing and applications: Resonance parameters + uncertainties An EXFOR database with more uncertainties than errors The TALYS code The Reference Input Parameter Library (RIPL) Software for remaining reaction types (nubar, fns + unc.) For many nuclides: A set of adjusted model parameters + uncertainties + “non-physical evaluation actions” All major world libraries The ENDF-6 formatting code TEFAL NJOY, MCNP(X) + other codes A script that drives everything The secret: Insist on absolute reproducibility

4

5

6 Resonance Parameters. TARES Experimental data (EXFOR) Nucl. model parameters TALYS TEFAL Output ENDF Gen. purpose file ENDF/EAF Activ. file NJOY PROC. CODE MCNP FIS- PACT Nuclear data scheme + covariances -K-eff -Neutron flux -Etc. -activation - transmutation Determ. code Other (ORIGEN) +Uncertainties +Covariances +(Co)variances +Covariances TASMAN Monte Carlo: 1000 TALYS runs

7 Uncertainties for Cu isotopes

8 Application 1: TENDL TALYS Evaluated Nuclear Data Library, n, p, d, t,h, a and g libraries in ENDF-6 format 2400 nuclides (all with lifetime > 1 sec.) up to 200 MeV Neutrons: complete covariance data (MF31-MF35) MCNP-libraries (n,p and d) and multi-group covariances (n only) Production time: 2 months (40 processors) Strategy: Always ensure completeness, global improvement in 2010, Extra effort for important nuclides, especially when high precision is required (e.g. actinides): adjusted parameters (data fitting). These input files per nuclide are stored for future use. All libraries are always reproducible from scratch The ENDF-6 libraries are created, not manually touched Zeroing in on the truth for the whole nuclide chart at once

9 TENDL: Complete ENDF-6 data libraries MF1: description and average fission quantities MF2: resonance data MF3: cross sections MF4: angular distributions MF5: energy spectra MF6: double-differential spectra, particle yields and residual products MF8-10: isomeric cross sections and ratios MF12-15: gamma yields, spectra and angular distributions MF31: covariances of average fission quantities (TENDL-2010) MF32: covariances of resonance parameters MF33: covariances of cross sections MF34: covariances of angular distributions MF35: covariances of fission neutron spectra (TENDL-2010) and particle spectra (TENDL-2011) MF40: covariances of isomeric data (TENDL-2011)

10 IAEA covariance visualisation system (V. Zerkin)

11

12 Application 2: “Total” Monte Carlo Propagating covariance data is an approximation of true uncertainty propagation (especially regarding ENDF-6 format limitations) Covariance data requires extra processing and “satellite software” for application codes Alternative: Create an ENDF-6 file for each random sample and finish the entire physics-to-application loop. (Koning and Rochman, Ann Nuc En 35, 2024 (2008)

13 Resonance Parameters. TARES Experimental data (EXFOR) Nucl. model parameters TALYS TEFAL Output ENDF Gen. purpose file ENDF/EAF Activ. file NJOY PROC. CODE MCNP FIS- PACT Nuclear data scheme + covariances -K-eff -Neutron flux -Etc. -activation - transmutation Determ. code Other (ORIGEN) +Uncertainties +Covariances +(Co)variances +Covariances TASMAN Monte Carlo: 1000 TALYS runs

14 Resonance Parameters. TARES Experimental data (EXFOR) Nucl. model parameters TALYS TEFAL Output ENDF Gen. purpose file ENDF/EAF Activ. file NJOY PROC. CODE MCNP FIS- PACT Nuclear data scheme: Total Monte Carlo -K-eff -Neutron flux -Etc. - activation - transmutation Determ. code Other codes +Uncertainties +Covariances TASMAN Monte Carlo: 1000 runs of all codes

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22 Application: criticality benchmarks Total of random ENDF-6 files Sometimes deviation from Gaussian shape Rochman, Koning, van der Marck Ann Nuc En 36, 810 (2009) Yields uncertainties on benchmarks

23

24 Covariance versus Total Monte Carlo Advantages:Advantages: - Relatively quick- Exact - Use in sensitivity study- Requires only “main” software - Easier release (TENDL) Disadvantages:Disadvantages: - Approximative (cross-correlations)- (Computer) time consuming - No covariance for gamma production,- Backward (sensitivity) route DDX (MF36), etc. not obvious - Requires special processing - Requires covariance software for application codes

25

26 Application: SFR void coefficient KALIMER-600 Sodium Fast Reactor (Korea) Total Monte Carlo with MCNP and FISPACT Uncertainties due to transport libraries only, but for all materials Sensitivity profiles with MCNP K-eff, void coefficient, burn-up and radiotoxicity using TMC

27

28 The total uncertainty is underestimated. Uncertainties for: Activation cross sections Fission yield data Decay data Are not (yet) taken into account.

29

30 TMC: Other possibilities Random thermal scattering data libraries (?) Random decay data libraries Random fission yield libraries Normalization to experimental data or other nuclear data libraries at the basic input level (TENDL-2010) Optimization to integral benchmarks using e.g. simulated annealing (“search for the best random file”)

31

32 Optimization of Pu-239 Select 120 ICSBEP benchmarks Create 630 random Pu-239 libraries, all within, or closely around, the uncertainty bands Do a total of 120 x 630 =75600 MCNP criticality calculations Do another 120 x 4 calculations:

33 Optimization of Pu-239

34 Optimization of Pu-239 6% of libraries have lower chi-2 than JEFF-3.1 Library #307 has the lowest

35

36 Conclusions To improve evaluated libraries, TMC is an easier tool than covariances + perturbation + sensitivity However, the world wants covariances, and they get covariances (TENDL) With a reproducible automated system, almost anything is possible. After some years of serious software development we can now fork into various branches: -TALYS Evaluated Nuclear Data Library (TENDL) including complete covariance data (MF31-35) -Total Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation -Nuclear data library optimization -Other applications (not discussed here) The results of all improvements in uncertainly handling (UMC, model uncertainties, etc.) will be directly visible