National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Analyzing Covered Bridges for Live Loads Covered Bridge Preservation National Best Practices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WIND FORCES.
Advertisements

Wind Loads: The ASCE 7 Provisions
Loads and Load Paths "Architecture is inhabited sculpture."
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING DIVISION Ronald L. Lynn, Director/Building Official Gregory J. Franklin, Assistant Director Neil Burning, Manager.
Standardized Load Tables Characterizing Residential Solar Thermal and Solar Electric Installations For Residential Structures in Minnesota Jason S. Hanlon,
Horizontal Diaphragms
TRAILS AS TRANSPORTATION Design & Construction Michael J. Kubek, P.E. Ohio Department of Transportation, District 12 Production Administrator.
Engineering with Wood Tension & Compression
INTRODUCTION This chapter presents guidance on the application of geometric design criteria to facilities functionally classified as collector roads and.
Construction Loading Analysis 2010 Contractor Engineer Conference Bill Dreher Structures Design Chief WisDOT.
Networking the World TM 86 Leon Kempner, Jr., P.E. Bonneville Power Administration February 6, 2000 IEEE Three Second Gust Extreme Wind Speed Map, CP2363.
Sample Problem ASCE 7-05 Seismic Provisions
& CRITERIA FOR MAXIMUM ELEVATION OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN FLOODPLAINS William L. Coulbourne, P.E. Applied Technology Council
Shear Capacity of Composite Steel Girder at Simple Support Virtis/Opis User Group Conference Nashville, TN, August 3-4, 2010 George Huang, PhD, PE California.
Structure Analysis I. Lecture 2 Types of Structures & Loads.
National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Covered Bridges The First National Covered Bridge Conference Burlington, VT June 5-7, 2003.
Overhead Sign Support Structures: Meeting AASHTO 2001 John W. van de Lindt CDOT Staff Bridge Communication Day – September 27, 2004.
DESIGN OF TRUSS ROOF Chapter 7 University of Engineering & Technology, Taxila 1Prof Dr Z. A. Siddiqi.
LDG: Lateral Design Graph - tutorial LDG: Lateral Design Graph Copyright Prof Schierle LDG is an Excel program to design and visualize design for.
Design Standards For Local Agency Bridges Statewide Local Agency Project Delivery Conference May, 2006 Design Standards For Local Agency Bridges Statewide.
Best Practices Related to Research Problem Identification, Scoping, and Programming: A Researcher’s View Martin Pietrucha, Director The Thomas D. Larson.
THE BUILDING ENVELOPE: Lecture 4 Designing the Building Envelope.
ARC 810: Building Climatology Department of Architecture, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria ARC 810: Building Climatology Department of.
I. Truss Bridge Gussets Background
Recent Experience on Building Collapses under Snow Loads Stewart Macartney – blyth+blyth.
2182 D - Timber Framing Code Wall Bracing Class Exercise 1.
303 Third St, Cambridge, MA Brian Tufts Structures Option Advisor: Dr. Ali Memari 4/14/08.
Lancaster, PA Courtyard by Marriott Danielle Shetler - Structural Option Senior Thesis - Spring 2005.
Clear Zone Conflicts in AASHTO Publications Dick Albin Washington State Department of Transportation Presented at the AASHTO Subcommittee on Design Meeting.
ME31B: CHAPTERTHREE INTRODUCTION TO STRUCTURAL DESIGN.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. What Does a Structural Engineer Do?
Using HAZUS-MH to Assess Tsunami Risk Bill Bohn, Tetra Tech June 19, 2007.
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures Introduction. Steel as a Building Material Advantages High strength / weight ratio Properties are homogeneous and predictable.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
New AASHTO Design Publications New AASHTO Design Publications  A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (2004 Green Book)  A Policy.
1 Virtis/Opis Technical Update Virtis Opis BRIDGEWare Users Group Meeting 2010 Nashville, Tennessee.
Jonathan Goodroad Structural Option 2005 Thesis Penn State AE Delaware State University Administration and Student Services Building.
Free walls, roofs and billboards
FRAMING SEMINARS 2012 PRESENTED BY KW ENGINEERING 1.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. What Does a Structural Engineer Do?
CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Highway Design Criteria Overview April 24, 2006 David R. Dougherty, P.E.
Text Information Manual of Steel Construction - $95 Make check to AISC Notes for CE482 by Dr. Hans Gesund - $10 Cash or check to University of Kentucky.
Cover Plated Beams Used in renovation or restoration projects or to meet difficult depth limitations.
Sprinkler Loads on Trusses
MWFRS Method v/s Components and Cladding Method for Truss Uplift Connection Design for Wind Overview.
GSD Third Semester Core Fall 2014 Codes; Flow/Force.
Heel Blocking Requirements and Capacity Analysis
Sprinkler Loads on Trusses Educational Presentation.
Industry Standards and Load Ratings of Enclosures
Overdriven Nails in Structural Sheathings Overview.
FHWA: Revision of Thirteen Controlling Criteria for Design; Notice for Request and Comment. Comments Due: December 7, 2015 Jeremy Fletcher, P.E., P.S.M.
Structural Loads.
Airplane Hangar Design The design of a steel-framed airplane hangar Matthew Klein Edward F. Cross School of Engineering, Walla Walla University, College.
Lay-On Gable Frame Connection Overview. Introduction A lay-on gable frame is typically connected from the top during truss placement, but after sheathing.
SECTION 8 - RACKING (BRACING) AND SHEAR FORCES STUDENT HANDOUT
SEISMIC & WIND ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES
Exterior Brick Masonry Veneer Supported by Metal Plate Connected Wood Trusses (MPCWT) Overview Revised 8/1/2016.
Objectives of Design of Reinforced Concrete Elements
Bottom Chord Live Load Concurrency and Truss Design
Impact of C&C loads due to ASCE/SEI 7-16
Agricultural Hall and Annex Easting Lansing, MI
NFPA 5000 Occupancy Classifications
ENGINEERING SERVICES Report National Sunroom Association
Overdriven Nails in Structural Sheathings
UNIT-V ELEMENT OF BUILDINGS.
Floor Truss Ribbon Board Load Path
North Shore at Canton The Pennsylvania State University
LDG requires Excel and macros enabled.
Document TYREGTR Agenda item 4.4
Structure II Course Code: ARCH 209 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg.
Presentation transcript:

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Analyzing Covered Bridges for Live Loads Covered Bridge Preservation National Best Practices Conference June 5-7, 2003 Presented by: Matthew J. Low, P.E. Hoyle, Tanner & Associates, Inc. Manchester, New Hampshire Burlington, Vermont

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Outline Background Snow Load Wind Load Vehicular Load Pedestrian Load Load Combinations Conclusions Questions

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Majority of covered bridge construction from 1820 to 1910 prior to modern vehicle loads AASHTO Specifications introduced in 1931 Specifications include little guidance for application of live loads to covered bridges, specifically: –Snow Loads –Wind Loads Background

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Consider use of other codes Other codes are available: IBC 2000 NFPA 5000 ASCE 7-02 Minimum Design Loads for Building and Other Structures State/City Building Codes Covered bridge load combinations must be developed Background

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Snow load is ignored for conventional bridges per AASHTO 25 states have covered bridges and experience snow fall Covered bridges act as “unheated structures” Snow Load

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Roof snow load may be determined by ASCE 7-02, IBC 2000, etc. First determine local ground snow load Snow Load

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Steps to determine roof snow load by ASCE 7-02 Ps = (Cs)(0.7)(Ce)(Ct)(I)(Pg) Ps = Sloped Roof Snow Load Cs = Cold Roof Slope Factor Ce = Exposure Factor Ct = Thermal Factor I = Importance Factor Pg = Ground Snow Load Snow Load

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Example with 6:12 Pitch Roof Ce = 1.0 (Table 7-2) Ct = 1.2 for unheated structure (Table 7-3) Cs = 0.8 +/- (Figure 7-2) I = 1.0 (Category I) Pg = 40 PSF (Burlington, VT) Therefore, Ps = 26.9 PSF This value is hardly insignificant Snow Load

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Wind Load Covered bridges are susceptible to significant wind pressures

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Wind load in AASHTO very conservative Not developed for Covered Bridges AASHTO: 100 mph base wind velocity Wind pressure = 75 PSF for Truss Bridges Wind pressure = 50 PSF for Girder Bridges Wind Load

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation ASCE 7-02, Method I = Simple Diaphragm Buildings Ps = (  I) (Ps30) = Adjustment Factor I = Importance Factor Ps30 = Wind Pressure for Exposure B, h = 30 feet and I = 1.0 Wind Load

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Example With Exposure B, Height = 30 Feet, 6:12 Pitch Roof I = 0.87 (Table 6-1, Table 1-1) = 1.0 Basic wind speed = 100 MPH Therefore, According to ASCE 7-02, Figure 6-2 Ps Wall = 0.87 * 14.4 PSF = 12.5 PSF Ps Roof = 0.87 * 3.3 PSF = 2.9 PSF Significantly less than AASHTO values Wind Load

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Use AASHTO and State DOT Provisions Apply H, HS or Lane Load to Produce Maximum Stress Vehicular Load

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Use AASHTO Provisions Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges Guide Specifications for Design of Pedestrian Bridges Typically ranges from 65 PSF to 85 PSF Pedestrian Load

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Create rational load combinations Evaluate snow load at Operating Level Evaluate pedestrian load at Operating Level Load Combinations

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Design/Rating Load Cases 1.DL + 100%/Inventory Level 2.DL + Vehicular + 133%/Operating Level 3.DL + Vehicular + 133%/Operating Level Load Combinations

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Wind Load Combination 100% Load Combinations

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation AASHTO Specifications do not adequately address covered bridges Other codes are available ASCE 7-02 IBC 2000 NFPA 5000 Conclusions

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Snow load and wind loads determined by ASCE 7-02 Load cases based on probability of occurrence and experience Design and rating combinations proposed for DL, vehicular, pedestrian, snow loads Wind loads analyzed separately Conclusions

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Method allows for preservation, not intended to increase capacity Conclusions

National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Questions Matthew J. Low, P.E. Hoyle, Tanner & Associates, Inc. 150 Dow Street Manchester, New Hampshire (603)