O Does humor impact relationship satisfaction? o Four different styles of humor (Martin, Puhlik-Doris, Larsen, Gray, & Weir, 2003)  Humor which enhances/protects.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Maternal Psychological Control: Links to Close Friendship and Depression in Early Adolescence Heather L. Tencer Jessica R. Meyer Felicia D. Hall University.
Advertisements

Abstract Being bullied during adolescence and poor exercise habits are both serious problems in the American society. Previous research has found that.
What to do, and what not to do, to be happy and satisfied: Affect regulation strategies and subjective well-being in representative sample of Croatia Zvjezdana.
The relationship between level of religious devotion and marital satisfaction Amanda Caddell Kevin Utt.
Intrapsychic and Attachment Influences on Adolescent Romantic Jealousy Erin M. Miga, Joseph P. Allen, Amanda Hare University of Virginia This study was.
Both self-esteem and co-rumination have been shown to influence an individual’s psychological well-being. Rose (2002) defined co- rumination as “excessively.
Abstract Investigated the mother-child relationship and adolescents’ emotional symptoms and adaptive skills reported by youth. Negative mother-child relationship.
Reflection on Adolescent Playfulness Marianne B. Staempfli Ph.D. Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies.
Predictors and Consequences of Involvement in Age-Discrepant Romantic Relationships Amy Bender Hanover College 2007.
The development of a humour styles questionnaire for younger children Background and Rationale Fox et al. (2011) developed a reliable and valid scale to.
The Nature of Adolescents’ Non-romantic Sexual Relationships and Their Link With Well-being Catherine M. Grello Deborah P. Welsh University of Tennessee.
Unfaithful: Examining Infidelity in Adolescent Romantic Relationships Rebecca E. Furr, Hannah G. Arick, & Deborah P. Welsh University of Tennessee.
1]Knoll, N., Burkert, S., & Schwartzer, R. (2006). Reciprocal support provision: Personality as a moderator? European Journal of Personality, 20,
WANTED: More Participants! Self-Disclosure with Dogs: Getting the Public to Talk About What They Talk About By Aislinn Evans-Wilday Supervised by Daniel.
The financial practices and perceptions behind separate systems of household financial management Dr Katherine Ashby, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences,
Elizabeth F. Broady Sarah J. Hickman Hanover College
By Claire Fox 1, Simon Hunter 2, Lucy James 1 and Hayley Gilman 1 1 Keele University, 2 University of Strathclyde Box 1: Humour Styles Adaptive: Affiliative.
Music Preference and Relationship Satisfaction
Parental Satisfaction: The Effects of Perceived Parental Self Efficacy, Care-Giving Role and Child Age Hamill, N. R., Fleming, M. J., (University of Canberra)
Coping With Intimate Partner Violence: Dependent Victims Downplay Violence Abstract Discussion Aim #1, Nonvoluntary dependence: Do female victims of dating.
BACKGROUND Evolutionary Personality Psychology is the study of individual differences in evolved systems for social behavior. The most familiar and best.
The role of humor in human relationships: An evolutionary model
I Think I’m OK, Why Don’t You?: The Saga of Disagreeable Youth Christopher A. Hafen, Megan M. Schad, Elendra T. Hessel, Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia.
Exploring the Relationships Among College Students’ Goal Orientations, Perfectionism, and Academic Self-Efficacy Hannah Geis and Brittany Weber, Faculty.
AER International Conference 2010 Amy R. McKenzie, Ed.D. & Susan Miller Smedema, Ph.D., CRC Florida State University 1.
Affiliation: Beneficial or Detrimental? Linnea M. Heintz, University of Wisconsin-Stout Advisor: Jennifer Byrd-Craven, Oklahoma State University Introduction.
This research was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, award reference RES Humour styles as moderators and mediators of the.
Similarly, rejection sensitivity tends to be negatively associated with being a perpetrator of relational aggression in romantic relationships for young.
MGT 291C-B. Researching “value” Researching empowerment Connecting value to empowerment and empowerment to commitment.
Functional Impairment and Depressive Symptoms: Mitigating Effects of Trait Hope Jameson K. Hirsch, Ph.D. 1,2, S. Kaye, B.S. 1, & Jeffrey M. Lyness, M.D.
Problem-Solving Abilities and Feelings of Control: A Work in Progress Emily M. Kaiser, Department of Communication Studies, College of Arts and Sciences.
Interpersonal Skills 4 detailed studies Health Psychology.
Introduction and Aim Higher subjective social status (our perceived position in society relative to other people) has been linked to better mental health.
Positive and Negative Affect and Health in Lung Cancer Patients Jameson K. Hirsch, Ph.D. 1,2, H. Mason 1, & Paul R. Duberstein, Ph.D. 2 Department of Psychology,
Gender differences in symptom reporting: the influence of psychological traits. Laura Goodwin Dr Stephen Fairclough Liverpool John Moores University BACKGROUND.
Examining Subjective Understanding of Participants and Outside Observers’ in Adolescent Romantic Couples’ Interactions Joseph W. Dickson 1 Melinda S. Harper.
Reciprocity between Humor and Peer Victimization
Implicit Vs. Explicit Peer Rejection Megan M. Schad, Amori Yee Mikami, Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia We would like to thank the National Institute.
ABSTRACT Recent studies have examined the association of singular adolescent attitudes to particular age periods (Schnirer, 2001). We analyze the relationship.
Many thanks to my thesis committee members for your time, help, humor, and support: Dr. David Wasieleski, Dr. Mark Whatley, and Dr. Jennifer Rahman. Conclusion.
The chicken or the egg? Aggression and depression in adolescent romantic relationships. Rebecca Furr, Laura Widman & Deborah Welsh University of Tennessee.
Personal Control over Development: Effects on the Perception and Emotional Evaluation of Personal Development in Adulthood.
The Role of Physical Attractiveness in Adolescent Romantic Relationships. Rebecca Furr, M.A. & Deborah Welsh, Ph.D. University of Tennessee.
Attachment and Development in Adolescent Romantic Couples’ Relationship Quality Sharon C. Risch University of Tennessee.
Parents' Marital Functioning and the Development of Adolescent Romantic Relationships Amanda L. Hare, F. Christy McFarland, & Joseph P. Allen University.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 38.
Approaches to Learning and the Acquisition of General Knowledge By Adrian Furnham, Andrew Christopher, Jeanette Garwood, and G. Neil Martin Personality.
Reactions to Humorous Comments and Implicit Theories of Humor Styles Nicholas A. Kuiper, Gillian A. Kirsh, and Catherine Leite Presented by Willie Hallford.
1 Psychology 320: Gender Psychology Lecture Invitational Office Hour Invitations, by Student Number for January 21 st 11:30-12:30, 3:30-4:30 Kenny.
The Effect of Athlete’s Perceptions of Coaching Behavior and Coaches’ Perceived Behavior on Burnout in NCAA Division III Collegiate Athletes: A Proposal.
Compassion Meditation vs. Mindfulness Meditation: Effect on Attitude and Disposition By Graham Maione Advisor: Dr. Paul Bueno de Mesquita.
Template provided by: “posters4research.com”   Ideals: mental constructs that represent an idea of traits we are attracted to in potential partners (Fletcher.
Correlation Coefficients of Religious Orientation & Psychological Well-Being Participants 118 male and 381 female undergraduate students at Eastern Kentucky.
Narcissism, Intrinsic and Extrinsic Romantic Ideals, and Relationship Satisfaction Gwendolyn Seidman Albright College Sample and Procedure 206 Ps completed.
Selfishness and Self-Mattering: Do I Fit In? Leah Burke Advisors: Ellen Cohn, Ph.D. & Alexander Blandina, M.A. The University of New Hampshire INTRODUCTION.
Mankind’s Greatest Blessing: Personal Humor Style and Humor Appreciation By: Steven LaCorte The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between.
Predictors of Stress Related Growth in people with SCI compared to the Stress Related Growth of their close persons Lude P 1,2,3, Kennedy P 4,5, Elfström.
Biological, Cognitive and Sociocultural Explanations to the origins of attraction The Origins of Attraction.
Psychological sources of stress Daily Hassles. Psychological sources of stress: Daily Hassles & Uplifts There is a problem with Holmes & Rahe’s view that.
Christian Hahn, M.Sc. & Lorne Campbell, PhD
Introduction Hypotheses Results Discussion Method
Laughing Together Or Joking Apart?
Sociosexuality and Perceptions of Partner Over Time
Emily A. Davis & David E. Szwedo James Madison University Introduction
General Social Competence (18)
The Effects of Childhood Emotional Abuse on Later Romantic Relationship Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Self-Worth, Alcohol, and Jealousy Madeline M.
Kristin E. Gross & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
Aashna A. Dhayagude & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
Presentation transcript:

o Does humor impact relationship satisfaction? o Four different styles of humor (Martin, Puhlik-Doris, Larsen, Gray, & Weir, 2003)  Humor which enhances/protects the self Self-enhancing: tolerant, accepting; humorous perspective in the face of stress Aggressive: ridicule, sarcasm; humor without regard for impact on others  Humor which enhances relationships with others Affiliative: jokes, spontaneous humor; occasional putting down of oneself (while maintaining acceptance) Self-defeating: excessively self- disparaging; allowing oneself to be the target of ridicule to gain approval o Self-enhancing and affiliative humor will result in greater relationship satisfaction o Aggressive and self-defeating humor will result in lower satisfaction o Humor style assessed through 32-item questionnaire adapted from Martin et al. (2003) Participants asked to rate their partner’s sense of humor as opposed to their own o Relationship satisfaction measured using 7-item questionnaire from Hendrick and Hendrick (1997) o Asked not to consult partners while taking surveys Example Items – Humor Styles o Self-enhancing “If my partner is feeling depressed, he/she can usually cheer himself/herself up with humor” o Affiliative “My partner enjoys making people laugh” o Aggressive “If someone makes a mistake, my partner will often tease them about it” o Self-defeating “My partner lets people laugh at him/her or make fun at his/her expense more than he/she should” Example Items – Satisfaction o “How well does your partner meet your needs?” o “To what extent has your relationship met your original expectations?” Love to Laugh, Laugh to Love: Humor Styles and Relationship Satisfaction Gabe Persons, Jake Gorman, & John Buri, Faculty Advisor Dept of Psychology, University of St. Thomas o Scores were obtained for humor (8 items corresponded to each) o A bivariate correlation was used to compare satisfaction scores with the 4 humor scores o 70 participants – 18 years of age or older 21 males; 49 females o Recruited online through University of St. Thomas Sona Systems and Facebook o Positive correlation between self- enhancing humor and satisfaction when responses were pooled Females approached significance o Males who reported having partner with aggressive humor showed higher self-reports of relationship satisfaction Female results inverse of this Neither were significant o Future research would benefit from comparing self-ratings of humor to those ratings made by partner o Individuals more satisfied with relationships tend to report higher positive humor use and lower negative humor use (Butzer & Kuiper, 2008) o Perception of a partner’s humor style predicts relationship satisfaction (Cann, Zapata, & Davis, 2011) Positive forms of humor predict higher levels of relationship satisfaction Background Present Study Participants Methods Results Aggressive Humor Self-Defeating Humor Satisfaction (all) r = p =.318 r =.116 p =.340 Satisfaction (males) r =.080 p =.729 r =.251 p =.273 Satisfaction (females) r = p =.088 r =.054 p =.710 Self-Enhancing Humor Affiliative Humor Satisfaction (all) r =.269 p =.024 r =.187 p =.122 Satisfaction (males) r =.224 p =.287 r =.233 p =.310 Satisfaction (females) r =.256 p =.076 r =.160 p =.271 Discussion References Butzer, B., & Kuiper, N. A. (2008). Humor use in romantic relationships: The effects of relationship satisfaction and pleasant versus conflict situations. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 142(3), Cann, A., Zapata, C. L., & Davis, H. B. (2011). Humor style and relationship satisfaction in dating couples: Perceived versus self-reported humor styles as predictors of satisfaction. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 24(1), Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1997). Love and satisfaction. In Satisfaction in close relationships. (pp ) New York, NY, US: Guilford Press. Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), Hypotheses