LAND OWNERSHIP AND FARM MANAGEMENT IN ECUADOR: EGALITARIAN FAMILY FARMING SYSTEMS AND GENDERED CONSTRAINTS Carmen Diana Deere Gender and Assets Workshop,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Engendering Agricultural Censuses: The case of Malawi By Gunvor Iversen Moyo Statistics Norway Presented at the Global Forum on Gender Statistics, Accra.
Advertisements

PROPERTY STATUS AND DECISION-MAKING: EVIDENCE FROM GENDER ASSET GAP PROJECT Hema Swaminathan Centre for Public Policy Indian Institute of Management Bangalore.
Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009 American Sociological Association Annual Meeting Atlanta, GA August 14-17, 2010 Rose M. Kreider,
Gender Asset Gaps Cheryl Doss, Yale University Presented at the Gender and Assets Workshop, World Bank, June 2012.
Living Single: The Effects of Domestic Capital Investments On Men’s Domestic Labor Participation Richard N Pitt, Jr. Vanderbilt University Department of.
Investing in Women Smallholders Ruchi Tripathi Head of Right to Food ActionAid International June 2011.
ICES 3° International Conference on Educational Sciences 2014
Gender and Economic Transformation in Africa Cheryl Doss Yale University Presented at the African Centre for Economic Transformation July 18, 2012.
Assets, Wealth and Spousal Violence: Insights from Ecuador and Ghana Abena D. Oduro, University of Ghana Carmen Diana Deere, University of Florida Zachary.
The role of gendered attitudes towards women, and experience with HIV/AIDS.
Pacific Regional Workshop - Linking Population and Housing with Agricultural Censuses Noumea, New Caledonia 28 May - 1 June 2012 Concepts Agricultural.
Carmen Diana Deere Center for Latin American Studies and Food & Resource Economics University of Florida.
Combining the strengths of UMIST and The Victoria University of Manchester An analysis of the relationship between time spent on active leisure and educational.
This research is a component of the Global Livestock Collaborative Research Support program support by USAID Grant No. PCE-G and by contributions.
Sociology 601 Class 28: December 8, 2009 Homework 10 Review –polynomials –interaction effects Logistic regressions –log odds as outcome –compared to linear.
A Comparative Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Tobacco and Maize Farmers in Tabora- Tanzania A.Kidane; A.Hepelwa; E.Ngeh & T. W. Hu This study was supported.
By Sanjay Kumar, Ph.D National Programme Officer (M&E), UNFPA – India
Filling the Gender Data Gap in Agriculture and Rural Development 1.
United Nations Statistics DivisionRegional Workshop on Integrating a Gender Perspective in the Production of Statistics, Amman, Jordan, 1-4 December 2014.
How Much Do Women in Africa Contribute to Agriculture? Luc Christiaensen, Talip Kilic, Amparo Palacios-López, AGRICULTURE IN AFRICA TELLING FACTS FROM.
Measuring gender relations with GGS data Maria Eugenia COSIO ZAVALA Pascal SEBILLE CERPOS Centre de Recherche Populations et sociétés University of Paris.
The Gendered Nature of Land and Property Rights in Post-Reform Rwanda Kelsey Jones-Casey Independent Consultant and Researcher Isthmus & Strait Consulting.
1 21ST SESSION OF AFRICAN COMMSION FOR AGRICULTURE STATISTICS WORKSHOPWORKSHOP HELD IN ACCRA, GHANA, 28 – 31 OCTOBER 2009 By Lubili Marco Gambamala National.
Innovations in Methodologies for Analyzing the Gender Asset Gaps in Agriculture Cheryl Doss, Yale University ICAE 2012, Foz do Igazu, Brazil.
Carmen Diana Deere Department of Food & Resource Economics Center for Latin American Studies University of Florida International Banquet, AAEA annual meetings,
Gender and Assets Cheryl Doss, Yale University. Is there a gender-asset gap? Does it matter? How do we understand the causes and consequences of the gender-asset.
Conservation & the Absentee Landowner: Attitudes & Behavior Peggy Petrzelka Utah State University Acknowledgements: Great Lakes Protection Fund, Conservation.
1 Gender Issues in Agriculture Statistics Tashkent, July 2005.
Carmen Diana Deere and Jennifer Twyman Center for Latin American Studies and Food & Resource Economics University of Florida.
The Effect of Elderly Household Members on School Enrollment of Children in Tibet Barbara A. Anderson*, Cheong-Seok Kim**, John H. Romani*, John Traphagan***
SESSION 4: IMPLICATIONS FOR DATA COLLECTION Carmen Diana Deere University of Florida Gender Asset Gap Project World Bank Workshop on Gender & Assets, Gender.
Multi-dimensional measures of empowerment Contact:
SESSION 8 GENDER ISSUES IN THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE.
Near East Regional Workshop - Linking Population and Housing Censuses with Agricultural Censuses. Amman, Jordan, June 2012 Tabulations and Analysis.
Why Measure Asset Ownership and Control at Individual Level – Importance for Policy Making in Ghana Ghana Statistical Service 30 th July, 2013 Bangkok,
Exploring Relationships between Gender Attitudes, Couple Concordance, and Family Planning in Tanzania Geeta Nanda, DrPH, MHS Sidney Ruth Schuler, PhD Rachel.
Gender in Agriculture Report Prepared by CARE International in the West Bank & Gaza.
Assets, Wealth and Spousal Violence: Insights from Ecuador and Ghana Abena D. Oduro, University of Ghana Carmen Diana Deere, University of Florida Zachary.
Access and Control over Land in Rwanda An Intrahousehold Analysis Florence Santos, Diana Fletschner and Vivien Savath March 2014.
Land, Assets and Livelihoods Gendered Analysis of Evidence from Odisha Vivien Savath, Diana Fletschner, Amber Peterman, Florence Santos March 25,2014.
The Contemporary Kisii Household Gender Roles, Identity and Social Value in Everyday Life.
Guide on Gender Analysis of Census Data Ralph Hakkert Population and Development Branch Technical Division, UNFPA.
Male Method Choice in Bangladesh: Does It Matter Who Makes The Decision? Mohammad Amirul Islam Sabu S. Padmadas Peter W.F. Smith Division of Social Statistics.
WOMEN’S PROPERTY, MOBILITY AND DECISION-MAKING: EVIDENCE FROM RURAL KARNATAKA, INDIA Hema Swaminathan, Rahul Lahoti, Suchitra J. Y. Centre for Public Policy.
 What measures have been collected?. Presentations for EDGE Project Technical Meeting on Measuring Asset Ownership from a Gender Perspective Cheryl Doss.
Husbands' Traditionality and Wives' Marital and Personal Well-being in Mexican American Families Yuliana Rodriguez, Jill K. Walls, Heather M. Helms, &
Women and Philanthropy: An Untapped Resource Big Brothers Big Sisters Mid-Large Agency Alliance CEO Networking & Learning Meeting Revving up your fundraising.
Off- Farm Labor Supply of Farm- Families in Rural Georgia Dr. Ayal Kimhi Ofir Hoyman Tbilisi, 2005.
LAND OWNERSHIP AND FARM MANAGEMENT IN ECUADOR: PERCEPTIONS OF HUSBANDS AND WIVES Jennifer Twyman, University of Florida IAFFE Annual Conferemce. Barcelona.
Out-migration of Young Adults and Living Arrangements of the Elderly in Rural China: The Case of Chaohu Merril Silverstein Andrus Gerontology Center University.
Consistency in reporting contraception between spouses in Bangladesh: evidence from recent demographic and health survey Mohammad Amirul Islam Sabu S.
1 Household Interaction Impact on Married Female Labor Supply Zvi Eckstein and Osnat Lifshitz.
PROPERTY STATUS AND INTER SPOUSAL DYNAMICS IN DECISION-MAKING IN KARNATAKA Hema Swaminathan, Suchitra J. Y., Rahul Lahoti Centre for Public Policy Indian.
+ The Likelihood of Marriage for Educated, Urban Chinese Women with High Income Levels EDUCATION INCOME PROFESSION FAMILY FUTURE.
Using microsimulation model to get things right: a wage equation for Poland Leszek Morawski, University of Warsaw Michał Myck, DIW - Berlin Anna Nicińska,
Determinants of women’s labor force participation and economic empowerment in Albania Juna Miluka University of New York Tirana September, 14, 2015.
1 Determinants of women's autonomy over sexual behaviors within marital relationships in contemporary Vietnam Hongyun Fu, MA Mai Do, MD, DrPH Lung Duy.
2014 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) Key Indicators Report.
2015 Afghanistan Demographic and Health Survey (AfDHS) Key Indicators Report.
INTER-SPOUSE COMMUNICATION AND CONTRACEPTIVE BEHAVIOR IN CAMEROON: A COUPLE-BASED ANALYSIS MBELLA MBELLA Cédric Stéphane Ministry of Economy, Planning.
Gap in the literature Recent evidence of gender gap in productivity comparing men- women managed plots Evidence of gender specific impacts and responses.
Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and Household Decision Making: Dynamics among Married Couples in India Archana More Sharma, PhD APHA Roundtable Presentation.
Gender Issues.
Department of Economics The University of Melbourne
Day 2. What to Measure.
The Gender Asset Gap Project in Ghana
Rufai A.M., Salman K.K. and Salawu M.B
Day 3. How to Measure.
Who’s cooking? Analysis of food preparation time in the 2003 ATUS
Presentation transcript:

LAND OWNERSHIP AND FARM MANAGEMENT IN ECUADOR: EGALITARIAN FAMILY FARMING SYSTEMS AND GENDERED CONSTRAINTS Carmen Diana Deere Gender and Assets Workshop, World Bank Jennifer Twyman June 14, 2012

Objective  Determine if female landowners are also the farm managers.  Not typically addressed, but…  Assumed that owners and managers are the same.  Research Questions:  Is the form of land ownership (individual vs. joint) related to whether women participate in decision-making?  What other factors are associated with women landowners’ participation in decisions regarding their own plots?

Land Ownership & Farm Management: Honduras & Nicaragua NicaraguaHonduras Women as principal ag decision-maker 8.8%8.7% Women have land rights 21%13.9%  Issues  Definitions Principal decision- maker Land rights  Unit of analysis Household, farm, parcel Percent of Households reporting… Source: Deere, Alvarado & Twyman 2012

Data: 2010 Ecuador Household Asset Survey (n=2,892)  Interviewed husband & wife together when possible  Household member registry  Assets inventory  Household level characteristics and experiences  Interviewed husband and wife separately  Participation in decisions  Financial assets  Marital & inheritance regimes—legal knowledge Household QuestionnaireIndividual Questionnaire

Data: Form of Ownership  12.4% of households reported owning land  513 parcels Form of Ownership % of parcels Individual man29.0 Individual woman28.1 Joint by couple34.4 Other joint8.6 Total100.0

Data: Agricultural Decision Questions  Who in the household made the decision on what to plant?  Who made the decision on what inputs to use?  If some of the harvest was sold, who made the decision on how much to sell?  Who decided how to spend the money generated from the sale?

Data: Sample Size & Cultivation Decision  Partnered women  228 parcels  Owned by women and  A household member works land Ind. Owner Jt. Owner Total Alone47%12%18% Joint26%66%60% None27%22% Total100% (n = 35) 100% (n = 193) 100% (n = 228) Women’s Responses Woman’s Participation in the Cultivation Decision

Models  Modeled each decision separately  Binary dependent variable logistic regression models  Wife participates= 1  Otherwise = 0  Key Variables of interest:  Form of Land Ownership (individual v. joint)  Wife’s share of couple’s wealth  Off-farm employment  Fieldwork

Results—Form of Land Ownership Woman’s participation in the decision about… What to CultivateInput Use How much to sell How to spend proceeds Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Joint Owner (base: individual owner) 1.35* (0.720) 0.93 (0.778) (1.548) (2.330)  Women who are joint owners are more likely than individual owners to participate in the decision about what to plant. (Odds ratio: 3.85)

Results—Wife’s share of couple’s wealth Woman’s participation in the decision about… What to CultivateInput Use How much to sell How to spend proceeds Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Wife’s share of couple’s wealth (4.094) * (4.698) (5.742) ( ) Wife’s share squared (3.753) 7.859* (4.483) (6.374) * ( )

How wife’s share and odds of wife participating in input use decision Min Odds (0.51), wife’s share = 0.51

How wife’s share and odds of wife participating in input use decision Min Odds (0.51), wife’s share = 0.51

Results—Off-farm Employment Woman’s participation in the decision about… What to CultivateInput Use How much to sell How to spend proceeds Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Wife works off-farm (0.559) (0.637) (0.946) (1.726) Husband works off (0.524) (0.540) (0.924) (2.309)  Off-farm employment is not statistically significant; it is not related to wife’s participation in agricultural decision-making.

Results—Fieldwork Woman’s participation in the decision about… What to CultivateInput Use How much to sell How to spend proceeds Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Wife does fieldwork 3.849*** (0.560) 3.277*** (0.649) 3.763*** (0.850) (1.304) Husband fieldwork * (1.071) * (1.114) (2.02) (3.514)  Wives who participate in fieldwork on the parcel are more likely to participate in the decision-making than wives who do not do fieldwork.  If the husband participates in fieldwork, women are less likely to participate in the decision-making than when the husband does not do fieldwork.

Results—Other Variables Variables: What to CultivateInput Use How much to sell How to spend proceeds Parcel size (ha) Wife’s age Age Difference+ Wife’s edu+ Edu difference Consensual Union- Children under 6+ Rural(n/a) Coast Indigenous

Results—Model Statistics Woman’s participation in the decision about… What to CultivateInput Use How much to sell How to spend proceeds Number of Cases (N) Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square (df) (17)*** (17)*** (17)*** (16)*** Pseudo R

Conclusions  Majority of women landowners in Ecuador participate in the agricultural decisions  Participation in fieldwork is highly correlated with women’s participation in decision-making  Positively related to women’s participation in fieldwork  Negatively related to men’s participation in fieldwork  No correlation between off-farm work and women’s participation in agricultural decision-making

Conclusions  Joint land owners more likely than individual owners to participate in cultivation decision.  Important to exert her land rights if less secure than individual ownership?  Wife’s share of couple’s wealth was negatively related to her participation in input decision  Is she choosing in which decisions to participate? Does not choose agriculture.  Future work  Do same analysis with men’s responses—can examine women who own jointly in comparison to wives who do not own land  Explore the relationship between wife’s share of wealth and agricultural decision-making

Thank You!

Who are the farmers?  Household head  What about women within dual/male- headed households?  Landholder  Makes most decisions  Best informed  Keeps revenue from crops  Various people within the household?

Gender Analyses  Productivity (and/or efficiency)  Typically by plot  Sometimes by head of household  Does type of decision matter?  Gender roles & responsibilities  Size of landholdings?  Women participate more on small farms?  Important to ask about specific decisions, o.w. typically response is male household head.  Regional differences in women’s participation

Data: Input Use Decision Ind. Owner Jt. Owner Total Alone45%18%23% Joint25%54%48% None30%28%29% Total100% Women’s Participation in Input Use Decision n = 164

Data: Selling & Spending Decisions Ind. Owner Jt. Owner Total Alone59%8%15% Joint22%67%61% None19%25%24% Total100% Ind. Owner Jt. Owner Total Alone67%16%23% Joint26%78%71% None7%6% Total100% Women’s Participation in Selling Decision Woman’s Participation in Spending Decision n = 115

Explanatory Variables VariableMeanStd. Dev.MedianRange Size (ha) – 710 Wife’s share – Wife’s age – 82 Age Difference – 29 Wife’s Yrs. Schooling – 18 Edu. Diff – 12 Descriptive Stats—Continuous Variables

Explanatory Variables Variable% Joint owner (ind.)85 Consensual union (married)8 Children under 632 Rural85 Coast17 Variable% Indigenous19 Wife works off-farm31 Husband works off-farm52 Wife does fieldwork72 Husband does fieldwork87 Descriptive Stats—Categorical Variables

How wife’s share and odds of wife participating in cultivation decision Min Odds (12.5), wife’s share = 0.59

Results—Age Woman’s participation in the decision about… What to CultivateInput Use How much to sell How to spend proceeds Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Wife’s Age (0.025) (0.028) (0.040) (0.103) Age Difference (husband – wife) (0.048) (0.053) (0.068) 0.570* (0.338)

Results—Education Woman’s participation in the decision about… What to CultivateInput Use How much to sell How to spend proceeds Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Wife’s Years of Schooling (0.084) (0.085) (0.120) 0.567* (0.333) Schooling Difference (husband – wife) (0.085) (0.082) (0.133) (0.308)

Results—Type of Relationship Woman’s participation in the decision about… What to CultivateInput Use How much to sell How to spend proceeds Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Consensual Union (Marriage) (1.001) (0.937) * (1.532) (2.910)

Results—Children Under 6 in Household Woman’s participation in the decision about… What to CultivateInput Use How much to sell How to spend proceeds Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Children under *** (0.614) (0.638) (0.895) (2.259)

Results—Location Woman’s participation in the decision about… What to CultivateInput Use How much to sell How to spend proceeds Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Rural (Urban) (0.763) (0.779) (1.301) - Coast (Sierra) (0.671) (0.730) (0.993) (1.863)

Results—Ethnicity Woman’s participation in the decision about… What to CultivateInput Use How much to sell How to spend proceeds Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Coefficient-- β (Std. Error) Indigenous (Other ethnicities) (0.795) (0.798) (1.200) (2.337)

Results—Model Statistics Woman’s participation in the decision about… What to CultivateInput Use How much to sell How to spend proceeds Number of cases (N) Likelihood ratio chi-square (df) (17)*** (17)***74.96 (17)***39.10 (16)*** Pseudo R