Evaluation of ECHAM5 General Circulation Model using ISCCP simulator Swati Gehlot & Johannes Quaas Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie Hamburg, Germany.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numerical Weather Prediction Parametrization of Diabatic Processes Cloud Parametrization 2: Cloud Cover Richard Forbes and Adrian Tompkins
Advertisements

Quantifying sub-grid cloud structure and representing it GCMs
R. Forbes, 17 Nov 09 ECMWF Clouds and Radiation University of Reading ECMWF Cloud and Radiation Parametrization: Recent Activities Richard Forbes, Maike.
BBOS meeting on Boundary Layers and Turbulence, 7 November 2008 De Roode, S. R. and A. Los, QJRMS, Corresponding paper available from
Introduction to parametrization Introduction to Parametrization of Sub-grid Processes Anton Beljaars room 114) What is parametrization?
1 An initial CALIPSO cloud climatology ISCCP Anniversary, July 2008, New York Dave Winker NASA LaRC.
Earth Science & Climate Change
© Crown copyright Met Office Radiation developments Latest work on the radiation code in the Unified Model James Manners, Reading collaboration meeting.
Climate modeling Current state of climate knowledge – What does the historical data (temperature, CO 2, etc) tell us – What are trends in the current observational.
Clouds and Climate: Forced Changes to Clouds SOEE3410 Ken Carslaw Lecture 4 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds.
The Radiative Budget of an Atmospheric Column in Tropical Western Pacific Zheng Liu Department of Atmospheric Science University of Washington.
Surface Skin Temperatures Observed from IR and Microwave Satellite Measurements Catherine Prigent, CNRS, LERMA, Observatoire de Paris, France Filipe Aires,
The Radiative Budget of an Atmospheric Column in Tropical Western Pacific Zheng Liu 1 Thomas Ackerman 1,2, Sally McFarlane 2, Jim Mather 2, University.
Introduction to Numerical Weather Prediction and Ensemble Weather Forecasting Tom Hamill NOAA-CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center Boulder, Colorado USA.
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies University of Wisconsin - Madison Steve Ackerman Director, Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
Photo by Dave Fratello. Focus To evaluate CAM5/CARMA at 1x1 degree resolution with aircraft observations. - Improve cirrus cloud representation in the.
1 Une description statistique multi-variable des nuages au dessus de l’océan tropical à partir des observations de jour de l’A-train en haute résolution.
Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002 Large-Eddy Simulation Andreas Chlond Department Climate Processes.
Observational Needs for Testing Global Model Parameterizations Andrew Gettelman, NCAR Thanks to: J. Kiehl, W. Collins, P. Rasch.
A Radar Data Assimilation Experiment for COPS IOP 10 with the WRF 3DVAR System in a Rapid Update Cycle Configuration. Thomas Schwitalla Institute of Physics.
29th EWGLAM meeting, Dubrovnik, October 2007 ALARO Physics developments Neva Pristov LACE Working group for physics.
NCAR’s CFMIP/COSP contact
Diagnosing Climate Change from Satellite Sounding Measurements – From Filter Radiometers to Spectrometers William L. Smith Sr 1,2., Elisabeth Weisz 1,
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
Marine organic matter in sea spray Nd vs. SO4, binned into low-OM, intermediate OM, and high-OM groups Adding marine organic matter as a source into ACME.
Synoptic variability of cloud and TOA radiative flux diurnal cycles Patrick Taylor NASA Langley Research Center Climate Science Branch
A43D-0138 Towards a New AVHRR High Cloud Climatology from PATMOS-x Andrew K Heidinger, Michael J Pavolonis, Aleksandar Jelenak* and William Straka III.
Clouds in the Southern midlatitude oceans Catherine Naud and Yonghua Chen (Columbia Univ) Anthony Del Genio (NASA-GISS)
Future Climate Projections. Lewis Richardson ( ) In the 1920s, he proposed solving the weather prediction equations using numerical methods. Worked.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Southern Ocean cloud biases in ACCESS.
Determination of Tropical Pacific Cloud Structures using AQUA MODIS Data Presented By: Terry Kubar Advisors: Dennis Hartmann and Rob Wood.
Identifying 3D Radiative Cloud Effects Using MODIS Visible Reflectance Measurements Amanda Gumber Department of Atmospherics and Oceanic Sciences/CIMSS.
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
Steve Klein and Jim Boyle Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Mark Webb United Kingdom Meteorological.
10/05/041 Satellite Data in the Verification of Model cloud forecasts Christoph Zingerle Tartu, 24. – 26. Jan HiRLAM mini workshop on clouds and.
April Hansen et al. [1997] proposed that absorbing aerosol may reduce cloudiness by modifying the heating rate profiles of the atmosphere. Absorbing.
Yuying Zhang, Jim Boyle, and Steve Klein Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Jay Mace University.
Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting, November 25-26, 2002 Dr. Daniela Jacob Regional climate modelling Daniela Jacob.
Trends in Tropical Water Vapor ( ): Satellite and GCM Comparison Satellite Observed ---- Model Simulated __ Held and Soden 2006: Robust Responses.
Trends in Tropical Water Vapor ( ): Satellite and GCM Comparison Satellite Observed ---- Model Simulated __ Held and Soden 2006: Robust Responses.
Investigations of Artifacts in the ISCCP Datasets William B. Rossow July 2006.
The NTU-GCM'S AMIP Simulation of the Precipitation over Taiwan Area Wen-Shung Kau 1, Yu-Jen Sue 1 and Chih-Hua Tsou 2 1 Department of Atmospheric Sciences.
Use of a high-resolution cloud climate data set for validation of Rossby Centre climate simulations Presentation at the EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite.
Representation of Subgrid Cloud-Radiation Interaction and its Impact on Global Climate Simulations Xinzhong Liang (Illinois State Water Survey, UIUC )
Yuqing Wang and Chunxi Zhang International Pacific Research Center University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Horizontal Variability In Microphysical Properties of Mixed-Phase Arctic Clouds David Brown, Michael Poellot – University of North Dakota Clouds are strong.
AEROCOM AODs are systematically smaller than MODIS, with slightly larger/smaller differences in winter/summer. Aerosol optical properties are difficult.
Update on the 2-moment stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in CAM Hugh Morrison and Andrew Gettelman National Center for Atmospheric Research CCSM Atmospheric.
Cloudnet Workshop April 2003 A.Tompkins 1 Changes to the ECMWF cloud scheme  Recent package of changes for 25r3:  COMPLETE REWRITE OF NUMERICS FOR CLOUD.
Evaluation of cloudy convective boundary layer forecast by ARPEGE and IFS Comparisons with observations from Cabauw, Chilbolton, and Palaiseau  Comparisons.
Update on progress with the implementation of a statistical cloud scheme: Prediction of cloud fraction using a PDF- based or “statistical” approach Ben.
Sea Ice, Solar Radiation, and SH High-latitude Climate Sensitivity Alex Hall UCLA Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences SOWG meeting January 13-14,
Representing Effects of Complex Terrain on Mountain Meteorology and Hydrology Steve Ghan, Ruby Leung, Teklu Tesfa, PNNL Steve Goldhaber, NCAR.
Studies of the tropical upper troposphere using MODIS data A. E. Dessler Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center University of Maryland S. Sherwood,
ECMWF Radiation and Clouds: Towards McICA? Towards a McICA representation of cloud-radiation interactions in the ECMWF model Radiation: J.-J.
Properties of Tropical Ice Clouds: Analyses Based on Terra/Aqua Measurements P. Yang, G. Hong, K. Meyer, G. North, A. Dessler Texas A&M University B.-C.
© Crown copyright Met Office Systematic Biases in Microphysics: observations and parametrization Ian Boutle, Steven Abel, Peter Hill, Cyril Morcrette QJ.
Cloud, radiation, and precipitation changes with dynamic regime: An observational analysis and model evaluation study PI: George Tselioudis Co-PI: Chris.
Date of download: 6/24/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Study area of Colorado Plateau with black dots for SNOTEL locations and digital.
Clouds and radiation in the GRAPES NWP model Qiying Chen National Meteorological Center China Meteorological Administration Exeter, Apr th WGNE.
Investigating Cloud Inhomogeneity using CRM simulations.
Clouds and Large Model Grid Boxes
H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR) , S. Ghan (PNL)
Multiscale aspects of cloud-resolving simulations over complex terrain
Cloud Validation: The issues
Improvement of Cloud Cover Fraction parameterization in Chemistry Transport Model(CTM) Zhenzhen Yin.
Panel: Bill Large, Bob Weller, Tim Liu, Huug Van den Dool, Glenn White
Quantitative verification of cloud fraction forecasts
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
Inhomogeneous radiative properties of cirrus clouds
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of ECHAM5 General Circulation Model using ISCCP simulator Swati Gehlot & Johannes Quaas Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie Hamburg, Germany

2 Outline Motivation Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion Outline Background and motivation Model and data used Inclusion of sub-column sampler within the ISCCP simulator Results and discussion Conclusion

3 Motivation Global climate models work at a much coarser scale to resolve cloud processes and hence they are “parameterized”, leading to uncertainty In order to have confidence in the cloud parameterizations, the evaluation studies for GCM clouds are very essential ISCCP satellite data provides an adequately long time series for cloud climatology and microphysics This study focuses on application of ISCCP satellite simulator for detailed cloud diagnostics from ECHAM5 atmospheric GCM and model evaluation with comparison to observations Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion

4 Model and data used Model evaluation studies for ECHAM5 GCM ‐ Simulations with T63 spectral resolution ‐ Additional module of ISCCP satellite simulator Analysis of diurnal cycle of convection using ECHAM5 data - Comparison of ISCCP-type cloud cover diagnosed in the model with satellite data - Focus on high and convective clouds - Analysis of ISCCP histograms – model Vs observations Model verification studies using satellite data ‑ International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) ‑ MODerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion

5 ISCCP simulator Additional module of ISCCP simulator is coupled with ECHAM5 to create ISCCP like cloud types in the model output Low Mid High ISCCP cloud types classification ISCCP cloud fraction histogram distribution Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion

6 Need of a sub-column sampler GCM Grid cell: km Typical grid box in a GCM with inhomogeneous distribution of clouds within it Figure from A Tompkins, ECMWF, 2005 Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion

7 Sub-grid scale variability: conventional approach ~500m ~200km grid box Typical model grid box (cloud overlap) Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion

8 Sub-column sampler ~500m ~200km grid box Dealing with horizontal cloud inhomogeneity and vertical overlap of clouds in the model grid box using stochastic cloud generator (based on Räisänen et al, QJRMS 2004) (Stochastically generated independent sub columns) Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion

9 Case study over four tropical regions Area 1 – Africa 00 o S to 30 o S and 00 o E to 30 o E Area 2 – Amazon 00 o S to 30 o S and 25 o W to 55 o W Area 3 – India 00 o N to 30 o N and 60 o E to 90 o E Area 4 – Indonesia 10 o N to 20 o S and 90 o E to 120 o E Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion

10 Case study India: Diurnal cycle Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion Diurnal cycle for India: model, ISCCP data, and MODIS data

11 Case study India: ISCCP histograms Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion Diurnal average ISCCP cloud fraction histograms: comparison of the model output, ISCCP data, and MODIS data

12 Case study Africa: Diurnal cycle Diurnal cycle for Africa: model, ISCCP data, and MODIS data Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion

13 Case study Africa: ISCCP histograms Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion Diurnal average ISCCP cloud fraction histograms: comparison of the model output, ISCCP data, and MODIS data

14 Global JJA averaged histograms (land and sea) Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion Diurnal average ISCCP cloud fraction histograms: comparison of the model output, ISCCP data, and MODIS data

15 Conclusion ECHAM5 model is evaluated using ISCCP simulator containing sub-grid variability information The model simulates the total cloud cover quite reasonably for the land and sea areas An overestimation of high and deep convective clouds is seen on comparison with ISCCP observations The model as well as ISCCP data miss a large amount of mid- cloud cover compared to MODIS observations Underestimation of low clouds in the model when compared to observations ISCCP and MODIS data show large discrepancies, particularly for land areas Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion

16 Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion Thank you Swati Gehlot Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie Hamburg, Germany

17 Spare Sheets Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion

18 Geographical distribution of convective clouds Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion

19 Sub-grid cloud generator Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion Stochastic cloud generator for generating random sub-columns in a model grid cell Initialized with GCM grid mean values of cloud fraction, liquid water and ice Vertical variance by maximum-random cloud overlap assumption for cloud fraction and cloud condensate Horizontal variance of total cloud water, using the Tompkins cloud scheme with beta distribution PDF The generated sub-columns consist at each level of entirely clear sky, or entirely cloudy sky with constant cloud condensate Tested with 100 sub columns, found reasonable global distributions of ISCCP variables.

20 Case study Amazon: Diurnal cycle Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion

21 Case study Amazon: ISCCP histograms Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion

22 Case study Indonesia: Diurnal cycle Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion

23 Case study Indonesia: ISCCP histograms Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion

24 Summary: Diurnal cycle Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion Four tropical regions comprising of land and sea areas are analyzed for evaluation of diurnal cycle of ISCCP clouds (JJA04) The amplitudes of diurnal cycle for model TCC varies between 5-17% (land) and 3- 12% (sea) compared to ISCCP data TCC which lies between 10-13% (land) and 3-13% (sea). The land areas are slightly overestimated where as the sea areas are relatively well simulated by the model For all the regions (land/sea), the high cloud cover (HCC) is overestimated in the model (8% in Africa to 43% in Indonesia) The low cloud cover (LCC) is underestimated in the model in the range of 7% (in Amazon, fig 3) to 19% (in Indonesia, fig 5) compared to the ISCCP satellite observations. The model underestimates the mid-cloud cover (MCC) with a range of 2% (in Africa, fig 3) to 10% (in Indonesia, fig 5) compared to the ISCCP satellite observations The reasonable computation of ISCCP TCC is due to the cancellation of errors by the overestimation of HCC and the underestimation of LCC and MCC

25 Summary: ISCCP histograms Outline Motivation Model Sub-column sampler Results Conclusion For all the test areas, the model simulated ISCCP histograms were computed using diurnal average cloud amount for JJA 2004 The model diagnoses larger amount of high clouds (for eg. India), and the histograms reveal that these are optically very thin The model misses much of the low cloud cover (LCC) and the mid-cloud cover (MCC), when histograms are compared with ISCCP observations The globally averaged histograms show that the sea area is relatively well simulated in the model compared to the land area The ISCCP simulator shows a decent agreement with the COSP simulator in terms of distribution of clouds in the ECHAM5 model