GeoWEPP ArcGIS 10.1 Development Team LESAM Lab Team

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Little Canyon Creek Subwatershed Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project Sponsored by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Advertisements

Modelling catchment sediment transfer: future sediment delivery to the Carlisle urban area Tom Coulthard Jorge A. Ramirez Paul Bates Jeff Neal.
An open source version of the Nonpoint-Source Pollution and Erosion Comparison Tool Climate Tools Café Webinar Dave Eslinger, Ph.D. 3 May, 2012.
J.Q. Wu, S. Dun, W.J. Elliot, H. Rhee J.R. Frankenberger, D.C. Flanagan P.W. Conrad, R.L. McNearny.
REMM: Riparian Ecosystem Management Model USDA-Agricultural Research Service University of Georgia California State University – Chico USDA-Natural Resources.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Great Lakes Tributary Modeling Program 516(e) Landuse BMP Discussion & SWAT (Soil Water Assessment Tool) Workshop June 22,
Final BMP Modeling Workshop September 29, 2011 UB Geography Department Sponsored by the Buffalo District of the US Army Corps of Engineers.
M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C. Byrne, S. Rahman, R. Powell, W
The Effects of Different Resolution DEMs in Determining Overland Flow Regimes Stacy L. Hutchinson 1, J.M. Shawn Hutchinson 2, Ik-Jae Kim 1, and Philip.
Introducing Web-Based Decision Tools for Environmental Management To Lake Michigan Communities Bernie Engel Long-Term Hydrological Impact Assessment (L-THIA)
Useful Tools for Predicting Erosion from Disturbed Rangelands: Disturbed WEPP for Rangelands The Water Erosion Prediction Project in the Forest Service.
LTHIA – Upgrades and Training Bernard A. Engel Tong Zhai Larry Theller Agricultural and Biological Department Purdue University In conjunction.
Web-Based GIS for Hydrological Impact Analysis Bernie Engel, Professor and Head Larry Theller, GIS Specialist Agricultural and Biological Engineering Purdue.
Workshop for Watershed Management Using Web-Based Decision Support Tools Bernard A. Engel Jin-Yong Choi.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
The Benefits of Investing In Conservation… …and the Costs of Not Investing Developed by Daniel Mountjoy USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Laura.
Hydrologic Theory One of the principal objectives in hydrology is to transform rainfall that has fallen over a watershed area into flows to be expected.
Calibration: Calibration was sensitive to lateral conductivity and exponential decay in soil conductivity. The sediment module of DHSVM 3.0 was sensitive.
Watershed Characterization System (WCS) and its Modeling Extensions
Soil Erosion and Conservation Developed 9/15/2000 by: Brian Matchett Sara Moyer.
Forest Hydrology Issue: Interaction of forests, fish, and climate One of the dominant pathways by which land cover change affects freshwater fish habitat.
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
Geographical & Environmental Modelling Dr Nigel Trodd Coventry University.
Introducing Web-Based Decision Tools for Environmental Watershed Management Bernie Engel and Roxanne Mitchell Agricultural & Biological Engineering Purdue.
A Distributed Flash Flood Forecasting Rainfall- Runoff Model Applied to Watersheds in the Northeast United States Michael Schaffner NOAA National Weather.
SEDSPEC Sediment and Erosion Design and SPECification Tool Dr. M. Sharif USACERL (800)
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
Welcome to the NSERL! Chi-hua Huang NSERL Research Leader.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Kristie J. Franz Department of Geological & Atmospheric Sciences Iowa State University
Greg Jennings, PhD, PE Professor, Biological & Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University BAE 579: Stream Restoration Lesson.
USDA Process-based Tools for Estimating Runoff, Soil Loss, and Sediment Yield – The WEPP Model Dennis C. Flanagan Research Agricultural Engineer USDA-Agricultural.
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
Modeling Variable Source Area Hydrology With WEPP
GeoWEPP ArcGIS 10.1 for soil erosion project Development Team Haoyi Xiong – Application leading developer Jonathan Goergen - Application co-lead developer.
Ag. & Biological Engineering
Mokelumne Avoided Cost Analysis Technical Committee Meeting: GeoWEPP modeling 1/9/2013 Mary Ellen Miller Michigan Tech Research Institute Bill Elliot,
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
Sediment Retention model
Runoff Pond Design, Lutsen, MN By Mark Greve. Problem Poplar River increases in sediment load near Lutsen ski hills Structure needed to slow flow and.
August 20th, CONTENT 1. Introduction 2. Data and Characteristics 3. Flood analysis 1. MOUSE 2. SOBEK 3. ARC-SWAT 4. Conclusions and suggestions.
WEPP—A Process-Based Hydrology and Erosion Model for Watershed Assessment and Restoration Joan Q. Wu, Markus Flury, Shuhui Dun, R. Cory Greer Washington.
WEPP—A Process-Based Hydrology and Erosion Model for Watershed Assessment and Restoration Joan Q. Wu 1, William J. Elliot 2, Donald K. McCool 3, Markus.
Modeling experience of non- point pollution: CREAMS (R. Tumas) EPIC (A. Povilaitis and R.Tumas SWRRBWQ (A. Dumbrauskas and R. Tumas) AGNPS (Sileika and.
Soil Movement in West Virginia Watersheds A GIS Assessment Greg Hamons Dr. Michael Strager Dr. Jingxin Wang.
CUAHSI Hydrologic Information System and its role in Hydrologic Observatories Core Team: D. Maidment, J. Helly, P. Kumar, M. Piasecki, R. Hooper Collaborators:
™ Nutrient Management Planning ¨ Will these be mandated in your state?  An emerging national issue is how to account for agricultural non-point source.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
LTHIA and Online Watershed Delineation - Tale of a DEM consumer Larry Theller,Bernie Engel, and Tong Zhai Purdue University Agricultural and Biological.
Building an OpenNSPECT Database for Your Watershed Shan Burkhalter and Dave Eslinger National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office for.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey October 22, 2015 EROS Fire Science Understanding a Changing Earth.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
RACC High School Training June 26, 2012 Jody Stryker University of Vermont Introduction to Watershed Hydrology.
NASA BAER Project: Improving Post-Fire Remediation Through Hydrological Modeling NASA Applied Science Program Applied Sciences Program - Wildfires.
Predicting the hydrologic implications of land use change in forested catchments Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Great Lakes Tributary Modeling Workshop The Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPPP) [1] National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA),
RESULTS Cont’d EFFECTS OF CROPPING AND TILLAGE SYSTEMS ON SOIL EROSION UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE IN OKLAHOMA X-C. John Zhang USDA-ARS Grazinglands Research.
Estimating Annual Sediment Yield and a Sediment Delivery Ratio for Red Creek, Utah and Wyoming Paul Grams Department of Geography and Earth Resources.
Modeling Source-water Contributions to Streamflow
USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service
Application of soil erosion models in the Gumara-Maksegnit watershed
Distributed modelling
Anticipating Impacts of AWM Interventions
Optimising Predictions of Sediment and Nutrient Loads Using AnnAGNPS
Paper by: Bloniarz D. , M. Matteo, T
Soil Loss Estimation. USLE – Universal Soil Loss Equation SLEMSA – Soil Loss Estimation Model for Southern Africa.
Predicting the hydrologic and water quality implications of climate and land use change in forested catchments Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil.
Soil Conservation.
Chapter 3 Soil Erosion and Its Controls
LA06 Assessment of Impacts and Adaptation Measures for the Water Resources Sector Due to Extreme Events Under Climate Change Conditions. REGIONAL PROJECT.
Presentation transcript:

GeoWEPP ArcGIS 10.1 Development Team LESAM Lab Team Haoyi Xiong – Application leading developer (haoyixio@buffalo.edu) Jonathan Goergen - Application co-lead developer Misa Yasumiishi - Webpage developer Martin Minkowski - GeoWEPP ArcGIS 9.x developer (ESRI Project Engineer now) Chris Renschler - Project Leader Tell them about yourself, have recently released and get lots of downloads LESAM Lab Team

Contents 1. GeoWEPP introduction 2. GeoWEPP for non-structural management Vegetation Buffer Strip (Strip Cropping), Reforestration 3. GeoWEPP for structural management Culvert (Impoundment), Terrace (Road, parking lot)

Introduction Predict soil erosion & runoff in a small watershed for environmental management scenarios. A process based soil erosion model for federal agencies involved in water & soil conversion, initiated in 1985 WEPP is a processed based model: Topography; Hydrology; Climate; Soil Erosion; Dem, landuse, soil are ASCII format

GeoWEPP Toolbar 1. Delineate channels 2. Delineate subcatchments 3. Generate climate data for WEPP input 4. Generate erosion pattern by accepting watershed 5. Show reports from WEPP 6. Save project 7. Remap with different tolerable value 8. Get Hillslope Info 9. Change associated land use and soil in a hillslope 10. Rerun WEPP to get new erosion pattern 11. Load a single hillslope to WEPP 12. Go to WEPP to load watershed project 13. Save project and exit

Example site East of Gowanda, NY Data are from USDA

Channels & Subcatchment delineation - TOPAZ Critical Source Area: Minimum upstream drainage area Minimum Source Channel Length: Minimum length for a delineated channel 1 Critical Source Area & 1 Minimum Source Channel Length Select outlet point from channel

Generating climate for WEPP- PRISM Use UTM-Zone and coordinate of outlet to locate nearest climate station data

Accept watershed to predict erosion

Accept watershed to predict erosion

Soil erosion prediction - WEPP Flowpath Method Watershed Method Processing model 1T = 1 ton/hectare/year Accurate but slow Rough but fast Watershed method: erosion is predicted for an entire hillslope with only 1 flowpath simulated. It only takes 1 domestic landuse and soil type into account. Flowpath Method: erosion is predicted for a hillslope with all flowpath simulated. All land use and soil type are used for analysis. Flowpath method considers sedimentation in the down-slope Additional operations: Remap with different tolerable erosion value Load a single hillslope to WEPP for further research

GeoWEPP Reports Watershed Method Flowpath Method = = Soil loss value of watershed method is different with that of flowpath method, since there is sedimentation in the down-slope =

GeoWEPP for Nonstructural Management

Vegetation Buffer Strip How much run-off will vegetation Buffer Strip reduce?

Vegetation Buffer Strip – Flowpath method Original With Vegetation Buffer Strip Same idea for Strip Cropping Change each pixels associated landuse ASCII value to pavement Same idea for Strip Cropping: create land use ASCII file based on contours on topography maps and use flowpath method to predict runoff Run off: 2595 𝒎 𝟑 𝒚𝒓 2138 𝒎 𝟑 𝒚𝒓 - 457 𝒎 𝟑 𝒚𝒓 23.7 𝒕𝒐𝒏 𝒚𝒓 10.5 𝒕𝒐𝒏 𝒚𝒓 - 13.2 𝒕𝒐𝒏 𝒚𝒓 Soil Loss:

Return Period Analysis - Extreme Event Load a single hillslope to WEPP Simulate for 100 years In a year, there is 2% probability for an extreme event causing 16.0 tons/ha soil loss Flowpath Method Watershed Method Find an extreme event causing maximum run-off and soil loss for a hillslope in a period of time

Vegetation Buffer Strip – Return Period Analysis Original With Vegetation Buffer Strip Run off in extreme event is highly reduced Insert a break on slope and add grass to the downslope

Reforestation Post-Fire Pre-Fire 3442.5 𝒎 𝟑 𝒚𝒓 Run off: 2595 𝒎 𝟑 𝒚𝒓 2595 𝒎 𝟑 𝒚𝒓 3442.5 𝒎 𝟑 𝒚𝒓 - 847.5 𝒎 𝟑 𝒚𝒓 23.7 𝒕𝒐𝒏 𝒚𝒓 31.0 𝒕𝒐𝒏 𝒚𝒓 - 7.3 𝒕𝒐𝒏 𝒚𝒓 Soil Loss:

GeoWEPP for structural management

Impoundment & culvert – Return period analysis Peak runoff rate VS. Culvert maximum discharge rate -> identify whether culvert will be broken Tells how much sediment goes into culvert or impoundment Use WEPP to simulate a single storm event as climate input for GeoWEPP to identify whether the culvert will be destroyed by the flood Read return period report from GeoWEPP for the watershed Use watershed method simulate runoff for 30 years Zoom in to the culvert site Select the culvert entry point as outlet point

Terraces / Roads / Parking lot Original Terraces Change each pixels associated landuse ASCII value and soil ASCII value to pavement You can also load a hillslope to WEPP and insert break as shown in the “Vegetation Buffer Strip – Return period analysis” Run off: 2595 𝒎 𝟑 𝒚𝒓 3123.3 𝒎 𝟑 𝒚𝒓 + 528.3 𝒎 𝟑 𝒚𝒓 23.7 𝒕𝒐𝒏 𝒚𝒓 29.8 𝒕𝒐𝒏 𝒚𝒓 + 6.1 𝒕𝒐𝒏 𝒚𝒓 Soil Loss:

Culvert Tool for flow direction Since culvert under road change the flow direction, DEM may record elevation of the road, which is above culvert and leads to incorrect flow direction. Noted that DEM resolution may greatly influence flow direction 5m DEM for another study site Developed by Brian Clarkson

Stream Customization – GeoWEPP Extension Select a point in channel to specify where the channel start Make sure that hydrology in model is correct for further process.

Stream Customization – GeoWEPP Extension ArcMap Hydrology Tools GeoWEPP without customization GeoWEPP with Customization

http://geowepp.geog.buffalo.edu/

References GeoWEPP: Renschler, C.S. (2003) Designing geo-spatial interfaces to scale process models: The GeoWEPP approach. Hydrological Processes 17, p.1005-1017. WEPP: Laflen, J.M., L.J. Lane, and G.R. Foster. 1991. WEPP—a next generation of erosion prediction technology. Journal of Soil Water Conservation 46(1): 34–38. Flanagan, D.C., and M.A. Nearing (eds.). 1995. USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) Hillslope Profile and Watershed Model Documentation. NSERL Report No. 10, National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, West Lafayette, Indiana. GeoWEPP Applications: Flanagan, D.C., J.R. Frankenberger, T.A. Cochrane, C.S., Renschler, and W.J. Elliot (2013) Geospatial Application of the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) Model. Transactions of the ASABE (in press) Renschler, C.S., and D.C. Flanagan (2008) Site-Specific Decision-Making Based on GPS RTK Survey and Six Alternative Elevation Data Sources: Soil Erosion Prediction. Transactions of the ASABE 51(2):413-424.[2009 ASABE Superior Paper Award] Renschler, C.S., and Lee, T. (2005) Spatially distributed Assessment of Short- and Long-term Impacts of Multiple Best Management Practices in Agricultural Watersheds. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(6):446-456. Renschler, C.S., Flanagan, D.C., Engel, B.A., Kramer, L.A., and Sudduth, K.A. (2002) Site-Specific Decision-Making Based on GPS RTK Survey and Six Alternative Elevation Data Sources: Watershed Topography and Delineation. Transactions of the ASAE 45(6):1883-1895. Renschler, C.S., and J. Harbor (2002) Soil erosion assessment tools from point to regional scales – The role of geomorphologists in land management research and implementation. Geomorphology 47, p.189-209.