Dr. Majed Wadi MBChB, MSc Med Edu

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Item Analysis.
Advertisements

How to Make a Test & Judge its Quality. Aim of the Talk Acquaint teachers with the characteristics of a good and objective test See Item Analysis techniques.
FACULTY DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERIES OFFICE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION TULANE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE Using Statistics to Evaluate Multiple Choice.
Covariance and Correlation
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). All rights reserved
Rebecca Sleeper July  Statistical  Analysis of test taker performance on specific exam items  Qualitative  Evaluation of adherence to optimal.
Consistency in testing
Reliability and Validity checks S-005. Checking on reliability of the data we collect  Compare over time (test-retest)  Item analysis  Internal consistency.
© McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Reliability and Objectivity.
Item Analysis: A Crash Course Lou Ann Cooper, PhD Master Educator Fellowship Program January 10, 2008.
Advanced Topics in Standard Setting. Methodology Implementation Validity of standard setting.
Statistics of EBO 2010 Examination EBO General Assembly Sunday June 21st, 2010 (Tallin, Estonia) Danny G.P. Mathysen MSc. Biomedical Sciences EBOD Assessment.
Test Construction Processes 1- Determining the function and the form 2- Planning( Content: table of specification) 3- Preparing( Knowledge and experience)
Item Analysis What makes a question good??? Answer options?
Z - SCORES standard score: allows comparison of scores from different distributions z-score: standard score measuring in units of standard deviations.
Lesson Seven Item Analysis. Contents Item Analysis Item Analysis Item difficulty (item facility) Item difficulty (item facility) Item difficulty Item.
Item PersonI1I2I3 A441 B 323 C 232 D 112 Item I1I2I3 A(h)110 B(h)110 C(l)011 D(l)000 Item Variance: Rank ordering of individuals. P*Q for dichotomous items.
Objective Exam Score Distribution. Item Difficulty Power Item
Chi-square Test of Independence
SETTING & MAINTAINING EXAM STANDARDS
Item Analysis Prof. Trevor Gibbs. Item Analysis After you have set your assessment: How can you be sure that the test items are appropriate?—Not too easy.
Lesson Nine Item Analysis.
Multiple Choice Test Item Analysis Facilitator: Sophia Scott.
ANALYZING AND USING TEST ITEM DATA
Classical Test Theory By ____________________. What is CCT?
Mean Median Mode Range by: courtney widmer. MEAN definition: the average of a set of data steps 1 add numbers 2 count numbers 3 divide the number of numbers.
Part #3 © 2014 Rollant Concepts, Inc.2 Assembling a Test #
Completion, Short-Answer, and True-False Items
Test item analysis: When are statistics a good thing? Andrew Martin Purdue Pesticide Programs.
Field Test Analysis Report: SAS Macro and Item/Distractor/DIF Analyses
The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for genetics Michelle K. Smith, William B. Wood, and Jennifer K. Knight Science Education Initiative.
Chapter 7 Item Analysis In constructing a new test (or shortening or lengthening an existing one), the final set of items is usually identified through.
 Closing the loop: Providing test developers with performance level descriptors so standard setters can do their job Amanda A. Wolkowitz Alpine Testing.
Techniques to improve test items and instruction
Group 2: 1. Miss. Duong Sochivy 2. Miss. Im Samphy 3. Miss. Lay Sreyleap 4. Miss. Seng Puthy 1 ROYAL UNIVERSITY OF PHNOM PENH INSTITUTE OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES.
Lab 5: Item Analyses. Quick Notes Load the files for Lab 5 from course website –
TYPES OF STATISTICAL METHODS USED IN PSYCHOLOGY Statistics.
How to Perform Simple Manual Item Analysis Dr. Belal Hijji, RN, PhD January 18, 2012.
UTOPPS—Fall 2004 Teaching Statistics in Psychology.
Basic Measurement and Statistics in Testing. Outline Central Tendency and Dispersion Standardized Scores Error and Standard Error of Measurement (Sm)
Grading and Analysis Report For Clinical Portfolio 1.
8 Strategies for the Multiple Choice Portion of the AP Literature and Composition Exam.
NCLEX ® is a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) How Does It Work?
Assessment and Testing
2. Format of stem 1. Balance of content level What is a “good” (or “bad”) multiple-choice item? (Trade secrets from a professional) Psychology and applied.
Presented By Dr / Said Said Elshama  Distinguish between validity and reliability.  Describe different evidences of validity.  Describe methods of.
Introduction to Item Analysis Objectives: To begin to understand how to identify items that should be improved or eliminated.
Overview and interpretation
Test Question Writing Instructor Development ANSF Nurse Training Program.
Language Testing How to make multiple choice test.
Dan Thompson Oklahoma State University Center for Health Science Evaluating Assessments: Utilizing ExamSoft’s item-analysis to better understand student.
Utilizing Item Analysis to Improve the Evaluation of Student Performance Mihaiela Ristei Gugiu Central Michigan University Mihaiela Ristei Gugiu Central.
Psychometrics: Exam Analysis David Hope
Dept. of Community Medicine, PDU Government Medical College,
Items analysis Introduction Items can adopt different formats and assess cognitive variables (skills, performance, etc.) where there are right and.
Exam Analysis Camp Teach & Learn May 2015 Stacy Lutter, D. Ed., RN Nursing Graduate Students: Mary Jane Iosue, RN Courtney Nissley, RN Jennifer Wierworka,
4. Evaluation of measuring tools: item analysis Psychometrics. 2011/12. Group A (English)
Using Data to Drive Decision Making:
ARDHIAN SUSENO CHOIRUL RISA PRADANA P.
Data Analysis and Standard Setting
Classroom Analytics.
UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School
Classroom Assessment Ways to improve tests.
TOPIC 4 STAGES OF TEST CONSTRUCTION
By ____________________
Summative Assessment Grade 6 April 2018 Develop Revise Pilot Analyze
Lies, Damned Lies & Statistical Analysis for Language Testing
This file contains class distributions for all quizzes and exams, starting with quiz 1. Two graphs will be posted for each quiz/exam. The first graph.
Analyzing test data using Excel Gerard Seinhorst
Tests are given for 4 primary reasons.
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Majed Wadi MBChB, MSc Med Edu Test Item Quality Dr. Majed Wadi MBChB, MSc Med Edu

Objectives To know basic concepts in test item analysis To know test item analysis criteria for good MCQ To judge MCQ based on test item analysis

Good Exam BUT Blueprinting Good question writing and checking Standard setting BUT Also post hoc item analysis Make this exam better by excluding bad items Make later exams better by revising or rejecting questions (Revest, 2012)

Basic concepts in Test Item Analysis Exam score is a number which reflects the sum (count) of the correct; raw ratings (Downing, 2009) Raw Percentage (%) Difficulty index is the proportion of examinees who answered an item correctly. It is denoted by p-value (Ebel and Frisbie, 1991; Osterlind, 2002; Downing, 2009; Rahim, 2010). Sometime, it is called facility index

Basic concepts in Test Item Analysis Discrimination index (D) is the ability of an item to discriminate between high-ability examinees from low-ability examinees. It is calculated by getting the difference between the number of examinees getting the correct response in the high-ability and low-ability groups divided by the percentage that is used to identify the high and low examinee. This percentage can be 25, 27, or 33. (Ebel and Frisbie, 1991; Osterlind, 2002; Downing, 2009a; Rahim, 2010).

Basic concepts in Test Item Analysis Point-Biserial Correlation is a special type of correlation coefficient (rpbis), in which students’ performance of the item (1 for correct response and 0 for incorrect response) is correlated with their performance of the entire test. It is used as another variant of the discrimination index. (Osterlind, 2002; Downing, 2009) It can be calculated using SPSS

Example

Item analysis interpretation Difficulty index: Range from 0% or 0 (difficult) to 100% or 1 (easy) Acceptable Too easy Too difficulty Difficulty index 0.20 – 0.80 Above 0.80 Below 0.20 Explanation Good Common sense •Wrong key •Ambiguous/misleading •Trivial fact

Item analysis interpretation Discrimination index Range from 1 to -1 Discrimination index 0.40 and above 0.20 – 0.39 Below 0.20 Negative value Explanation Very good item Reasonably good but need improvement •Too easy Too difficult •Ambiguous •Misleading •Wrong answer key

Classification of test item

Thank you