EU Competition Policy. Internal Market One of the activities of the Community: “an internal market characterised by the abolition, as between member States,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Business Law Lesson 2 February 27 th, 2013.
Advertisements

GREETINGS TO CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS FOR ICAIS POST QUALIFICATION COURSE VIDEO CONFERENCE FROM HYDERABAD 26 AUGUST 2005.
1 SPORT AND COMPETITION LAW AT EU LEVEL beyond the White Paper on Sport Tilburg University, Spring semester 2010 MICHELE COLUCCI
EU Competition Policy Michele Colucci ISDE-JMLS Barcelona June 2-4, Web site:
1 SPORT AND COMPETITION LAW AT EU LEVEL Madrid, february 2007 MICHELE COLUCCI
Why competition law? Economic performance Social welfare Well being of consumers.
Environmental Legal TeamEnvironment and Beyond Advanced European Union Law The European Internal Market: Free movement of goods (I) 6 th Lecture,
1 “Introduction to EU Trade Policy” – July 2008 How We Make Trade Policy n Contents n Part I: EU Trade Powers n Part II: The evolving scope of Trade Policy.
IP rights and competition law: Friends or foes? Etienne Wéry Attorney at the bars of Paris and Brussels Lecturer at Robert Schuman University (Strasbourg)
The fundamentals of EC competition law
LUMSA – International Commercial Law COMPETITION LAW – GENERAL PRINCIPLES Competition law is law that promotes or seeks to maintain market competition.
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class I, 6th Oct 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
INTRODUCTION TO COMPETITION LAW
Fair Trading Commission Overview of Competition Law The Experience of Barbados Competition law and Policy Training Workshop March 30-31, 2011 The Savannah.
Georgetown University. The Efficiency Properties of Competitive Markets Q $/q S D MC ATC P P=MC Allocative efficiency P=minAC Productive efficiency IndustryFirm.
1 Competition Policy Development, Objectives and the Law This presentation is based on Motta (2004), Competition Policy, Cambridge University Press.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
Georgetown University. Hurricane Charlie ….and Dennis, Katrina and Rita What about a $10 bag of ice?
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class V, 3rd Nov 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
1 Is there a conflict between competition law and intellectual property rights? Edward Whitehorn Head, Competition Affairs Branch Carrie Tang Assistant.
Prohibited agreements: Article 101 (3) Julija Jerneva ( )
World-class legal education in the heart of London The Competition Protocol: Undermining EU Competition Law? Wednesday April 28 th 2010,
European Commission – Directorate General for Competition Dr. K. Mehta, Director, Cartels A PRIMER ON ANTI-TRUST POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION UCL – Louvain-la-Neuve.
LUMSA – International Commercial Law 17 October 2014 Prof. Avv. Roberto Pirozzi
Vertical Restraints: An Introduction
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class IV, 27th Oct 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
Introductory course on Competition and Regulation Pál Belényesi University of Verona October 2006.
Advising your Clients on the Effect of Competition Law Professor Mark Williams 11 March 2011.
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class II, 13th Oct 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
Practical Impact Of European Community Anti Trust Law On R&D Agreements Volker Linden, Rechtsanwalt, German-Australian-Pacific Lawyers Association International.
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
Competition Policy and Law Presentation to Study Tour for Russian Member Universities of the Virtual Institute Network 26 March 2009.
EU Competition Policy. History of Competition Law National Laws v. EU Competition Law.
International & Foreign Law Search, Liu 1 Separation of Powers? Commission—executive? Council—Legislative? Parliament—Legislative? Court--Judiciary.
© DET JURIDISKE FAKULTET UNIVERSITETET I OSLO “object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition” The term “prevention, restriction.
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE Moscow 2006 New Antimonopoly Law of the Russian Federation.
Basic economic freedoms. 1. Free movement of goods The Community shall be based upon a customs union which shall cover all trade in goods and which shall.
EU. Institutions History and Objectives of Competition Law.
European competition policy. Role of competition policy Promote economic efficiency To control intensity of competition within economy Some areas it is.
Law and Economics EU/EC Competition Law Professional Career Programme (PCP) Yoshiharu, ICHIKAWA 2011/12/10.
EU Competition Law. Introduction Competition law protects competition in a free market economy, that is, an economic system in which the allocation of.
Law and Economics EU/EC Competition Law Professional Career Programme (PCP) Yoshiharu, ICHIKAWA 2011/12/17.
“object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition” The term “prevention, restriction and distortion” – Used interchangeably Economic.
EU Business Law: Anticompetitive agreements (Art. 101 TFEU) Dr. Agata Jurkowska-Gomułka.
Abuse of dominant position European Business Law 2013/2014 University of Warsaw Faculty of Management Dariusz Aziewicz LL.M.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business, a Division of Thomson Learning 20.1 Chapter 20 Antitrust Law.
The Economic Environment of Business – Lecture 5 Competition Policy.
Law and Economics EU/EC Competition Law Professional Career Programme (PCP) Yoshiharu, ICHIKAWA 2012/01/14.
Competition Policy in India: an Overview Pankaj Jain Faculty : Lovely Professional University.
LEB Slide Set 14 Competition Law Matti Rudanko. LEB Slide Set 14 2 A Constitution of Market Economy Well-functioning markets – an unwritten fundamental.
competition rules in inland transport
Abuses of Dominant Position
Markkinoiden juridinen toimintaympäristö Kalvot 15
European Union Law Week 10.
EU Competition Rules for Technology Transfer Agreements
Competition Law and its Application: European Union
Competition Law (EU, USA, Turkey)
 The term “prevention, restriction and distortion” Used interchangeably
Lear - Laboratorio di economia, antitrust, regolamentazione
EU Competences Tamara Ćapeta 2016.
The competition enforcement in regulated sectors
Intel: Back to the Future?
Legal Aspects Of Corporate Business
Dr. Rajesh Kumar Lecture-1
SPORT AND COMPETITION LAW AT EU LEVEL beyond the White Paper on Sport
EU Competition Policy Article 101 TFEU.
Free movement of persons
SPORT AND EU COMPETITION LAW
SPORT AND COMPETITION LAW AT EU LEVEL beyond the White Paper on Sport
Presentation transcript:

EU Competition Policy

Internal Market One of the activities of the Community: “an internal market characterised by the abolition, as between member States, of obstacles to the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital” (Art. 3(1)(c)) “The internal market shall comprise an area without internal frontiers…” (Art. 14(2))

Competition Policy Community’s task: “to promote … a high degree of competitiveness” (Art. 2) Another activity of the Community: “a system ensuring that competition in the internal market is not distorted” (Art. 3(1)(g)) “the adoption of an economic policy … conducted in accordance with the principle of an open market economy with free competition” (Art. 4(1))

Objectives of EU Competition Law

Market integration Protecting competition Fairness and equity Protecting economic freedom Public policy, social-political-environmental reasons (promoting small and medium sized firms) Strategic reasons (trade, industrial policy)

History of Competition Law National Laws v. EU Competition Law

History of Competition Law Sherman Act, USA (1890) German laws – Treaty of Rome (1957) Regulation no. 17/1962 (replaced by no. 1/2003)

Sources of EU Competition Law

EC Treaty Articles (81-89) Regulations –Council –Commission Commission decisions Judgements –European Court of Justice –Court of First Instance Commission notices and guidelines Commission Annual reports National level playing field!

Effect on trade between Member States Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty are only applicable if there may be an appreciable, direct or indirect, actual or potential influence on the flow or pattern of trade between at least two Member States of the EU. See Art. 3 of Regulation 1/2003

Competition Law by “sub-fields” Antitrust Articles 81-82; 86 (ex post analysis) Mergers Regulation no. 4064/89, replaced by 139/2004) (ex ante analysis) State Aids Art (ex ante analysis) Control of collusion and other anticompetitive behaviors (agreements in restraint of trade – abusive behaviors of dominant undertakings) Control of mergers, joint ventures, acquisitions Control of direct or indirect aid given by member States to undertakings

Treaty provisions Articles Articles 31 and 86 Articles 10 and Undertakings States and undertakings States

Important definitions / Common notions Notion of “Undertaking” “Effect on trade” concept Distortion of competition within the common market Market Definition Economic notion; irrelevance of property Commission Notice (2004) Effect doctrine Commission Notice (1997)

Definition of “Relevant market” Defining the relevant market means determining the scope of the competition rules in respect of restrictive practices and abuses of a dominant position as well as the scope of mergers regulations Product (interchangeability/substitutability) Geographic (homogenous market conditions)

Art. 81 Anticompetitive Agreements “1. The following shall be prohibited as incompatible with the common market: all agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which may affect trade between Member States and which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the common market, and in particular those which: (a) directly or indirectly fix purchase or selling prices or any other trading conditions; (b) limit or control production, markets, technical development, or investment; (c) share markets or sources of supply; (d) apply dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage; (e) make the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contract 2. Any agreements or decisions prohibited pursuant to this article shall be automatically void. 3. The provisions of paragraph 1 may, however, be declared inapplicable in the case of: — any agreement or category of agreements between undertakings, — any decision or category of decisions by associations of undertakings, — any concerted practice or category of concerted practices, which contributes to improving the production or distribution of goods or to promoting technical or economic progress, while allowing consumers a fair share of the resulting benefit, and which does not: (a) impose on the undertakings concerned restrictions which are not indispensable to the attainment of these objectives; (b) afford such undertakings the possibility of eliminating competition in respect of a substantial part of the products in question.”

Art. 81. (1): general prohibition (not absolute) -Collusion -Effect on trade between members States -Restriction of competition Art. 81 (2): consequences of a violation -Nullity -Pecuniary sanctions -Reparation of damages Art. 81 (3): exemptions

Collusion Such „agreements” allow firms to exercise market power they would not otherwise have. Types of collusion Tacit Collusion Explicit Collusion “It is contrary to the rules on competition for a producer to co-operate with his competitors, in any way whatsoever, in order to determine a co-operated way of action or to ensure its success by prior elimination of all uncertainty as to each others conduct regarding the essential elements of that action” (ECJ ICI v. Commission, Case 48/69)

Article 82 Abuse of dominant position “Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the common market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the common market in so far as it may affect trade between Member States. Such abuse may, in particular, consist in: (a) directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions; (b) limiting production, markets or technical development to the prejudice of consumers; (c) applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage; (d) making the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts.”

Absolute prohibition -One or more undertakings having a dominant position in the EU or a substantial part of it -Abusive conduct -Effect on trade between Member States. Consequences of a violation -Nullity -Pecuniary sanctions -Reparation of damages

Dominance Dominance refers to a situation where a firm has a lot of market power Market power: the ability that a firm has to raise prices over marginal costs (Above competitive level and earning supra-normal profits). In other way, market power presents undertakings with the possibility of limiting output and raising price, which are clearly harmful to consumer welfare. Types of dominance Single Dominance Collective Dominance “the ability of a firm to behave independently of competitors, buyers and ultimately, the consumers”. (ECJ, United Brands, Case 27/76 and Hoffman La Roche, Case 85/76)

Article 86 “1. In the case of public undertakings and undertakings to which Member States grant special or exclusive rights, Member States shall neither enact nor maintain in force any measure contrary to the rules contained in this Treaty, in particular to those rules provided for in Article 12 and Articles 81 to Undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest or having the character of a revenue-producing monopoly shall be subject to the rules contained in this Treaty, in particular to the rules on competition, in so far as the application of such rules does not obstruct the performance, in law or in fact, of the particular tasks assigned to them. The development of trade must not be affected to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the Community. 3. The Commission shall ensure the application of the provisions of this Article and shall, where necessary, address appropriate directives or decisions to Member States.”

Article 86(1) “public undertakings” and “undertakings to which member States grant special or exclusive rights” Article 86(2) “undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest” Article 86(3) Prohibition to member States to enact or mantain in force measures contrary to the Treaty, in particular to rules on competition Subject to rules on competition only in so far as their application is compatible with the performance of the tasks assigned to them Commission surveillance

“services of general economic interest” Article 16 “given the place occupied by the services of general economic interest in the shared values of the Union as well as their role in promoting social and territorial cohesion” Article 86 (2) -Expection to the application of rules of the Treaty where the latter would obstruct the provision of “services of general economic interest”. -However, even where such exception applies, special rights must not go beyond what is necessary for the performance of that service.

Liberalisation Article 86(3) -Since 1985, the Commission adopted decisions covering most of the areas where member States granted special and exclusive rights (posts, mobile telecomunications, airports, ports and maritime transport, insurance, broadcasting / energy and railways)