Kimberton, PA | 610.933.5246 Columbus, GA | 706.221.7688 Strategic Air Planning: Where Do We Grow From Here? Colin McCall |

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Source Review (NSR) Program Basics
Advertisements

Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Environmental Management Commission.
How Will Georgia-Florida Wildfires Affect Regional Air Quality Planning? Wes Younger Georgia Environmental Protection Division.
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
1 Year in Review: Clean Air Act Presented by: Tom Wood Stoel Rives LLP October 8, 2010 Things Are Getting Really Complicated.
Sean O’Brien Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting Seminar 2014.
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
December 4, Utility MACT Air & Waste Management Association/EPA Information Exchange December 4, 2002 William H. Maxwell Combustion Group/ESD.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
1 An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for the 8- Hour Ozone NAAQS Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG November 16, 2005.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Actions to Reduce Mercury Air Emissions and Related Exposure Risks in the United States Ben Gibson Office of Air Quality and Planning and Standards U.S.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
Implications of the 2008 Ozone Standard Changes Deanna L. Duram, P.E., C.M. August 7, 2008 trinityconsultants.com.
Air Quality Management China City Mobilization Workshop Joseph Paisie USEPA Beijing, China.
Environmental Protection Division Air Quality Update Georgia EPD Jimmy Johnston Georgia Environmental Protection Division August 5, 2010.
Proposed Rulemaking 25 Pa. Code Chapter 121. General Provisions Chapter 127 Subchapter E. New Source Review John Slade, Chief Division of Permits Bureau.
Flexible Air Permitting Innovation Done Right State-EPA Innovations Symposium Denver, CO January 24, 2006.
Kimberton, PA | Kennesaw, GA | Strategic Air Planning: Is the Time for a PAL Here? Mark Wenclawiak, CCM|
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
National Academy of Sciences: Air Quality Management in the United States MWAQC Briefing March 24, 2004.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Regulatory Requirements For Modeling. Air Quality Model Estimates Developing Air Pollution Control Plans Assessment of Environmental Impacts Projecting.
PM fines Quantification Issues Ron Myers OAQPS/EMAD/EFPAG 12/6/2005.
EPA’s Revisions to Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards (PM NAAQS) Air Quality Committee Meeting January 9, 2013 Sushma Masemore,
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Other Aspects of PSD Title V Permitting.
Imperial County PM 10 SIP: Update Imperial County APCD SIP Workgroup Meeting September 24, 2008.
Jessica Montanez Environmental Protection Agency NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) PROGRAM.
1 Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal General Overview March 1, 2006 US EPA.
Brad Miller Anna Kelley. National Ambient Air Quality Standard Update New Sulfur Dioxide Non-Attainment Area – Effective October 4, 2013 Ozone Secondary.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
1 Status of SO 2 Implementation and Modeling Issues Michael Ling Associate Director, Air Quality Policy Division U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning.
Permitting and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
National and Regional Programs to Reduce Ozone Transport Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee April 27, 2005.
NSR and Title V Activities WESTAR Business Meeting May 2005.
Air Quality Management Comparison of Cap-and-Trade, Command-and Control and Rate-Based Programs Dr. Ruben Deza Senior Environmental Engineer Clean Air.
Exceptional Events and Fire Policy Presented by Don Hodge, U.S. EPA Region 9 Interagency Air and Smoke Council meeting May 2, 2012 Disclaimer: Positions.
NSR—Minor New Source Review Darrel Harmon U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation.
SO 2 NAAQS Modeling MassCAIR Stakeholder Meeting December 13, 2011.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
Pulp & Paper Sector Strategy & New Source Performance Standards Strategy Peter Tsirigotis, Director Sector Policies & Programs Division National Association.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
Natural Events Policy Questions PM 2.5 Natural Events – States/Regions Need Written Statement Clarifying Position That It Is Allowed Under Current Law.
Jerry Beasley, Ph.D., P.E. Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality MMA Environmental & Safety Conference and Expo October 16, 2015.
PSD/Nonattainment Applicability Arturo J. Garza Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2016.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
Regulatory Roadmap: Power sector environmental rules
Steve Page Office Director, OAQPS NACAA Spring Meeting 2010
Flexible Air Permitting
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
NACAA Permitting Workshop, Chicago June 14, 2011
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
Major New Source Review (NSR) Part 2
Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal
CEQA Guidelines & Thresholds Update
Proposal to Revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particle Pollution WESTAR Meeting March 2006.
PM2.5 NSR and Designations
Presentation transcript:

Kimberton, PA | Columbus, GA | Strategic Air Planning: Where Do We Grow From Here? Colin McCall | | (706) , x14 November 7, 2012 Presented to the Manufacture Alabama Environmental Conference by All4 Inc.

2 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  NAAQS  Boiler MACT/CISWI/NHSM  MACT Regulations/Residual Risk  GHG Regulation  Visibility/Regional Haze  Utility MACT/NSPS  Multi-pollutant Rules  More… Air Pressure

3 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Focus on these areas that create liability and are obstacles to growth Construction Permitting (New Source Review) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) Agenda

4 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Reform Rules: “Actual-to-Projected-Actual”  Baseline Actual Emissions: 10 year lookback  Projected Actual Emissions Should be based on business projections Exclude emissions “that could have been accommodated” Tracked for 5 or 10 years New Source Review Permitting

5 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Source Reporting and Tracking Obligations  Are business or accounting projections available?  Project Aggregation Considerations Technical and Economic Dependence  Individual projects are “easier” to permit but multiple projects can cause confusion New Source Review Permitting

6 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Recommendations Know your 5 year capital plan Consider relationships between projects Think like an auditor Be careful about internal documentation Consider flexible permitting options New Source Review Permitting

7 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  The “newer” NAAQS levels are extremely stringent  NAAQS are health based and are unlikely to be reversed (e.g., recent court cases)  Single biggest air regulatory obstacle to industrial growth for the foreseeable future  Very few projects can increase emissions without an offsetting emissions decrease NAAQS Summary

8 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) 196 micrograms per cubic meter (  g/m 3 ) 99 th %tile of Daily Maximum 1-Hour Concentration  1-Hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ) 188  g/m 3 98 th %tile of Daily Maximum 1-Hour Concentration  24-Hour and Annual PM  g/m 3 (24-Hour) – 98 th Percentile 15  g/m 3 (Annual) Important NAAQS Levels

9 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  NAAQS Implementation: designating areas as attainment or nonattainment and establishing SIP regulations Typically evaluated using ambient monitors to measure real pollutant concentrations Process implemented by ADEM  PSD Permitting: evaluating the NAAQS levels for specific projects and facilities Evaluated using dispersion models and EPA guidance Process performed by individual facilities NAAQS Big Picture

10 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Dispersion models can be conservative, particularly for short-term concentrations  Modeling is based on potential-to-emit, not actual emission rates  Results can be very sensitive to inputs such as meteorological data  Ambient background concentrations are summed with modeled concentrations  Generally difficult to model compliance NAAQS Modeling

11 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  PSD permitting projects for major facilities  NAAQS Implementation Process (specifically for the 1-Hour SO 2 NAAQS)  Modeling at the discretion of State agencies for minor construction permitting  Modeling triggered when a nearby facility performs PSD permitting  Modeling performed by environmental groups When is Modeling Required?

12 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Common theme: For most facilities, future emissions will decrease from historic actual levels as a result of new and developing air regulations and standards and other influences, regardless of growth in productivity. NAAQS Implications

13 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  1-Hour SO 2 update: Process that was originally based on dispersion modeling awaits EPA rulemaking An enhanced ambient monitoring network is likely, possibly paid for and operated by facilities  PM2.5 annual NAAQS levels is proposed to be tightened (11 to 13  g/m 3 ) NAAQS Current Events

14 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Understand your dispersion modeling status relative to the NAAQS  Use that knowledge early in the planning process for new capital projects  Follow the 1-Hour SO 2 NAAQS implementation process to understand how it impacts you  Consider the implications and benefits of ambient pollutant and meteorological monitoring  Don’t make any changes (e.g., Boiler MACT) without considering the NAAQS NAAQS Takeaways

15 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Ability to change operations/equipment quickly and as needed  Long range targets for planning: Internal - production/energy/economics External - rule driven costs to comply  Clarity in regulatory requirements particularly for permitting Facility Needs

16 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  “Plantwide Applicability Limitation” (PAL) is an available regulatory option that can potentially ease air permitting PSD cycle  Federal PSD rule provides for PALs based on historic actual emissions  PALs are pollutant specific and could be a critical part of a strategic plan  PALs are another permitting option that shouldn’t be immediately dismissed PAL Option

17 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  For a facility with a PAL permit that maintains emissions below PAL, physical changes and changes in method of operation are not major modifications and do not require approval under PSD  Possibilities of a competitive advantage PAL Advantages

18 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  PALs historically worked for relatively simple industries with limited sources and where technology was driving emissions lower per unit of production  New air quality world we are in is forcing facilities to realization that future emissions will be lower per unit of production driven by rules, standards, permitting, technology… PAL Considerations

19 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Same baseline actual emissions used in PSD applicability assessment: Adjust for current applicable requirements Add PSD significance threshold Justify PAL and provide method of compliance Establishing a PAL

20 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  PAL established for 10 year period  Increased emissions tracking, testing, and monitoring obligations  PAL can be adjusted down to account for new applicable requirements  Getting out of a PAL can have serious ramifications  ADEM approval of projects is still required  PAL can be ratcheted down at the end of the permit term based on actual emissions PAL Concerns

21 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Develop historic facility-wide baseline emission rates and potential PAL levels  Address potential NAAQS issues  Consider new rules, facility operations plans, potential energy efficiency improvements, new technologies, low hanging fruit for emissions reductions  Weigh value of PAL for each pollutant PAL Approach

22 Your environmental compliance is clearly our business.  Know your projects and how they relate to one another  Understand how your facility relates to the NAAQS levels (and discuss meteorological monitoring)  Talk about air requirements early and often in the planning process for projects  Understand where emission reductions are available within your fenceline  Consider all permitting options (including PALs) Final Thoughts

Kimberton, PA | Columbus, GA | Questions/Comments Colin McCall| | (706) , x14