MCIC Workshop 2012 Complying with NC Air Quality Regulations Boiler MACT/GACT and 112j Steve Schliesser Division of Air Quality Environmental Engineer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cathy Beahm Technical Assistance Specialist NH DES, Air Resources
Advertisements

EPAs Information Collection Request (ICR) Programs Lessons learned from a Brick up side the head.
Impacts of the New Boiler MACT Rules Les Oakes King & Spalding.
Part 63 Boiler Rule for Area Sources AWMA Conference September 11-14, 2012 Biloxi, MS Lee Page Air Toxics Assessment and Implementation Section U.S. Environmental.
Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world Proposed Area and Major Source Boiler NESHAP Overview David Dunn Environmental Resources Management.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
Boiler GACT Update Georgia AWMA Conference
Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials Definition: How it Relates to Boiler MACT and CISWI Rules Biloxi, MS ♦ September 13, 2012 Melissa Hillman Justin Fickas.
Harmonization of Part 60 and Part 75 CEM Requirements Robert Vollaro
Harmonization of Parts 60 and 75
Jan. EPA Final GHG Reporting Guidance (actually Dec ) Mar. 31stAnnual GHG Reporting AprilProposed HAPs or Mercury MACT July 1st Annual Toxic Release.
1 Impact of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials Rule 2012 Annual ARIPPA Tech Convention August 22, 2012 Presented by: John Slade, Senior Consultant, All4.
Identification of Non- Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Wastes EPA Proposed Rule April 30, 2010 Osman Environmental Solutions Harrisburg, PA.
MSW LANDFILL MACT STANDARD DEVELOPMENT SWANA’s 22nd Annual Landfill Gas Symposium March 22-25, 1999 Michele Laur Emission Standards Division US Environmental.
Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Environmental Management Commission.
Definition of Solid Waste Final Rule Public Meeting Charlotte Mooney Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Air Toxics Rule Changes (pursuant to Session Law ) North Carolina Division of Air Quality July 2013 Environmental Management Commission.
New Federal Regulations for Internal Combustion Engines Doug Parce.
Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.
Overview of the Clean Air Act and the Proposed Petroleum Refinery Sector Risk and Technology Review and New Source Performance Standards Public Outreach.
Wes Thornhill, Chief Industrial Chemicals Section Air Division
Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern Section AWMA Conference Callaway Gardens, GA Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern.
Division of Air Quality Update on EPA Boiler MACT Rules Steve Schliesser Environmental Engineer March 2012.
April 15, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
1 Year in Review: Clean Air Act Presented by: Tom Wood Stoel Rives LLP October 8, 2010 Things Are Getting Really Complicated.
Materials Lifecycle Solutions MACT DEVELOPMENT DEFINITIONS HAP - HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS: FEDERAL LIST OF 188 COMPOUNDS AND COMPOUND CATAGORIES. COMMON.
1 National Association of Clean Air Agencies Spring Membership Meeting 2008 Steve Page, Director Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Office.
NCMA Workshop March 24, 2015 Booker Pullen Supervisor, Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919) Permitting.
DEP’s Air Regulatory Update
Compliance Update NCMA 2015.
INDUSTRIAL BOILER MACT (40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD)
INDUSTRIAL BOILER MACT RULE (Title 40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDDD)
HAPs To Be Regulated: Mercury Only Electric utility steam generating units are uniquely regulated by Congress under 112(n)(1)(A) EPA was required to study.
December 4, Utility MACT Air & Waste Management Association/EPA Information Exchange December 4, 2002 William H. Maxwell Combustion Group/ESD.
Robert L. Burns, Jr., Esq. Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC August 1, 2013 Impact of Environmental Regulation on Coal Combustion for Electrical.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Air Toxics in Region 4 A&WMA Annual Conference August 6, 2008 Lee Page Air Toxics Assessment and Implementation Section EPA, Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
North Carolina Division of Air Quality Report on Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Generating Units In response to 15 NCAC 02D.2509(b)
The Impact of Greenhouse Gas Regulation on Energy Production: Legal Framework for Greenhouse Gases Standards for Fossil-Fuel Fired Electric Generating.
Air Toxics Rule Changes (pursuant to Session Law ) North Carolina Division of Air Quality Air Toxics Rule Changes Stakeholder Meeting March 20,
Final Amendments to the Regional Haze Rule: BART Rule Making June 16, 2005.
Mississippi Air Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality September 12, 2012.
UTILITY MACT WORKING GROUP STATE AND LOCAL STAKEHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS.
Blue Skies Delaware; Clean Air for Life NESHAPs Jim Snead October 8, 2008.
NC Toxic Air Pollutant Reports (pursuant to Session Law ) North Carolina Division of Air Quality Air Quality Committee Meeting January 9, 2013.
Assessment of Mercury Rules for Electric Generators in North Carolina September 9, 2015 Presented to the Environmental Management Commission – Air Quality.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Best Available Retrofit Technology Rule - Colorado David R. Ouimette Colorado Air Pollution Control Division.
Presumptive MACT For Municipal Solid Waste Landfills July 1999 Emission Standards Division US Environmental Protection Agency.
Georgia’s 112(g) Experiences Eric Cornwell Acting Manager Permitting Program.
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
1 Recommendations of the Clean Energy Group on Utility MACT Issues Utility MACT FACA Meeting September 9, 2002 Robert LaCount The Clean Energy Group The.
Non-Hg HAPs: A Utility View Larry S. Monroe, Ph.D. EPA MACT Working Group July 9, 2002.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
Larry S. Monroe, Ph.D. Senior Research Consultant Southern Company Birmingham, Alabama October 22, 2010 Coal-Fired Power Plants Environmental Control Technology.
Portland Cement NESHAPs & NSPS, and Related Solid Waste Combustion Rules David L. Jones Eastern Kern APCD November 4, 2011 California Desert Air Working.
All About Waste Dallas, TX ♦ May 18, 2016 Carrie Yonley, P.E.
APPA Conference Call on EGU MACT Rule January 20, 2011.
Clean Air Act Litigation Update State Air Director Meeting May 2015
Steve Page Office Director, OAQPS NACAA Spring Meeting 2010
Clean Water Act Regulations affecting Electric Utilities
North Carolina Division of Air Quality Mike Abraczinskas
What is the Boiler NESHAP?
Department of Environmental Quality
CAIR Replacement Rule and Regional Haze
Department of Environmental Quality
Boiler Sheltered Initiative
Presentation transcript:

MCIC Workshop 2012 Complying with NC Air Quality Regulations Boiler MACT/GACT and 112j Steve Schliesser Division of Air Quality Environmental Engineer March

Topics to be Covered Background - EPA Boiler MACT and GACT Effects of Vacatur on EPA Stay of Boiler Rules Current vs. Proposed 5D Boiler MACT Current vs. Proposed 6J Boiler GACT 2

Background on EPA Boiler MACT Rules Clean Air Act Requires National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) – Maximum Achievable Control Standards (MACTs) for major facilities emitting one HAP > 10 ton/yr or multiple HAPS > 25 ton/yr – Generally Available Control Standards (GACTs) for non-major facilities 3

Boiler MACT Impact in North Carolina Affects 98 facilities and ~1,000 boilers All but one facility has 112(j) permit, shielding MACT compliance up to 8 yrs (2018/2019) NC has 2 nd highest projected cost impact from Boiler MACT -- > $1 billion 4

Boiler MACT Rulemaking Process Timetable EPA Proposed Rule in Jan 2003 EPA Promulgated Final Rule in Sept 2004 U.S. Court Vacated and Remanded Final Rule in June 2007 EPA Proposed Rule in June 2010 U.S. Court Denied EPA Time-Extension Request in Jan 2011 EPA Promulgated Final Rule in March 2011 EPA Stayed Effective Date of Final Rule in May 2011 EPA Proposed Amendments to Final Rule in Dec 2011 U.S. Court Vacated EPA Stay in Jan 2012 EPA Expects to Promulgate Final Rule by May

Recently (Re)Proposed Boiler MACT (BM) EPA stayed March Boiler MACT final rule in May 2011 U.S. Court vacated EPA stay in Jan EPA had authority, just did not follow procedure Slight national impact, but one NC facility with huge impact -- lost 112(j) permit since rule’s restored effective date occurred before permit was issued DAQ submitted comments on re-proposal in Feb 2012 EPA expects to finalize Boiler MACT in May

MACT procedure sets bar of top 12% -- for each boiler type/fuel sub-category and each HAP -- for others to meet Re-proposal offer more flexibility, less cost impact, with offsetting increases/decreases in HAP emissions Highlights of proposed changes – Added new sub-categories for total of 19 – New and alternative HAP emissions limits – New work practice standards and provisions Recently (Re)Proposed Boiler MACT 7

Proposed Changes to Final March 2011 Boiler MACT New subcategories for light and heavy industrial fuel oil to reflect boiler design disparity and improve achievability. New emissions limits for PM specific for each solid fuel (biomass, coal) to reflect actual differences. Alternative total selective metals emission limits in addition to using PM as surrogate, improving flexibility. New CO emissions limits and averaging time with new data showing high variability in short- and long-term measurements. Replace dioxin emission limits with work practice standards given most data were below detection. Removed PM CEMS requirements for biomass units given variability in PM characteristics 8

MACT Floor Methodology Pool of top performers (average of top 12%) will set MACT floor for each sub-category - Review MACT floor pool test reports for valid data - Finding invalid data or re-categorizing will produce another pool and MACT floor Account for performance variability of top 12%; - previously variability factor ranged from of MACT emission limit = Floor average * Variability factor 9

HAP/ Fuel - Design Units2004 “Final” 2010 Proposal 2011 “Final” 2011 Proposal Mercury - Biomass lb / Trillion Btu No limit Coal 93 - Oil No limit Hydrogen chloride - Biomass lb / Million Btu No limit Coal Oil Particulate - Biomass Wet Stoker lb / Million Btu Biomass Dry Stoker Coal Stoker Heavy Liquid Oil No limit Light Liquid Oil Short List of Boiler MACT Emission Standards for Existing Units 10

Boiler MACT Particulate Matter Emission Limits 11

Existing Boiler MACT CO Emission Limits 12

Existing Boiler MACT Hydrogen Chloride Emission Limits 13

Boiler MACT Mercury Emission Limits 14

Why Mercury Limit High for Existing Liquid Fuel Oil Boilers? MACT floor based on 10 sources burning 2, 4, 6, recycle oil Fuel oil floor avg = 0.37 lb/TBtu, MACT limit = 26 - Variability factor = 70, outside normal range of 3-10 Solid fuel floor avg = 0.40, MACT limit = Variability factor = 8, within normal range of 3-10 Previous MACT fuel oil limits = 3.5 – 4.0 Mercury in virgin fuel oil -- <1.0 lb/TBtu Of 71 fuel oil sources for which EPA has data, only 4 would reduce mercury emissions. 15

(Re)Proposed Boiler GACT GACT procedure uses generally available (not maximum achievable) control technologies or management practices Re-proposal eases burden without changing emissions, costs, benefits Affects 300 permitted facilities and 600 boilers in NC > 90% burn gas, oil, or biomass will conduct only periodic tune-ups and some perform one-time energy assessment Remaining that burn coal must meet mercury and CO limits. Delay March 2012 tune-up deadline 1-year until March EPA no-action-assurance memo delays tune-up deadline til Oct

Boiler GACT Emission and Work Practice Standards Source Category Fuel Category Heat Input, MMBtu/hr PM, lb/MMBtu/h r Mercury, lb/MMBtu/h r CO, ppm Work Practice Standard All< 10None Tune-up every 2 years Existing Coal ≥ 10None 4.8E-6 O 2 One time energy assessment Biomass None Boiler tune-up Oil New Coal ≥ 10 < E-6 O 2 No energy assessment ≥ Biomass ≥ 10 < None Boiler tuneup ≥ Oil ≥ 10 < ≥ For more details see 17

Boiler MACT and GACT Future Schedule Rules promulgated (3 rd time) in May 2012 Effective 60 days after Fed Reg publication (~July ‘12) Expect litigation, possibly from both sides Compliance date for 112(j) permitted facilities : ◦ May be > MACT rule compliance date (~July ‘15) ◦ Must be within a reasonable period of time; and ◦ Cannot exceed 8 years from (last) promulgation date. 18

DAQ Comment on EPA NESHAP Rules EPA submittals on Boiler MACT, GACT, CISWI and Non Hazardous Solid Waste Definition Focus on implementation, compatibility, and program management issues Few comments helped to effect rule changes Sent NACAA letter stating their comments do not reflect DAQ interests and concerns 19

Questions? Steve Schliesser Environmental Engineer EPA boiler rules website: EPA Boiler MACT docket, go to then enter EPA–HQ–OAR–2002–