Last Topic - The Ombudsman Federal Ombudsman Provincial Ombudsman Banking Ombudsman Federal Insurance Ombudsman and Federal Tax Ombudsman Federal Ombudsperson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Access to Court Records Developments in New Zealand.
Advertisements

Chapter 4: Enforcing the Law 4 How Can Disputes Be Resolved Privately?
Openness, Privacy and Access to Electronic Court Records Paul Schabas Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP May, 2008.
Application of the law LLB. Notion of the application of the law The application of the law is a conventional act of a state authority (court, administrative.
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
Last Topic - Administrative Tribunals
1 Judicial Review Under NEPA Bob Malmsheimer April 1, 2006.
Supreme Court Of Canada
Last Topic - Difference between State and Nation
The Judicial Branch. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
Chapter 13: Criminal Justice Process ~ Proceedings Before Trial Objective: The student should be able to identify the required procedures before a trial.
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch
1 CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS EVIDENCE MANAGEMENT Beverly T. Beal North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges June, 2006.
Last Topic - The Sovereignty Meaning Kinds Parliamentary Sovereignty vs Judicial Independence.
+ The Criminal Court System. + Today... Criminal courts are complex administrative organizations. They oversee the entire process of prosecuting criminal.
Legal and Court Terminology. Indictment A formal criminal charge against a person who then becomes the defendant.
Introduction to Data Forensics CIS302 Harry R. Erwin, PhD School of Computing and Technology University of Sunderland.
Provincial Court (Province A) Provincial Court (Province B) Federal Court (Trial Court) Tax Court Supreme Court (Trial Court) Court of Queen’s Bench.
Ch. 13 Clicker Review.
© 2011 South-Western | Cengage Learning GOALS LESSON 1.1 LAW, JUSTICE, AND ETHICS Recognize the difference between law and justice Apply ethics to personal.
Prepared by Douglas Peterson, University of Alberta 2-1 Part 1 – Introduction to the Law Chapter 2 – The Judicial System.
Part I Sources of Corrections Law. Chapter 4 - Going to Court Introduction – Chapter provides information on appearing in court, either as a witness or.
Judicial Review Judicial review –means by which courts control the exercise of governmental power –ensure that public bodies (government departments; local.
The Court System Business Law Mr. DelPriore. Privately Resolved Disputes  Don’t go to court too fast “I’ll sue you.” “I’ll see you in court.” “My daddy.
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch
Get out your notebook and textbook!. Chapter 18: The Federal Court System.
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Business Law in Canada, 7/e, Chapter 2 Business Law in Canada, 7/e Chapter 2 The Resolution of Disputes.
Mr. Valanzano Business Law. Dispute Resolution Litigate – ________________________________________________ In some cases, people decided too quickly to.
Headquarters U. S. Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters Air Force FOIA Exemptions Brief Della Macias HAF/IMII.
What Should Be A Crime?. Recall: Two Main Perspectives 1. Achieving social order outweighs concerns for social justice. 2. CJ system goals must be achieved.
Chapter 2 The Court System and Dispute Resolution Twomey, Business Law and the Regulatory Environment (14th Ed.)
Principles of International Commercial Arbitration Allen B. Green McKenna Long & Aldridge, LLP.
Federal Courts There are two separate court systems in the United States: 1) Federal and 2) State *Most cases heard in court are heard in State courts.
Evidence in Court Holy Trinity Law Audrius Stonkus.
The role of the judiciary is to act as an independent third party to resolve disputes Governed under principle of Rule of Law: Government must follow.
Civil Liberties.  It is often said in the American justice system that it is better to allow ten guilty people to go free than to let one innocent person.
VCE Legal Studies: Evaluating the role of the court as a law-maker
Understanding the Criminal Justice System CJUS 101 Chapter 9: The Court Process From First Appearance through Trial.
The Judicial Branch Unit 5. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
 The United States has an adversarial court system. › This means that two opposing sides must argue their cases before a judge in order to find the truth.
Legislative Agenda Part 1 Austin Constitution Meetup Presentation by Jon Roland January 15, 2009.
Chapter 20 Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights.
TRIAL PROCEDURE Dr. KAROLINA KREMENS, LL.M. (Ottawa) International Criminal Procedure.
2011©Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.. Judicial System and History 2011©Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Opt in vs. Opt out Emmanuel Gybels. 2 Introductionary remark : there is not one answer to this question – approach varies depending on type of claim and.
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch. “The Federal Court System & How Federal Courts Are Organized”
The Criminal Court System Chapter 7. In this chapter we will look at… The Criminal Court Structure The Criminal Court Structure The Participants The Participants.
The Hearing Process 1. 2 Notice of Claim Status Issued by Carrier Legally Binding Triggers Protest Period (usually 90 days)
1 Ethical Lawyering Spring 2006 Class 8. 2 Rest. 68 Except as otherwise provided in this Restatement, the attorney-client privilege may be invoked as.
CHAPTER 18 QUESTIONS. Question #1 What is meant by “dual court system”? National judiciary and the state court systems existing in each of the 50 states.
THE ROLE OF COURTS AND TRIBUNALS IN ENHANCING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION SEVENTH ANNUAL COLLOQUIUM OF THE IUCN ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL.
Comparing the Inquisitorial and Adversarial Systems.
Judicial Review The Supreme Court’s power to overturn any law that it decides is in conflict with the Constitution.
Types of Courts Unit A Objective Dual Court System Federal Court System State Court System.
Article III: The Judicial Branch Chapters: 11,12
- Why do we have rules? - What are some important rules at home? At school? For society? - What are the criteria for good rules?
Canada’s Court System CLN4U – Mr. Andrez.
Lesson 25: What Is the Role of the Supreme Court in the American Constitutional System?
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
The Judicial Branch And the Federal Courts.
Protection of News Sources
Judicial Proceedings & The Media
Judicial Branch.
The Criminal Court Structure
Arbitration Proceedings II
The impact of article 47 CFREU on national caselaw between general principles and sectorial Application Jacek Chlebny, professor at the University of Łódź,
The Canadian Legal System
Sorting Out the Courts SS.7.C.3.11: Diagram the levels, functions, and powers of the courts at the state and federal levels.
Sorting Out the Courts SS.7.C.3.11: Diagram the levels, functions, and powers of the courts at the state and federal levels.
Presentation transcript:

Last Topic - The Ombudsman Federal Ombudsman Provincial Ombudsman Banking Ombudsman Federal Insurance Ombudsman and Federal Tax Ombudsman Federal Ombudsperson for Protection of Women

Public Interest Immunity Discretion of Court Jail Hearing Sealed Document In-Camera Proceeding

Public Interest …… Public-interest immunity (PII) is a principle of English common law under which the English courts can grant a court order allowing one litigant to refrain from disclosing evidence to the other litigants where disclosure would be damaging to the public interest

Public Interest …… This is an exception to the usual rule that all parties in litigation must disclose any evidence that is relevant to the proceedings

Public Interest …… In making a PII order, the court has to balance the public interest in the administration of and the public interest in maintaining the confidentiality of certain documents whose disclosure would be damaging

Discretion of Court One of the implications of this concept, highlighted in the case-law considered, is that the matter of cannot be dealt with in an arbitrary manner; it can only be sustained in accordance with the law

Discretion of …… The use of the words ‘in the public interest’ in such matters are not pointless, but emphasize the assumed nature of orders relating to tenure, relocation etc.

Discretion of …… If Administrative Rules are made on merit in accordance with definite procedures, instructions etc., the same will rightly be considered and treated as part of the terms and conditions of Natural Justice

Discretion of …… If rules and instructions are departd from and as a result merit is discouraged on account of favoritism, sifarish or considerations other than merit

Discretion of …… The Constitutional Courts in Pakistan has held that the compliance of illegal orders of superiors is not justified on the basis of having been issued from higher authority ……(Contd)

Discretion of …… Constitution must be obeyed, such orders must be presented before the court without immunity, hence it is entire discretion of the Court of issue the Immunity order, where just & equitable AND in the best interest of public

Jail Hearing One of the implications of this concept, highlighted in the case-law is, that the matter cannot be dealt with in an ordinary manner; it can only be sustained in accordance with the law

Jail Hearing ……. When the accused is a public figure

Jail Hearing ……. When sentiments of Public at against the accused

Jail Hearing ……. When it is in the best interest of Public

Jail Hearing ……. When the matter is of national security

Jail Hearing ……. When accused is well connected with criminals & strong chances of his escape

Jail Hearing ……. When security of accused is at high risk

Jail Hearing ……. When the matter is of national security

Sealed Documents Record sealing is the practice of sealing or, in some cases, destroying records that would otherwise be publicly accessible as public records

Sealed Documents …… The term is derived from the tradition of placing a seal on specified files or documents that prevents anyone from reviewing the files without receiving a court order

Sealed Documents …… The modern process and requirements to seal a record and the protections it provides vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and even between civil and criminal cases

Sealed Documents …… Generally, Record sealing can be defined as the process of removing from general review the records pertaining to a court case However, the records may not completely disappear and may still be reviewed under limited circumstances

Sealed Documents …… The public policy of record sealing balances the desire to free named citizens from the burdens caused by the information contained in state records while maintaining the state's interest in the preservation of records that may be beneficial to the state or other citizens

In-Camera Trial In camera is a Latin phrase meaning “in private” or “in chambers” and it is used in law to refer to proceedings conducted without public access

In-Camera Trial ……. A judge can make a decision to hear an entire trial in camera, or to review certain arguments, documents, and evidence in private, while leaving other parts of the trial open to the public

In-Camera Trial ……. A common argument is a concern about national security in cases where evidence aired before the public could present a security threat

In-Camera Trial ……. An in camera hearing or review is held in the judge's chambers. This environment is less formal and more comfortable for a small group, including the judge, the attorneys, and the witness or object under discussion

In-Camera Trial ……. The press and members of the public sometimes protest moves for confidentiality in a trial, arguing that the public has a right to know

Next Topic - Administrative Tribunals Role Courts & Tribunals