27July05_SQO INCORPORATING MULTIPLE LINES OF EVIDENCE INTO SEDIMENT QUALITY OBJECTIVES Scientific Steering Committee Meeting July 26, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prioritized Sites for Amphipod TIE Study Identify 12 potentially toxic inter-tidal sites Sample four sites at a time to find two suitable sites for amphipod.
Advertisements

Draft data - do not cite or quote EEPS Benthos RMP Status & Trends sediment monitoring added benthos at 27 stations in 2008 for implementing SQO.
Exposure and Effects Workgroup Study Ideas Five-Year Plan: Risk to Birds Is there clear evidence of pollutant effects on survival, reproduction,
Draft data - do not cite or quote Sediment contamination Sediment toxicity Benthic community structure Results used to identify and map areas of unimpacted.
Draft Data - Do not cite or quote Sediment contamination Sediment toxicity Benthic community structure Results used to identify and map areas of unimpacted.
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
Indicators to measure the effectiveness of the implementation of the Strategy State of the art Karin Sollart Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
Lake-scale planning for management, conservation and restoration Objective: Bring together researchers, managers, NGO representatives and other interested.
“International context and response to draft D5b – a conservation agencies view” PROTECT Workshop, Aix en Provence. 14 May 2008.
Carcinogen Classification Criteria Patricia Richter Ph.D., DABT Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee June 8, 2010.
RMP NOV 08 Improving Benthic Assessment Tools for the San Francisco Estuary Aroon Melwani, Sarah Lowe, and Bruce Thompson RMP Exposure and Effects Workgroup.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Integration of different metrics to a whole water body classification for all.
Water Quality Control Plan for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries – Part 1 Sediment Quality Water Quality Control Plan for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries – Part.
Development of Chemistry Indicators Steven Bay Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP)
Parameterising Bayesian Networks: A Case Study in Ecological Risk Assessment Carmel A. Pollino Water Studies Centre Monash University Owen Woodberry, Ann.
Scaling and Attitude Measurement in Travel and Hospitality Research Research Methodologies CHAPTER 11.
1 “Changing Performance” Nashville, Tennessee February 2, National Title I Conference M aximizing the I mpact of S choolwide P rograms on I mproving.
Defining Responsible Forest Management FSC Forest Certification Standards Defining Responsible Forest Management Version:
ORD’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) Sound Science for Measuring Ecological Condition
Development of Sediment Quality Objectives for California Bays and Estuaries Overview and Meeting Objectives Steven Bay Southern California Coastal Water.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
Present Development of a Regional Guidance Document for Dredged Material Evaluation Christopher McArthur, P.E. (US Environmental.
Implementation of the Essential Standards The Australian Quality Framework (AQTF) is the national set of standards which assures nationally consistent,
Creating a Shared Vision Model. What is a Shared Vision Model? A “Shared Vision” model is a collective view of a water resources system developed by managers.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
SEPA Compliance Assessment Scheme. Aims and Benefits 1.Proportionate 2.Consistent, fair and legally correct 3.Transparent and accountable 4.Targeted,
Development of Sediment Quality Objectives for California Bays and Estuaries Scientific Steering Committee Meeting Summary August 3-4, 2004.
MJ Paul Tetra Tech Inc. Center for Ecological Sciences RTP, NC USING BIOLOGICAL RESPONSES IN NUTRIENT CRITERIA DEVELOPMENT: APPLICATIONS, OPPORTUNITIES,
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Consideration for Stakeholders Regarding Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment as Part of the MSD Prevention Strategy for Ontario Richard Wells University.
The Integrated Food Security and Humanitarian Phase Classification (IPC) Workshop on Feasibility for Continuous and Integrated Drought Management 21 September.
1 Sediment Quality Objectives for California Enclosed Bays and Estuaries Benthic Indicator Development Scientific Steering Committee 26 th July 2005.
PREMISES FOR DEVELOPING AND APPLYING SEDIMENT QUALITY OBJECTIVES Presented and (mostly) agreed upon during the October 27, 2004 meeting of the Advisory.
Advisory Committee Kickoff Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California July 29, 2003 CAL/EPA.
Benthic Community Assessment Tool Development Ananda Ranasinghe (Ana) Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) Sediment.
Development of Sediment Quality Objectives for California Bays and Estuaries Project Update-June 2004 Steven Bay Southern California Coastal Water Research.
Discriminant Analysis Discriminant analysis is a technique for analyzing data when the criterion or dependent variable is categorical and the predictor.
Development of Sediment Quality Objectives for California Bays and Estuaries Project Update-April 2004 Steven Bay Southern California Coastal Water Research.
Quality Assurance Programme of the Canadian Census of Population Expert Group Meeting on Population and Housing Censuses Geneva July 7-9, 2010.
Development of Sediment Quality Objectives for California Bays and Estuaries Project Update Steven Bay Southern California Coastal Water Research Project.
Development of Sediment Quality Objectives for California Bays and Estuaries Project Update Steven Bay Southern California Coastal Water Research Project.
Development of Sediment Quality Objectives for California Bays and Estuaries Technical Approach Steven Bay Southern California Coastal Water Research Project.
Development of Toxicity Indicators Scientific Steering Committee Meeting July 26, 2005 Sediment Quality Objectives For California Enclosed Bays and Estuaries.
Sediment Quality Advisory Committee Meeting December 13, 2004 Sacramento Chris Beegan
Assessment of Sediment Quality in San Francisco Estuary RMP EEWG Meeting September 6, 2007 SCCWRP Team: Bay, Ranasinghe, Ritter, Barnett, Weisberg SFEI.
The Development and Validation of the Evaluation Involvement Scale for Use in Multi-site Evaluations Stacie A. ToalUniversity of Minnesota Why Validate.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review MHK MA\Categorizing and Evaluating the Effects of Stressors M. Grippo and I.
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
Brian Hitchens and Sam Williams PCBs in the Urban Environment: Implications for Long-Term Sustainability Of Low-Threshold Remediation.
SQO 4/7/05 INCORPORATING MULTIPLE LINES OF EVIDENCE INTO SEDIMENT QUALITY OBJECTIVES Stephen B. Weisberg Southern California Coastal Water Research Project.
Workshop Annual Status Report Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California July 7, 2004 Chris Beegan
New Emphasis on Sediment Quality Objectives Water Board, SCCWRP, SFEI RMP Annual Meeting 2007.
Proposed Topics for Application of Sediment Quality Objectives.
Food Security Analysis Unit The Integrated Food Security and Humanitarian Phase Classification (IPC) ALNAP Nairobi June 2006.
California Sediment Quality Advisory Committee Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California.
Lecture: 5 Development and Environmental Economics By Miss Pratiti Singha, Assistant Professor(Part Time), Department of Economics, Radhamadhab College,
Development of Toxicity Indicators Steven Bay Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP)
CLINICAL GOVERNANCE Presentation for Assembly of Governors Thursday 15 December 2011.
WISER Water bodies in Europe: Integrative Systems to assess Ecological status and Recovery.
The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades The primary purpose of assessment and evaluation is to improve student learning.
K. Bruce Jones EPA Office of Research and Development U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Regional Vulnerability Assessment Advisory Panel Meeting October,
International Water Quality Guidelines for Ecosystems
Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment
Executive Order No. 23 Update Air & Waste Management Association Conference November 16, 2018 Presentation will focus on the latest policy development.
GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISATION in England & Wales
WG C – Groundwater Activity WGC-3 Integrated Risk Assessment and Management Wouter GEVAERTS Thomas TRACK Dietmar MÜLLER.
United Nations Statistics Division
Data Security and Protection Toolkit Assurance 2018/19
History EU+Norway Water Directors meeting in Paris Oct 2000 Member States and the European Commission agreed in Paris to developed a Common Strategy.
Presentation transcript:

27July05_SQO INCORPORATING MULTIPLE LINES OF EVIDENCE INTO SEDIMENT QUALITY OBJECTIVES Scientific Steering Committee Meeting July 26, 2005

27July05_SQO TOPICS FOR TODAY Issues raised at last SSC meeting Approach to validating the MLOE framework A new issue associated with missing data Expansion of the MLOE framework to indirect effects

27July05_SQO BASICS OF THE MLOE FRAMEWORK Three lines of evidence –Represent a continuum from exposure to effect Four categories for each LOE MLOE merged into a station assessment Integration accomplished through classifying all possible combinations –4x4x4 tables –Reference –Marginal deviation from reference –Moderate effect –Severe effect –Unimpacted –Likely unimpacted –Inconclusive –Possibly impacted –Likely impacted –Clearly impacted

27July05_SQO CHEMISTRY: Moderate Effect ReferenceMinor deviation Moderate effect Severe effect Reference Likely Unimpacted Possibly Impacted Likely Impacted Minor Deviation Possibly Impacted Likely Impacted Moderate Effect Likely Impacted Clearly Impacted Severe Effect Likely Impacted Clearly Impacted BenthosBenthos Toxicity

27July05_SQO ISSUES RAISED AT LAST SSC MEETING Should LOE be weighted equally? –Chemistry is the stressor being regulated –Benthos are the endpoint of interest –Toxicity tests are the easiest to interpret Ensure that there is a place for ancillary data in the assessment framework Can you separate classification and uncertainty?

27July05_SQO STATION ASSESSMENT CATEGORIES Unimpacted Likely unimpacted Inconclusive Possibly impacted Likely impacted Clearly impacted

27July05_SQO SEPARATING CLASSIFICATION AND UNCERTAINTY Three types of uncertainty –Data quality for a particular data set –Confidence in particular indicators / thresholds –Level of agreement among individual LOE Our feeling: Best dealt with as a narrative aspect of the implementation guidance

27July05_SQO CHEMISTRY: Minor Deviation ReferenceMinor deviation Moderate effect Severe effect Reference Unimpacted Likely Unimpacted Possibly Impacted Minor Deviation Likely Unimpacted Possibly Impacted Likely Impacted Moderate Effect Possibly Impacted Likely Impacted Severe Effect Possibly Impacted Likely Impacted BenthosBenthos Toxicity

27July05_SQO SEPARATING CLASSIFICATION AND UNCERTAINTY Three types of uncertainty –Data quality for a particular data set –Confidence in particular indicators / thresholds –Level of agreement among individual LOE Our feeling: Best dealt with as a narrative aspect of the implementation guidance

27July05_SQO TOPICS FOR TODAY Issues raised at last SSC meeting Approach to validating the MLOE framework A new issue associated with missing data Expansion of the MLOE framework to indirect effects

27July05_SQO VALIDATION Repeatability –Are replicate samples at a site classified the same? Consistency in distribution among individual LOE SQO application in water bodies of “known” condition

27July05_SQO KNOWN CONDITION Use Bay Protection and Cleanup Program assessment to identify compromised water bodies –That program had targeted data collection to identify hot spots Use chemistry and toxicity to identify cleanest waterbodies –Use data from sites where only part of the triad is available –Screen these waterbodies further based on land use –Confirm the list using Stakeholder Advisory Committee feedback

27July05_SQO TOPICS FOR TODAY Issues raised at last SSC meeting Approach to validating the MLOE framework A new issue associated with missing data Expansion of the MLOE framework to indirect effects

27July05_SQO NEW ISSUE How should the MLOE framework be applied in habitats where we have not yet developed interpretational tools? –Differs from situation where data were not previously collected, but could be collected When tools are available for two LOE, apply the modified assessment framework that was developed for the unavailable data situation When tools are for only available for one LOE, use that LOE in a screening mode –Apply BPJ to other LOE when screening indicates the necessity –BPJ may require additional data collection to establish site-specific reference condition

27July05_SQO TOPICS FOR TODAY Issues raised at last SSC meeting Approach to validating the MLOE framework A new issue associated with missing data Expansion of the MLOE framework to indirect effects