1 Book Cover Here Chapter 10 INTERROGATION OF SUSPECTS AND HOSTILE WITNESSES Guidelines and Procedures Criminal Investigation: A Method for Reconstructing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CJ305: Legal Foundations of Criminal Evidence Welcome to Unit 6! Instructor: K. Austin Zimmer, J.D. Make sure you adjust your speakers and audio settings.
Advertisements

Miranda Warning Law Enforcement I.
ADVISE SUSPECT OF ARTICLE 31 -
AJ 104 Chapter 14 Self-Incrimination.
Section 3 Introduction-1
Naval Science 402 Leadership and Ethics Lesson 19 Legal Rights of the Accused Jurisdiction.
The Government must respect ALL legal rights of all people. It must treat people fairly.
What would society look like if Eric Cartman was a police officer.
Unit I: Basic Principles of Government The Citizens.
The Investigation Phase Criminal Law and Procedure.
Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco
Miranda Rights 5th Amendment
BY: KATIE LOSINIECKI Miranda v. Arizona. Facts Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1966 for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old woman After being interrogated.
Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11 th Edition John N. Ferdico Henry F. Fradella Christopher Totten Prepared by Tony Wolusky Interrogations,
1 Confessions Chapter 11. Smart Talk: Contemporary Interviewing and Interrogation By Denise Kindschi Gosselin PRENTICE HALL ©2006 Pearson Education, Inc.
The 5 th & 6 th Amendments. Fifth Amendment The primary focus of the 5 th amendment is the criminal process. due processdue process double jeopardydouble.
1 Book Cover Here Chapter 18 ROBBERY Criminal Investigation: A Method for Reconstructing the Past, 7 th Edition Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights.
Chapter 16 Lesson 2 Civil and Criminal Law. Crime and Punishment crime  A crime is any act that harms people or society and that breaks a criminal law.
Chapter 2 Interrogation and Forensic Reporting © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Seven: Confessions and the 5 th Amendment This multimedia product and its contents are protected.
Miranda v. Arizona A Primer. Miranda Background Dealt with the admissibility of statements made during custodial interrogation under the Fifth Amendment's.
1 Chapter 12 Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence Obtaining Statements and Confessions for use as Evidence.
Rights When Arrested Objective 2.01 Recognize types of courts. Business Law.
Chapter 2 Interrogation and Forensic Reporting
Arrests and Miranda. 2 Copyright and Terms of Service Copyright © Texas Education Agency, These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as.
Chapter 16.2 Criminal Cases.
Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Chapter 4 Interrogation.
American Criminal Justice: The Process
III. Rights of the Accused. A. Exclusionary Rule Exclusionary Rule – Supreme Court ruled any evidence collected illegally cannot be used in federal court.
Chapter 1 The Pursuit of Justice Unit #1 Notes Packet.
1 Bakersfield College Criminal Justice Charles Feer, JD, MPA Miranda.
Miranda v Arizona Rights of the Accused. Citations 384 U.S. 436 (1966) oDocket # 759 oArgued February 28, 1966 o Decider June 13, 1966.
Call To Order Complete the following statement: You have the right to remain silent… And take out your homework!!!
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
Ashley Nine March 25, 2010 Period 7.  Poor living immigrant from Mexico living in Arizona.  He was charged with rape and kidnapping.  He was arrested.
CJ210: Interrogation: Purpose, Guidelines, Procedures, and the Miranda Ruling Unit 6 Seminar.
By James W. Osterburg and Richard H. Ward Copyright © 2007 Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., a member of the LexisNexis Group Newark, NJ
Chapter 20 Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights.
Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda 1966 Charged & convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges second trial, with his confession excluded.
Arrests and Miranda.  Right to a grand jury  Protection against double jeopardy  Protection against self-incrimination  Right to due process  Custody.
The Investigation.  Right to remain silent  Right to an attorney  No interrogation should take place before they read  Are a result of the US Supreme.
CJ210: Interrogation: Purpose, Guidelines, Procedures, and the Miranda Ruling Unit 6 Seminar: Miranda, Interrogation, Interviews, and other.
Describe the difference between and interview and an interrogation.
Investigative Constitutional Law Charles L. Feer, JD, MPA Bakersfield College Department of Criminal Justice Investigative Constitutional Law.
CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 6 (Chapter 8 – Admissions & Confessions)
 Online Miranda quiz Online Miranda quiz. The constitutional implications of custodial interrogation.
Essential Questions: What rights are guaranteed to all Americans who are accused of crimes?
Looking at Miranda Your Right to Remain Silent
Supreme Court Cases on Self Incrimination Sarah Claypoole.
Miranda V. Arizona By: Elise Kloppenburg. Facts of the Case Phoenix, Arizona 1963 Ernesto Miranda, 23 years old Arrested in his home Taken to the police.
Land Mark Supreme Court Cases Assignment
Miranda Warnings. Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Objective Students.
The Warren Court and judicial activism “The biggest damn fool mistake I ever made”, Dwight D. Eisenhower on Earl Warren, quoted in 1977 Chief Justice,
Tracing Our Rights
Unit 4 Seminar. Tell me what the Miranda warning is and what it means to you.
Know Your Rights Santa Teresa High School Intro to LPSCS.
Chapter 2 Interrogation and Forensic Reporting
Miranda v. Arizona.
#lawday2016.
Warm-up Has anyone tried to get you to confess to something you didn’t do? How did this happen? Have you ever confessed to something and then regretted.
The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science
Aim: What are the protections offered by the case of Miranda vs
By Michael Cleary Period 8 10/3/13 College Business Law Mr. Como
Rights of Criminal Suspects
Miranda Warnings.
#lawday2016.
Ch. 3-2 The Fifth Amendment Right to Remain Silent
Interrogations and Confessions
Miranda Rights You have the right to remain silent…
Ap u.s. government & politics
Presentation transcript:

1 Book Cover Here Chapter 10 INTERROGATION OF SUSPECTS AND HOSTILE WITNESSES Guidelines and Procedures Criminal Investigation: A Method for Reconstructing the Past, 7 th Edition Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

2 The Purpose of Interrogation Incriminating information Exculpatory information Details of the crime Accomplices Circumstances Follow-up leads Location and clarification of evidence Admission or Confession Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

3 Why People Confess: HOROWITZ Basic Concepts 1.Accusation 2.Evidence is Available 3.Forces – Friendly and Hostile 4.Guilt Feelings 5.Confession Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

4 Why People Confess: PAVLOV Basic Concepts – Intensity of Signal – Anxiety Waiting – Alternate Signals – Physical Condition Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

5 Why Some DO NOT Confess No pangs of conscience/no guilt Fearful of consequences To avoid self-incrimination Attorney recommendation (Miranda) Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

6 Interrogation: Guidelines and Procedures Miranda Guidelines – The right to remain silent – Anything said can be used against the individual – Right to counsel – Counsel for the indigent – The wish to remain silent – Waiving one’s rights – Admission of statements Congressional Action Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

7 Implementing Miranda As a means of compliance with the Miranda decision, many police departments have cards printed out that spell out the constitutional rights of the individual – Officer must also verbally inform the individual Courts have ruled that any statements made outside the context of Miranda rules are allowed Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

8 Implementing the Miranda Warnings Miranda Warning Card 1. You have the right to remain silent. This means you do not have to answer any questions. 2. If you answer any question, anything you say can be used against you in court. 3. You have the right to legal counsel. This means you may secure the services of a lawyer of your own choosing and seek his or her advice. You may also have him or her present with you while you are being questioned. 4. If you cannot afford to hire a lawyer, one will be appointed to represent you before any questioning takes place, if you so wish. This will be done without any expense to you. 5. If you decide to answer questions now without a lawyer present, you retain the right to stop answering at any time. At that time you still have the right to seek the advice of a lawyer before continuing to answer questions. Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

9 Waiving One’s Rights “Waiver of Rights” Form I have had my rights explained to me and have read a statement of them. I understand what my rights are. I do not want an attorney at this time. I know and understand the consequences of what I am doing. I am willing to answer questions and to make a statement. No threats have been made to me. No coercion of pressure of any kind has been exerted against me. No promises have been made to me. DATE: _________________________________________________ (Signature) TIME: _____________________ LOCATION: _____________________ WITNESS: _____________________DATE: _____________________ TIME: _____________________ WITNESS: _____________________DATE: _____________________ TIME: _____________________ Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

10 Congressional Action 1968 – Congress passed a law that applied only to federal prosecutions – Intent was to get around Miranda and allow voluntary confessions to be admitted into evidence 1997 – Janet Reno stated that the 1968 law was unconstitutional 1999 – 4th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals permitted the resurrection of the 1968 law that had never been involved – Reaffirmed the admissibility of voluntary confessions Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

11 Interrogation in Practice Preparation The Setting – Privacy – The Room Creating the Tone Interrogation by Males and/or Female Multiple Interrogators Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

12 Creating the Tone Dress and Appearance Diction Mannerisms Attitude Taking Command of the Situation Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

13 Conducting the Interrogation Preliminaries – Capacity of the subject to understand and respond rationally to questions Intoxication, influence of drugs, abnormal emotional reactions, etc. Advice of physician may be needed – When the person to be interrogated is a suspect Opportunity to admit their guilt is needed Beginning the Interrogation The Body of the Interrogation Evaluation of Responses The “Break” Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

14 Documenting the Interrogation Recording Statements and the Confession A Consensus Favoring Videotaping Reducing the Confession to Writing Witnessing the Confession Time and Personal Needs Register Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

15 Types of Cases Videotaped 83% of agencies videotaped homicide cases Rape cases — 77% Aggravated battery or assault cases — 71% Armed robbery cases — 61% Drunk driving cases — 59% Unarmed robbery cases — 45% Burglary — 44% Other property crimes — 34% Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved

16 Conclusion Keep the interrogation process humane No investigator wishes to have an innocent person confess to a crime Corroborate guilt beyond the confession with evidence A confession can be therapeutic (a chance to “tell all”) – but limit written confession to crime under investigation Copyright © 2014, Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved