December 13, 2011 ICSD facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

Guiding Principle Five Mentoring needs to be tailored to the needs of the individual teacher and, at the same time, verifying their skills as teachers.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A
Day 2: Learning and Teaching Session 2: Recording Evidence NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Leadership Training Module 2
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Laying the Groundwork ISLN September 2012.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Teacher Observation Training
The Framework for Teaching: Digging Deeper August 27, 2012 Bernie Cleland & Duffy Miller
November 17, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4 Developed.
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness
Effective Evaluation Feedback: Getting People to Commit to Changing Practice.
Mathematics 3 – 8 Standards for Mathematical Practice TLQP Tom Sweeney The Sage Colleges.
JOHN F. SHEEHAN, PH.D. EVIDENCE-BASED OBSERVATIONS.
Shelee King George Puget Sound Center for Teaching, Learning and Technology.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Reaching and Preparing 21st Century Learners
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.
Created and facilitated by: Melissa Aviles-Ramos ELA Instructional Specialist, Network 603 Tel:
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
Domain 1. Outcomes By the end of this session participants will: Gain a deeper understanding of Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Be able to apply their.
Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Day 3 Welcome Back!
INSTRUCTION DOMAIN #3. GROUP WORK How it works: 1.Look at your assigned group and move to the corresponding table. Everyone will take their materials.
November 29, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 3 Developed by Teaching.
Math and Science Institute Exploring Physical Science Today’s Agenda Review of homework and participant sharing of their ENGAGE components of 5E. Engage.
Literacy Partner’s Meeting Wednesday, October 22 nd Moderated Marking: The What, The Why, The How.
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Rhode Island Innovation Evaluation & Support System (RIIESS) for Support Professionals Fall 2013.
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Artifact Brainstorming Domains 1 and 4 Department of Professional & Organizational Development Howard County Public School System, 2014.
A brief introduction to
Common Core State Standards & North Carolina Essential Standards Support for School Executives 1.
Reading Text in the Social Studies Classroom District Learning Day Bolton High School August 5, 2015.
The Achievement Chart Mathematics Grades Note to Presenter:
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day 1: Professional Practice.
Developing Questions That Matter
The Power of Observation. Before Observation Which students are the focus of the observation? What method will best capture the observation? What opportunities.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 2 Developed by Teaching.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Innovate. Engage. Empower THE ONECLAY WRITES SCORING EXPERIENCE WELCOME! FIND A SEAT TALK TO OTHERS AT YOUR TABLE AND DISCUSS SUCCESSES SO FAR THIS YEAR.
QUADRANT PARTNERS VIDEO SUCCESSFUL COACHING Know contemporary views & standards Model & demonstrate effective instructional behaviors Provide.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
TCRP TEACHER TRAINING TCRP Overview. Agenda Objective By the end of the session all teachers will be able to: TCRP Pverview Agenda and Objectives 2 1.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Good Morning Please come in and pick a table. At least 2 people need to sit at each table. Take a piece of purple paper out of the basket. Trace your hand.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome!
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
The Year of Core Instruction
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners
The Framework for Teaching
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners Literacy
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

December 13, 2011 ICSD facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4 Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Workshop Objectives: SESSION 4 Participants will: Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Priorities of the Rubrics Cognitive Engagement “Effective” = students must be cognitively engaged “Highly Effective” = cognitive engagement PLUS meta- cognition and student ownership of their learning Constructivist Learning Effective and Highly Effective = evidence of learning experiences designed to facilitate students’ construction of knowledge & connections to prior knowledge. 21 st Century Skills Effective and Highly Effective = evidence of application of 21st Century college & career-readiness skills and dispositions Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD 4

Reviewing the Focus Components Today’s observation will focus on: Danielson = 2a, 2b, 3b, 3c Take time now to review the section of the Teachscape rubric related to the component assigned to your table. Pay particular attention to the“indicators.” Talk with your table mates about what concretely you will be looking for in relation to the indicators. Some indicators are very clear; others need a bit of interpretation. Be prepared to share 2or 3 critical “look fors” for your assigned component.

Observing Practice Observe the video Collect evidence, with a focus on: Danielson = 2a, 2b, 3b, 3c Be prepared to categorize evidence and develop clarifying questions. Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Checking Evidence Use the self-check questions to review your evidence collection Have I recorded only facts? Is my evidence relevant to the criteria being examined? Whenever possible, have I quantified words such as few, some, and most? Have I used quotation marks when quoting a teacher or student? Does my selection or documentation of evidence indicate any personal or professional preferences? Have I included any opinion (in the guise of fact)? Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Observing Practice: Sorting Evidence Sort your evidence so that it aligns with the appropriate component in the rubric. Using the placemat version of the rubric, write a component (3a, 3d etc.) next to each piece of evidence you have written down. Do this on your own. Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Observing Practice: Clarifying Questions With a partner, develop clarifying questions you have about the lesson you observed that you would like to have answered before you rate the teacher’s performance.  Try to frame your questions so that they are non- evaluative.  Consider the following: How might the teacher respond to the question? How will the response assist you in leveling this teaching performance? How might the question assist the teacher in reflecting on this lesson?

Leveling Teacher Performance Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

The Evidence Cycle Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD COLLECT DATA (Evidence) SORT TO ALIGN WITH YOUR FRAMEWORK Interpret: Clarify Conclusions

Leveling Practice On your own, assign a level to the teaching performance we just watched for the following components/elements: Danielson = 2a, 2b, 3b, 3c Use the “Lesson Observation Leveling” chart provided to write in your chosen level for each of the components above. Write at least one piece of evidence for each component/element you level. Write additional evidence if you have it. Share your levels with a partner, providing evidence to support your level choices. As a table, try to reach consensus on the levels.

Evidence of Professional Responsibilities Your table will be assigned a component of Domain 4. With your table-mates, brainstorm evidence you would collect for your assigned component of Domain 4. Use the provided chart to capture your thoughts. Please hand in one completed chart per table. We will collate the ideas and share it with all. If we have time, we will do some oral sharing. Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Evaluation and Closure Complete the paper evaluations and leave at your table. Please evaluate and comment on your entire experience in LE Training Sessions 1-4. Also write any questions on the evaluation sheet. PowerPoint and Materials will be on NT website Thank you for your participation!