FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS THREE Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Using the Parkride2.mac Macro to Model Park and Ride Demand in the Puget Sound Region 22 nd International Emme Users Conference September 15-16, 2011,
Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, Illinois GIS Estimation of Transit Access Parameters for Mode Choice Models GIS in Transit Conference October 16-17, 2013.
TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES ATHENS 2004 ATTIKO METRO S.A. Anna Anastasaki.
Denver’s Activity-Based Model Project: Status Report Erik Sabina, P.E., DRCOG Thomas Rossi, Principal, Cambridge Systematics TRB Transportation Planning.
SUZANNE CHILDRESS, ERIK SABINA, DAVID KURTH, TOM ROSSI, JENNIFER MALM DRCOG Focus Activity-Based Model Calibration/Validation Innovations in Travel Modeling.
The transition to activity-based models in the U.S. Mark Bradley Bradley Research & Consulting Santa Barbara, CA.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS TWO Denver Regional Council of Governments June 30, 2011.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Comparison of Activity-Based Model Parameters Between Two.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
1. Identify the variable(s) of interest (the focus) and the population of the study. 2. Develop a detailed plan for collecting data. Make sure sample.
Using NHTS to Estimate Activity Patterns Heather Contrino, Travel Surveys Team Leader FHWA Office of Highway Policy Information Nancy McGuckin, Travel.
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Trip Generation and Mode Choice CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Practical Application of Activity-Based Models
Measuing Preferences, Establishing Values, The Empirical Basis for Understanding Behavior David Levinson.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.
San Francisco Bay Area Activity-Based Models Specification & Training Study Chuck Purvis Metropolitan Transportation Commission Oakland, California Workshop.
Building and Learning Activity-Based Models Erik Sabina Jennifer Malm Jennifer Malm Suzanne Childress John Bowman DeVon Culbertson.
Model Task Force Meeting November 29, 2007 Activity-based Modeling from an Academic Perspective Transportation Research Center (TRC) Dept. of Civil & Coastal.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Changes in Daily Travel Patterns 1994 to 2007/2008 Robert E. Griffiths Technical.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FIVE Denver Regional Council of Governments July27, 2011.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
The Development of a Direct Demand Non-Home Based Model for Urban Rail Travel Rhett Fussell, PE –PB Americas Bill Davidson-PB Americas Joel Freedman-PB.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
From Academia to Application: Results from the Development of the First Accessibility-Based Model Mike Conger, P.E. Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning.
In this presentation, we will: 1.Describe each step the Compass model and show comparable steps in the IRM. Compass = What,, Where, How IRM= Who, What,
A New Policy Sensitive Travel Demand Model for Tel Aviv Yoram Shiftan Transportation Research Institute Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Act Now: An Incremental Implementation of an Activity-Based Model System in Puget Sound Presented to: 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
For Model Users Group June 10, 2011 Kyeil Kim, Ph.D., PTP Atlanta Regional Commission.
DVRPC TMIP Peer Review TIM 2 Model Oct. 29 th, 2014.
Characteristics of Weekend Travel in the City of Calgary: Towards a Model of Weekend Travel Demand JD Hunt, University of Calgary DM Atkins, City of Calgary.
Greater Toronto & Hamilton Area School Travel Household Attitudinal Study.
1 Activity Based Models Review Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Model Task Force Data Committee October 17, 2008.
September, 2012An Activity Based Model for a Regional City1.
Importance of Modeling Bicycle Ownership at Individual Level to Predict Travel Mode Share May 18, 2015 Nazneen Ferdous and John Gliebe, RSG Richard Walker,
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
TO THE BLACK BOX AND BACK – The TRANS Model October 2008.
Activity-Based Modeling How does it work?. CT-RAMP model Coordinated Travel – Regional Activity Based Modeling Platform (CT-RAMP) for the Atlanta Region.
Evaluating Transportation Impacts of Forecast Demographic Scenarios Using Population Synthesis and Data Simulation Joshua Auld Kouros Mohammadian Taha.
1. Identify the variable(s) of interest (the focus) and the population of the study. 2. Develop a detailed plan for collecting data. Make sure sample.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
Calgary Commercial Movement Model Kevin Stefan, City of Calgary J.D. Hunt, University of Calgary Prepared for the 17th International EMME/2 Conference.
Presented to Model Task Force Model Advancement Committee presented by Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Date November 24, 2008.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference presented by Arun Kuppam, Cambridge.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
Methodological Considerations for Integrating Dynamic Traffic Assignment with Activity-Based Models Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Srinivasan Sundaram.
Estimation of a Weekend Location Choice Model for Calgary KJ Stefan, City of Calgary JDP McMillan, City of Calgary CR Blaschuk, City of Calgary JD Hunt,
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FOUR Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
Student Travel: Evidence from 13 Diverse Metro Regions of the United States Guang Tian and Reid Ewing Department of City & Metropolitan.
Impact of Aging Population on Regional Travel Patterns: The San Diego Experience 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Columbus.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Demand Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
ILUTE A Tour-Based Mode Choice Model Incorporating Inter-Personal Interactions Within the Household Matthew J. Roorda Eric J. Miller UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO.
Responses to Gas Prices in Knoxville, TN Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates Mike Conger, P.E.
Peter Vovsha, Robert Donnelly, Surabhi Gupta pb
Aktivitetsbaseret modellering af transportefterspørgsel
FUSING LONG AND SHORT DISTANCE TRAVEL IN THE COLORADO STATEWIDE MODEL
Districtwide Passenger Origin & Destination (O & D) Surveys 2015 Planning & Development Committee November 01, 2016.
AMPO Annual Conference October 22, 2014
Steps Closer to ABM: Example from Jerusalem
Congestion and Time-Of-Day Forecast Outcomes of an Activity-Based Model
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Presentation transcript:

FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS THREE Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011

Tentative Schedule Model Steps July 7 Final Model Steps/ How to Run the ModelJuly 14 Theoretical UnderpinningJuly 21 SQL DatabaseJuly 28 ????August 4 Should we continue after this?

Focus Model Flow: 28 Steps FEEDBACK

Focus Model Flow STAGE 1: Make Population And Network STAGE 2: Run GISDK to Mode Choice STAGE 3: C# Logit Models to Create Trips STAGE 4: GISDK Assignment FEEDBACK

Review of Class 2 In stage one, we create a disaggregate list of people and households. We know a lot of details like age, income, household size, worker status, student status, and number of children. We can use this to help determine how people travel. For example, Chris P. is more likely to drop off kids because he has them in his household.

Review of Class 2  After stage one:  1. A synthesized population living at X-Y coordinates  2. A database filled with point locations and people, model variables  Slight digression: we know a lot more about the places too: mixed use density, intersection density  3. A set of highway and transit networks ready for use.

Review of Class 2  After Stage 2:  Now we have a LOT of matrices:  All highway and transit skims  A set of commercial and external trips O-Ds  A set of DIA trips O-Ds and modes  And all stage one outputs: population, networks, a ready database.

Focus Model Flow: Stage 3 STAGE 1: PREPROCESS STAGE 2 :GISDK Through Mode Choice STAGE 3: C# Logit Models to Create Trips STAGE 4: GISDK Assignment FEEDBACK

The steps in Stage 3. Mostly Logit Models. The heart of the model.  8. Regular Work Location Choice19. Tour Main Mode Choice  9. Regular School Location Choice20. Tour Time of Day Choice  10. Auto Availability21. Intermediate Stop Generation  11. Aggregate Logsum Generation22. Trip Time of Day Simulation  12.Daily Activity Pattern23. Trip Time Copier  13. Exact Number of Tours24. Intermediate Stop Location  14.Work Tour Destination Type25. Trip Mode Choice  15.Work-Based Subtour Generation26. Trip Time of Day Choice  16. Tour Time of Day Simulation 27. Write Trips to TransCAD  17. Tour Primary Destination Choice  18. Tour Priority Assignment

Long Term Choices  8. Regular Work Location Choice  9. Regular School Location Choice  10. Auto Availability  11. Aggregate Logsum Generation

Talking time: Let’s talk about ourselves again- Someone volunteer or I will pick you How many cars does your household have? What about you or where you live or what you do determines this?

Long term choice 3: How many cars will our household own?  Auto Ownership Model  Final Choice: Number of Household Cars =0, 1, 2, 3, 4+  Type of Model: Multinomial Logit  Inputs: (What do you think predicts?) Household Size Income Group Accessibility of Home Location (by transit included) Age of People in Household

How the auto ownership choice looks on the household table:

Aggregate Destination Choice Logsum Generation (don’t fall asleep)  The aggregate destination choice logsums are a measure of total accessibility for a household.  A measurement of how easy it is to get to all destinations (shopping, hospitals, schools, etc) by all modes (walking, biking, transit, driving)  Size of destination= number of jobs  End up with a number that describes the accessibility the household has to do many activities: social recreational, meal etc

Long term choices made  Each individual has regular work location, school location. We know how many cars a household has and how it accessible it is to various types of services.  Now we need daily choices for travel. How many trips will each person take and for what purposes?

HOME WORK STORE Next we generate tours and information about location, mode, and time.

Tour Generation Models  12.Daily Activity Pattern  13. Exact Number of Tours  14.Work Tour Destination Type  15.Work-Based Subtour Generation

How many tours do you take on a typical workday?  Seven tour types: work, school, escort, personal business, shop, meal, social recreation  What are the drivers of how many tours you take?  Someone volunteer again.

Daily Activity Pattern Choice  Model knows now: - where each person works, goes to school - How many cars their household has - How accessible their home is to other locations In Daily Activity Pattern, the model predicts: How many different and what type of activities will a person conduct in a day?

Daily Activity Pattern Choice  Choice: 0-1 if they make a tour or make a stop or both for: Work, School, Drive Passenger, Meal, Shopping, Social Recreation, or Personal Business  Model Type: Logit  300 possible choices (some limitations on number of types of activities to make tours and stops)  Inputs: (What do you think predicts?) Worker Status Income Group Age Household Accessibility (Logsums)

Exact Number of Tours  Given if a person will make tours from DAP, Choice: This predicts the number of tours; for example 1, 2, 3+ work tours by purpose: work, school, escort, personal business, meal, shop, social/recreation Model Type: Logit Inputs: (What do you think predicts?) Similar to DAP Auto Ownership Gender Student Status

Doing what?Number of Tours Number of Stops Working10 Going to school00 Shopping0 1 Escorting others00 Socializing00 Eating out10 Personal business 00 End up with info like this:

Tours get written into the database.

Work Tour Destination Type Work Based Subtour Generation  A couple of simple models related to tour generation  On each work tour, will I go to my regular workplace or not= work tour destination type? Or will I got some other place to work?  Work-Based Subtour Generation: How many times will I leave work and return in one day? (i.e. go to lunch and come back)

Now we need to know more information about the tours 16. Tour Time of Day Simulation (When) 17. Tour Primary Destination Choice (Where) 18. Tour Priority Assignment (Priority) 19. Tour Main Mode Choice (Mode) 20. Tour Time of Day Choice (Time)

Tour Time of Day Simulation  Tour Time of Day Simulation: Type of Model = Monte Carlo  This is a weird one!  Before we pick where a person goes and which mode they use on a tour we need a skim time period to pick from to choose how long it takes  We use a weighted random assignment of the TOUR DESTINATION ARRIVAL TIME/ TOUR DESTINATION DEPARTURE TIME based on the purpose of the tour.