2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.
Advertisements

Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.
KEY TERMS Argument: A conclusion together with the premises that support it. Premise: A reason offered as support for another claim. Conclusion: A claim.
Hypotheticals: The If/Then Form Hypothetical arguments are usually more obvious than categorical ones. A hypothetical argument has an “if/then” pattern.
Types of Arguments Inductive Argument: An argument in which the truth of the premises is supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. Strong.
Rules of Inferences Section 1.5. Definitions Argument: is a sequence of propositions (premises) that end with a proposition called conclusion. Valid Argument:
Deduction and Induction Elementary deduction, my dear Watson…
Arguments, validity, soundness, persuasiveness
Common Valid Deductive Forms: Dilemma P or q If p then r If q then s Therefore, r or s Example, Either George W. Bush will win the election or John Kerry.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5. ” All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.” Ambrose Bierce “ Those who lack the courage.
Reason & Argument Lecture 3. Lecture Synopsis 1. Recap: validity, soundness & counter- examples, induction. 2. Arguing for a should conclusion. 3. Complications.
Euler’s circles Some A are not B. All B are C. Some A are not C. Algorithm = a method of solution guaranteed to give the right answer.
Chapter 1 Critical Thinking.
Deductive Validity Truth preserving: The conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is logically impossible for the premises to be true and the.
Moral Reasoning   What is moral reasoning? Moral reasoning is ordinary critical reasoning or critical thinking applied to moral arguments.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
LESSON 3: PRACTICE WITH VALID/INVALID; MORE ON INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS Logic.
Deductive Arguments and Inference Rules Terminology: Valid Argument: – truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion – It would be contradictory.
This is Introductory Logic PHI 120 Get a syllabus online, if you don't already have one Presentation: "Good Arguments"
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Types of Deductions and Inductions with Examples.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Basic Argumentation.
Section 2 Logic.
Logical Arguments. Strength 1.A useless argument is one in which the truth of the premisses has no effect at all on the truth of the conclusion. 2.A weak.
Deductive versus Inductive Reasoning Consider the following two passages: Argument #1 Mr. Jones is a member of the Academy of Scholarly Fellows and only.
The Science of Good Reasons
Deductive Arguments.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Chapter 3: MAKING SENSE OF ARGUMENTS
1 DISJUNCTIVE AND HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISMS DISJUNCTIVE PROPOSITIONS: E.G EITHER WHALES ARE MAMMALS OR THEY ARE VERY LARGE FISH. DISJUNCTS: WHALES ARE MAMMALS.(P)
Philosophy: Logic and Logical arguments
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
The construction of a formal argument
Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments
6.6 Argument Forms and Fallacies
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Thinking Critically 1C Discussion Paragraph 1 web 88. State Politics 89. US Presidents 90. Web Venn Diagrams.
CHAPTER 9 CONSTRUCTING ARGUMENTS. ARGUMENTS A form of thinking in which certain reasons are offered to support conclusion Arguments are Inferences - Decide.
Fun with Deductive Reasoning
Syllogisms and Three Types of Hypothetical Syllogisms
Hypothetical Syllogism If/Then Statements. Parts Major Premise: Two-part statement: – 1) "if," statement, known as the antecedent; – 2) consequent Minor.
Chapter 7 Evaluating Deductive Arguments II: Truth Functional Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Arguments Arguments: premises provide grounds for the truth of the conclusion Two different ways a conclusion may be supported by premises. Deductive Arguments.
Symbolic Logic ⊃ ≡ · v ~ ∴. What is a logical argument? Logic is the science of reasoning, proof, thinking, or inference. Logic allows us to analyze a.
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Lecture Notes Chapter 7.
Logic: The Language of Philosophy. What is Logic? Logic is the study of argumentation o In Philosophy, there are no right or wrong opinions, but there.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
L = # of lines n = # of different simple propositions L = 2 n EXAMPLE: consider the statement, (A ⋅ B) ⊃ C A, B, C are three simple statements 2 3 L =
Introduction to Philosophy Doing Philosophy: Arguments
PHIL102 SUM2014, M-F12:00-1:00, SAV 264 Instructor: Benjamin Hole
Types of Arguments Inductive Argument: An argument in which the truth of the premises is supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. Strong.
Chapter 3 Basic Logical Concepts (Please read book.)
What makes a Good Argument?
Deductive Arguments.
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
Win Every Argument Every Time
Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions
Logical Forms.
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
Critical Thinking Lecture 2 Arguments
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
Critical Thinking Lecture 11 The Syllogism
Argumentation.
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive

Deductive Reasoning Attempts to provide sufficient (or conclusive) evidence for the conclusion Attempts to provide sufficient (or conclusive) evidence for the conclusion Deductive reasoning can be recognized by the structure of the argument and sometimes by the conclusion offered Deductive reasoning can be recognized by the structure of the argument and sometimes by the conclusion offered

Inductive Reasoning Attempts to make the conclusion probable or likely—evidence is not intended to be conclusive Attempts to make the conclusion probable or likely—evidence is not intended to be conclusive Typically recognized by probabilistic claims in either or both of the premises and conclusions Typically recognized by probabilistic claims in either or both of the premises and conclusions Includes statistical and demographic reasoning, predictions, analogies and explanations Includes statistical and demographic reasoning, predictions, analogies and explanations

Some Examples Either Bob or Joe was going to win the award. Bob didn’t win, so Joe must have. Either Bob or Joe was going to win the award. Bob didn’t win, so Joe must have. I think Wayne committed the murder. He had the motive, he had the opportunity, his bloody glove was found on the scene, and he has no alibi. I think Wayne committed the murder. He had the motive, he had the opportunity, his bloody glove was found on the scene, and he has no alibi. I’m sure Alice knows how to swim. After all, most people know how to swim. I’m sure Alice knows how to swim. After all, most people know how to swim.

More Examples If you stop smoking, you’ll live longer. Current research shows that on average, non-smokers live 5.5 years longer than smokers. If you stop smoking, you’ll live longer. Current research shows that on average, non-smokers live 5.5 years longer than smokers. If we stick with our current quarterback, our team probably won’t get any better. He’s had a few years now, and we haven’t improved yet. Perhaps it’s time for someone new. If we stick with our current quarterback, our team probably won’t get any better. He’s had a few years now, and we haven’t improved yet. Perhaps it’s time for someone new. Since 2 x 2=4, and 2 2 is the same as 2 x 2, then 2 2 =4. Since 2 x 2=4, and 2 2 is the same as 2 x 2, then 2 2 =4.

Judging Validity A deductive argument is judged on 2 criteria: validity and soundness A deductive argument is judged on 2 criteria: validity and soundness An argument is valid if the truth of the premises would guarantee the truth of the conclusion An argument is valid if the truth of the premises would guarantee the truth of the conclusion An argument is invalid if the conclusion could be false even if all the premises are true An argument is invalid if the conclusion could be false even if all the premises are true N.B.: This judgment is purely formal—it has nothing to do with the truth of either premises or conclusions N.B.: This judgment is purely formal—it has nothing to do with the truth of either premises or conclusions

Some Examples Either the kitchen is on fire, or my pot roast is burning. I can see the kitchen’s not on fire, so my pot roast must be burning. Either the kitchen is on fire, or my pot roast is burning. I can see the kitchen’s not on fire, so my pot roast must be burning. All CEOs are wealthy. Martin is wealthy, so he must be a CEO. All CEOs are wealthy. Martin is wealthy, so he must be a CEO. Only Democrats would vote for Hilary Clinton. Wade is a Democrat, so he must have voted for Hilary. Only Democrats would vote for Hilary Clinton. Wade is a Democrat, so he must have voted for Hilary.

More Examples Deceptive advertising is no different from lying. Since lying is wrong, so too is deceptive advertising. Deceptive advertising is no different from lying. Since lying is wrong, so too is deceptive advertising. Republicans support tax cuts for the wealthy. George is a Republican, so he must support tax cuts for the wealthy. Republicans support tax cuts for the wealthy. George is a Republican, so he must support tax cuts for the wealthy. Republicans support tax cuts for the wealthy. John supports tax cuts for the wealthy, so he must be a Republican. Republicans support tax cuts for the wealthy. John supports tax cuts for the wealthy, so he must be a Republican.

Argument Forms There are some argument form that are always valid They are: Modus Ponens, Modus Tollens, Categorical Syllogism, Disjunctive Syllogism, Hypothetical Syllogism and Constructive Dilemma

Argument Forms Continued There are two argument structures that are always invalid. They are: Affirming the Consequent and Denying the Antecedent

Soundness and Unsoundness A deductive argument is sound is (1) it is valid, and (2) its premises are true. A deductive argument is sound is (1) it is valid, and (2) its premises are true. A deductive argument is unsound if either (1) it is invalid, or (2) it is valid, but at least one premise is false A deductive argument is unsound if either (1) it is invalid, or (2) it is valid, but at least one premise is false

Some Examples All men are mortal. Socrates is a man, therefore Socrates is mortal. All men are mortal. Socrates is a man, therefore Socrates is mortal. Either the moon is made or green cheese, or I’m the Pope. Unfortunately, the moon IS made of green cheese, so I’m sadly not the Pope. Either the moon is made or green cheese, or I’m the Pope. Unfortunately, the moon IS made of green cheese, so I’m sadly not the Pope. If the General Manager was retained, our team’s losing ways were bound to continue. Since I see we aren’t winning yet, we must have retained the General manager. If the General Manager was retained, our team’s losing ways were bound to continue. Since I see we aren’t winning yet, we must have retained the General manager. Only rock stars and athletes are wealthy. Since Ellen is pretty wealthy, she must be either a rock star or an athlete. Only rock stars and athletes are wealthy. Since Ellen is pretty wealthy, she must be either a rock star or an athlete.