Robert Cooper L. Garrison, L. Rebenitsch, R. Tayloe, R. Thornton.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Advertisements

Robert Cooper
M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Gamma backgrounds, shielding and veto performance for dark matter detectors M. Carson,
The Angra Neutrino Detector Detector, VETO and electronics conceptual design Laudo Barbosa (May 18th, 2006) Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF)
M. Carson, University of Sheffield IDM 2004, University of Edinburgh Veto performance for a large xenon detector.
Prototype of the Daya Bay Neutrino Detector Wang Zhimin IHEP, Daya Bay.
Neutron background measurements at LNGS Gian Luca Raselli INFN - Pavia JRA1 meeting, Paris 14 Feb
Prospects for 7 Be Solar Neutrino Detection with KamLAND Stanford University Department of Physics Kazumi Ishii.
Alternative Prototype Detector Design D. Reyna Argonne National Lab.
DESCANT – DEuterated SCintillator Array for Neutron TaggingScott Williams, Warsaw, Oct 2007 DESCANT: DEuterated SCintillator Array for Neutron Tagging.
Liquid Xenon Gamma Screening Luiz de Viveiros Brown University.
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Luminosity Monitors MICE Video Conference 7 May 2009 Paul Soler.
Count rate estimates from TDR Assuming beam intenisties from previous slide and acc *rec from SIM LH2 case [counts/24h] p [GeV/c] beam momentum Solid.
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Lance Garrison R. Cooper, H.-O. Meyer, T. Mikev, L. Rebenitsch, R. Tayloe, R. Thornton.
Neutron Generation and Detection Lee Robertson Instrument & Source Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory 17 th National School on Neutron and X-ray Scattering.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
BCAL R&D GlueX Collaboration Meeting Newport News, Virginia September 9-11, 2004 George Lolos, Zisis Papandreou.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
KamLAND Experiment Kamioka Liquid scintillator Anti-Neutrino Detector - Largest low-energy anti-neutrino detector built so far - Located at the site of.
Simulation study of RENO-50 Jungsic Park Seoul National University RENO-50 International Workshop June 13-14, 2013 Hoam Faculty House, Korea.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Scintillation hodoscope with SiPM readout for the CLAS detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) IEEE conference, Dresden, October 21, 2008.
THE FORWARD PROTON DETECTOR AT DZERO Gilvan Alves Lafex/CBPF 1) MOTIVATION 2) DETECTOR OPTIONS 3) FPD R&D 4) OUTLOOK Lishep 98 Lafex/CBPF Feb 17, 1998.
Neutron Monitoring Detector in KIMS Jungwon Kwak Seoul National University 2003 October 25 th KPS meeting.
MiniBooNE Michel Sorel (Valencia U.) for the MiniBooNE Collaboration TAUP Conference September 2005 Zaragoza (Spain)
Start Counter Collaboration Meeting September 2004 W. Boeglin FIU.
Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron Malek MAZOUZ LPSC Grenoble EINN 2005September 23 rd 2005.
1 IDM2004 Edinburgh, 9 september 2004 Helenia Menghetti Bologna University and INFN Study of the muon-induced neutron background with the LVD detector.
Experimental Nuclear Physics Some Recent Activities 1.Development of a detector for low-energy neutrons a. Hardware -- A Novel Design Idea b. Measure the.
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Performance Comparisons of Safeguard Detector Designs D. Reyna (Argonne National Laboratory) with help from R.W. McKeown (Drexel University)
Muon and Neutron Backgrounds at Yangyang underground lab Muju Workshop Kwak, Jungwon Seoul National University 1.External Backgrounds 2.Muon.
Start and Vertex Detector W. Boeglin, A.Klein Current Design: 3300 scintillating fibers 1mm diameter 3 double layers (1 axial, 2 stereo) cylindrical geometry.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
WIMP search Result from KIMS experiments Kim Seung Cheon (DMRC,SNU)
Jun Cao Jan. 18, 2004 Daya Bay neutrino experiment workshop (Beijing) Detector Module Simulation and Baseline Optimization ● Determine module geometric.
Robert Cooper
Robert Cooper L. Garrison, L. Rebenitsch, R. Tayloe, R. Thornton.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
Luminosity Monitor Design MICE Collaboration Meeting 31 May 2009 Paul Soler.
DARK MATTER SEARCH Carter Hall, University of Maryland.
1 LTR 2004 Sudbury, December 2004 Helenia Menghetti, Marco Selvi Bologna University and INFN Large Volume Detector The Large Volume Detector (LVD)
Recent Results from RENO NUFACT2014 August. 25 to 30, 2014, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. Hyunkwan Seo on behalf of the RENO Collaboration Seoul National University.
Second Workshop on large TPC for low energy rare event detection, Paris, December 21 st, 2004.
1 Work report ( ) Haoqi Lu IHEP Neutrino group
MiniBooNE: Status and Plans Outline Physics motivation Beamline performance Detector performance First look at the data Conclusions Fernanda G. Garcia,
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
Fast neutron flux measurement in CJPL
Laser Geiger cell (update)
SoLid: Recent Results and Future Prospects
MoNA detector physics How to detect neutrons. Thomas Baumann NSCL.
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
Muon and Neutron detector of KIMS experiment
Neutron backgrounds in KamLAND
Calibration, Simulations, and “Remaining” Issues
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
of Neutrons produced by
Signal and Background in LENS
Status of Neutron flux Analysis in KIMS experiment
Neutron Beam Test for Measuring Quenching Factor of CsI(Tl) Crystal
Mini Tower Preliminary Results
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
The Development of a Segmented Detector using ZnS:Ag/6Li
Presentation transcript:

Robert Cooper L. Garrison, L. Rebenitsch, R. Tayloe, R. Thornton

INTRODUCTION

MI-12 Neutron Background Run Neutrons ~18 m from target 40 days on target (60 days total) In-line behind beam target (ground) 1 kg EJ-301 detector motivated SciBath placement

MI-12 Neutron Background Run Neutrons ~18 m from target 40 days on target (60 days total) In-line behind beam target (ground) 1 kg EJ-301 detector motivated SciBath placement

THE SCIBATH DETECTOR

Design Concept Bath of liquid scintillator ~40 cm length cubic volume 3D array, crossed wave- length shifting fiber readout 768-channel with 64-anode PMT system (x12) IU custom-built DAQ ($70 per channel with PMT)

The SciBath Detector 80 L liquid scintillator (LS) 88% mineral oil 11% pseudocumene 1% PPO 768 (3-16x16) array wavelength-shifting fibers (x,y,z axes) 1.5 mm diameter 2.5 cm spacing UV → blue

The SciBath Detector Pulsed LED calibration

The SciBath Detector N 2 and LS plumbing

The SciBath Detector Electronics readout & PMTs

The SciBath Detector Electronics readout & PMTs

Sample Event

Anticipated Sensitivity (n events)

n /  Particle Discrimination

“muons”

n /  Particle Discrimination neutrons

PRELIMINARY NEUTRON ENERGY SPECTRUM

Beam Spill Time / PE Structure Bin 6 Bin 10 Bin 11 Bin 12Bin 13Bin 16 Bin 20

Beam Spill Time / PE Structure Softening of PE spectrum in time

Preliminary Analysis Roadmap 1.Measure proton PE response 2.Convert proton PEs to energy scale 3.Unfold spectrum of neutrons from protons 4.Divide detector efficiency 5.Normalize to X units (X = time, POT, triggers, etc.) Future spectra will combine 3. and 4. in MC

Preliminary Analysis Roadmap 1.Measure proton PE response 2.Convert proton PEs to energy scale 3.Unfold spectrum of neutrons from protons 4.Divide detector efficiency 5.Normalize to X units (X = time, POT, triggers, etc.) Future spectra will combine 3. and 4. in MC

SciBath In-Beam PE Spectrum PEs

Preliminary Analysis Roadmap 1.Measure proton PE response 2.Convert proton PEs to energy scale 3.Unfold spectrum of neutrons from protons 4.Divide detector efficiency 5.Normalize to X units (X = time, POT, triggers, etc.) Future spectra will combine 3. and 4. in MC

Proton Response and Quenching Birk’s Law used to convert to energy deposit Handles quenching for large dE / dx

Proton Response and Quenching Birk’s Law used to convert to energy deposit Handles quenching for large dE / dx

Energy Deposit Spectrum Assume everything is a proton recoil and apply quenching formula 300 MeV protons can “range-out” in SciBath.

Preliminary Analysis Roadmap 1.Measure proton PE response 2.Convert proton PEs to energy scale 3.Unfold spectrum of neutrons from protons 4.Divide detector efficiency 5.Normalize to X units (X = time, POT, triggers, etc.) Future spectra will combine 3. and 4. in MC

A Quick Unfolding Algorithm Assume isotropic CM scattering Assume uniform energy deposit Assume monotonic with endpoint Integrate uniform “cake layers”  n p EpEp EnEn

A Quick Unfolding Algorithm Assume isotropic CM scattering Assume uniform energy deposit Assume monotonic with endpoint Integrate uniform “cake layers”

A Quick Unfolding Algorithm Assume isotropic CM scattering Assume uniform energy deposit Assume monotonic with endpoint Integrate uniform “cake layers”

A Quick Unfolding Algorithm Assume isotropic CM scattering Assume uniform energy deposit Assume monotonic with endpoint Integrate uniform “cake layers”

Unfolded Neutron Spectrum

Preliminary Analysis Roadmap 1.Measure proton PE response 2.Convert proton PEs to energy scale 3.Unfold spectrum of neutrons from protons 4.Divide detector efficiency 5.Normalize to X units (X = time, POT, triggers, etc.) Future spectra will combine 3. and 4. in MC

Detection Efficiency (MC)

Predicted Neutron Spectrum

Preliminary Analysis Roadmap 1.Measure proton PE response 2.Convert proton PEs to energy scale 3.Unfold spectrum of neutrons from protons 4.Divide detector efficiency 5.Normalize to X units (X = time, POT, triggers, etc.) Future spectra will combine 3. and 4. in MC

Neutron Spectrum per Beam Spill 3 neutrons per spill (1 neutron > 40 MeV)

NEXT STEPS

Underway Implement MC unfolding Least squares fit or maximum likelihood? POT analysis Explore effect of n- capture tagging, fiducial cuts, and PID Directional analysis Double scatter analysis More Aggressive n /  discrimination Validate with cosmic n’s