Microscopic time-dependent analysis of neutrons transfers at low-energy nuclear reactions with spherical and deformed nuclei V.V. Samarin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Influence of the neutron-pair transfer on fusion V. V. Sargsyan*, G. G. Adamian, N. V. Antonenko In collaboration with W. Scheid, H. Q. Zhang, D. Lacroix,
Advertisements

CHAPTER 9 Beyond Hydrogen Atom
Pavel Stránský 29 th August 2011 W HAT DRIVES NUCLEI TO BE PROLATE? Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Alejandro.
Emission of Scission Neutrons: Testing the Sudden Approximation N. Carjan Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires de Bordeaux-Gradignan,CNRS/IN2P3 – Université Bordeaux.
The Dynamical Deformation in Heavy Ion Collisions Junqing Li Institute of Modern Physics, CAS School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University.
1 Cold molecules Mike Tarbutt. 2 Outline Lecture 1 – The electronic, vibrational and rotational structure of molecules. Lecture 2 – Transitions in molecules.
RFSS: Lecture 9 Nuclear Reactions
Monday, Nov. 11, 2013PHYS , Fall 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #17 Monday, Nov. 11, 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Alpha Particle.
Nuclear models. Models we will consider… Independent particle shell model Look at data that motivates the model Construct a model Make and test predictions.

Higher Order Multipole Transition Effects in the Coulomb Dissociation Reactions of Halo Nuclei Dr. Rajesh Kharab Department of Physics, Kurukshetra University,
1 Role of the nuclear shell structure and orientation angles of deformed reactants in complete fusion Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Flerov Laboratory.
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Reactions Categorization of Nuclear Reactions According to: bombarding.
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODELS
Classical Model of Rigid Rotor
Wavefunctions and Energy Levels Since particles have wavelike properties cannot expect them to behave like point-like objects moving along precise trajectories.
Lecture 10 Energy production. Summary We have now established three important equations: Hydrostatic equilibrium: Mass conservation: Equation of state:
Chapter 41 Atomic Structure
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Binding Energy B tot (A,Z) = [ Zm H + Nm n - m(A,Z) ] c 2 B  m.
NUCLEAR MODELS.
Ch 9 pages Lecture 23 – The Hydrogen Atom.
Lecture 19: The deuteron 13/11/2003 Basic properties: mass: mc 2 = MeV binding energy: (measured via  -ray energy in n + p  d +  ) RMS.
1 He and hydrogenoid ions The one nucleus-electron system.
Effects of self-consistence violations in HF based RPA calculations for giant resonances Shalom Shlomo Texas A&M University.
Nuclear Reactions AP Physics B Montwood High School R. Casao.
Cross Sections One of the most important quantities we measure in nuclear physics is the cross section. Cross sections always have units of area and in.
Quantum Mechanical Model of the Atom Mathematical laws can identify the regions outside of the nucleus where electrons are most likely to be found. These.
Nuclear deformation in deep inelastic collisions of U + U.
Quantum Theory. The Quantum Model of the Atom Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle: This idea involves the detection of electrons. Electrons are detected.
Wolfram KORTEN 1 Euroschool Leuven – September 2009 Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams Motivation and introduction Theoretical aspects of Coulomb.
Nuclear Models Nuclear force is not yet fully understood.
Breakup effects of weakly bound nuclei on the fusion reactions C.J. Lin, H.Q. Zhang, F. Yang, Z.H. Liu, X.K. Wu, P. Zhou, C.L. Zhang, G.L. Zhang, G.P.
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
 Nature of nuclear forces, cont.  Nuclear Models lecture 3&4.
Application of correlated states of interacting particles in nonstationary and modulated LENR systems Vladimir I.Vysotskii Kiev National Shevchenko University,
NEUTRON SKIN AND GIANT RESONANCES Shalom Shlomo Cyclotron Institute Texas A&M University.
Lecture 23: Applications of the Shell Model 27/11/ Generic pattern of single particle states solved in a Woods-Saxon (rounded square well)
Atomic Structure The theories of atomic and molecular structure depend on quantum mechanics to describe atoms and molecules in mathematical terms.
L.D. Blokhintsev a, A.N. Safronov a, and A.A. Safronov b a Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia b Moscow State.
MS310 Quantum Physical Chemistry
Fusion of light halo nuclei
Atomic Orbitals And Quantum Numbers. Quantum Numbers A series of 4 numbers (and/or letters) that specify the properties of an electron in its orbit The.
Gross Properties of Nuclei
K.M.Shahabasyan, M. K. Shahabasyan,D.M.Sedrakyan
Monday, Oct. 2, 2006PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #8 Monday, Oct. 2, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Nuclear Models Shell Model Collective Model.
Time dependent GCM+GOA method applied to the fission process ESNT janvier / 316 H. Goutte, J.-F. Berger, D. Gogny CEA/DAM Ile de France.
Systematical Analysis of Fast Neutron Induced Alpha Particle Emission Reaction Cross Sections Jigmeddorj Badamsambuu, Nuclear Research Center, National.
Quantum Theory and Electron Configuration
Dynamical Model of Surrogate Reaction Y. Aritomo, S. Chiba, and K. Nishio Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai, Japan 1. Introduction Surrogate reactions.
1 Z.Q. Feng( 冯兆庆 ) 1 G.M. Jin( 靳根明 ) 2 F.S. Zhang ( 张丰收 ) 1 Institute of Modern Physics, CAS 2 Institute of Low Energy Nuclear Physics Beijing NormalUniversity.
Production mechanism of neutron-rich nuclei in 238 U+ 238 U at near-barrier energy Kai Zhao (China Institute of Atomic Energy) Collaborators: Zhuxia Li,
Lecture 4 1.The role of orientation angles of the colliding nuclei relative to the beam energy in fusion-fission and quasifission reactions. 2.The effect.
Few-Body Models of Light Nuclei The 8th APCTP-BLTP JINR Joint Workshop June 29 – July 4, 2014, Jeju, Korea S. N. Ershov.
Nuclear Phenomenology 3C24 Nuclear and Particle Physics Tricia Vahle & Simon Dean (based on Lecture Notes from Ruben Saakyan) UCL.
Semi-Empirical Mass Formula part II Quantum Terms
V. Nuclear Reactions Topics to be covered include:
Mean free path and transport parameters from Brueckner-Hartree-Fock
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia
Open quantum systems.
Chapter 41 Atomic Structure
 Heisenberg’s Matrix Mechanics Schrödinger’s Wave Mechanics
CHAPTER 5 The Schrodinger Eqn.
Chapter 41 Atomic Structure
Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions, JINR, Dubna, Russia
Parametrisation of Binding Energies
Fusion and neutron transfer reactions with weakly bound nuclei within time-dependent and coupled channel approaches VIACHESLAV SAMARIN Flerov Laboratory.
From Atoms, to Nucleons, to Quarks
Representations of the Nuclear Potential
More About Matter Waves
V.V. Sargsyan, G.G. Adamian, N.V.Antonenko
Presentation transcript:

Microscopic time-dependent analysis of neutrons transfers at low-energy nuclear reactions with spherical and deformed nuclei V.V. Samarin Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna The aim of report is application of based quantum mechanics equations for neutron transfers description.

2 Motivation Neutron transfers in the low energy nuclear reactions allow us to obtain new isotopes of atomic nuclei with increased neutron content. The probability of neutron transfer is highest during so-called grazing nuclear collisions. In this case the distances between the surfaces of the atomic nuclei do not exceed the range of the action of nuclear forces (1–2 fm). The most probable transition is the one between the nuclei of the external, most weakly bound neutrons. A new possibility for theoretical study of this reactions is provided by numerical solution for the non-stationary Schrodinger equation for external neutrons [1]. In this study the spin-orbital interaction and Pauli's exclusion principle were taken into consideration for spherical and deformed nuclei. 1. V.Samarin, V. Zagrebaev, Walter Greiner. Phys. Rev., C 75, (2007).

3 We studied four nuclear reactions (three from them more detail) and used two methods: 1. 6 Не Au 2. 6 Не Pb O + 48 Са Са U 1.Time-dependent Schrödinger equation with spin-orbital interaction and Pauli's exclusion principle 2. Spherical and deformed nuclei shell model for external nucleons More detail and less detail

4 Time-dependent Schrödinger equation with spin-orbital interaction 1. Samarin V. V., Samarin K. V. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys V. 74. P Samarin V. V., Samarin K. V. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys V. 75. P Samarin V. V., Samarin K. V. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys V. 76. P Time-dependent Schrödinger equation with spin-orbital interaction is numerically solved by difference method [1-3] for external neutrons of spherical nuclei at their grazing collisions with energies near to a Coulomb barrier. in Cartesian coordinates R 0 =1 fm

5 Samarin V.V. Phys. Atom. Nucl., 2010, 73, p Deformed nuclei shell model Schrödinger equation for the nucleon energy levels and wave functions at arbitrary axial-symmetrical field with spin-orbit interactionare calculated by a numerical solution of a Schrödinger equation for an arbitrary axial-symmetrical field with spin-orbit interactions, basedon decomposing on Bessel functions and difference scheme along internuclear axis.

6 Time-dependent Schrödinger equation solution is the way of visual simulation of neutron transfer for reactions with halo nuclei 6 Не. At first, for frontal and grazing collisions with energy below Coulomb barrier you can see, that 6 Не neutron wave function of 1p 3/2 state is arranged between projectile and target nuclei. There is stable space structure, like to 3d state of Au or Pb, with zero angular momentums projection to internuclear axis. 6 Не Pb, Е cm =18 MeV, frontal collision 6 Не Au, Е cm =18 MeV, grazing collision

7 At second, for frontal and grazing collisions with energy in vicinity of Coulomb barrier you can see, that 6 Не neutron wave function of 1p 3/2 state is arranged between projectile and target nuclei with some space structure too. Е=20 MeV 6 Не Pb, Е cm =20 MeV, frontal collision 6 Не Au, Е cm =21 MeV, grazing collision

8 At next, for grazing collision with energy above of Coulomb barrier you can see, that 6 Не neutron wave function of 1p 3/2 state is arranged between projectile and target nuclei with stable space structure like to rotated 3d state of Au. 6 Не Au, Е cm =30 MeV, grazing collision

9 At last, for grazing collision with energy more above of Coulomb barrier you can see, that 6 Не neutron wave function of 1p 3/2 state is arranged between projectile and target nuclei with some space structure like to rotated 3d state of Au too. 6 Не Au, Е cm =60 MeV, grazing collision

10 If distances between nuclear centers and surfaces is decreasing, potential barrier between two potential walls is decreasing too ( Fig. 1), transfer probability is increasing ( Fig. 2). This reason lead to cross section of neutron transfer at 6 He+ 197 Au, which satisfactorily agrees with experimental data (Fig. 3). Spacing interval between nuclear surfaces Probabilities p of the transfer of the external neutron of the 6 Не as functions of the minimum distance s between the surfaces of 6 Не, 197 Au nuclei for the energies in the center of mass system near barrier energies from 18 to 22 MeV ( ), 30 MeV ( ) and 60 MeV ( ). Fig. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3. p

11 R1R1 R2R2 1p 3/2 197 Au 3d 5/2,3/2 6 Не For reaction 6 Не Au, in frontal collision dominant transfer is: 1p 3/2 ( 6 Не)  3d 5/2, 3/2 ( 197 Au). Calculated by time-dependent Schrödinger equation occupied states probabilities in Au for stripping neutron with full momentum projection  are shown on Fig. 2. Fig. 2 We may illustrate semiclassically dominant neutron transfer for neutron orbits with zero angular momentums projection to internuclear axis, which touching each other. Neutron energy and momentum for classical orbit in projectile equal approximately to neutron energy and momentum for classical orbit in target. In this case angular momentums relatively to centers of nuclei will be proportional to radii of nuclei (Fig. 1). Fig. 1

12 18O18O Pauli's exclusion principle limit transfers to occupied states for reactions 18 O+ 48 Ca. Preliminary: unlimited transfers Begin of collision End of collision 48 Ca 1d 5/2 Neutron states in spherical shell model 1d 5/2

13 Pauli's exclusion principle limit transfers to occupied states for reaction: 48 Ca+ 248 U Preliminary: unlimited transfers End of collision Begin of transfer Neutron states in spherical shell model End of collision Begin of collision Neutron states in deformed shell model are studied in next slides 3d 5/2 238 U 48 Ca 238 U Begin of transfer End of collision 1f 7/2 48 Ca 238 U 2g 9/2

14 Fig. 1. Probabilities of neutrons pick-up (solid curves) and stripping (dashed curves) for 48 Са at reactions 48 Са + 18 O (curves 1) и 48 Са U (curves 2) as function on minimum value of internuclear distance Pauli's exclusion principle were taken into consideration by: 1. exception with transfer to occupied states in “frozen” nuclei shell structures (simple approximation). 2. time dependent many body wave function (M=2, 3) (more correct approximation). Fig. 2. Probabilities of neutrons pick-up (solid curves) and stripping (dashed curves) for 48 Са at reactions 48 Са U as function on minimum value of internuclear distance At reaction 48 Ca+ 238 U probabilities of neutrons stripping and pick-up are commensurable.

15 Visual simulation of neutron transfers at reaction 18 O+ 48 Ca. Two external neutrons: 1d 5/2 from 18 O and 1f 7/2 from 48 Ca with moment projection  =1/2, 3/2 are took into account Visual simulation of neutron transfers at reaction 48 Ca+ 238 U Three external neutrons: 1f 7/2 from 48 Ca and 2g 9/2, 1i 11/2 from 238 U with moment projection  =1/2, 3/2 are took into account

16 Nucleons transfers in low-energy nuclear reactions 40,48 Ca+ 238 U with deformed nucleus 238 U a) Some upper energy levels for neutron states with module  of total angular momentum projection to symmetry axis at hypothetic nuclei 238 U with quadrupole deformation  2 and octupole deformation  4 =  2 /2 (a) and at real nucleus 238 U with  2 = 0.215,  4 = (b), dashed lines correspond unoccupied levels a b

17 Visual simulation of neutron pick-up at reaction 40 Ca+ 238 U during frontal collision at energy in the center of mass system E=192 MeV. In the beginning external neutron of 238 U is in initial state 1j 15/2 with angular momentum projections on symmetry axis  =5/2. Angle between symmetry axes of deformed nucleus 238 U and initial velocity of 40 Ca nucleus equal 45 o. Neutron pick-up at reaction 48 Ca+ 238 U

18 Neutrons pick-up in low-energy nuclear reactions 40 Ca+ 238 U with deformed nucleus 238 U a) Probability density of the external neutron of 238 U for initial state 1j 15/2 with angular momentum projections on symmetry axis  =5/2 during frontal collision with the 40 Ca at energy in the center of mass system E=192 MeV. Angle between symmetry axes of deformed nucleus 238 U and initial velocity of 40 Ca nucleus equal 45 o. b) The probabilities of neutron pick-up at reaction 40 Са+ 238 U as a function of minimum distance s between nuclear surfaces. Angles between symmetry axes of deformed nucleus 238 U and initial velocity of 40 Ca nuclei equal 45 o (solid line) and 90 o (dashed line). a b

19 Visual simulation of neutron stripping at reaction 48 Ca+ 238 U during frontal collision at energy in the center of mass system E=175 MeV. In the beginning external neutrons of 48 Ca is in initial state 1f 7/2. Angle between symmetry axes of deformed nucleus 238 U and initial velocity of 48 Ca nucleus equal 0 o. Neutron stripping at reaction 48 Ca+ 238 U

20 Visual simulation of neutron stripping at reaction 48 Ca+ 238 U during frontal collision at energy in the center of mass system E=192 MeV. In the beginning external neutrons of 48 Ca is in initial state 1f 7/2. Angle between symmetry axes of deformed nucleus 238 U and initial velocity of 48 Ca nucleus equal 45 o. Neutron stripping at reaction 48 Ca+ 238 U

21 Neutrons stripping in low-energy nuclear reactions 48 Ca+ 238 U with deformed nucleus 238 U a) Probability density of the external neutrons of 1f 7/2 shell of 48 Ca during a frontal collision with the 238 U at energy in the center of mass system E=192 MeV. Angle between symmetry axes of deformed nucleus 238 U and initial velocity of 40 Ca nucleus equal 45 o. b) The probabilities of neutron stripping at reaction 48 Са+ 238 U (a) as a function of minimum distance s between nuclear surfaces. Angles between symmetry axes of deformed nucleus 238U and initial velocity of Ca nuclei equal 45 o (solid line), 90 o (dashed line) and 0 (dotted line). ba

22 Conclusion A new possibility for theoretical study of this reactions is provided by numerical solution for the non-stationary Schrödinger equation for external neutrons. In this study the spin-orbital interaction and Pauli's exclusion principle were taken into consideration. Time-dependent Schrödinger equation is numerically solved by difference method for external neutrons of spherical nuclei 6 He, 18 O, 48 Са and deformed nucleus 238 U at their grazing collisions with energies near to a Coulomb barrier. The probabilities of transfer of neutrons at reactions 6 He+ 197 Аu, 18 O+48Ca, 40,48 Ca+ 238 U are determined as function on minimum internuclear distances. The calculation results of cross section for formation of the 198 Au isotope in the 6 Не+ 197 Au reaction agree satisfactorily with the experimental data in vicinity of the Coulomb barrier. At reactions 6 He+ 197 Аu, 18 O+ 48 Ca, neutrons are predominantly transferred from a smaller nucleus to the greater nucleus. At reaction 48 Ca+ 238 U probabilities of neutrons stripping and pick-up are commensurable. Nonstationary quantum approach applied in this work may be used for internal nucleons too. It may be useful for nucleons transfer experimental data analysis.

23 Thank you for attantion! Dubna