TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reece Parker and Justin Cherry, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting Seminar 2014.
Advertisements

Implications of AERMOD on a Chemical Plant William B. Jones Roger P. Brower Zephyr Environmental Corporation Columbia, Maryland Presented at 100 th Annual.
Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part II) Reece Parker and Justin Cherry, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.
Air Toxics Rule Changes (pursuant to Session Law ) North Carolina Division of Air Quality July 2013 Environmental Management Commission.
Dispersion Modeling Jim McGraw Program Development Supervisor.
AERMOD Modeling System Photo: Ralph Turcotte presentation by: Larry L. Simmons May 23, 2006.
1 Air Quality Impact Analysis and Other PSD Requirements Donald Law U.S. EPA Region 8.
Kentucky Division for Air Quality Taimur Shaikh Ph.D.
Meteorological Data Issues for Class II Increment Analysis.
Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our.
Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part 1) Rachel Melton and Matthew Kovar Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.
1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA
Matthew Kovar Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair 2015.
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
Adam N. Pasch 1, Ashley R. Russell 1, Leo Tidd 2, Douglas S. Eisinger 1, Daniel M. Alrick 1, Hilary R. Hafner 1, and Song Bai 1 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc.,
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for NO 2 and SO 2 – New Modeling Challenges August 4, 2011 Air & Waste Management Association – Southern Section.
Classification of Air Pollutants
Air Quality Modeling.
Second Conference on Legal Challenges and Opportunities of Mexico’s Increased Global Interaction American Bar Association Los Cabos, Mexico, November 2013.
PERMITTING ELECTRIC GENERATING UNITS Jim Linville & Erik Hendrickson Air Permits Division.
Earth System Sciences, LLC Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases Doug Blewitt, CCM 1.
Medical Waste Management Rulemaking Open Participation Meeting Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Waste Permits Division August 18, 2015, Austin.
Dispersion Modeling 101: ISCST3 vs. AERMOD
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar Abhilash Vijayan Kanwar Siddharth Bhardwaj University of Toledo.
Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System for Environmental Managers Ashok Kumar University of Toledo Introduction.
Fine scale air quality modeling using dispersion and CMAQ modeling approaches: An example application in Wilmington, DE Jason Ching NOAA/ARL/ASMD RTP,
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
EPA’s DRAFT SIP and MODELING GUIDANCE Ian Cohen EPA Region 1 December 8, 2011.
September Lori Hanson, Lead worker Dispersion Modeling (515)
Air Dispersion Modeling City of Albuquerque Environmental Health Department Air Quality Program Director: Mary Lou Leonard.
Regulatory Requirements For Modeling. Air Quality Model Estimates Developing Air Pollution Control Plans Assessment of Environmental Impacts Projecting.
GIS Applications for Air Quality Management Robert Wu 吳震球 South Coast Air Quality Management District SCCAEPAApril 26, 2008.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering.
Current and Future Air Quality Issues Facing the States Bart Sponseller Air Management Bureau Director Joseph Hoch Regional Pollutants Section Chief NASA.
Cristina Gonzalez-Maddux ITEP MODEL INPUTS AND FEDERAL GUIDANCE CRISTINA GONZALEZ-MADDUX ITEP, RESEARCH SPECIALIST.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Proposed Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models
Best Available Control Technology/Lowest Achievable Emission Rate Evaluation Sarah Fuchs Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
1 Modeling Under PSD Air quality models (screening and refined) are used in various ways under the PSD program. Step 1: Significant Impact Analysis –Use.
Toxicology Update - Implementation of Revised Impacts Review Procedures Mike Coldiron, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
1 Overview Community Health Modeling Working Group Meeting Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support Division May 6, 2003.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Navajo Nation Air Quality Control Program Operating Permit Program Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency Route 112 North/Bldg Fort Defiance,
HF Modeling Task Mike Williams November 19, 2013.
Modeling, Impacts, and Effects Review Dom Ruggeri, P.E., Manager Technical Program Support Section TCEQ, Air Permits Division Austin, Texas September.
Jericho Project Air Quality Assessment. TOPICS METHODOLOGY EMISSION SOURCES RESULTS AND ASSESSMENT MITIGATION AND MONITORING CONCLUSION.
NSR—Minor New Source Review Darrel Harmon U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Introduction to Modeling – Part I Sarah Kelly ITEP Sarah Kelly ITEP.
Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.
1 THE AERMOD MODELING SYSTEM AN OVERVIEW FOR THE 8 TH MODELING CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 22, 2005.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
Roger W. Brode U.S. EPA/OAQPS/AQAD Air Quality Modeling Group AERMOD Update: Status of AERSCREEN and AERSURFACE NESCAUM Permit Modeling Committee Annual.
Consequence Analysis Robert Wu South Coast Air Quality Management District.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
1 Near-field NO 2 Impacts due to PM Traps for Diesel Engines Tony Servin, P.E. Atmospheric Modeling and Support Section Planning and Technical Support.
Comparisons of CALPUFF and AERMOD for Vermont Applications Examining differing model performance for a 76 meter and 12 meter (stub) stack with emission.
Air Modeling Updates 2015 Region 4 Grants/Planning Meeting May 19-21, 2015 Atlanta, Georgia 1.
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Meteorological Site Representativeness and AERSURFACE Issues
AERLINE: Air Exposure Research model for LINE sources
Suggested Analyses of WRAP Drilling Rig Databases
Introduction to Hands-on Activities
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Particulate Matter Formation and Regulation
Presentation transcript:

TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013

Outline  TCEQ  Air Permits Division  Air Dispersion Modeling Team  Modeling Overview  AERMOD  Examples  Questions?

What is the TCEQ? The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality strives to protect our state's human and natural resources consistent with sustainable economic development. Our goal is clean air, clean water, and the safe management of waste.

Air Permits Division A ny person who plans to construct any new facility or engage in the modification of any existing facility which emits air contaminants into the atmosphere shall obtain a permit pursuant to Title 30 Texas Administrative Code (30 TAC) §

Air Permits Division  New Source Review (NSR) program Two main goals: ○ Clean up dirty areas ○ Keep clean areas clean

What do we permit?

Air Permits Division  Technical Review... Identify emission sources Confirm emissions calculations Determine Best Available Control Technology Determine applicability of state/federal rules and regulations Analyze off-property health impacts

Air Dispersion Modeling Team  Provide guidance TCEQ Permit Reviewers Air Permit Applicants Consulting Firms  Review modeling demonstrations  Conduct modeling for small businesses/permit resolution

Modeling Overview  Why model? To assess impacts from new or modified sources Requirement to conduct modeling is contained in: ○ 30 TAC Chapter 116 ○ 40 CFR Parts 51, 52, 266 Cost-effective tool to estimate impacts ○ Ambient monitoring is expensive

Modeling Overview  Modeling for regulatory purposes Federal Review/PSD ○ NAAQS CO, Pb, NO 2, O 3, PM 10, PM 2.5, and SO 2 ○ Increment SO 2, NO 2, PM 10, and PM 2.5

Modeling Overview  Modeling for regulatory purposes (continued) State Review ○ Property Line Standards SO 2, H 2 S, and H 2 SO 4 ○ NAAQS CO, Pb, NO 2, O 3, PM 10, PM 2.5, and SO 2 ○ Effects Review Non-criteria pollutants Examples: formaldehyde, ammonia, and benzene

Modeling Overview  Emission Event Modeling Accidental releases ○ Unplanned events ○ Upsets  State Implemention Plan (SIP) Modeling ○ An enforceable plan developed at the state level that explains how the state will comply with air quality standards according to the Federal Clean Air Act.

Modeling Overview  What is a model ? A tool used to predict impacts from new and existing sources of emissions. Mathematical equations used to simulate atmospheric processes ○ Transport ○ Dispersion ○ Transformation ○ Removal

Modeling Overview  Two levels Screening (SCREEN3 or AERSCREEN) ○ One source ○ Worst-case meteorology Refined (ISC3 and AERMOD) ○ Many sources ○ Specific meteorology ○ Many locations of interest

AERMOD  American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model

AERMOD: Input Information  Source input data Source location, parameters, emission rates Different types of sources: ○ Point ○ Area ○ Volume  Building (downwash) information ○ Mechanical turbulence due to structure ○ Enhanced turbulence = greater dispersion ○ Can reduce plume rise

AERMOD: Input Information  Downwash Simulation

AERMOD: Input Information  AERMAP Calculates elevations for: ○ Terrain Data Source base elevations Building base elevations Receptor base elevations ○ Receptor locations Where concentrations are predicted

AERMOD: Input Information  AERMET Processes meteorological data into format used by model ○ Meteorological data Surface data Upper air data

AERMOD: Input Information  AERMET (continued) Incorporates surface characteristics ○ AERSURFACE Land use/land cover data Albedo Bowen ratio Surface roughness

AERMOD: Model Options  Source Groups Group sources together to get an impact for that group. Several source groups may be setup in a single run  Averaging Times 1-hr, 3-hr, 8-hr, 24-hr, or annual ○ Dependent on the pollutant being evaluated.

AERMOD: Model Options  Hour of Day Scalar When hours of operation need to be limited.  Wind Scalar Applied to particulate sources (i.e. storage pile) for more accurate wind speeds.

Example: AERMOD Output Averaging Time Overall Concentration/Impact Source Group

Example: Property Line

Example: Receptor Grid Receptor

Example: Buildings & Sources

Questions ?