Bob Green Garland Power and Light

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spinning Reserve from Load Consideration of a Trial at Xcel Energys Cabin Creek Station Presentation to CMOPS January 7, 2005 John Kueck ORNL Brendan Kirby.
Advertisements

January 9, 2013 BAL-001-TRE-1 Primary Frequency Response Update for Texas RE RSC.
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING BLACK START OPERATIONS
Active Power and Frequency Control
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
Cihangir Gençoğlu , Joint Transmission System Operator – Utility Regulator Renewable Energy Workshop, Istanbul Integrating Intermittent Renewable.
PRESENTATION FREQUENCY CONTROL
Process Control Instrumentation II
ANCILLARY SERVICES THE NEXT STEP IN MARKET GRANULARISATION.
Governor Response Sequence Bob Green Garland Power and Light ERCOT Future AS Workshop January 20, 2014.
Frequency Control Turbine Governor Droop NERC Requirement
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
Market Based Solutions for Demand Response Providers Today and the Future Alice Jackson Occidental Energy Ventures Corp.
PDCWG Report to ROS August 12, 2010 Sydney Niemeyer.
BAL-001-TRE-1 Primary Frequency Response in the ERCOT Region
Comparison of Governor Deadband & Droop Settings of a Single 600 MW Unit A Hz Deadband with a Straight Line Proportional 5% Droop Curve Compared.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
Effect of generation loss and Frequency Response Characteristics (FRC) on tie-line flow to Southern Region under various scenarios and Target setting for.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
Frequency Response Standard. ERCOT Governor Droop.
FREQUENCY CONTROL AND AUTOMATIC GENERATION CONTROL
PRS - RPRS Task Force Status Summary - August 14, PRS RPRS Task Force Status Summary Prepared for WMS and PRS August 2006.
WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” Mike Grimes for QMWG Meeting 10 August 2009.
Page 1 Slides for FR Technical Conference Office of Electric Reliability September 2010.
Frequency Control Task Force Report to WMS March 22, 2006.
Managing Reliability and the Markets with PI
PID CONTROLLERS By Harshal Inamdar.
1 PDCWG Report to ROS October 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
Graph Trend Definitions Telemetered SCE: Sum of all QSE’s Telemetered SCE (uses “Left” scale). Regulation Deployed: Sum of all Regulation Ancillary Service.
October Project Release (NPRRs 710, 706, 698 and 595) ERCOT Operations & Market Operations WebEx Training October XX, 2015.
Operational Issues & Risks ERCOT Operations Planning August 22, 2008.
Outstanding Issues & Action Items 1.Obligations to Honor Ancillary Services Commitments 2.Variable ERCOT Bias 3.Sign reversals of the Regulation Signal.
PDCWG Report to ROS David Kee Chair CPS Energy Sydney Niemeyer Vice Chair NRG Energy.
FREQUENCY-POWER CHARACTERISTICS OF SYNCHRONOUS GENERATOR
Operations Report Kent Saathoff System Operations ERCOT.
-- Bhanu Bhushan -- < > (August, 2011)
Resource Parameters Needed for LFC NATF WebEx Meeting 05/11/2010 Dave Maggio Operations Engineer, Supply Integration and Grid Applications.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
GENERAL BACKGROUND AND SPEED GOVERNORS
BAL-001-TRE-01 ERCOT CPS2 R2 Waiver Regional Variance April 16, 2009 Sydney Niemeyer.
PDCWG Report to ROS Sydney Niemeyer Chair NRG Energy Don Blackburn Vice Chair Luminant Energy.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Load Frequency Control (LFC) Business Requirements Energy.
PDCWG Report to ROS March 11, 2010 Sydney Niemeyer.
Improving Primary Frequency Response Bob Green PDCWG August 3, 2011.
Responsive Reserve Service Deliverability Review September 15,
Control Loops Tune a Fish. Control Loops Tuning of a control loop involves selecting loop parameters to ensure stable control under all operating conditions.
Frequency Control Task Force Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006.
Modelling the NPCC System with 12.5% Wind Penetration
PDCWG Report to ROS January 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
Droop Calculator and Unit Performance Evaluation SAR-003-TRE-001 March 31, 2009 Sydney Niemeyer.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
BAL-001-TRE-1 CPS2 Waiver FERC-Ordered Modification to ERCOT waiver CPS2 Report to RSC December 16, 2008.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
1 10. BUSINESS STRATEGIES IN ANCILLARY SERVICE MARKETS Asko Vuorinen.
PDCWG Report to ROS October 16, 2008 Bob Green PDCWG Chair Garland Power & Light.
7. FREQUENCY CONTROL AND REGULATING RESERVES
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
Frequency Response of Electrical Power Systems
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Lesson 22: Active Power Division Between Alternators
Economic Operation of Power Systems
Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6
Sarath Chandrasiri / EPD / MEW DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF GAS TURBINES PRESENTED BY: THE DIRECTORATE OF ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION  K. A. CHANDRASIRI.
Automatic Generation Control (AGC)
Svetlana Rybina, Lauri Holopainen
Presentation transcript:

Bob Green Garland Power and Light Governor and AGC Control of System Frequency TRE Technical Workshop March 31, 2009 Bob Green Garland Power and Light

Two generators equipped with governors having output feedback

Schematic of a governor with output feedback

Response of governor with output feedback

Steady-state speed characteristic (droop) curve

Calculation of steady-state speed characteristic R(per unit), the slope of the “droop” curve, is defined as f(p.u.)/ P(p.u.), where f(p.u.)= f(HZ) / 60.0, and P(p.u.)= P(MW) / Unit Capacity. For a 600 MW unit that has a governor response of 20 MW for a frequency excursion that settles out at 59.9 HZ, R=f(p.u.) / P(p.u.) = (0.1/60)/(20/600) =0.05 or 5% droop. Once the droop is known, the MW response to frequency deviation can be determined by (P/f)=(1/R), or P=(1/R) X f. For the 600 MW unit with 5% droop, (P/600)=(1/0.05) X (f/60), or P=200MW/HZ

So, how do governors with the steady-state speed characteristic interact when there are multiple generators in a power system? What determines the steady state system frequency after a load is added to the system?

Multiple Generator Governor Response Consider an isolated power system with three generators on-line and operating at 60HZ. The load is 360 MW and the generator outputs for units #1, #2 and #3 are 80MW, 120MW and 160MW, respectively. A load of 21MW (P) is added. What frequency does the system settle at? How much does each unit pick-up (MW)? Since R(p.u.)=( f(HZ)/60)/( P(MW)/Capacity), then (P/f)=(1/R) X Capacity/60). UNIT CAPACITY R (DROOP) P/f #1 300MW 0.100 (10%) 50MW/HZ #2 450MW 0.075 (7.5%) 100MW/HZ #3 600MW 0.050 (5%) 200MW/HZ Solution: Unit #1: P1=50 X f Unit #2: P2=100 X f Unit #3: P3=200 X f Pi=350f=21MW, and f=21/350=0.06HZ Frequency=60-0.06=59.94HZ P1=50 X 0.06=3MW P2=100 X 0.06=6MW P3=200 X 0.06=12MW check: Pi=21MW

Three generators serving 360MW

Three generators serving 367MW

Three generators serving 374MW

Three generators serving 381MW

The system frequency reaches steady-state at a value that causes the sum of the on-line generator output MW to be equal to the system load MW. With this type of governor, when the system load increases, the system frequency decreases and visa versa. How do we control frequency to 60HZ, no matter what the load is?

Power system equipped for supplemental control

Addition of a speed changer

Steady-state speed characteristic with speed changer

Power output as a function of frequency

How does the addition of the speed changer to the governor facilitate the control of frequency? Hint: The system frequency reaches steady-state at a value that causes the sum of the on-line generator output MW to be equal to the system load MW.

From a central site, you increase or decrease the 60HZ set-points until the sum of the 60HZ set-points is equal to the system load. Then the frequency will stabilize at 60HZ. This form of supplemental control is called Automatic Generation Control (AGC) and more specifically, Load Frequency Control (LFC).

Load of 367MW and 60HZ SPs increased by 7 MW

Load as a function of frequency (load damping)

Governor and load characteristic curve intersection

Illustration of typical governor dead band

Generation oscillations at the dead band frequency

Primary Control Secondary or Supplementary Control Common Name Governor Control/Response AGC Control/Response Function-Generic Holds the system together as load changes occur and also as un-commanded generation excursions occur Shifts generation between units to achieve security and economic objectives plus restores frequency to the rated value. Function-Technical Provides the correct amount of mechanical input to turbines to match the electrical output of the corresponding generators Changes the 60HZ governor set-points of the units to achieve scheduled values established by the market. Control Input Frequency/rotational speed of the turbine In ERCOT, the SCE for the portfolio of units Control Time Constant Fast - Seconds Slower - Tens of seconds and minutes Style of Control Local within the Units/PGCs—A QSE has no direct control over governor response. Centralized from ERCOT to Units via QSEs Performance Optimization Having more governors on-line (with a given droop characteristic) will minimize the magnitude of frequency deviations Having more units being controlled by AGC will minimize the duration of frequency deviations Key Parameters Steady state speed characteristic (droop), governor dead-band, first stage boiler pressure (steam units) and head (hydro units) Base power schedule plus deployments of balancing energy, regulation energy, responsive and non-spinning reserve. AGC dead-band, gains and frequency bias term. Market Characteristics If there ever is a governor response market, there will probably be bids, awards and settlement, but the market will never deploy the governor response. Bids, awards, deployments and settlement through the Ancillary Service Market. Performance monitoring of individual Services is approximate and complicated. Disturbance Timeline Initial governor response (to point B) is over completely by the time units start receiving secondary control signals in response to the disturbance. There needs to be recognition of governor response and coordination between RRS and RegUp deployments to insure smooth , rapid and sustained frequency recovery.