Instructor Survey Responses Spring 2008 Office of Academic Planning and Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bringing it all together!
Advertisements

PORTFOLIO.
Teacher Preparation and Education Reform: A Behavioral Systems Perspective Çhair: Ronnie Detrich, Wing Institute Discussant: Chuck Salzberg, Utah State.
Listening to the Future Presented by Larry Johnson and Kristi Nelson Transforming Lives, Education, and Knowledge.
Teaching and Learning Strategies
HFM SAN Distance Learning Project Teacher Survey 2010 – 2011 School Year... BOCES Distance Learning Program Quality Access Support.
PRINCIPLES OF ADULT LEARNING
Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.
Blended/hybrid Learning Discussion Knowledge Team March 2008 Online only Both online and f2f F2f only.
Getting Them Out Of Their Shells: Service Learning And CS Students Jim Bohy – Iowa Wesleyan College.
Increasing student investment in the first three weeks Mark Salisbury Kimberly Dyer.
Innovative Uses of Technology in Education IDE 1022 ACADEMIC WRITING COURSE Bilal Can TULUN IDE 1022 ACADEMIC WRITING COURSE Bilal Can TULUN
Effective Grading and Assessment:. Strategies to Enhance Student Learning.
Experience in Applying Online Learning Techniques in Computer Science & Engineering Dr. Aiman H. El-Maleh Computer Engineering Department King Fahd University.
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Data on Student Learning Office of Assessment University of Kentucky.
ECAR/MSU STUDY OF FACULTY AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Explorations in Instructional Technology November 21, 2014.
Blended Courses: How to have the best of both worlds in higher education By Susan C. Slowey.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
A New Web-Based Tool for Assessing the Student Experience in Learning Communities PNAIRP 2009 Portland, OR.
Barry A. Berger Professor of Regulatory Affairs Temple University School of Pharmacy QA/RA Graduate Program 1Discussion-BABTechDay2012.
Engaging Students: Piloting “Clickers” in AUC Classrooms Azza Awwad, Maha Bali, Riham Moawad Center for Learning and Teaching.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
What should teachers do in order to maximize learning outcomes for their students?
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Perspectives of student engagement Learning and Teaching Conference Faculty of Science and Engineering 30th March 2015 Mark Langan (School of Science.
Critical Events Legacy Learning Program Schema. Learning Program Learning Modules Classroom Management Special Needs Education Child Development Literature.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Strategies to Establish a Scientific Discourse Community Kaatje Kraft at Mesa Community College What is a Scientific Discourse Community? A scientific.
I Have to Know What??!! Online Teaching Competencies Adapted from “Online Teaching Facilitation Course: Core Competencies:
The Interpersonal Mode
Service Learning at Western London Council for Adult Education Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2007 Stephanie Hayne & Rich SwamiNathan.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
Secondary CLASS Observation Training
Efolios, Blogs, and Podcasts: Engaging at-risk Students Cari Kenner Victoria Williams St. Cloud State University.
What Works: Research-Based Best Practices in Developmental Education A Presentation by Ruth Dalrymple and Marilyn Mays based on Hunter R. Boylan’s work.
S&T Student Course Evaluations: Beyond Question 7 – Part 2 Dan Cernusca, Ph.D. Instructional Design Specialist Missouri University of Science and Technology.
2009 Teaching and Learning Symposium John H. Bantham Management & Quantitative Methods Establishing Student-Faculty Expectations in the Classroom.
Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies.
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
CESI Cohort II Workshop 3 Wednesday, Nov. 27, 2013.
 Presented by:  Heidi Packer  Christy Lightholder  Gem Butterfield  Summer 2010 (Course 7461)
2009 Assessment of the Learning Edge Academic Program (LEAP) Tony M. Lentz & Talia Carroll.
2010 Iowa State University Teaching Seminar Addressing Classroom Behavior Issues Steven A. Freeman Associate Director Center for Excellence in Learning.
RESEARCH BINGO!. Compared to teachers in a flexible block schedule, teachers in a traditional, fixed-period schedule are more likely to implement a variety.
REPORTING ON DISABILITY. Prepared by: Christopher KARADJOV Associate Professor, Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, California State University.
Associate. Prof. Dr. Fatma M. Baddar Nursing administration & education Dep. Nursing College King Saud University.
NSE Assessment Overview: Your Role in Outcomes-Based Assessment What Will We Learn About Our Students?
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Contemporary Issues September 8, Adjunct Professor Kristin P. O’Neil Office Hours: Scheduled on an individual.
AN INQUIRY INTO THE STUDENTS’ READINESS TOWARDS SELF- DIRECTED LEARNING L.M. Kapila Bandara Faculty of Education University of Colombo.
Surveying the Freshman Class Eva Fernández Center for Teaching & Learning September 16, 2011.
Technology Workshop 2 June 22, Extent of Technology Integration in Instruction by ABE Teachers.
Assessing the Impact of the Interactive Learning Space Initiative on Faculty Morale and Student Achievement Ball State University 2015 Spring Assessment.
Grace Kim CSA 592 Spring 2010 Community College Transfer Program: Process Evaluation.
BEST PRACTICES FOR ADULT INSTRUCTION Derrick Messer, Terri Tillman & Tanisha Washington UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX AET 520 July 7, 2014 Dr. Shannon Long.
The Art and Science of Teaching: Integrating New Models and Technologies Sauder School of Business University of British Columbia William F. Massy Professor.
The Big Interview Amy Fouts EDU 650 Teaching, Learning, and Leading in the 21 st Century Instructor Richard Newman.
Dr Karuppiah Nirmala.
Challenges of Implementing PBL in Higher Learning Institutions in Developing Countries: A Case of SUA, Tanzania Sangeda A., Ndossi D. Sokoine University.
21st Centruy Approaches to Teaching Physics
Missouri State University
PNAIRP 2009 Portland, OR A New Web-Based Tool for Assessing the Student Experience in Learning Communities.
Rice Pilot of IDEA evaluation system
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
Presentation transcript:

Instructor Survey Responses Spring 2008 Office of Academic Planning and Assessment

Open-ended responses: Challenges to Facilitating Student Learning in Gen Ed Course 31%Various Pedagogical Challenges (e.g., Getting students to learn/practice course learning goals, 10%; Difficulty in addressing broad range of skills, perspectives, etc., in class, 7%) 24%Large Class Size 23%Students’ attitudes, behaviors, lack of motivation 11%Students’ lack of preparation, skills 6%Lack of various resources (class space, technology, funding for course support, time) 5%Lack of TAs, Poor TA Preparation Office of Academic Planning and Assessment (OAPA) September 2008

“What has been your greatest challenge in facilitating student learning/development in the General Education course you referenced above?” (Sample quotes) “Trying to make it so that my lectures are not just one-way information transfer events, but discussions of ideas that give students the chance to air their views. It's challenging to do this when the class is so large, especially in how it's very difficult to build the personal connections between instructor and students that facilitate in-class communication. One also needs these connections to get students to trust your motivations if you want to break them up into smaller discussion groups.” (codes: Pedagogical issues and class size) “The size of the class, without a doubt. Since I've taught it, class size has varied between students, with the least successful experience being the larger size. Students don't expect to learn and are typically resentful of the large lecture format; increasingly, it appears they resent Gen Eds. I find it a great challenge to truly engage more than approx 5% of the students in the class.” (codes: Class size and attitude) “One of the greatest challenges is to develop ways of teaching that enhance critical thinking and minimize "rote, traditional" ways of learning. Many students expect me to "teach to the test" and find it difficult to broaden this perspective. Since I teach mainly freshman, part of the challenge is to help them establish appropriate routines and practices that support learning and take advantage of the opportunities at the university. I try to help them develop experiences that enhance their view of themselves as competent "learners." Some of the challenge is to help them organize and balance their lives as they make the transition to the university community.” (code: Pedagogical issues) Office of Academic Planning and Assessment (OAPA) September 2008

Gen Ed Instructor Survey (2008) (open-ended responses): Recommendations for Improving Gen Ed 24%More support for instructional needs (Instructor development opportunities, 6%; More TAs, 7%; Better classroom set-ups, 5%) 19%Smaller class size, more discussion sections 10%Recommendations for specific pedagogical approaches 9%Better academic support & information for students 9%Encourage/Reward faculty participation 9%Change requirements/program 8%Ensure/Maintain Gen Ed Program Integrity 6%Various policy changes <5%Improve Gen Ed Reputation (5%); Improve students’ attitudes (3%) Office of Academic Planning and Assessment (OAPA) September 2008