Steve Schallhorn MD Myth Busters in Patient Selection for LASIK Steve Schallhorn MD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Faik Orucov*, MD, Sinan Goker*,MD, Abraham Solomon**, MD, Joseph Frucht- Pery**, MD Comparison of Tecnolas and Allegretto laser in situ keratomileusis.
Advertisements

Laser Eye Surgery Technology LASIK. Anatomy of the eye.
1 Comparison of bitoric with monotoric laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 Laser. By Mohamed Abdul-Rahman.
Bladeless LASIK Eye Surgery
ME5888. Night Carrier Operations Spectacles ME5888.
LaserVision Refractive Audit Mr John Fenton FRCSI.
GUSTAVO TAMAYO MD CLAUDIA CASTELL MD
Dose-response for Mitomycin-C in prevention of haze in photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia: Six month preliminary results CDR Elizabeth M. Hofmeister,
Evaluation of Enhancement Rates following Hyperopic LASIK with Femtosecond versus Microkeratome Assisted Flap Creation Raj Rajpara, BS * Richard M. Awdeh,
Corneal topography orbscan
Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography for Evaluation of Posterior Corneal Changes after Refractive Surgery Dr. Tommy Chung Yan Chan Dr. Vishal Jhanji.
Intraoperative Aberrometry Mark Packer, MD, FACS Clinical Associate Professor Oregon Health & Sciences University.
Astigmatism “NO TOUCH” PROCEDURE
By Kelsey Matthews. History  LASIK stands for laser in situ keratomileusis  Developed in 1991 by a greek doctor Ioannis Pallikaris  Purpose to correct.
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: 2009 ASCRS Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD Boston: April 13, 2010.
LASIK What are the Limits ?
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: The 2004 ISRS/AAO Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD ISRS / AAO Meeting New Orleans- October 22, 2004.
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: 2012 ASCRS Survey
Wavefront Sensing of the Human Eye
Physician Certification for CustomVue ™ Presbyopic Ablations.
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: The 2006 ISRS/AAO Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD ** David Leaming, MD ISRS / AAO Meeting Las Vegas- November 11, 2006 **
1 Cataract Surgery Stephen G. Slade MD, FACS. 2 Financial Disclosure Alcon, AMO, B&L Consultant, Clarity, NuLens, RVO, Technolas 2 This presentation represents.
Comparison of Orbscan and Ultrasound Pachymetry Measurements Faik Orucov, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD,Ziv Caspi, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, and.
Jérôme C. VRYGHEM, M.D. Brussels Eye Doctors Brussels, Belgium
INTRA OPERATIVE ONLINE PACHY METRY –A SAFETY TOOL Dr. KUMAR J DOCTOR DOCTOR EYE INSTITUTE MUMBAIINDIA NO FINANCIAL INTEREST.
Comparison of flap thickness results using M2 130 micron flap and one use plus 100 micron flap Ahmed El-Massry M.D. Ophthalmology Department Alexandria.
Evaluation of Safety and Effectiveness of Multizone Laser Vision Correction in Presbyopic Patients ASCRS 2010 Paul Van Saarloos PhD – CustomVis, employee.
Authors: Col. Assoc.Prof. Jiri Pasta, MD, PhD. Katerina Buusova Smeckova, MD, MBA Jaroslav Madunicky, MD Eva Vyplasilova, MD Department of Ophthalmology.
Prospective Study of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus Scott X. Stevens, MD Bend Ophthalmology, LLC Author has no financial interest.
Corneal CXL in Children With Progessive Keratoconus Author do not have any financial interest in the surgical procedure or the medicines used in this study.
Photorefractive Keratectomy in Posterior Polymorphous Dystrophy [CONTROL ID: ] Edward W. Trudo 1, Kraig S. Bower 2, Charles D. Coe 2, Denise A. Sediq.
March 2011 Bascom Palmer Eye Institute University of Miami Elaine Wu, M.D. Ana Paula Canto, M.D. William Culbertson, M.D. Sonia Yoo, M.D. Financial disclosure:
P91: Clinical Performance of Phakic Angle-Supported Investigational IOL in Prospective Global Trials, ASCRS 2010, Boston P91: Clinical performance of phakic.
Patient Satisfaction After LASIK: Analysis of Over 15,000 Patients Steve Schallhorn MD Consultant for AMO Medical Director Optical Express.
Refractive outcome after myopic LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome or a femtosecond laser keratome Mark E Johnston, MD, FRCSC No.
Young Joo Shin, 1 Sang Mok Lee, 2 Jin Choi, 3 Eun Ryung Han, 4 Dong Hae Kim 4 1 H ally m University Gangnam Sacred Heart Hospital 2 3The Armed Forces Medical.
LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue CustomCornea CustomCornea A Comparison of Wavefront Guided Refractive Surgery outcomes.
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: 2005 ASCRS Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD Steve Wexler, MD San Francisco: March 18, 2006.
ELEVATION AND PACHYMETRY VALUES IN NORMAL CORNEAS OBTAINED BY GALILEI ASCRS Boston April Vision Sana Research Group Vision Sana Research Group.
M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD The.
Refractive Accuracy of LASIK Using the IntraLase and Zyoptix BACKGROUND Wavefront guided customized lasik procedures are designed to correct both lower.
A New Technique for Precise, Predictable SBK Surgery Using the B&L Zyoptix XP Microkeratome David R. Shapiro, MD Shapiro Laser Eye Center Ventura, California.
Refractec ViewPoint™ CK System for the Treatment of Spherical Hyperopia Sheryl Berman, MD Medical Officer FDA/CDRH/ODE/DOED.
Faik Orucov*, MD, Sinan Goker*,MD, Abraham Solomon**, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery**, MD *Refractive Surgery Department, ISTANBUL SURGERY HOSPITAL Istanbul,
10 year follow up of LASIK surgery for low to high levels of myopia Qasim Qasem FRCS, Caitriona Kirwan MRCOpth, Michael O’Keefe FRCS. Institutional Affiliations:
Ocular functional optical zone following hyperopic LASIK/PRK: Analysis based on polychromatic retinal image quality Mitchell P. Weikert, MD Li Wang, MD,
Faik Orucov*, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ.
Long Term Results of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Sutureless Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty “FALK” Mohamed Abou Shousha, MD, Sonia H. Yoo, MD, William Feuer,
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: 2008 ASCRS Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD San Francisco: April 4, 2009.
Toric IOLs: wavefront aberrometry and quality of life Mencucci Rita Giordano Cristina, Stiko Ermelinda, Miranda Paolo, Eleonora Favuzza, Ugo Menchini Authors.
Presbyopia CT Zyoptix Hyperopia Advanced (Rochester) Nomogram Scott MacRae MD Professor of Ophthalmology Professor of Visual Science University of Rochester.
Poster produced by Faculty & Curriculum Support (FACS), Georgetown University School of Medicine LASIK Combined with Corneal Cross-linking in Eyes with.
John P Berdahl M.D.* David R. Hardten M.D., F.A.C.S.* *No relevant financial disclosures.
Division of Plastic Surgery University of Puerto Rico Norma I. Cruz, MD Nothing to disclose.
Measurement of 60 kHz Femtosecond LASIK Flaps with Anterior Segment Ocular Coherence Tomography & Ultrasonic Subtraction Pachymetry Edward E. Manche, MD.
and High-Order Aberrations After Intrastromal Presbyopia Correction
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: The 2005 ISRS/AAO Survey
LASIK vs PRK Differences a) Procedure b) Recovery
post-lasik corneal ectasia
Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ keratomileusis
No financial interest for all authors
Is Photorefractive Keratectomy the Laser Vision Correction of Choice?
Eun Kyoung Lee1,2, Young Keun Han1,2,3
The authors have no financial interest to disclosure
Dr Haralabos Eleftheriadis, M.D Ultralase Clinic Bristol UK
Mohamed Abdelrahman Awadalla,FRCS Magrabi Eye Hospital Cairo - Egypt
PERRY S. BINDER, MS MD* San Diego, California
Retrospective Study of 4 Cases That Developed Ectasia After LASIK (Intralase flaps) with Low-Risk Based on Ectasia Risk Score System Allan Luz, MD Colin.
Refractive Surgery Outcomes: Corneas Thinner than 500 microns Vs
Presentation transcript:

Steve Schallhorn MD Myth Busters in Patient Selection for LASIK Steve Schallhorn MD

DISCLOSURES Consultant to AMO Global Medical Director Optical Express Consultant to AMO Global Medical Director Optical Express

Thin Cornea “Patients with a central corneal thickness less than 500 microns should not undergo LASIK because they are much more likely to be abnormal and develop ectasia”

Distribution of Preop Central Corneal Thickness thinnest of 3 ultrasonic pachymetry readings Mean:549µ Stdev: 31µ 2 STD below:488µ 81,715 consecutive LASIK – 1 Apr 08 to 31 Mar 09 – IL and mech flaps – 2,181 eyes CCT < 500u – 79,534 eyes CCT >=500u 81,715 consecutive LASIK – 1 Apr 08 to 31 Mar 09 – IL and mech flaps – 2,181 eyes CCT < 500u – 79,534 eyes CCT >=500u

Age Distribution

Preop Sphere

Ectasia has been observed in 3 Patients Pt 1Pt 2Pt 3 Age Preop MRx (R/L) -1.25/-1.0 X /-0.50 X /-1.0 X /-0.50 X / /-0.50 X 095 CCT537 / / / 527 Flap methodMoriaIntralaseMoria Est RSB334 / / / 281 Preop K Ectasia diagnosis Right eye 11 months postop Right eye 18 months postop Left eye 15 months postop TreatmentCXL

Preoperative Sphere “Patients with more than 3D of hyperopia should not undergo LASIK because they are much more likely to be unhappy afterwards”

Dissatisfaction as a Function of Treated Hyperopia Average preop sphere: +2.0 ± 0.9D

Preoperative Astigmatism “Patients with high cylinder should not undergo LASIK because they are much more likely to be unhappy afterwards”

Dissatisfaction as a Function of Treated Astigmatism Average preop cyl: 0.76D Patients

Low Light Pupil Diameter “Patients with >=8mm pupils should not undergo LASIK because they are much more likely to be unhappy and have visual symptoms”

1M LASIK Dissatisfaction vs Low Light Pupil Patients

1M LASIK Problems with Daily Activities and Night Driving vs Low Light Pupil Patients

Hyperopic Presbyopes “A +2.50D 60 year old should not undergo LASIK. An RLE procedure will result in much higher patient satisfaction and less dry eye”

12 Month Age Stratified Random Sample RLELASIK 112 pts159 pts Gender: M/F(%)41% / 59%43% / 57% Age (years): Mean (SD)60.2 ± ± 4.8) Min, Max45 to 7050 to 70 Preop Sphere: Mean (SD)+2.55 ± 0.99D+2.24 ± 0.69D Min, Max+1.00 to Preop Cylinder: Mean (SD)-0.60 ± 0.47D-0.54 ± 0.43D Min, Max0.0 to Preop MSE: Mean (SD)+2.25 ± 0.97D+1.97 ± 0.66D Min, Max0.00 to to +4.25

Procedure vs. Satisfaction P =

“During the past week, how many times a day do you use artificial tears?”

Refractive Target “It is best to target a little myopia in presbyopic patients to enhance their satisfaction”

Mean 1 M Satisfaction vs Postop Sphere Dominant eye in patients >=40 yrs & patients <=30 yrs 1,643 1,173 2,576 7,338 2,439 8,214 1, , More Satisfied

Conclusions Analysis of large patient datasets can provide a unique insight to improve refractive surgery Analysis of large patient datasets can provide a unique insight to improve refractive surgery Patient selection Patient selection Refractive target Refractive target “Myth busters” “Myth busters” Analysis of large patient datasets can provide a unique insight to improve refractive surgery Analysis of large patient datasets can provide a unique insight to improve refractive surgery Patient selection Patient selection Refractive target Refractive target “Myth busters” “Myth busters”