HES-HKS & KaoS meeting Toshiyuki Gogami 18Dec2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Beam stability (direction/flux) 2.Absolute  beam flux.
Advertisements

Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
AGS CNI Update: Non-linear Corrections to Energy Loss in Si Dead Layer Outline Standard dead layer fitting technique Non-linear corrections Compare results.
GRAPE(Gamma-Ray detector Array with Position and Energy sensitivity) Developed at CNS for in-beam  -ray spectroscopy with High Resolution M.
Λ hypernuclea r spectroscop y at Jefferson Lab The 3 rd Korea-Japan on Nuclear and Hadron Physics at J-PARC, at Inha University in Korea 2014/3/20 – 2014/3/21.
Outline: 1) Experiment Setup 2) HES Geant4 Simulation 3) Missing Mass Spectra Calibration 4) Experiment status Zhihong Ye, March 16 th 2009 HU Group Meeting.
Alignment study 19/May/2010 (S. Haino). Summary on Alignment review Inner layers are expected to be kept “almost” aligned when AMS arrives at ISS Small.
Particle by Particle Emittance Measurement to High Precision Chris Rogers Imperial College/RAL 17th March 2005.
OVERVIEW NEDA Introduction to the Simulations – Geometry The Simulations Conclusions 3.7% This work summarizes the introduction to the simulations of.
GAMMA-PARTICLE ARRAY FOR DIRECT REACTION STUDIES SIMULATIONS.
1 September 09Mark Rayner – Emittance measurement by The TOFs1 Emittance measurement by the TOFs Via trace space reconstruction of individual muons. Complementary.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
1 Statistics Toy Monte Carlo David Forrest University of Glasgow.
Chris Rogers, MICE CM16 Wednesday Plenary Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
GAMMA-PARTICLE ARRAY FOR DIRECT REACTION STUDIES SIMULATIONS.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
G EANT 4 energy loss of protons, electrons and magnetic monopole M. Vladymyrov.
Geant4: Electromagnetic Processes 2 V.Ivanchenko, BINP & CERN
Spectroscopic Investigation of P-shell Λ hypernuclei by the (e,e'K + ) Reaction - Analysis Update of the Jlab Experiment E Chunhua Chen Hampton.
HLab meeting 10/14/08 K. Shirotori. Contents SksMinus status –SKS magnet trouble –Magnetic field study.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 1  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
Chapter 14 Monte Carlo Simulation Introduction Find several parameters Parameter follow the specific probability distribution Generate parameter.
S-2S meeting Toshiyuki Gogami 27Aug2014. Contents About correction using “Energy loss vs. missing mass”
Lambda hypernuclear spectroscopy at JLab Hall-C Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for the HES-HKS collaboration 1.Introduction.
Analysis strategy of high multiplicity data Toshiyuki Gogami 24/Feb/2011.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
Analysis memo (JLab E05-115) 30 May 2014 Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami.
S-2S meeting Toshiyuki Gogami 4Aug2014. Contents Missing mass resolution study J-PARC/KEK tour (7/29, 7/30) CAD drawing of water Cerenkov detector.
Energy Loss Toshiyuki Gogami 15Apr2013. Simulation Particles are generated at the center of target Randomly generation points are moved in the target.
HLAB MEETING ~ Status Report ~ Toshiyuki Gogami 14Jan2014.
E Analysis update Adjust of the Splitter-HKS Side Yuncheng Han May 09, 2012 Hampton University JLab hypernuclear collaboration meeting.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting Toshi Gogami. Contents Energy loss simulation by HES,HKS and POSI 1.POSI for beam energy loss – Harver foil is already implemented.
M. Dugger, February Triplet polarimeter study Michael Dugger* Arizona State University *Work at ASU is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
Systematic error and double Gaussian fitting Toshi Gogami 3Apr2014.
Neutron Flux Measurement at the CYRIC T. Horiguchi and A. Ishikawa (Tohoku University) For the FPCCD group.
FSI and Mw(qqqq) 1 FSI and Mw(qqqq) Marie Legendre, Djamel Boumediene, Patrice Perez, Oliver Buchmüller … an alternative approach … PFCUT and PCUT update.
W Mass and Width at LEP2 Jeremy Nowell ALEPH / Imperial College London On behalf of the LEP collaborations.
JLab hypernuclear collaboration meeting / JSPS Core to Core Seminar Analysis Status of Heavy targets data of HES-HKS 9May2012 – 11May2012 Department of.
HES-HKS analysis meeting Toshi Gogami 5Mar2014. Contents  Cross section & Λ binding energy 12 C(e,e’K + ) 12 Λ B 10 B(e,e’K + ) 10 Λ Be 7 Li(e,e’K +
JLab における (e,e'K + ) 反応を用い た 精密ラムダハイパー核分光実験 東北大学理学研究科 後神 利志 Toshiyuki Gogami Strangeness 2010 at KEK JLab Hall-C.
Λ hypernuclear spectroscopic experiment via (e,e’K + ) at JLab Graduate school of science, Tohoku Univ. Toshiyuki Gogami JLab Hall-C in May 2009.
Validation of EM Part of Geant4
Analysis strategy of high multiplicity data Toshiyuki Gogami 24/Feb/2011.
HES-HKS and KaoS meeting 21Nov2013 Toshi Gogami. Contents Response function of hypernuclei.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
Fiber target simulation for the S-2S experiment Toshiyuki Gogami 2015/10/17.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting Toshi Gogami 11/July/2012.
Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.
Fiber target simulation for S-2S experiment Toshiyuki Gogami 2015/10/15.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting 1Nov2013 Toshi Gogami 2009 年の今頃.
Mu to e Meeting BNL, June 2006 Extinction requirement relaxation (Kevin O’Sullivan) Stopping Target Geometry (Cenap Ozben, David Morse) Yannis Semertzidis.
Study of light hypernuclei by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku Univ. Toshiyuki Gogami JLab E collaboration, 2009, JLab.
Lambda hypernuclear spectroscopy up to medium heavy mass number at JLab Hall-C Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for the HES-HKS.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting 24/Feb/2014 Toshi Gogami. Contents 12 Λ B cross section Comparison with Motoba-san’s calculation Acceptance Linearity after matrix.
QM2004 Version1 Measurements of the  ->     with PHENIX in Au+Au Collisions at 200 GeV at RHIC PPG016 Figures with Final Approval Charles F. Maguire.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting 30July2013 Toshi Gogami. Contents Λ の減少 (H の減少 )
Energy Loss Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University Toshi Gogami 22/May/2013.
HKS collaboration 2008/5/16 Wedding Party 2008/5/10.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting. Contents Different distorted initial matrices Distorted matrix sample 6 (dist6) Distorted matrix sample 7 (dist7) Distorted matrix.
DESY BT analysis - updates - S. Uozumi Dec-12 th 2011 ScECAL meeting.
Target Effect, Beam correction and T0 Adjustment
Tracking(1) Kp2 decay-in-flight BG simulation
J/   analysis: results for ICHEP
E Collaboration Meeting Mar10-11, 2010
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Preliminary Request: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS
Presentation transcript:

HES-HKS & KaoS meeting Toshiyuki Gogami 18Dec2013

Missing mass Resolution Intrinsic mass resolution Production point displacement from the matrix origin Mass offset due to energy loss in target

Intrinsic mass resolution  Energy straggling, raster and mass offset are not included in these estimation  Total resolution cannot be a simple quadratic sum since variables are not independent (but, simple quadratic sum is shown as an intrinsic resolution here) (but, simple quadratic sum is shown as an intrinsic resolution here)

Production point displacement from the matrix origin (z-direction) 1.Effects are smaller (<0.1 MeV/c 2 ) for other targets since their thickness are less than 0.05 cm. 2.These effects are implicitly absorbed by matrices in a process of tuning (already checked in blind analysis)

Energy loss correction (Before talking about mass offset) Target Most probable value for each particle  Energy loss correction value Production at the center of target e e’ K+K+

Energy loss correction (Before talking about mass offset) Target Most probable value for each particle  Energy loss correction value Production at the center of target e e’ K+K+

Mass offset due to energy loss ~ 0.7 MeV (hand calc MeV) z Most probable values Target

In the case of 7 Λ He Others = 1.4 – 0.58 = 0.82 [ MeV ] Offset: 0.7 MeV, intrinsic: 0.4 MeV Sqrt(0.7* *0.4) = 0.8 Matrix Matrix + MM offset + others

Achievable resolution Simply subtracted matrix z dependence

Blind analysis The first results

Flow chart of blind analysis Compare Blind

Flow chart of blind analysis 1.Imitation data generation 2.Distorted matrix generation 3.Tuning 4.Comparison tuned results with generated data

The first sample Tune with Λ and Σ0 with realistic B.G. shape

Missing mass Restarted tuning…. With new energy loss corrections for 12 C target  87.5 mg/cm 2 (ELOG)

Carbon target 700 keV (FWHM)

Lithium target 1000 keV (FWHM)

720 keV (FWHM)

Summary Resolution estimation Estimation will be improved soon Blind analysis The first results (delta B Λ < 100 keV) Matrix tuning restarted

Backup

Li target

Target [mg/cm 2 ] Intrinsic (page 4) + Δm offset [MeV/c 2 ] Monte Carlo – (matrix z dep.) ΛCH Λ He 7 Li Λ Be 10 B Λ B 12 C Λ V 52 Cr

Production point displacement from the matrix origin (x-direction) x includes information of z because the target is tilted  A pure effect from the x-dependence is compensated by the z-dependence Target z x

Production point displacement from the matrix origin (y-direction) y-dependence

Energy loss correction (Before talking about mass offset) Target Most probable value for each particle  Energy loss correction value Production at the center of target e e’ K+K+

Spectrometer resolution

Mass offset where A, B and C are defined in page 4. Simply calculated by z Most probable values Target

Mass offset where A, B and C are defined in page 4. Simply calculated by z Most probable values Target

Want to understand simulated results (resolution)

Energy loss correlation Bug fixed in POSI  Expected correlation can be seen now.