Annie Michaelian Jill Okurowski Stephen Toto. Tri-State Quality Review Rubric.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ELA/Literacy K-2 Session 1: Developing Criterion-Based Feedback
Advertisements

Math Common Core Standards
Understanding the Common Core Standards and Planning Lessons to Address The Standards.
Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units.
Mathematics EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Training Washington, DC February 11,
Curriculum Shifts in Reading and Writing Whetstone Elementary School Literacy Night October 2013.
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Rating Process Mathematics Lessons/Units Mary Cahill, Director of Curriculum, SED Anu Malipatil, Fellow for Common Core,
Created by NWRESD Data Quality Project CCSS Stewardship Committee 2013 Created by NWRESD Data Quality Project EQuip Network Common Core Stewardship Committee.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Process ELA/Literacy Lessons/Units EQuIP Collaborative Fall 2012.
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Process Mathematics and ELA/Literacy Lessons/Units June 2012.
The Importance of Technology in High School Science Amy Roediger.
EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Training Session: ELA/Literacy Grades
Overview of the CCSSO Criteria– Content Alignment in English Language Arts/Literacy Student Achievement Partners June 2014.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Louisiana Reading Association Update April 21, 2012.
Educator’s Guide Using Instructables With Your Students.
EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Training Session: Mathematics.
Mathematics EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Training Washington, DC May 19,
Adapt or Adopt in ELA: Support for Districts & Schools on Curriculum Decision Making EngageNY.org.
English Language Arts Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
Grade Level Meetings May/June 2013
CWA Pilot Workshop: Civil Rights Investigations March 2011.
Language Arts Florida Standards (LAFS) EQuIP Rubrics Training
IMPLICATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT AND LEADERSHIP! PRESENTED BY: SHERYL WHITE EDUCATOR LEADER CADRE- ELA CHAIR Common Core Shifts in English Language.
Session Goals Use the EQuIP quality review process to determine the quality and alignment of lessons and units to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
Honors Level Course Implementation Guide [English Language Arts]
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Process Mathematics Lessons/Units EQuIP Collaborative Fall 2012.
How do we evaluate the quality of existing and newly created text-based lessons and units of study???? Please refer to the Tri-State Review Rubric for.
EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Training Session: ELA/Literacy Grades 6 – 8 1.
Revisiting LDC, Day 2 Elementary Bowling Green, Kentucky – Reach Associates November 15,
English Language Arts Common Core Lesson Alignment NCAGT/PAGE Conference March 1, 2013 Lisa L. McIntosh.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Mathematics Training Module: Grades 9-12
1 An Overview of the 6 Shifts in ELA Literacy.
Understanding PARCC and Disciplinary Literacy November
Summer 2012 Day 2, Session 6 10/13/2015R/ELA.EEA.2012.©MSDE1 Educator Effectiveness Academy English Language Arts And the journey continues… “Transitioning.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
English Language Arts/Literacy Louisiana Textbook Adoption Publisher’s Orientation March 1, 2012.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Dimension IV of the EQuIP Rubric: Assessment Illinois State Board of Education Content Specialists Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons.
EQuIP Rubric & Effective CCSS Feedback Training Session: Math.
EQuIP Rubric & Quality Review Training Session: ELA/Literacy Grades 9 – 12 1.
CCSS outlines what students are expected to learn in K-12 ELA (English language arts) and math in order to be college and career ready.
FACILITATOR SARA OVERBY COORDINATING TEACHER FOR SECONDARY LITERACY Performance Tasks: An Integrated.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
12/16/2015MSDE1 “Transitioning to the CCSS by Making Strategic and Informed Choices in the Classroom” Day 1 Principals Only Session.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Instructional Materials Quality Review Rubric Winter 2013 Presenters: Drew Hinds, ODE Jeff Coleman, Clackamas ESD Marta.
Text Is Foundation Presenter: Nicole A. Zdeb, Director of Academic Services at NWEA.
The EQuIP Rubric Evaluating Quality Instructional Products.
Implementing the Common Core State Standards Monday, January 23rd - 4pm EST Deconstructing the Common Core Standards: Analyzing for Content, Level of Cognition.
NEW JERSEY COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS INSTRUCTIONAL SHIFTS KEY IDEAS.
Instructional Implications for PARCC Assessment in the Science and Social Studies Classroom Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
DAY 1.
Using the EQuIP Rubric Ensuring alignment of lessons and units to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in English language arts (ELA)/literacy 1 hr.
The Importance of Technology in High School Science
Session Goals Use the EQuIP quality review process to determine the quality and alignment of lessons and units to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Using the EQuIP Rubric Grades 9-12 Leadership Global Neutral 01001a
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
EQuIP and Learning Forward Professional Learning Community Modules
Using the 7 Step Lesson Plan to Enhance Student Learning
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Process
Presentation transcript:

Annie Michaelian Jill Okurowski Stephen Toto

Tri-State Quality Review Rubric

Quality Review Rubric & Process Purposes

Step 1. Understand the Rubric Organization for ELA/Literacy

Rating Scale for Each Dimension:  3: Meets all “must have” criteria (**) and most of the other criteria in the dimension.  2: Meets many of the “must have” criteria and many of the other criteria in the dimension.  1: Meets some of the criteria in the dimension.  0: Does not meet the criteria in the dimension

The Overall Rating Scale:  E: Exemplar Lesson/Unit - meets all the “must have” criteria (**) and most of the other criteria in all four dimensions (mainly 3’s).  E/I: Exemplar if Improved - needs some improvement in one or more dimensions (mainly 3’s and 2’s).  R: Needs Revision - is a “work in progress” and requires significant revision in one or more dimensions (mainly 2’s and 1’s).  N: Not Recommended - does not meet the criteria in the dimensions (mainly 1’s and 0’s).

** “Must have” criteria  The lesson/unit aligns with the CCSS:  Focuses teaching and learning on a targeted set of grade-level CCS ELA/Literacy standards.**  Makes close reading of text(s) a central focus of instruction and includes sequences of text- dependent questions that cause students to read closely, examine textual evidence, and discern deep meaning.**  Includes a clear and explicit purpose for instruction and selects text(s) that are of sufficient quality and scope for the stated purpose.**  Focuses on quality text selections that measure within the grade-level text complexity band.** (i.e., present vocabulary, syntax, text structures, levels of meaning/purpose, and other qualitative characteristics that are similar to CCSS grade-level exemplars  In addition, for units:  Integrates reading, writing, speaking and listening so that students apply and synthesize advancing literacy skills.  (Grades 3-5) Builds students’ content knowledge and their understanding of the reading and writing norms in history/social studies, the arts, science or technical subjects. (Note: Grades rubric for literacy in history/social studies and science is under development.)

** “Must have” criteria  Text-Based Evidence: Facilitates rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing through specific, thought-provoking questions about common texts (including, when applicable, illustrations, charts, diagrams, audio/video, and media).**  Writing from Sources: Routinely expects that students draw evidence from texts to inform, explain, or make an argument in various written forms (notes, summaries, short responses, or formal essays).**  Academic Vocabulary: Focuses on building students’ academic vocabulary throughout instruction.**

** “Must have” criteria  Increasing Text Complexity**  Balance of Texts: Includes a balance of informational and literary texts as stipulated in the CCSS [p.5] and indicated by instructional time.**  Building Disciplinary Knowledge: Provides opportunities for students to build knowledge about a topic or subject through analysis of strategically sequenced, discipline- specific texts.  Balance of Writing: Includes a balance of on-demand and process writing (e.g. multiple drafts and revisions over time) and short, focused research projects.

 Cultivates student interest and engagement in reading, writing, and speaking about texts.**  Provides all students with multiple opportunities to engage with text of appropriate complexity for the grade level; includes appropriate scaffolding so that students directly experience the complexity of the text.**  Focuses on sections of text(s) presenting the greatest challenge through discussion questions and other supports that promote deep thinking.  Integrates appropriate supports for students who are ELL, students with disabilities, and students reading well below the grade level text band.  Provides extensions and/or more advanced text for students reading well above the grade level text band.  In addition, for units:  Includes a progression of learning where concepts and/or skills advance and deepen over time.**  Gradually removes supports, requiring students to demonstrate their independent capacities.  Provides for authentic learning, application of literacy skills, student-directed inquiry, analysis, evaluation, and/or reflection.  Integrates targeted instruction in such areas as grammar and conventions, writing strategies, fluency, and all aspects of foundational reading for grades 3-5.  Includes regular independent reading based on student choice and interest to build stamina, confidence, and motivation.  Uses technology and media to deepen learning and draw attention to evidence and texts as appropriate

** “Must have” criteria  The lesson/unit regularly assesses whether students are mastering standards-based content.  Elicits direct, observable evidence of the degree to which a student can independently demonstrate the major targeted grade level CCSS standards with appropriately complex text(s).**  Assesses student proficiency using methods that are unbiased and accessible to all students.**  Includes aligned rubrics and/or assessment guidelines that provide sufficient guidance for interpreting performance.**  In addition, for units:  Uses varied modes of assessment, including a range of pre, formative, summative, and self-assessment measures.