Micromegas detectors for the CLAS12 central tracker Brahim Moreno (for the Saclay group) CLAS12 technical workshop 03/17/ 2010 Jefferson lab Update on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of test beam data analysis … with emphasis on resistive coating studies Progress and questions 1Meeting at CEA Saclay, 25 Jan 2010Jörg Wotschack,
Advertisements

Parallel Ionization Multiplier (PIM) : a multi-stage device using micromeshes for tracking particles MPGD’s Workshop at NIKHEF April 16th2008 April 16th.
RD S. Aune CEA/IRFU Micromegas Bulk for CLAS12 vertex tracker.
Micro MEsh GASeous Detectors (MicroMegas)
Micromegas studies using cosmic rays Franck Sabatié May 7th 2009 Saclay cosmic ray bench Data acquisition system and analysis tools MIP detection Position.
Beijing, August 18, 2004 P. Colas - Micromegas for HEP 1 Recent developments of Micromegas detectors for High Energy Physics Principle of operationPrinciple.
Simulation of the spark rate in a Micromegas detector with Geant4 Sébastien Procureur CEA-Saclay.
Simulation of the spark rate in a Micromegas detector with Geant4 Sébastien Procureur CEA-Saclay.
Micromegas for CLAS12 Central Detector - Update Franck Sabatié November 19th 2009 Micromegas option for the Central Detector Why, Where, How ? R&D milestones.
Bulk Micromegas Our Micromegas detectors are fabricated using the Bulk technology The fabrication consists in the lamination of a steel woven mesh and.
W. Clarida, HCAL Meeting, Fermilab Oct. 06 Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Geant4 Simulation Progress W. Clarida The University of Iowa.
Micromegas detectors for the CLAS12 central tracker Brahim Moreno (for the Saclay group) CLAS12 central detector meeting : 2 december 2009 Cea Saclay CERN.
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Anaheim, California S. Colafranceschi (CERN) and M. Hohlmann (Florida Institute of Technology) (for the CMS GEM Collaboration)
Status of PNPI R&D for choice of the MUCH tracking base detector (this work is supported by INTAS) ■ Introduction ■ MICROMEGAS ■ GEM ■ MICROMEGAS+GEM ■
Simulation of the spark rate in a Micromegas detector with Geant4 Sébastien Procureur CEA-Saclay.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
Central tracker for 12GeV upgrade in HallB Micromégas : a new detector for CLAS12 Detector’s principle GARFIELD simulation Spatial resolution measurement.
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
1 CLAS12/Central Tracker review. Saclay 12/09 Stéphan AUNE Central Tracker review Micromegas central & forward tracker  R&D and prototypes  CAD implantation.
TPC R&D status in Japan T. Isobe, H. Hamagaki, K. Ozawa, and M. Inuzuka Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo Contents 1.Development of a prototype.
Performance of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
M. Chefdeville LAPP, Annecy, France. Introduction  Motivations for a Digital hadronic calorimeter Count hits instead of measuring energy deposits Reduce.
Experimental and Numerical studies on Bulk Micromegas SINP group in RD51 Applied Nuclear Physics Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata, West.
June 22, 2009 P. Colas - Analysis meeting 1 D. Attié, P. Colas, M. Dixit, Yun-Ha Shin (Carleton and Saclay) Analysis of Micromegas Large Prototype data.
Preliminary results of a detailed study on the discharge probability for a triple-GEM detector at PSI G. Bencivenni, A. Cardini, P. de Simone, F. Murtas.
Summary of MM meeting at CEA Saclay, 25/26 Jan 2010 Some selected topics.
PNPI, R&D MUCH related activity ● Segmentation ● Simulation of the neutral background influence ● R&D of the detectors for MUCH ● Preparation to the beam.
Update on DHCAL and RPC progress Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Development of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Shahnoor Habib For HEP Group, UT Arlington Oct. 12, 2002 TSAPS Fall ’02, UT Brownsville Simulation.
Itzhak Tserruya, BNL, May13, HBD R&D Update: Demonstration of Hadron Blindness A. Kozlov, I. Ravinovich, L. Shekhtman and I. Tserruya Weizmann Institute,
S. AUNE 15/09/08 Micromegas Bulk for CLAS12 tracker.
Test of the GEM Front Tracker for the SBS Spectrometer at Jefferson Lab F. Mammoliti, V. Bellini, M. Capogni, E. Cisbani, E. Jensen, P. Musico, F. Noto,
 The zigzag readout board is divided into eight η-sectors; each sector has a length of ~12 cm and comprises 128 zigzag strips; zigzag strips run in radial.
A. SarratTPC jamboree, Aachen, 14/03/07 1 Full Monte Carlo of a TPC equipped with Micromegas Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia Motivation Simulation content.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
Wenxin Wang On behalf of LCTPC 01/11/2012W.Wang_ IEEE Conference Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference & workshop on Room-Temperature.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
Micromegas for the Central Tracker Sébastien Procureur CEA-Saclay.
Beam Test of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, A.
Review of Micromegas Tracking Detectors for CLAS12 – May 7, 2009 Reviewers: Madhu Dixit, Mac Mestayer Presentations covered the following topics: –detector.
Six modules Micromegas TPC beam test & Test bench 12/4/2012W.Wang_RD51 mini week1 D. Attié, P. Colas, M. Dixit, P. Hayman, W. Wang.
Christian Lippmann (ALICE TRD), DPG-Tagung Köln Position Resolution, Electron Identification and Transition Radiation Spectra with Prototypes.
T. Zerguerras- RD51 WG Meeting- CERN - February Single-electron response and energy resolution of a Micromegas detector T. Zerguerras *, B.
RD51 GEM Telescope: results from June 2010 test beam and work in progress Matteo Alfonsi on behalf of CERN GDD group and Siena/PISA INFN group.
Villa Olmo, Como October 2001F.Giordano1 SiTRD R & D The Silicon-TRD: Beam Test Results M.Brigida a, C.Favuzzi a, P.Fusco a, F.Gargano a, N.Giglietto.
1 Plannar Active Absorber Calorimeter Adam Para, Niki Saoulidou, Hans Wenzel, Shin-Shan Yu Fermialb Tianchi Zhao University of Washington ACFA Meeting.
NoV. 11, 2009 WP meeting 94 1 D. Attié, P. Colas, E. Ferrer-Ribas, A. Giganon, I. Giomataris, F. Jeanneau, P. Shune, M. Titov, W. Wang, S. Wu RD51 Collaboration.
DHCAL Jan Blaha R&D is in framework of the CALICE collaboration CLIC08 Workshop CERN, 14 – 17 October 2008.
A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.
RPCs with Ar-CO2 mix G. Aielli; R.Cardarelli; A. Zerbini For the ATLAS ROMA2 group.
Tracker Neutron Detector: INFN plans CLAS12 Central Detector Meeting - Saclay 2-3 December 2009 Patrizia Rossi for the INFN groups: Genova, Laboratori.
R&D activities on a double phase pure Argon THGEM-TPC A. Badertscher, A. Curioni, L. Knecht, D. Lussi, A. Marchionni, G. Natterer, P. Otiougova, F. Resnati,
-Stephan AUNE- RD51 BARI. Saclay MPGD workshop R&D 09/10/20101 Saclay workshop R&D for new Bulk structure.
Commissioning and Calibration Strategies for Micromegas Vertex Tracker
High-Resolution Micromegas Telescope for Pion- and Muon-Tracking
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
The MICROMEGAS detector in CAST
Use of Beam Loss Monitor type detectors in CNGS muon station
Performance of a Multigap RPC prototype for the LHCb Muon System
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
High Rate Photon Irradiation Test with an 8-Plane TRT Sector Prototype
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils
A DLC μRWELL with 2-D Readout
Presentation transcript:

Micromegas detectors for the CLAS12 central tracker Brahim Moreno (for the Saclay group) CLAS12 technical workshop 03/17/ 2010 Jefferson lab Update on R&D 1

Micromegas detectors for the CLAS12 central tracker Update on R&D Introduction Experiments Conclusions and outlook 2

3 Introduction: micromegas and CLAS12 AdressedAnalysis undergone Experiment undergone Upcoming experiment bMM feasibility  cbMM feasibility  MM behaviour in magnetic field  Sparking rate (in barrel configuration: )  Sparking rate (in forward configuration: )  Sparking rate VS incident particle momentum  Long prototypes characterization  Experimental estimation of hadron flux in central region ? bMM: bulk micromegas cbMM: curved bluk micromegas Experiment at CERN (SPS) Spatial resolutions and detection efficiencies (with beam) Experiment at Saclay Experiment at CERN (PS)

Experiment at CERN (SPS): new results Ongoing work Upcoming experiment Experiments

Experiment at CERN: new results Ongoing work Upcoming experiment Experiments

6 Experiment at CERN (1) Main goal: evaluating sparking rate in presence of or without magnetic field x y z Pitch: region a → 400μm region b → 1000μm Distance between strips: 100μm magnet Goliath Beam Scintillator paddles coupled to PMTs Gaz: 5% Isobutane/Ar x y z Region a Region b 10 cm Barrel configuration

7 Experiment at CERN (2) MM TypeDrift gapDrift materialAmplification gap Mesh material Orientation 1Classic5 mmAluminized mylar128 μmCopperX 2Bulk5 mmAluminized mylar128 μmStainless steel Y 3Bulk2 mmAluminized mylar128 μmStainless steel X 4Bulk5 mmStainless steel128 μmStainless steel X 5Bulk5 mmAluminized mylar128 μmStainless steel X Main detectors characteristics

8 Experiment at CERN (3) Magnet 1.77 m Upper coil Beam

9 Experiment at CERN (4) Beam Detectors Electronics

10 Experiment at CERN (5) Experiment: 23rd Oct 2009 – 3rd Nov 2009 Beam Characteristics: Nature: pion or muon Energy: 150 GeV Spill duration: 9s Time between spill: 1mn Particle/spill: ~10 6 part/spill Measurements at: 0, 0.28, 0.56, 0.7, 0.84, 1.12 and 1.4 T ~210 runs Running conditions and data for the CERN experiment

11 Spark probability (1): as a function of gain No sizeable different behaviours between classic and bulk micromegas

12 Spark probability (2): transparency effect Transparency : probability for a primary electron to get through the mesh Transparency decreases (at fixed mesh HV) as drift HV increases Lower spark probability Less electron getting through mesh at 1500V than at 600V Increasing drift HV requires to increase the gain in order to compensate the loss in transparency HV mesh (V) Drift HV: 1500V Drift HV: 600V Stainless steel drift electrode

13 Spark probability (3): magnetic field effect Classic MM: HV 380/1500 Y Bulk : HV 380/1200 X Bulk : HV 380/1500 No sizeable (transverse) magnetic field effect

14 Experiment at CERN (6) Detection efficiencies Classic MM (5mm drift gap) Bulk MM (5mm drift gap) Bulk MM (2mm drift gap) Bulk MM (5mm drift gap, stainless steel drift electrode) No magnetic field Muon beam (150 GeV) Pitch = 400 μm Y-detector de-activated for tracking Classic and bulk micromegas with equal drift gap behave the same: efficiency plateau reached at gain ≈ 3000

15 Experiment at CERN (7) Resolutions No magnetic field Muon beam (150 GeV) Pitch = 400 μm Y-detector de-activated for tracking Classic and bulk micromegas with equal drift gap behave the same: resolution ≈ 70 μm Approximative start of efficiency plateau Resolution weakly depends on mesh HV

Experiment at CERN: new results Ongoing work Upcoming experiment Experiments

17 Ongoing work: new long prototypes tests (1) Main goal: Characterization of nominal CLAS12 MM (and also mecanics tests, drift electrode tests) Detectors may also be used for experiment and get knowledge on nominal CLAS12 MM behaviour (efficiency, in beam resolution…) Location: Saclay Detector to be tested: bulk MM (512  117 mm, amplification gap = 128 μm, 4  72 strips, pitch = 400 μm) Gaz: 5% Isobutane/Ar To do list: Characterization flat / curved detector:  Gain  Energy resolution Comparison between flat and curved detector results In progress To be done 512 mm 117 mm

18 Ongoing work: new long prototypes tests (2) Test bench for flat detector characterization Very good eyes may see the peak associated with the 55 Fe source on the oscilloscope… 55 Fe source Gaz exit Gaz entry

19 Ongoing work: long prototypes latest version tests (3) Detector characterization Active surface was divided into 15 zones for homogeneity test Spectra obtained with 55 Fe source in zone 14 Peak associated with 5.9 KeV photons Detector in flat configuration Drift HV = 600V Mesh HV = 420V

20 Ongoing work: long prototypes latest version tests (3) Resolution in flat detector configuration Drift HV = 600V Mesh HV = 420V

Main goal: Study longitudinal magnetic field effects on sparking rate Location: Saclay Detector: bulk MM with stainless steel drift electrode (used for our CERN tests) To do : sparking rate VS magnetic field (using α source) for  Different gaz mixture  Different drift and mesh HV  Different drift gap 21 Ongoing work: tests with longitudinal magnetic field (1) x y z Region a Region b 10 cm Pitch: region a → 400μm region b → 1000μm Forward configuration

22 Ongoing work: tests with longitudinal magnetic field (2) Experimental set-up Electronics Acquisition PC Magnet Magnet (0,1.5T) Detector to be placed inside the magnet

Experiment at CERN: new results Ongoing work Upcoming experiment Experiments

24 Upcoming experiment: new beam test at CERN (1) Goals: Study sparking rate VS incoming particles momentum Drift gap influence Mesh type effects Gaz mixture effects Location: CERN using the Proton Synchrotron (PS) Date: 16th September rd October 2010 Detectors: 1 X-bulk (reference) with 5 mm drift gap 1 Y-bulk (reference) with 5 mm drift gap 2 X-bulk with adjustable drift gap 1 X-bulk with a second mesh type 1 X-bulk with a third mesh type 1 X-bulk with a thick drift electrode Main goal Priority Detector optimization

25 Energy range planned to be used Upcoming experiment: new beam test at CERN (2) PS main advantages: Beam energy close to CLAS12 central tracker running conditions Adjustable beam energy PS beam

Conclusions and outlooks Lot of work in progress: October CERN tests analysis almost finalized Tests of third generation prototypes ongoing Experimental sparking rate investigation in forward region configuration begun New experiment in autumn at CERN using PS to study sparking rate VS incident particle momentum

Back up slides

28 Micromegas and CLAS12 (2) Use: alternative/complement to silicon vertex tracker 4 x 2MM 4 x 2SI 2 x 2SI + 3 x 2MM Specs.  pT /p T (%)   (mrad) <10-20   (mrad) <10  z (μm) tbd. (for 0.6 GeV/c,  = 90°) A mixed solution combines advantages of both the silicon (SI) and micromegas (MM) detectors Curved bulk micromegas Flat bulk micromegas

Basic principles of a micromegas detector ~100  m thin gap

30 Basic principles of a micromegas detector: bulk- micromegas Same principle as « classic » micromegas Difference lies in construction process: mesh embedded on the PCB Advantages: Detector built in nearly one process Geometry (flexible PCB) Drift electrode Strips Micromesh Amplification Conversion

31 What is a spark? (1) Drift electrode Mesh PCB 600V 400V Ionizing particle (MIP) conversion amplification e- Signal amplified Charge collected on the strips

32 What is a spark? (2) Drift electrode Mesh PCB 600V 400V Ionizing particle (hadron) conversion amplification High charge density Spark = discharge in amplification gap Discharge blinds MM detector because it sets mesh and strip to the same voltage Recovery time depends on Protection circuit (~1 ms) Discharge

33 Description Beam Electronics Oct the 23rd – Nov the 3rd Detectors

34 Preliminary results: beam profile Correlation 1-3 (XX) X3 (mm) Correlation 1-2 (XY) X1 (mm) Y2 (mm) Online monitoring 2D beam profiles Run with beam spread in Y Muon beam (~150 GeV) 1 = classic MM (X-strips) 2 = bMM (Y-strips) 3 = bMM (X-strips)

Preliminary results for tracking ΔX (strip) = difference between expected and measured hit position Residual ΔX (strip) Before alignment correction Only the small pitch region (400 μm) is taken into account σ < pitch/(12) 1/2