1 Evaluating Multi-Item Scales Using Item-Scale Correlations and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. RCMAR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Estimating Reliability RCMAR/EXPORT Methods Seminar Series Drew (Cobb Room 131)/ UCLA (2 nd Floor at Broxton) December 12, 2011.
Advertisements

Psychometric Evaluation of Multi-Item Scales Questionnaire Design and Testing Workshop February 6, 2013, 1-2:30pm Wilshire Blvd. Suite 710 Los Angeles,
Remaining Challenges and What to Do Next: Undiscovered Areas Ron D. Hays UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research
Why Patient-Reported Outcomes Are Important: Growing Implications and Applications for Rheumatologists Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine RAND.
Methods for Assessing Safety Culture: A View from the Outside October 2, 2014 (9:30 – 10:30 EDT) Safety Culture Conference (AHRQ Watts Branch Conference.
Evaluating Multi-Item Scales Health Services Research Design (HS 225A) November 13, 2012, 2-4pm (Public Health)
Psychometric Evaluation of Survey Data Questionnaire Design and Testing Workshop October 24, 2014, 3:30-5:00pm Wilshire Blvd. Suite 710 Los Angeles,
Item Response Theory in Patient-Reported Outcomes Research Ron D. Hays, Ph.D., UCLA Society of General Internal Medicine California-Hawaii Regional Meeting.
Overview of field trial analysis procedures National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008.
Abdomen GI Dr. Pretto. Case Neonate presents with: – Respiratory distress – Absent crying – Cyanosis.
Item response modeling of paired comparison and ranking data.
Primer on Evaluating Reliability and Validity of Multi-Item Scales Questionnaire Design and Testing Workshop October 25, 2013, 3:30-5:00pm Wilshire.
Psychometric Properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey September 11, 2012.
Use of Health-Related Quality of Life Measures to Assess Individual Patients July 24, 2014 (1:00 – 2:00 PDT) Kaiser Permanente Methods Webinar Series Ron.
Patient-Centered Outcomes of Health Care Comparative Effectiveness Research February 3, :00am – 12:00pm CHS 1 Ron D.Hays, Ph.D.
Multitrait Scaling and IRT: Part II Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Questionnaire.
Evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life Measures June 12, 2014 (1:00 – 2:00 PDT) Kaiser Methods Webinar Series Ron D.Hays, Ph.D.
Development of Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores from PROMIS Global Items Ron D. Hays ( ) UCLA Department of Medicine
GI Problems Among the Elderly
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
 Celiac disease is an immune reaction to eating gluten, a protein found in wheat, barley and rye.  If you have celiac disease, eating gluten triggers.
Measurement Issues by Ron D. Hays UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research (June 30, 2008, 4:55-5:35pm) Diabetes & Obesity.
1 11/17/2015 Psychometric Modeling and Calibration Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. September 11, 2006 PROMIS development process session 10:45am-12:30 pm.
Impact of using a next button in a web-based health survey on time to complete and reliability of measurement Ron D. Hays (Rita Bode, Nan Rothrock, William.
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Measurement Process Levels of Measurement Reliability and Validity: Why They Are Very, Very Important A Conceptual Definition of Reliability.
METHODS Sample: The Institute for Survey Research of Temple University conducted face-to-face interviews for the 1995 National Alcohol Survey (NAS). The.
CFA: Basics Beaujean Chapter 3. Other readings Kline 9 – a good reference, but lumps this entire section into one chapter.
Item Response Theory (IRT) Models for Questionnaire Evaluation: Response to Reeve Ron D. Hays October 22, 2009, ~3:45-4:05pm
Multitrait Scaling and IRT: Part II Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Questionnaire Design and Testing.
Evaluating Self-Report Data Using Psychometric Methods Ron D. Hays, PhD February 6, 2008 (3:30-6:30pm) HS 249F.
Multi-item Scale Evaluation Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine/Health Services Research
Multitrait Scaling and IRT: Part I Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Questionnaire Design and Testing.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Multitrait Scaling and IRT: Part I Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Questionnaire Design and Testing.
Psychometric Evaluation of Questionnaire Design and Testing Workshop December , 10:00-11:30 am Wilshire Suite 710 DATA.
Evaluating Self-Report Data Using Psychometric Methods Ron D. Hays, PhD February 8, 2006 (3:00-6:00pm) HS 249F.
Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Joshua S. Malett, Sarah Gaillot, and Marc N. Elliott Physical Functioning Among Medicare Beneficiaries International Society for Quality.
Introducing Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Novices Using Kevin Heslin's SF-36 Data from Opioid Users Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. May 8, 2009, 12:01-12:59pm.
Overlap between Subjective Well-being and Health-related Quality of Life. 3 Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. (Alina Palimaru) November 18, 2015 (11:30-12:00 noon) Geriatric.
Measurement of Outcomes Ron D. Hays Accelerating eXcellence In translational Science (AXIS) January 17, 2013 (2:00-3:00 pm) 1720 E. 120 th Street, L.A.,
Psychometric Analyses of Survey to Assess Parental Perceptions of Their Children’s Dental Care in the California Healthy Families Program Ron D. Hays October.
Considerations in Comparing Groups of People with PROs Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine May 6, 2008, 3:45-5:00pm ISPOR, Toronto, Canada.
Construct Validity of the Moisture Subscale of the Braden Scale©: A Secondary Analysis Mary Pat Rapp, Tolulope Omolayo, Kilty Brown, Jing Li, Ryan Barrett,
Multitrait Scaling and IRT: Part I Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Questionnaire.
Impact of using a next button in a web-based health survey on time to complete and reliability of measurement Ron D. Hays (Rita Bode, Nan Rothrock, William.
Overview of Item Response Theory Ron D. Hays November 14, 2012 (8:10-8:30am) Geriatrics Society of America (GSA) Pre-Conference Workshop on Patient- Reported.
Evaluating Multi-item Scales Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine/Health Services Research HS237A 11/10/09, 2-4pm,
Evaluating Multi-Item Scales Health Services Research Design (HS 225B) January 26, 2015, 1:00-3:00pm CHS.
Evaluating Patient-Reports about Health
Ron D. Hays September 12, 2006 Network Testing ~ 5 or 6pm
Psychometric Evaluation of Items Ron D. Hays
Chapter 15 Confirmatory Factor Analysis
UCLA Department of Medicine
Evaluating Patient-Reports about Health
UCLA Department of Medicine
Evaluating Multi-Item Scales
assessing scale reliability
Evaluating IRT Assumptions
Eric Shah, William D. Chey, Chris Almario, Brennan Spiegel
Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of Multi-Item Scales
Evaluating Multi-Item Scales
Evaluating Multi-item Scales
Multitrait Scaling and IRT: Part I
Evaluating Multi-item Scales
Evaluating Multi-Item Scales
Psychometric testing and validation (Multi-trait scaling and IRT)
Evaluating the Significance of Individual Change
UCLA Department of Medicine
Presentation transcript:

1 Evaluating Multi-Item Scales Using Item-Scale Correlations and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. RCMAR Methods Seminar June 18, 2012, 3-4pm Drew Cobb Room 131/Broxton 2 nd Floor Conference Room

2 Development and Evaluation of PROMIS GI Distress Scale (n = 574) Dinesh Khanna and Brennan Spiegel, PIs Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Irritable Bowel Disease, Scleroderma 61% female; median age = 48 (18-85 yr. range) Some college = median educational level Race/ethnicity – 13% Hispanic – 17% non-Hispanic black – 12% non-Hispanic Asian – 5% non-Hispanic other

3 8 Hypothesized Scales (101 items) 1. Gastroesphageal reflux (29 items) 2. Disrupted swallowing (7 items) 3. Diarrhea (7 items) 4. Bowel incontinence/soilage (4 items) 5. Nausea and vomiting (13 items) 6. Constipation (15 items) 7. Belly pain (8 items) 8. Gas/bloat/flatulence (18 items)

4 Gastroesphageal Reflux (29 items) In the past 7 days … How often did you have regurgitation—that is, food or liquid coming back up into your throat or mouth without vomiting? – Never – One day – 2-6 days – Once a day – More than once a day

5 Disrupted swallowing (7 items) In the past 7 days … How often did food get stuck in your throat when you were eating? – Never – Rarely – Sometimes – Often – Always

6 Diarrhea (7 items) In the past 7 days … How many days did you have loose or watery stools? – No days – 1 day – 2 days – 3-5 days – 6-7 days

7 Bowel incontinence (4 items) In the past 7 days … How often did you have bowel incontinence— that is, have an accident because you could not make it to the bathroom in time? – No days – 1 day – 2-3 days – 4-5 days – 6-7 days

8 Nausea and vomiting (13 items) In the past 7 days … How often did you have nausea—that is, a feeling like you could vomit? – Never – Rarely – Sometimes – Often – Always

9 Constipation (14 items) In the past 7 days … How often did you strain while trying to have bowel movements? – Never – Rarely – Sometimes – Often – Always

10 Belly pain (8 items) In the past 7 days … How often did you have belly pain? – Never – Rarely – Sometimes – Often – Always

11 Gas/bloat/flatulence (18 items) In the past 7 days … How often did you feel bloated? – Never – Rarely – Sometimes – Often – Always

12 Problematic Item* Constipation (Gisx62) In the last 7 days … How often did you have a bowel movement? – Never {3} – One day {2} – 2-6 days {1} – Once a day {1} – More than once a day {1}

13 Problematic Item #2 Gastroesphageal Reflux (Gisx22) In the last 7 days … How often did you burp? – Never {1} – One day {2} – 2-6 days {3} – Once a day {3} – More than once a day {4}

14 Problematic Item #3 Gas/Bloat/Flatulence (Gisx105) In the last 7 days … How often did you pass gas? – Never {1} – Rarely (only once or twice a day) {2} – About every 3-4 hours {3} – About every 2 hours {4} – About every hour {4}

15 Internal Consistency Reliability for 8 Scales (101 items) ScaleNumber of itemsAlpha Gastroesphageal Reflux Disrupted swallowing70.90 Diarrhea70.89 Bowel incontinence40.87 Nausea/vomiting Constipation Belly pain80.93 Gas/bloat Reliability Standards: 0.70 or above for group comparisons; 0.90 for individual assessment How often did you have a bowel movement? did not go with Constipation scale.

16 Item-scale correlation matrix

17 Item-scale correlation matrix

18

19

20 Summary of Item-Scale Correlations Gisx22 (burp) correlates only 0.30 with Gastroesphageal Reflux scale Gisx33 (pain in chest when swallowing food) correlates as highly with Gastroesphageal Reflux as with Disrupted swallowing scale Three items correlate as highly with Disrupted Swallowing as with Gastroesphageal Reflux scale: – Gisx28 (lump in throat frequency) – Gisx29 (lump in throat interfere) – Gisx30 (lump in throat bother)

21 Confirmatory Factor Analysis

22 Confirmatory Factor Analysis Eight-factor categorical model fit the data well (CFI=0.952 and RMSEA=0.049). Lower loadings on Gastroesphageal Reflux for: – Gisx22 (burp frequency): – Gisx20 (pain behind breastbone): Secondary loadings on Gas for: – GIsx48 (thought gas but liquid; BI): – GIsx72 (unfinished frequency; Con.): – GIsx73 (feeling unfinished bother; Con.):

23 Correlated Residuals r = 0.58 (Gas/bloat/flatulence) – GI108 (freq. gurgling in belly) with GI109 (freq. gurgling when not hungry) r = 0.53 (Constipation) – GI75 (freq. pain in anus) with GI76 (bother pain in anus) r = 0.50 (Gas/bloat/flatulence) – GI106 (gas interference) with GI107 (gas bother)

24 Item Response Theory (IRT) IRT models the relationship between a person’s response Y i to the question (i) and his or her level of the latent construct  being measured by positing b ik estimates how difficult it is for the item (i) to have a score of k or more and the discrimination parameter a i estimates the discriminatory power of the item.

25 Item Responses and Trait Levels Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 Person 1Person 2Person 3 Trait Continuum

26 Bowel Incontinence Items How often did you soil or dirty your underwear before getting to a bathroom? How often did you have bowel incontinence— that is, have an accident because you could not make it to the bathroom in time? How often did you leak stool or soil your underwear? How often did you think you were going to pass gas, but stool or liquid came out instead?

27 Graded Response Model Parameters (Incontinence) ItemSlope Threshold 1Threshold 2Threshold 3Threshold 4 Gisx Gisx Gisx Gisx How often did you soil or dirty your underwear before getting to a bathroom? 2. How often did you have bowel incontinence—that is, have an accident because you could not make it to the bathroom in time? 3. How often did you leak stool or soil your underwear? [No days; 1 day; 2-3 days; 4-5 days; 6-7 days] 4. How often did you think you were going to pass gas, but stool or liquid came out instead? [Never; Rarely; Sometimes; Often; Always]

28 Questions?

29 Coefficient Alpha Formula is Two-Way Fixed Model Below ModelIntraclass CorrelationReliability One- way Two- way fixed Two- way random BMS = Between Ratee Mean Square N = n of ratees WMS = Within Mean Square k = n of replicates JMS = Item or Rater Mean Square EMS = Ratee x Item (Rater) Mean Square

30 Confirmatory Factor Analysis Fit Indices Normed fit index: Non-normed fit index: Comparative fit index:  -  2 null model 2  2 null  2 model 2 - df nullmodel 2 null  df -1  - df 2 model  - 2 null df null 1 - RMSEA = SQRT (λ 2 – df)/SQRT (df (N – 1))