CN-1 Everolimus Renal Safety and Efficacy Extrapolations, Dose Recommendations Lawrence Hunsicker, MD Professor of Medicine and Medical Director of Organ.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Pharmacometrics (PM)?
Advertisements

1 Rash and Low T2* MRI in a Paediatric Thalassaemia Patient.
3. The ASCERTAIN Study. Source Holdaas H, Rostaing L, Serón D, et al. Conversion of long-term kidney transplant recipients from calcineurin inhibitor.
Everolimus plus Reduced-Exposure CsA is as Effi cacious as Mycophenolic Acid plus Standard-Exposure CsA Reference: Silva Jr HT, Cibrik D, Johnston T, et.
Assessment of Adalimumab Dose Selection for Adult Ulcerative Colitis Using Exposure-Response Analyses Michael Bewernitz1, Christine Garnett2,4, Klaus Gottlieb3,
Conversion from CNI to sirolimus Byung Chul Shin Division of Nephrology Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju.
30-Year Retrospective on Organ Transplant Immunosuppression in the Era of Calcineurin Inhibitors Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche, MD Professor of Medicine Department.
Glycemic Control in Acutely Ill Patients Martin J. Abrahamson, MD FACP Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School Senior Vice President for.
AKI Definitions Stuart L. Goldstein, MD Professor of Pediatrics University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Director, Center for Acute Care Nephrology.
Robert K Huff PharmD. Candidate May Objectives The study was designed to examine 3 main aspects Biochemical effects Safety Tolerability Evacetrapib.
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
The ERICA Trial Peter H. Stone, MD, FACC, Nikolay A. Gratsiansky, MD, Alexey Blokhin, MD, I-Zu Huang, MD, Lixin Meng, MS, MPH, for the ERICA Investigators.
SYMPHONY: Results at 12 Months. Daclizumab Low dose CsA MMF Steroids B 50–100 ng/ml Low dose SRL D MMF Steroids Daclizumab 4-8 ng/ml Low dose TAC MMF.
ROCKET AF Renal Dysfunction Substudy Objective Evaluate the 2950 patients in the per-protocol cohort with a baseline CrCl of 30 to 49 mL/min who received.
Role of Rosuvastatin in the Treatment of Dyslipidemia
Clinical experience with ezetimibe/simvastatin in a Mediterranean population The SETTLE Study I. Migdalis a, A. Efthimiadis b, St. Pappas c, D. Alexopoulos.
William B. Kannel, MD, FACC Former Director, Framingham Heart Study
0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist.
Long-Term Efficacy of Dapagliflozin in T2DM Patients Receiving High-Dose Insulin John P.H. Wilding, DM, FRCP

Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Slide 1 EZT 2002-W-6022-SS Ezetimibe Co-administered with Statins: Efficacy and Tolerability Copyright © 2003 MSP Singapore Company, LLC. All rights reserved.
Comparison of Blood Pressure Lowering with Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone Kurt A. Wargo, Pharm.D., BCPS, Thomas M. English, Ph.D., Anna J. Aaron,
BackgroundBackground HDL-C levels are inversely related to CV event rates. HDL-C levels are inversely related to CV event rates. Torcetrapib, a cholesteryl.
Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) Collaborative Study Group N Eng J Med 345: , 2001 Edmund J. Lewis, M.D. Muehrcke Family Professor of.
Rapamune® Cyclosporine Withdrawal in Renal Transplantation Advisory Committee 1/24/02 Rosemary Tiernan, MD, MPH.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
Critical Appraisal of an Article on HARM. Clinical Question Is there potential harm after administering allopurinol in patients with gout and azotemia?
CI-1 Certican ® (everolimus) Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting November 16, 2005.
RAPAMUNE ® TM 1 Randomization Variable Day* to Day 386 Randomization Variable Day* to Day 386 RAPA, C min, TN0.765 CsA, C min, TN0.201 Gender0.117 Increasing.
FDA Case Studies Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee March 4, 2003.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
CR-1 Everolimus Benefit/Risk Assessment Howard J. Eisen, MD Thomas J. Vischer Professor of Medicine Chief, Division of Cardiology Drexel University College.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Endocrinologic & Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting
Critical Appraisal of an Article on HARM. Clinical Question Is there potential harm after administering allopurinol in patients with gout and azotemia?
Angelo L Gaffo Kenneth G Saag Core Evidence 2009:4 25–36
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
1 The Role of Exposure-Response Evaluation in Drug Development and Regulatory Decisions Case Study: Rosuvastatin Hae-Young Ahn, Ph.D. Office of Clinical.
1 Pulminiq™ Cyclosporine Inhalation Solution Pulmonary Drug Advisory Committee Meeting June 6, 2005 Statistical Evaluation Statistical Evaluation Jyoti.
TM RAPAMUNE ® O-1 RAPAMUNE ® Overview John F. Neylan, MD Vice President, Transplantation Immunology Clinical Research and Development Wyeth-Ayerst Research.
RAD Immunosuppression in Heart Transplant Recipients Duke Heart Failure Research Pager:
RAPAMUNE ® TM I-1 RAPAMUNE ® WYETH-AYERST RESEARCH January 24, 2002 Subcommittee of the Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee on Immunosuppressive Drugs January.
Manufacturer: AstraZeneca FDA Approval Date: December 22, 2015
Blood-Pressure and Cholesterol Lowering in Persons without Cardiovascular Disease (HOPE-3 trial) R4. 박은지 / PF. 정혜문 Salim Yusuf, M.B., B.S., D.Phil.,
Thymoglobulin: An Overview of Its Performance in Clinical Trials as an Agent for the Induction Therapy Reference: Osama Gaber A, Knight RJ, Patel S, et.
Risk Factors for Linezolid-Associated Thrombocytopenia in Adult Patients Cristina Gervasoni Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Milano.
Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is more effective than dexamethasone alone inpatients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma regardless of prior.
Switch to low dose ATV/r  LASA Study.  Design  Endpoints –Primary: proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 200 c/mL at W48 (ITT-E) ; non-inferiority.
Cardiovascular Disease and Antihypertensives The RENAAL Trial Reference Brunner BM, and the RENAAL study group. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular.
Kidney Graft Survival Rates do not improve by era: the impact of factor “Age” E. Bertoni MD, A. Larti MD, G. Rosso MD and M. Salvadori MD Renal Unit –
EVEROLIMUS IN LATE IMMUNOSUPPRESSION AFTER HEART TRANSPLANTATION:
US cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in 20,536 people at different levels of vascular disease risk: randomised placebo-controlled trial UK Medical Research.
Careggi University Hospital–
A high intra-patient variability in tacrolimus exposure is associated with poor long-term outcome of kidney transplantation Teun van Gelder Depts. of Pharmacy.
Creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min No HBV or HIV co-infection
EXPERIENCE WITH ALEMTUZUMAB IN KIDNEY TRASPLANTATION
FIGURE 1 Trial profile. The safety population was defined as all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug. All patients.
Shahad Abbas1,2 Alison H Thomson1,2 B) non-malignant patients.
The Safety and Efficacy of Full vs
Management of perioperative hypertension
Section 7: Aggressive vs moderate approach to lipid lowering
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
Welcome Ask The Experts March 24-27, 2007 New Orleans, LA.
Guidelines for Initiation of Therapy
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Major classes of drugs to reduce lipids
REFERENCE: APPLIED CLINICAL Slideshow by: lecturer HADEEL DELMAN
Intrapatient variability in cyclosporine blood levels in renal transplant patients. Intrapatient variability in cyclosporine blood levels in renal transplant.
Many post-MI patients are not receiving optimal therapy
Presentation transcript:

CN-1 Everolimus Renal Safety and Efficacy Extrapolations, Dose Recommendations Lawrence Hunsicker, MD Professor of Medicine and Medical Director of Organ Transplantation Carver College of Medicine at the University of Iowa

CN-2 Overview  Use of everolimus, together with cyclosporine (CsA) in usual doses, is associated with a significant reduction in kidney function  This effect is closely related to the trough (C 0 ) levels of CsA, but unrelated to the levels of everolimus  Use of everolimus with reduced dose CsA results in calculated creatinine clearance similar to those seen in patients treated with full dose CsA and either AZA or MMF  PK/PD analyses demonstrate everolimus and CsA, at reduced dose after the first month, is effective in preventing cardiac rejection

CN-3 Certican ® Proposed Dosage and Administration  Everolimus should be used in an initial dose of 1.5 mg per day in 2 divided doses, but dose adjusted to achieve a target trough level of 3 to 8 ng/mL  Recommended target exposure of CsA in the first month is 250 to 400 ng/mL  Exposure to CsA beyond Month 1 should be about –175 ng/mL for month –135 ng/mL for month –100 ng/mL beyond month 6

CN-4 Outline  Review of renal safety data from heart study B253  Role of everolimus and CsA –PK/PD relationships for renal function  Efficacy of reduced-dose CsA in cardiac transplantation –PK/PD efficacy heart study B253  Conclusions about safety and efficacy  Dosing recommendations

CN-5 Mean Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault) Over Time—24 Months Study B253 AZA, n Everolimus 1.5 mg, n Everolimus 3.0 mg, n Data from PTT b 24 months BL * * * * * * * * * *P < Error bars = Standard deviation.

CN-6 Renal Function—12 months Study B253 Everolimus AZA1.5 mg3.0 mg n = 145n = 132n = 129 Creatinine clearance mean (SD) (mL/min) 65.0 (22.89) 51.7 (19.06)* 51.3 (27.65)* n = 149n = 137n = 131 Creatinine mean (SD) (mg/dL) 1.67 (0.55) 2.06 (0.67)* 2.14 (0.95)* *P < vs AZA CS-20

CN-7 Outline  Review of renal safety data from heart study B253  Role of everolimus and CsA –PK/PD relationships for renal function  Efficacy of reduced-dose CsA in cardiac transplantation –PK/PD efficacy heart study B253  Conclusions about safety and efficacy  Dosing recommendations

CN-8 Absence of Renal Toxicity of Everolimus Monotherapy Study 2201—Rheumatoid Arthritis Parameter (mean) Placebo n = 60 Everolimus 6.0 mg n = 61 Creatinine (mg/dL) Baseline0.78 Week Week Slide set CPOs.ppt s32

CN-9 Design of Kidney Transplant Studies Studies B201, B251, A2306, A2307 ≤ 48 hrs Everolimus 1.5 mg (B201: n = 194; B251: n = 193) Everolimus 3.0 mg (B201: n = 198; B251: n = 194) MMF 2 g (B201: n = 196; B251: n = 196) ≤ 24 hrs Everolimus 1.5 mg/d (2306: n = 112; 2307: n = 117) Everolimus 3.0 mg/d (2306: n = 125; 2307: n = 139) Wk 1 - 4BaselineWeek Month B201, B251 A2306, A2307 a a With IL-2R monoclonal antibody. n’s from CSRs (Standard CsA) (Reduced CsA)

CN-10 a With IL-2R monoclonal antibody. Mean CsA Trough Levels and Creatinine Clearance With Conventional or Reduced-Dose CsA Studies B201, B251, A2306, A2307 a —ITT 12-month Analysis B201B251A2306A2307 CsA trough levels (ng/mL) 6 months Everolimus 1.5 mg Everolimus 3.0 mg MMF 2 g170178—— 12 months Everolimus 1.5 mg Everolimus 3.0 mg MMF 2 g157167—— Creatinine clearance (mL/min) Everolimus 1.5 mg Everolimus 3.0 mg MMF 2 g5469——

CN-11 Heart Study B253—Creatinine Clearance Decrease 30% After Month 1 by CsA and Everolimus Concentration a CsA exposure (ng/mL) a Time-weighted average trough until event or censoring DV - AC B253 PKPD draft2.doc

CN-12 Outline  Review of renal safety data from heart study B253  Role of everolimus and CsA –PK/PD relationships for renal function  Efficacy of reduced-dose CsA in cardiac transplantation –PK/PD efficacy heart study B253  Conclusions about safety and efficacy  Dosing recommendations

CN-13 BPAR ISHLT Grade ≥ 3A Rates vs Everolimus Exposure Study B BPAR rates by average everolimus trough level to event or day 450 a At 12 months.

CN-14 Percent of Patients Free of BPAR ISHLT Grade ≥ 3A Based on Everolimus Exposure Study B253—Day 1 to 225 Log-rank: Mean exposure 8 ng/mL (P 8 ng/mL (P < 0.001) Everolimus trough levels ≥ 8 ng/mL ng/mL < 3 ng/mL AZA Time after transplantation (days) Patients free of acute rejection, %

CN-15 BPAR ISHLT Grade ≥ 3A Acute Rejection by CsA and Everolimus Concentration a Study B253—Days CsA exposure (ng/mL) a Time-weighted average trough until event or censoring DV - AC B253 PKPD draft2.doc

CN-16 Rejection by CsA Exposure Quartile Day 1 to Month 1 Study B253 Novartis Briefing Book Table 4-11 Quartiles based on CsA exposure 1.5 mg AZA 3.0 mg

CN-17 Rejection by CsA Exposure Quartile Months 2 to 3 Study B253 Novartis Briefing Book Table 4-11 Quartiles based on CsA exposure 1.5 mg AZA 3.0 mg

CN-18 Rejection by CsA Exposure Quartile Months 4 to 6 Study B253 Quartiles based on CsA exposure 1.5 mg AZA 3.0 mg Novartis Briefing Book Table 4-12

CN-19 Rejection by CsA Exposure Quartile Months 7 to 12 Study B253 Quartiles based on CsA exposure 1.5 mg AZA 3.0 mg Novartis Briefing Book Table 4-13

CN-20 Rejection by CsA Exposure Quartile Everolimus 1.5 mg Over Months 2 to 12 Study B ac_ci12_rev.rtf Median CsA trough levels (ng/mL) Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4

CN-21 Outline  Review of renal safety data from heart study B253  Role of everolimus and CsA –PK/PD relationships for renal function  Efficacy of reduced-dose CsA in cardiac transplantation –PK/PD efficacy heart study B253  Conclusions about safety and efficacy  Dosing recommendations

CN-22 Summary  The combination of everolimus with standard dose CsA is associated with reduced renal function compared with CsA with AZA or MMF  But reduced dose CsA with either dose of everolimus is associated with excellent renal outcomes, similar to those with CsA and either AZA or MMF  The use of everolimus with lower doses of CsA after month 1 is equally effective in preventing cardiac rejection

CN-23 Conclusions  Renal toxicity is primarily associated with blood levels of CsA  Antirejection efficacy is primarily associated with blood levels of everolimus  It is possible to dose these agents so as to avoid renal toxicity and maintain antirejection efficacy  Thus in the hands of transplant experts, use of everolimus as we have recommended is effective in cardiac transplantation and is safe with respect to the effects on the kidneys

CN-24 Outline  Review of renal safety data from heart study B253  Role of everolimus and CsA –PK/PD relationships for renal function  Efficacy of reduced-dose CsA in cardiac transplantation –PK/PD efficacy heart study B253  Conclusions about safety and efficacy  Dosing recommendations

CN-25 Dose Recommendation for Everolimus  Initial dose of everolimus is 1.5 mg/day  We recommend use of everolimus to achieve trough concentrations of 3 to 8 ng/mL for the entire posttransplant period  As implied above, therapeutic monitoring of everolimus levels is appropriate

CN-26 Dose Recommendation for CsA  Recommended target exposure of CsA in the first month is 250 to 400 ng/mL  Exposure to CsA beyond Month 1 should approximate the median of the lowest exposure quartiles observed over time for study B253 –175 ng/mL for month –135 ng/mL for month –100 ng/mL beyond month 6