Applications of Ensemble Tropical Cyclone Products to National Hurricane Center Forecasts and Warnings Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, Ft. Collins, CO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR Dan Brown and Ed Rappaport, NHC.
Advertisements

The Storm Surge Toolkit Jamie Rhome Storm Surge Specialist/Team Lead National Hurricane Center Jamie Rhome Storm Surge Specialist/Team Lead National Hurricane.
Further Development of a Statistical Ensemble for Tropical Cyclone Intensity Prediction Kate D. Musgrave 1 Mark DeMaria 2 Brian D. McNoldy 3 Yi Jin 4 Michael.
Creation of a Statistical Ensemble for Tropical Cyclone Intensity Prediction Kate D. Musgrave 1, Brian D. McNoldy 1,3, and Mark DeMaria 2 1 CIRA/CSU, Fort.
Tropical Cyclone Forecasts Dr. Richard J. Murnane Risk Prediction Initiative Bermuda Biological Station for Research, Inc.
HFIP Ensemble Subgroup Mark DeMaria Oct 3, 2011 Conference Call 1.
HFIP Ensemble Products Subgroup Sept 2, 2011 Conference Call 1.
Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) 1 Near uniform spatial resolution of approximately 10 km. Coverage up to 52 deg latitude % flash detection day.
Predictability of Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasting Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS/StAR, Fort Collins, CO CoRP Science Symposium Fort Collins, CO August.
HFIP Ensemble Subgroup Mark DeMaria Nov 21, 2011 Conference Call 1.
Regional TC model ensemble forecast products Jon Moskaitis and the regional model subgroup: W. Lewis, Z. Zhang, J. Peng, A. Aksoy, F. Zhang, R. Torn, and.
Hurricane Diagnostics and Verification Workshop Opening Remarks Mark DeMaria May 4-6, 2009 National Hurricane Center Miami, Florida.
Forecasting Tropical cyclones Regional Training Workshop on Severe Weather Forecasting and Warning Services (Macao, China, 9 April 2013)
Advanced Applications of the Monte Carlo Wind Probability Model: A Year 1 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria 1, Stan Kidder 2, Robert.
Advanced Applications of the Monte Carlo Wind Probability Model: A Year 2 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria 1, Robert DeMaria 2, Andrea.
USE OF A MODIFIED SHIPS ALGORITHM FOR HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS
Development of a Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Genesis Prediction Scheme Jason Dunion1, John Kaplan2, Andrea Schumacher3, Joshua Cossuth4, & Mark DeMaria5.
ATMS 373C.C. Hennon, UNC Asheville Tropical Cyclone Forecasting Where is it going and how strong will it be when it gets there.
A. Schumacher, CIRA/Colorado State University NHC Points of Contact: M. DeMaria, D. Brown, M. Brennan, R. Berg, C. Ogden, C. Mattocks, and C. Landsea Joint.
Applications of ATMS/CrIS to Tropical Cyclone Analysis and Forecasting Mark DeMaria and John A. Knaff NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Fort Collins, CO Andrea Schumacher,
Improvements in Deterministic and Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Wind Predictions: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria and Ray Zehr NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
Current State of Proving Ground User Readiness at the National Hurricane Center Andrea Schumacher, CSU/CIRA Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NCEP/NHC.
The Impact of Satellite Data on Real Time Statistical Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasts Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
Improved Statistical Intensity Forecast Models: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO John A. Knaff, CIRA/CSU,
Update on Storm Surge at NCEP Dr. Rick Knabb, Director, National Hurricane Center and representing numerous partners 21 January 2014.
Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU Dan Brown and Ed Rappaport, NHC HFIP Workshop, 4-8 May 2009.
Improvements in Deterministic and Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Surface Wind Predictions Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Status Report Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,
1 Requirements for hurricane track and intensity guidance Presented By: Vijay Tallapragada and Sam Trahan (NWS/NCEP) Contributors: HWRF Team at EMC, NHC.
Guidance on Intensity Guidance Kieran Bhatia, David Nolan, Mark DeMaria, Andrea Schumacher IHC Presentation This project is supported by the.
An Improved Wind Probability Program: A Year 2 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO Stan Kidder,
An Improved Wind Probability Program: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO Stan Kidder,
Probabilistic Hurricane Storm Surge (P-Surge) Arthur Taylor MDL / OST December 4, 2006.
Statistical Evaluation of the Response of Intensity to Large-Scale Forcing in the 2008 HWRF model Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/RAMMB Fort Collins, CO Brian.
Storm Surge Modeling and Forecasting LTJG Jeffrey Pereira, NOAA Storm Surge Unit National Hurricane Center NOAA Storm Surge Workshop May 2011 LTJG Jeffrey.
NHC Activities, Plans, and Needs HFIP Diagnostics Workshop August 10, 2012 NHC Team: David Zelinsky, James Franklin, Wallace Hogsett, Ed Rappaport, Richard.
Daniel P. Brown and Jamie R. Rhome National Hurricane Center, Miami, FL Verification of the National Hurricane Center’s Atlantic and eastern North Pacific.
A. FY12-13 GIMPAP Project Proposal Title Page version 25 October 2011 Title: Combining Probabilistic and Deterministic Statistical Tropical Cyclone Intensity.
On the ability of global Ensemble Prediction Systems to predict tropical cyclone track probabilities Sharanya J. Majumdar and Peter M. Finocchio RSMAS.
Caribbean Disaster Mitigation Project Caribbean Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology Tropical Cyclones Characteristics and Forecasting Horace H. P.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2006 Matt Huddleston With thanks to: Frederic Vitart (ECMWF), Ruth McDonald & Met Office Seasonal forecasting team 14 th March.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Improving Hurricane Intensity.
61 st IHC, New Orleans, LA Verification of the Monte Carlo Tropical Cyclone Wind Speed Probabilities: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update John A.
Probabilistic Hurricane Storm Surge (P-Surge) Arthur Taylor Meteorological Development Laboratory, National Weather Service January 20, 2008.
Tracking and Forecasting Hurricanes By John Metz Warning Coordination Meteorologist NWS Corpus Christi, Texas.
Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project (HFIP): Where do we stand after 3 years? Bob Gall – HFIP Development Manager Fred Toepfer—HFIP Project manager Frank.
Development of Probabilistic Forecast Guidance at CIRA Andrea Schumacher (CIRA) Mark DeMaria and John Knaff (NOAA/NESDIS/ORA) Workshop on AWIPS Tools for.
A Global Tropical Cyclone Formation Probability Product Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR Daniel Brown, NHC 64.
Evaluation of Experimental Models for Tropical Cyclone Forecasting in Support of the NOAA Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project (HFIP) Barbara G. Brown,
Naval Oceanography Naval Oceanography: Enabling Decisions through Excellence in Tropical Cyclone Forecasting CAPT Michael Angove Commanding Officer, NMFC/JTWC.
The Impact of Lightning Density Input on Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensity Change Forecasts Mark DeMaria, John Knaff and Debra Molenar, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort.
Atlantic Simplified Track Model Verification 4-year Sample ( ) OFCL shown for comparison Forecast Skill Mean Absolute Error.
Exploitation of Ensemble Prediction System in support of Atlantic Tropical Cyclogenesis Prediction Chris Thorncroft Department of Atmospheric and Environmental.
Stream 1.5 Runs of SPICE Kate D. Musgrave 1, Mark DeMaria 2, Brian D. McNoldy 1,3, and Scott Longmore 1 1 CIRA/CSU, Fort Collins, CO 2 NOAA/NESDIS/StAR,
Improvements to Statistical Forecast Models and the Satellite Proving Ground for 2013 Mark DeMaria, John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR John Kaplan, Jason Dunion,
Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensity Change Forecasting Using Lightning Data during the 2010 GOES-R Proving Ground at the National Hurricane Center Mark DeMaria.
Development of a Rapid Intensification Index for the Eastern Pacific Basin John Kaplan NOAA/AOML Hurricane Research Division Miami, FL and Mark DeMaria.
Improved Statistical Intensity Forecast Models: A Joint Hurricane Testbed Year 2 Project Update Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, CO John A. Knaff,
HFIP Regional Ensemble Call Audio = Passcode = 10606# Meeting ID = May 2012.
2015 Production Suite Review: Report from NHC 2015 Production Suite Review: Report from NHC Eric S. Blake, Richard J. Pasch, Andrew Penny NCEP Production.
Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR.
National Hurricane Center 2009 Forecast Verification James L. Franklin Branch Chief, Hurricane Specialist Unit National Hurricane Center 2009 NOAA Hurricane.
New Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecast Tools for the Western North Pacific Mark DeMaria and John Knaff NOAA/NESDIS/RAMMB Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU.
Objective and Automated Assessment of Operational Global Forecast Model Predictions of Tropical Cyclone Formation Patrick A. Harr Naval Postgraduate School.
Mark DeMaria and John A. Knaff - NOAA/NESDIS/RAMMB, Fort Collins, CO
A Guide to Tropical Cyclone Guidance
HFIP Ensemble Product Subgroup Update on Prototype Products
Storm Surge Forecasting Practices, Tools for Emergency Managers, A Probabilistic Storm Surge Model Based on Ensembles and Past Error Distributions.
Michael J. Brennan National Hurricane Center
Storm Surge Modeling and Forecasting
Verification of Tropical Cyclone Forecasts
Presentation transcript:

Applications of Ensemble Tropical Cyclone Products to National Hurricane Center Forecasts and Warnings Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, Ft. Collins, CO Michael J. Brennan, NOAA/NWS/NHC, Miami, FL Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU, Ft. Collins, CO Kate Musgrave, CIRA/CSU, Ft. Collins, CO Timothy Marchok, NOAA/GFDL, Princeton, NJ Jon Moskaitis, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA Warn-on-Forecast and High Impact Weather Workshop 8-9 Feb 2012, Norman, OK

Outline Use of satellite data in tropical cyclone forecast models Use of model ensembles in tropical cyclone forecasting Summary of NHC probabilistic products Prototype probabilistic forecast tools for NHC – Ensemble statistical intensity models – Genesis probabilities from global models – Regional model ensembles – Hybrid statistical-dynamical model for wind speed probabilities – Application to hurricane warnings Summary

Satellite Data in Tropical Cyclone Models Global models – Assimilation of satellite radiances and derived products (feature track winds) Good for track and structure, but not max winds Regional models – Input through global model on outer mesh – TC initial location and intensity estimates Intensity forecasts of limited quality Statistical intensity models – GOES imagery, satellite altimetry used as predictors – Lightning data being tested under GOES-R3 – LEO input being tested under JHT and JPSS programs

Statistical Intensity Models HWRF, GFDL are regional coupled ocean/atmosphere models DSHIPS, LGEM are statistical models NHC Atlantic Operational Intensity Model Errors IR Brightness Temperatures and Lightning Locations for Hurricane Celia (2010) Input from GOES and other sources can be used directly as predictors in SHIPS/LGEM

Utilization of Ensembles in Tropical Cyclone Forecasting Hurricane impacts extend beyond landfall point of the storm center – De-emphasize “skinny black line” in hurricane products Users need deterministic forecast and measure of uncertainty – Strike probabilities introduced in 1983 – Generalized to wind speed probabilities in 2006 Ensembles can provide quantitative measures of forecast uncertainty Ensemble mean can be more accurate than single deterministic forecast

Probabilistic NHC Products: Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Genesis Forecasts 6 NHC began issuing categorical 48-h genesis probability forecasts in the Tropical Weather Outlook in 2008 – specific probabilities included beginning in 2010 Probability of tropical cyclone formation in the next 48 hours given for individual disturbances in 10% increments in the following categories: Low: < 30% Medium: 30–50% High: > 50% Based on analysis of current state of the atmosphere, satellite imagery, and model output 2. SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS ASSOCIATED WITH AN ELONGATED AREA OF LOW PRESSURE LOCATED BETWEEN THE WEST COAST OF AFRICA AND THE CAPE VERDE ISLANDS HAVE CHANGED LITTLE THIS EVENING. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ARE MARGINALLY CONDUCIVE FOR SOME SLOW DEVELOPMENT DURING THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS. THERE IS A MEDIUM CHANCE...30 PERCENT...OF THIS SYSTEM BECOMING A TROPICAL CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT 48 HOURS AS IT MOVES NORTHWESTWARD NEAR 10 MPH.

Probabilistic NHC Products (cont…) Wind Speed and Intensity Probability Products Wind Speed Probabilities depict location-specific probabilities for 34-kt (tropical-storm-force), 50-kt (58-mph), and 64-kt (hurricane-force) winds Text product shows cumulative and onset probabilities for a fixed set of locations Graphic shows cumulative probabilities for points over a large domain Intensity Probability Table shows the probability of tropical cyclone intensity (maximum wind) falling into various categories Both are created using 1,000 Monte Carlo realizations Random sampling of NHC track and intensity forecast errors from the previous 5 years Centered on official NHC forecast Errors are serially correlated Model track spread has some influence on error sampling Uses climatology and persistence model for wind radii Accounts for decay over land

Probabilistic NHC Products (cont…) Probabilistic Storm Surge Based on an ensemble of SLOSH model runs centered around the official NHC forecast Creates alternate scenarios based on previous NHC Along and across track errors and intensity forecast errors Varies radius of maximum wind in parametric wind model Run when hurricane watch or warning in effect for the U.S. Output includes: – Probabilities of storm surge exceeding thresholds from 2-25 ft – Exceedence height for various probability threshold (e.g., the surge height that has a 10% chance of being exceeded) 8

Experimental Probabilistic Tropical Cyclone Forecast Products 1.Ensemble statistical intensity models – Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project (HFIP) and GOES-R3 2.Genesis probabilities from global models – HFIP 3.Regional model ensemble products – HFIP 4.Hybrid statistical-dynamical model for wind speed probabilities – HFIP and Joint Hurricane Testbed (JHT)

1. SPICE (Statistical Prediction of Intensity from a Consensus Ensemble) Model Configuration for Consensus SPICE forecasts TC intensity using a combination of parameters from: – Current TC intensity and trend – Current TC GOES IR – TC track and large-scale environment from GFS, GFDL, and HWRF models These parameters are used to run DSHIPS and LGEM based off each dynamical model The forecasts are combined into two unweighted consensus forecasts, one each for DSHIPS and LGEM The two consensus are combined into the weighted SPC3 forecast

1. SPICE (Statistical Prediction of Intensity from a Consensus Ensemble) Model Configuration for Consensus DSHIPS and LGEM Weights for Consensus Determined empirically from sample Atlantic and East Pacific

1. SPICE Skill (2011 Atlantic Season) (304) (301) (263) (225) (192) (150) (116) (92) Number of Cases Skill Relative to SHIFOR

2. TC genesis probabilities using a consensus of global ensemble models 13 GFS, CMC, ECMWF, FNMOC ensembles (one model or multi-model) A vortex tracker is used to detect genesis in global ensemble forecast members. Probability is simply the percentage of members indicating genesis in a given lead time window (here, 0-24h). Pre-Ophelia Pre-Philippe Pre-Hilary False Alarm

3. Regional ensemble track product prototype -Loop over forecast lead time -Show track for ensemble mean only -Markers show ensemble mean and ensemble member positions at each lead time -Ellipses contain 2/3 of ensemble member positions (black for current lead time, gray for all previous lead times) -Number of members specified for each lead time Ellipse containing 2/3 of ensemble members at the current time Ellipses for all previous lead times

-Loop over forecast lead time -Show track for ensemble mean only -Markers show ensemble mean and ensemble member positions at each lead time -Ellipses contain 2/3 of ensemble member positions (black for current lead time, gray for all previous lead times) -Number of members specified for each lead time 3. Regional ensemble track product prototype Ellipse containing 2/3 of ensemble members at the current time Ellipses for all previous lead times

-Loop over forecast lead time -Show track for ensemble mean only -Markers show ensemble mean and ensemble member positions at each lead time -Ellipses contain 2/3 of ensemble member positions (black for current lead time, gray for all previous lead times) -Number of members specified for each lead time 3. Regional ensemble track product prototype Ellipse containing 2/3 of ensemble members at the current time Ellipses for all previous lead times

-Loop over forecast lead time -Show track for ensemble mean only -Markers show ensemble mean and ensemble member positions at each lead time -Ellipses contain 2/3 of ensemble member positions (black for current lead time, gray for all previous lead times) -Number of members specified for each lead time 3. Regional ensemble track product prototype Ellipse containing 2/3 of ensemble members at the current time Ellipses for all previous lead times

-Loop over forecast lead time -Show track for ensemble mean only -Markers show ensemble mean and ensemble member positions at each lead time -Ellipses contain 2/3 of ensemble member positions (black for current lead time, gray for all previous lead times) -Number of members specified for each lead time 3. Regional ensemble track product prototype Ellipse containing 2/3 of ensemble members at the current time Ellipses for all previous lead times

-Loop over forecast lead time -Show track for ensemble mean only -Markers show ensemble mean and ensemble member positions at each lead time -Ellipses contain 2/3 of ensemble member positions (black for current lead time, gray for all previous lead times) -Number of members specified for each lead time 3. Regional ensemble track product prototype Ellipse containing 2/3 of ensemble members at the current time Ellipses for all previous lead times

-Loop over forecast lead time -Show track for ensemble mean only -Markers show ensemble mean and ensemble member positions at each lead time -Ellipses contain 2/3 of ensemble member positions (black for current lead time, gray for all previous lead times) -Number of members specified for each lead time 3. Regional ensemble track product prototype Ellipse containing 2/3 of ensemble members at the current time Ellipses for all previous lead times

-Loop over forecast lead time -Show track for ensemble mean only -Markers show ensemble mean and ensemble member positions at each lead time -Ellipses contain 2/3 of ensemble member positions (black for current lead time, gray for all previous lead times) -Number of members specified for each lead time 3. Regional ensemble track product prototype Ellipse containing 2/3 of ensemble members at the current time Ellipses for all previous lead times

-Loop over forecast lead time -Show track for ensemble mean only -Markers show ensemble mean and ensemble member positions at each lead time -Ellipses contain 2/3 of ensemble member positions (black for current lead time, gray for all previous lead times) -Number of members specified for each lead time 3. Regional ensemble track product prototype Ellipse containing 2/3 of ensemble members at the current time Ellipses for all previous lead times

-Loop over forecast lead time -Show track for ensemble mean only -Markers show ensemble mean and ensemble member positions at each lead time -Ellipses contain 2/3 of ensemble member positions (black for current lead time, gray for all previous lead times) -Number of members specified for each lead time 3. Regional ensemble track product prototype Ellipse containing 2/3 of ensemble members at the current time Ellipses for all previous lead times

-Loop over forecast lead time -Show track for ensemble mean only -Markers show ensemble mean and ensemble member positions at each lead time -Ellipses contain 2/3 of ensemble member positions (black for current lead time, gray for all previous lead times) -Number of members specified for each lead time 3. Regional ensemble track product prototype Ellipse containing 2/3 of ensemble members at the current time Ellipses for all previous lead times

3. Regional ensemble intensity & wind radii product prototypes -Box plot for each lead time -Box plot shows the extrema and various quantiles of the ensemble intensity distribution

4. Hybrid Statistical-Dynamical Wind Speed Probabilities Statistical method: 1000 realizations from random sampling NHC track and intensity error distributions from last 5 years Replace realization tracks with values from global model ensembles – GFS, CMC, and ECMWF global ensembles used 1000 Track Realizations 64 kt h Cumulative Probabilities

4. Hybrid Statistical-Dynamical WSP Example: Earl MCP Hybrid w/ ensemble tracks (N=93) MCP MCP Hybrid w/ ensemble tracks (N=93) Realizations Probabilities Verification shows Hybrid MCP has more skill at longer lead times

Applying Probabilistic Forecasts to Hurricane Warnings HuLPA (Hurricane Landfall Probability Applications) Statistical relationship between wind speed probabilities and timing/location hurricane warnings Improvements to probabilities  improvements to watches & warnings

Summary Tropical cyclone products include deterministic products and measures of uncertainty Ensembles can provide quantitative measures of uncertainty and ensemble mean forecast Statistical intensity forecasts currently outperform coupled/ocean atmosphere models – Direct inclusion of satellite information more straightforward SPICE model provided additional improvement to statistical intensity forecasts Other ensemble based products under development Wind speed probabilities can provide objective guidance for hurricane watches and warnings