LEGAL AND ADVOCACY ISSUES IN SUPPORTIVE HOUSING NARPA CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 5, 2014 SEATTLE, WA PAMELA COHEN ATTORNEY DISABILITY RIGHTS CALIFORNIA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENFORCEMENT OF THE INTEGRATION MANDATE OF TITLE II OF THE ADA AND OLMSTEAD V. L.C. AS IT RELATES TO THE DUTIES OF PUBLIC ENTITIES; INTEGRATED/SEGREGATED.
Advertisements

COMPARISON OF REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL SETTINGS AND NON-RESIDENTIAL SETTINGS HCBS FINAL RULE FEBRUARY 10, 2015 NOTE: THIS MEETING WILL BE TAPE RECORDED.
Housing & Health Care Policy October Burning Questions.
DHSS DSAMH Department of Health and Social Services Division of Substance Abuse and Mental Health.
Development of the ODP Home and Community-Based Services Transition Plan – Your Ideas.
Department of Justice Olmstead Enforcement NASDDDS & NASMHPD Annual Conference November 12, 2013.
The Future of Day and Employment services for Adults receiving DDA Waiver Services Jade Ann Gingerich Director of Employment Policy, Maryland Department.
A General Overview of the New Federal Rules for Home and Community Based Settings Office of Aging and Disability Services December 19,
STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE Statewide Transition Plan for Compliance with Home and Community-Based Setting Final Rule 1 Public.
PARTNERING TO END HOMELESSNESS IN A CHANGING HEALTH CARE ENVIRONMENT Pamela S. Hyde, J.D. SAMHSA Administrator National Alliance to End Homelessness U.S.
11 Opportunities to Improve Care for Persons with Disabilities: The Community Living Initiative IMPLEMENTING NATIONAL HEALTH REFORM IN A DIFFICULT ECONOMIC.
Housing and Health Care Programs and Financing that Integrate Health Care and Housing Housing California Institute April 15, 2014 John Shen Long-Term Care.
Disability Rights Network of PA Where We Are Going ADA Title II Olmstead Olmstead plan requirements Olmstead planning in PA Where do we go from here?
Service Provider Title VI Training Civil Rights Act of 1964 Presented By: Tennessee Department of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Olmstead Case Study. Introduction Video hmKz83CJgr4.
Addictions and Mental Health The Olmstead Decision and Oregon’s Olmstead Plan Implications for Coordinated Care Organizations Residential Transition to.
Home and Community-Based Services Settings Rule Marty Ford Senior Executive Officer, Public Policy The Arc of the United States February 5, 2015.
An Overview of New Federal Rules for Home and Community-Based Settings Office of Aging & Disability Services October 2014.
Advocating for Reasonable Accommodation and Reasonable Modification With PHAs Midwest Regional Housing Forum September 11, 2003 Ann O’Hara Technical Assistance.
Illinois’ Money Follows The Person Demonstration “Pathways to Community Living Illinois’ Money Follows The Person Demonstration “Pathways to Community.
The Olmstead Decision and Community Integration 1.
OPTIONS, ISSUES AND THE INTERSECTION WITH OLMSTEAD Medicaid and Community Services.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
THE PRESCOTT EXPERIENCE RECOVERY RESIDENCES. GROUP HOME Unrelated Handicapped Persons Living together Residents generally incapable of living independently.
Lisa Bragança Access Living (312)
P: F: West Main Street, New York, NY | CMS HCBS Final Rule, Community Settings and DDS Summer 2014.
UPDATE NOVEMBER 10, 2011 Money Follows the Person Rebalancing Demonstration.
Medicaid and Behavioral Health – New Directions John O’Brien Senior Policy Advisor Disabled and Elderly Health Programs Group Center for Medicaid and CHIP.
HCBS Final Rule and Settings. Goals of the Presentation Review of the Final Rule Medicaid HCBS Requirements Intent of the Final Rule Requirements of the.
 “[W]e confront the question whether the proscription of discrimination may require placement of persons with mental disabilities in community settings.
HCBS Community Settings Regulation: The Impact on SEMP and Prevocational Services NYS-APSE Annual Conference May 4, 2015 Presented by Ceylane Meyers-Ruff.
E151U: Housing and Urban Development Policy Housing Planning.
Fair Housing & the Mental Health Services Act Housing Program October 6, 2010.
Affordable and Accessible Housing: A National Perspective Regional Housing Forum November 13, 2002 Emily Cooper Technical Assistance Collaborative, Inc.
Impact of CMS Final Rule on Home & Community-Based Services Yonda Snyder, Division of Aging June 23, 2015.
CIL-NET at ILRU CIL-NET Presents… Filing Complaints to Leverage Olmstead Enforcement: The Kansas Experience A National Teleconference & Webinar March 22,
“Overview and Comments on HUD’s NoFA: Housing Vouchers for Non-Elderly Individuals with Disabilities“ Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Housing Opportunities for People with Disabilities Policy Developments NCSHA Annual Conference October 20, 2014 Henry Korman, Partner Klein Hornig LLP.
Rebecca C. Cory, PhD. Manager, Disability Services North Seattle Community College.
Robert Bernstein, PhD Court Monitor
HCBS Community Rule & Delaware’s Transition Plan JULY 22, 2015.
Facilitator: Monique Parish Funded by California Department of Mental Health October 2009 Traumatic Brain Injury Grant Project Stakeholder Session.
Impact of CMS Final Rule on Adult Family Care, Adult Day Services, and Structured Family Caregiving Steve Bordenkecher, Division of Aging June 23, 2015.
Money Follows the Person Demonstration Grant & Waivers May 18, 2012.
What Is It, Anyway? Virginia Association of Housing and Community Development Officials February 25, 2008.
Olmstead Plan One Year Update Presented at ACLAIMH November 6, 2014.
ENFORCEMENT OF THE INTEGRATION MANDATE OF TITLE II OF THE ADA AND OLMSTEAD V. L.C. AS IT RELATES TO THE DUTIES OF PUBLIC ENTITIES; INTEGRATED/SEGREGATED.
North Carolina Olmstead Settlement Initiative. What is Olmstead? Olmstead v. L.C. is a US Supreme Court Decision in 1999.
Olmstead and Creating Integrated Permanent Supportive Housing Opportunities Presented by: Kevin Martone, Executive Director Technical Assistance Collaborative,
SUPPORTED LIVING ARRANGEMENTS (SLA) For Developmental Services Presented by: Kate McCloskey, M.A., C.P.M. Manager of Quality Assurance Sierra Regional.
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities Housing Vision Paper November 2013.
The Home and Community Base Services (HCBS) Rule: Transition Plan Update ARRM Business and Finance Forum November 18,
How & Why is it Time for Change? The Center for Life Enrichment Introduction Training 1 Their Cause is our Cause.
A STATEMENT OF VALUES INCLUDING PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES IN OUR COMMUNITIES.
DHMH HCBS Provider Self- Assessment: Initial Results June 9, 2016 Ian Stockwell MaryAnn Mood DHMH HCBS Transition Team Meeting.
Welcome! 1 To hear the audio portion of this presentation, please call: 1 (877) When prompted, enter participant code: # We will begin shortly!
General Operations Limitation on Use of Funds Termination of Assistance Other Program Requirements.
Current Developmental Disabilities Topic -Separate and Unequal: States Fail to Fulfill the Community Living Promise PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT.
1.  Overview of the HCBS Settings Final Rule  Implementation Requirements for States  Arkansas’s Transition Process 2.
Getting Prepared October 2016 District Meetings
The Medicaid waiver program
Advocating for Crisis Services
Human Services Delivery Systems and Organizations
Unique Housing Partnerships Create Community Living Options
Illinois Nursing Home Transitions
Serving Veterans with Disabilities and ADA Compliance
Division of ACF / Assisted Living Surveillance
Impact of CMS Final Rule on Home & Community-Based Services
S.260/H.R. 873: Transformation to Competitive Employment Act
Progressive Independence
Presentation transcript:

LEGAL AND ADVOCACY ISSUES IN SUPPORTIVE HOUSING NARPA CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 5, 2014 SEATTLE, WA PAMELA COHEN ATTORNEY DISABILITY RIGHTS CALIFORNIA

-Supportive Housing: What & Why? -Supportive Housing Advocacy -ADA Integration Mandate -Fair Housing Laws -Land Use and Planning -Siting Strategies OVERVIEW

SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: WHAT AND WHY?

WHAT IS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING? -Permanent: No time limits -Supported: Flexible non-mandated onsite or offsite services and supports to maximize independence -Rights and responsibilities of tenancy -Affordable -Integrated -Choice of units and roommate

NEW HCBS MEDICAID RULE All Settings Eligible for HCBS Waiver Reimbursement Must: -Be integrated in and support full access to the community; -Be selected by individual from among options; -Ensure rights to privacy, dignity, respect and freedom from coercion and restraint; -Optimize autonomy and independence in making life choices; and -Facilitate choice regarding services and providers

NEW MEDICAID HCBS RULE Additional Criteria for Provider-Owned or Controlled Home and Community-Based Residential Settings: -Individual has lease or similar agreement; -Individual has privacy in unit including lockable doors, choice or roommates and freedom to furnish or decorate the unit; -Individual controls his or her own schedule including access to food at any time; and -Setting is physically accessible.

NEW MEDICAID HCBS RULE Rebuttable presumption that these are NOT community- based settings: -Nursing Facilities -Institutions for Mental Disease -Intermediate Care Facilities for People -Hospitals - Any other setting that has the effect of discouraging integration of individuals from the broader community

SUPPORTIVE HOUSING WORKS SH is a successful, cost-effective model for providing housing & services to people who would otherwise be institutionalized or at risk of institutionalization. -National Governors Association; NASMHPD; DOJ; HUD; Surgeon General; SAMHSA; National Council on Disability

SUPPORTIVE HOUSING ADVOCACY -ADA Integration Mandate -Fair Housing Laws -Land Use and Planning Laws -Siting Strategies

ADA INTEGRATION MANDATE

States must “administer services, programs, and activities in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of qualified individuals with disabilities.” 28 C.F.R. § (d) 28 C.F.R. § 41.51(d)

UNNECESSARY INSTITUTIONALIZATION: - Perpetuates unwarranted assumptions that people with disabilities are incapable or unworthy of participating in community life; and - Severely diminishes everyday life activities, including family relations, social contacts, work options, economic independence, educational advancement, and cultural enrichment. Olmstead v. LC, 527 U.S. 581 (1999)

COMMUNITY PLACEMENT REQUIRED WHEN: 1. The state’s treatment professionals have determined that community placement is appropriate; 2. The individual does not oppose community placement; and 3. The placement can be reasonably accommodated, taking into account the resources available and the needs of others with disabilities. Olmstead v. LC, 527 U.S. 581 (1999)

OLMSTEAD PLANS A state can establish a fundamental alteration defense through a comprehensive, effectively working plan for community placement, and a waiting list that moves at a reasonable pace not controlled by endeavors to keep institutions fully populated.

SUPPORTIVE HOUSING AS OLMSTEAD REMEDY Remedies for Olmstead violations “typically require the public entities to expand the capacity of community-based alternatives by a specific amount, over a set period of time.” - Statement of the DOJ on Enforcement of the Integration Mandate of Title II of the ADA and Olmstead v. L.C. (Jan. 22, 2011)

CONSUMER CHOICE “Individuals who have been institutionalized and segregated have often been repeatedly told that they are not capable of successful community living and have been given very little information, if any, about how they could successfully live in integrated settings. As a result, individuals’ and their families’ initial response when offered integrated options may be reluctance or hesitancy.” - Statement of the DOJ on Enforcement of the Integration Mandate of Title II of the ADA and Olmstead v. L.C. (Jan. 22, 2011)

Housing -Preservation of Housing -LHH Rental Subsidy Program Services & Case Management -Access to NF/AH Waiver Services - Diversion and Community Integration Program -Targeted Case Management -Community Living Plans -City-Funded Community Living Fund -City-Provided MH & SA Services CHAMBERS V. SAN FRANCISCO (ND CA 2006) SETTLEMENT (2008)

O’TOOLE (DAI) V. CUOMO (ED NY 2003) SETTLEMENT (2013) NY state will provide as many scattered-site, supported housing units as necessary to afford all adult home residents with serious mental illnesses the opportunity to live in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs, and will provide and maintain community services and supports.

O’TOOLE (DAI) V. CUOMO (ED NY 2003) 2013 SETTLEMENT Community services and supports include, but are not limited to: -Care coordination -Psychiatric rehabilitation services -Employment services -Assistance with taking medication -Home health care -Personal assistance services -Assertive community treatment -Crisis services

- Hundreds of thousands of people with disabilities remain on waiting lists for HCBS services. -People younger than 65 are increasingly being isolated in nursing homes; -Progress in providing HCBS for persons with physical disabilities and mental illnesses has lagged significantly behind efforts for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. U.S. Senate “Harkin Report,” Separate and Unequal: States Fail to Fulfill the Community Living Promise of the Americans with Disabilities Act (July 18, 2013)

FAIR HOUSING LAWS

CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS -Land use and zoning ordinances violate 14 th Am right to due process if they are not rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc 473 U.S. 432, 446 (1985) - State constitutions may provide more protection.

FAIR HOUSING STATUTES -Fair Housing Amendments Act (1988) -Americans with Disabilities Act (1990) -Section 504 Rehabilitation Act (1973) -Similar State Statutes

FAIR HOUSING AMENDMENTS ACT Unlawful to “discriminate in the sale or rental, or to otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any buyer or renter because of a handicap of that buyer or renter, a person residing or intending to reside in that dwelling after it is sold, rented or made available, or any person associated with that buyer or renter.” 42 U.S.C § 3604(f)(1)

USING FAIR HOUSING LAWS TO PROMOTE SH

LAND USE AND PLANNING LAWS

FEDERAL AND STATE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS -Consolidated Plan - Condition of federal funding for affordable housing -Similar State Law Requirements -E.g. California Housing Elements

ELEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED PLANS Con Plans Must Include: -Housing and Homelessness Needs Assessment -Market Analysis -Strategic Plan -Annual Action Plan -Summary of Citizen Participation and Consultation -Annual Certifications of Compliance Any housing activities supported by federal funds must be consistent with the jurisdiction’s Con Plan.

USING LAND USE PLANNING TO PROMOTE SH -Participate in planning processes at federal, state and local levels -Nothing about us without us -Ensure that land use plans comply with fair housing laws - Reasonable accommodation ordinances -Ensure that proposed or existing restrictive zoning ordinances comply with land use plans - Local officials consult zoning codes, not planning documents

SITING STRATEGIES

SIX STEPS TO BUILDING COMMUNITY SUPPORT

QUESTIONS?

HELPFUL WEBSITES – US GOVERNMENT -Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services: -Department of Housing and Urban Development: -Department of Justice: -Substance Abuse and MH Services Administration:

HELPFUL WEBSITES – NONPROFITS -Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law: -Corporation for Supportive Housing: -Disability Rights California (coming soon: Everyone’s Backyard – Addressing “Not In My Backyard” Opposition to Supportive Housing for People with Mental Health Disabilities) -Technical Assistance Collaborative:

CONTACT INFORMATION Pamela Cohen Disability Rights California 1330 Broadway, Suite 500 Oakland CA (510)