Closing the Achievement Gap: An ESL Reform Initiative University of Northern Colorado TQE Dr. Elizabeth Franklin, MLCS Dr. Jenni Harding-Dekam, TE Ms.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T H A N K Y O U !. Charlie Robinson Charlie
Advertisements

Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Professional Development to Address the Needs of English Language Learners Andrea Honigsfeld, Ed.D. Molloy College.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Our Vision  As Dr. Robin McCoy stated in her welcome, our vision is to build capacity at the local school system level and sustain statewide implementation.
PROJECT NEXUS A Title III National Professional Development Program Funded by The Office of English Language Acquisition of the U. S. Department of Education.
 The purpose of the RTI/CCP Grant is to enhance the knowledge, skills, and dispositions of in-service teachers, pre-service teachers, and teacher education.
A Team Effort To Develop A Successful Program For English Language Learners Irene Jiménez Director of Bilingual/ESL Programs Hays CISD
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
Weber State University Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction Candidate Assessment Plan.
Good teaching, good teachers and comparative analysis Fernando Reimers.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
9/11/2014. University of North Texas Teacher Education and Administration Bilingual/ESL Teacher Certification Programs 1155 Union Circle # Denton,
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Data Collection Information 1.
Growing Success-Making Connections
May 8 th Assessment Day 2015 Agenda Introductions Assessment Overview Review General Education Outcomes. Overview of past assessment work. What.
ESOL Update 2014 Van Wert Elementary 2014/2015 School Year.
SIOP: Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Dr. Kelly Bikle Winter 2007.
Exploring Strategies for the Secondary Level in Mathematics Patricia Latham and Cathie McQueeney September 28, 2006.
Effective Use of Instructional Time Jane A. Stallings Stephanie L. Knight Texas A&M University.
CRIOP Professional Development: Program Evaluation Evaluatio Susan Chambers Cantrell, Ed.D. Pamela Correll, M.A. Victor Malo-Juvera, Ed.D.
Implementing Active Learning Strategies in a Large Class Setting Travis White, Pharm.D., Assistant Professor Kristy Lucas, Pharm.D., Professor Pharmacy.
ALWAYS LEARNING1 Effective Teaching for ALL Students: The SIOP ® Model NAME TITLE Pearson School Achievement Services.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
SIOP Overview Shelter Instruction Observation Protocol
SIOP Overview Humble ISD Sara Smith-Frings. ELLs in Humble I.S.D. Fall 2001 ELL 1226 Fall 2002 ELL 1438 Fall 2003 ELL 1578 Fall 2004 ELL 1750 Fall 2005.
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Sheltered Instruction Part III of III Presented by Office of English Language Learners
Assisting, Collaborating, and Training ESL Secondary Content Teachers ACT-ESL Virginia Commonwealth University School of Education Project Director: Dr.
Linden Public School District ESL/Bilingual K-12 Program April 2012 Alphonsina Paternostro, Supervisor.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
1 An Introduction to the SIOP Model Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Culturally Responsive Teaching in Diverse Classrooms
Secondary Teacher Education and Professional Training (STEP T) for English Language Learners (ELLs) National Professional Development Program 2007:
1 WELCOME! Pocatello/Chubbuck District #25 SIOP Coaches Training.
SIOP The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP)
Field Test of Counselor System July 2000 Alabama Professional Education Personnel Evaluation Program.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
MANHATTANVILLE COLLEGE Second Annual Educational Forum June 8, 2007 INCLUSION for ELs: SIOP IN ELEMENTARY CLASSROOMS Presenter: Marina A. Moran Bedford.
Spring 2009 MCAS Results. Dedham Elementary Schools.
DR. ELKE SCHNEIDER (PHD) DR. KELLY M. COSTNER (PHD) PROJECT FUNDED BY A US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION NATIONAL.
Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate.
Integrate English as a Second Language (ESL) strategies into the teacher preparation program for all students the semester prior to student teaching. Require.
South Jersey Math/Science Partnership at Rowan University Dr. Eric Milou Dr. Jill Perry SJMP.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
9/11/2014. University of North Texas Teacher Education and Administration Bilingual/ESL Teacher Certification Programs 1155 Union Circle # Denton,
SIOP: Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Dr. Kelly Bikle Winter 2007.
THE SIOP MODEL Presented by: Ann Dealy, Principal Brookside School
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
Dr. Antar Abdellah. To enable you as an EFL teacher to: 1. Develop and articulate instructional objectives adequately and clearly. 2. Create, construct,
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Supplemental Text Project Kenn Ward EDL 678 Dr. Pfennig June 2013.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
GUIDE THE ISS GUIDE TO THE SIOP MODEL AUGUST 1ST, 2013.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Success through Technology and Assessment August 1 st -3 rd Attended workshops and training to prepare for the grant o Achievement Series o eMetric o Obtaining.
SIOP Implementation in Manatee County A Title I and Title III Partnership Presented by: Debra Estes, ESOL Coordinator.
The grant has been operating at UNT as the fiscal agent
RETELL Faculty presentation
MANHATTANVILLE COLLEGE Second Annual Educational Forum June 8, 2007
Welcome Parents! Parent Advisory.
ESL 433 N Possible Is Everythin/tutorialrank.com.
ESL 433 NCompetitive Success/snaptutorial.com
ESL 433 N Education for Service/tutorialrank.com.
ESL 433 N Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
What can be learned from CAL’s latest research on the SIOP model?
Presentation transcript:

Closing the Achievement Gap: An ESL Reform Initiative University of Northern Colorado TQE Dr. Elizabeth Franklin, MLCS Dr. Jenni Harding-Dekam, TE Ms. Anne Ramírez, District 6 May 16, 2006

Thank you to the U.S. Department of Education and the Colorado Department of Education for funding to support this project.

Project Partners UNC College of Humanities and Social Sciences (English, Hispanic Studies/Undergraduate ESL/Mexican-American Studies, Social Science)  UNC College of Education and Behavioral Sciences  (Teacher Education: Elementary Education, Reading, Graduate ESL)  Cumbres (Hispanic Alumni Initiative for ESL and BE teachers)  Greeley/Evans District 6  Aims Community College  Colorado Department of Education (Lynda Franco)

Four Goals of the Project Increase the number of undergraduate and graduate students seeking and completing the ESL endorsement. Revise the undergraduate ESL program. Infuse second language content into the elementary and secondary education program so that all preservice teachers are prepared to work with second language learners. Provide professional development activities and coaching for teachers at four elementary schools in District 6.

Goal 1: Increase the Number of Students Seeking an ESL Endorsement (From 60 to 200): increase students in Cumbres. Undergrad Students Enrolled (Est.):  2002: 60  2003: 117  2004: 305  2005: Undergrad Students Graduated:  2002: 13  2003: 29  2004: 37  2005: 40 (Awarded May 2005)  2006: 34 (Awarded May 2006 ***)

 The number of students seeking the ESL endorsement has increased 500% in three years.  Approximately 40% of the current ESL students are students of color (38% of the students in ESL methods during the academic year are Latino; 2% are Asian-Pacific).  In , 30 new students were recruited for Cumbres, a leadership program for students who want to be ESL or BE teachers; in , 84 new students were recruited for Cumbres.  The retention of Cumbres students from to was 92.5%.  In , 23 Cumbres students graduated; 57% of these students were Hispanic. In , 27 Cumbres students graduated. In , 29 Cumbres students graduated; 69% of these students were students of color.

 $325, in scholarships were given to students earning an ESL endorsement through spring  $246, in scholarships were given to undergraduate students earning an ESL endorsement.  $79, in scholarships were given to graduate students earning an ESL endorsement.  83.3% of the elementary ESL endorsement students have passed the PLACE since 1/1/ % have passed the PRAXIS since 1/1/2003 (41 students passed; 7 failed).  32 TQE scholarship recipients have taken the ESL PLACE; 27 have passed it (84%).

Goal 2: Revise the Undergraduate ESL Program A new course, FL 395 Second Language Acquisition, was added to the ESL endorsement and has been taught five times. The ESL methods course was revised to include more focus on research-based practices (e.g. SIOP). Students complete a pre-post survey. The ESL practicum was revised with feedback from an advisory committee with District 6 supervisors and teachers. Students are now observed three times with the SIOP, they complete an oral language assessment of an ELL, and they complete a pre-post survey.

Evaluation of ESL Methods Course On the pre-post survey given in fall 2004, there was an average gain of on a five point scale (27 students). Students demonstrated growth on every criteria. On the pre-post survey given in fall 2005, there was an average gain of.9579 on a five point scale (38 students). Students demonstrated growth on every criteria.

Evaluation of ESL Practicum ESL cooperating teachers were trained on the SIOP. In , ESL cooperating teachers were asked to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the ESL practicum and the UNC ESL students. 8 teachers responded. Teachers commented that the partnership is a good one; UNC students ask a lot of questions, are creative, enthusiastic and caring; course requirements are clear. This is an improvement from previous semesters.

Evaluation of ESL practicum UNC students evaluated the ESL practicum in spring, students completed the evaluation. All 13 students reported that the practicum was a valuable experience, that they liked their cooperating teachers, and that they learned from them. In fall 2005, the comparison of pre and post scores on 29 components on the ELL content survey demonstrated that the ESL practicum students increased an average of 1.36 on a five point scale (from 3.46 to 4.82)in their perceptions of their effectiveness in working with ELLs.

Evaluation of ESL Practicum On the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) during fall 2005, the average score on the third observation was 5.0/6.0 on lesson preparation, 2.57/3.0 on building background; 2.68/3.0 on comprehensible input; 4.1/5.0 on lesson delivery; and 3.47/4.0 on review and assessment. On the oral language assessment during fall 2005, using 14 indicators of oral language proficiency, ELLs improved on indicators.

Goal 3: Infuse second language content into the elementary and secondary education program so that all preservice teachers are prepared to work with second language learners. Methods faculty completed hours of professional development activities: 45 hours on second language acquisition with Lynda Franco, 7 hours on parent involvement with the Colorado Statewide Parents Coalition; 7 hours on parent involvement at the Summit on Parent Involvement; 15 hours with Beth Franklin and Priscilla Falcon on the SIOP and critical pedagogy; and 25 hours on the Mexican education system, curriculum and qualities of high achieving schools.

Results of Pre-Post Survey Students in the methods completed a pre/post survey of perceptions of knowledge about effective practices in working with ELLs. There were two different surveys given; nine faculty completed one survey (24 items; 210 students) and 4 faculty completed the other survey (23 items; 73 students). On the first survey, there was an average change of.41 on a five point scale. On the second survey, the average change was.65 on a five point scale.

The biggest change (.75) on the first survey involved understanding how to group students for instruction. There was over a.50 change with respect to understanding the importance of wait time, differentiated instruction, increasing interaction, connecting language and content, language objectives, and scaffolding. For both surveys, there was positive growth on all items.

Results of the Exit Survey A spring 2005 exit survey of 57 students who graduated in elementary education indicated that 87.7% agreed or strongly agreed that they were prepared work with families of diverse ethnicities. This is an increase from fall 2004 where 79% of the students (38 students) stated this. In the spring 2005 exit survey, 66.6% of the students agreed or strongly agreed that they were prepared to teach ELLs. This is an increase from fall 2004 where 57.9% stated this.

The cooperating teachers (63) agreed or strongly agreed in a parallel survey that 95.2% of Block 2 UNC students were prepared to work with ethnically diverse families. These same cooperating teachers agreed that 89.4% of the students were prepared to work with ELLs.

Of the 60 elementary students who completed Block 1 (the literacy/science block prior to student teaching) in fall 2005, 90% agreed or strongly agreed that they were prepared to work with families of diverse ethnicities; 85% agreed or strongly agreed that they were prepared to work with ELLs. The survey of their cooperating teachers indicated that 90% (45 teachers) agreed or strongly agreed that the UNC students were prepared to work with ethnically diverse families; 85% of the teachers agreed or strongly agreed that the UNC students were prepared to work with ELLs.

Results of the Faculty Survey On an open-ended survey, seven methods faculty commented that they:  feel more confident about answering student questions about ELLs  understand classroom management from a Latino perspective  developed units addressing ELL needs with respect to composition and literature  incorporated ESL assignments  incorporated strategies for working with ELLS

incorporated group and oral language activities became more aware of how to integrate modifications without watering down the curriculum.

Methods Faculty Revisions to Courses Thematic unit lesson plans include an accommodation section specifically for ELLs. Excerpts from the video, Enhancing English Language Learning in Elementary Classrooms, are shown. A human graph is used to analyze empathy toward ELLs in the classroom and the community. UNC students seeking an ESL endorsement are clustered in Block 2. The Cumbres cohort model is, therefore, continued.

Because of the professional development, conversations between faculty of color and Education faculty have increased. Because of the professional development, faculty research in this area has increased (e.g. conference presentations, children’s book in press, research articles, classroom management book manuscript).

Goal 4: Provide professional development activities and coaching for teachers at four elementary schools in District 6.  80 District 6 teachers at four elementary schools received 45 hours of workshop instruction from Lynda Franco by spring  The course evaluations for the Franco workshops were strong ( ) on a 5 point scale.  On the 24 item pre and post ELL content surveys, teachers had an average change of.58 on a 5 point scale. At two of the schools, the average change was.849 and.895.

During the school year, 24 teachers at the four elementary schools were coached on their implementation of second language strategies. A 6 criteria rubric measured growth in classroom practice. In , 15 teachers made growth on all six criteria. All 24 teachers made growth on some criteria. The average amount of change was.65 on a 3.33 scale.

In , 29 teachers were coached. The average amount of change in classroom practice was.55 on a 3.33 scale. All teachers made some growth.