Doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0693r0 Submission May 2007 Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks Slide 1 Supporting Drop Eligibility in IEEE 802.11 MAC Notice: This document.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0256r0 Submission February 2007 A. Centonza, D. StephensonSlide 1 Limitations on the Use of EBR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /90r0 Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide b NICT Proposal IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0930r0 Submission July 2006 Nancy Cam-Winget, Cisco Slide 1 Editor Updates since Jacksonville Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0094r0 Submission November 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Comments on PAR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0644r2 Submission May 2006 Päivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Measurement Pilot Transmission Information as optional information in Probe.
Doc.: IEEE /0072r0 SubmissionS. Filin H. Harada, NICTSlide 1 Coexistence algorithms Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
Doc.: IEEE /0179r0 Submission April 2007 Wu Yu-Chun, Huawei HisiSlide 1 CRC_Length_and_FEC_gain_of_PSDU for the IEEE P Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /0054r0 Submission May 2011 Slide 1Hyunduk Kang, et al, ETRI Discussion on mode of management service Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /2237r0 Submission July 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D1.0 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /1606r0 Submission January 2005 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 AP Functions Diagram Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /1212r0 Submission TGT and MEF Liaison Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for.
Doc.: IEEE /86r2 Submission March, 2010 Gabor BajkoSlide 1 Location Proxy Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is.
Doc.: IEEE /0039r1 Submission January 2007 Larry Green, Ixia Slide 1 TCP Parameters and Settings Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0028r0 Submission January 2005 Eleanor Hepworth, Siemens Roke ManorSlide 1 Definitions and Terminology Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0220r0 Submission March 2005 Peter Ecclesine, Cisco SystemsSlide Liaison Report Atlanta Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0197r0 Submission March 2005 Nancy Cam-Winget et alSlide 1 TAP & JIT Merge Process Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0186r0 Submission January 2007 Guenael Strutt, MotorolaSlide 1 RFI London Update Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0652r1 Submission May 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D0.12 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Submission on comments to +HTC frames
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
IEEE WG Status Report – July 2005
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
3GPP liaison report May 2006 May 2006 Date: Authors:
November Opening Report
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
Descriptive Language Usage in TGv
(Presentation name) For (Name of group) (Presenter’s name,title)
On Coexistence Mechanisms
[Comparison between CDMA Code and Contention-based Access]
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
On Coexistence Mechanisms
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Experimental DTV Sensor
Selection Procedure Recommendation
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Spectrum Sensing Tiger Team
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
EC Motions – July 2005 Plenary
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
WNG SC Closing Report Date: Authors: November 2005
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0693r0 Submission May 2007 Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks Slide 1 Supporting Drop Eligibility in IEEE MAC Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0693r0 Submission May 2007 Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks Slide 2 Abstract This contribution proposes a mechanism for supporting frame drop eligibility in IEEE MAC

doc.: IEEE /0693r0 Submission May 2007 Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks Slide 3 What Is Drop Eligibility? The ability of a system (a network node, a station, an access point) to selectively drop frames when congested. Frame drop eligibility information is included in the frame header.

doc.: IEEE /0693r0 Submission May 2007 Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks Slide 4 How Can it be Used? In existing data networks, e.g. IP drop eligibility is used to differentiate between in-profile (low discard precedence) and out-of profile packets (high discard precedence) –In or Out of profile is determined according to some conformance definition usually based on token (leaky) bucket algorithm Some application, e.g. Video applications, generates frames with different importance –“Not all bits are created equal”  video over wireless tutorial –I, P, and B frames

doc.: IEEE /0693r0 Submission May 2007 Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks Slide 5 Some Examples IP Networks –IP differentiated services defines a number of per hop behaviors (PHB) –Assured Forwarding defines 3 drop eligibility levels for each AF class –PHB information is included in the type of service (ToS) byte of the IP header Frame Relay Networks –Discard eligibility (DE) bit FECN DLCI C/REA BECN DEEA ToS Byte PHBECN

doc.: IEEE /0693r0 Submission May 2007 Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks Slide 6 Nodal Scheduling Decisions Nodal scheduling decisions are working in two dimensions, urgency and importance Urgency is decided by the transmission scheduler (who goes first) Importance is decided by the discard precedence (whom to keep) Urgency Importance

doc.: IEEE /0693r0 Submission May 2007 Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks Slide 7 What does IEEE e Have? IEEE e user priority (UP) is based on IEEE 802.1D –Defines 8 straight priority levls –No consideration for discard eligibility. IEEE e somehow convolute the 8 priority levels with the 4 access categories (AC) –IEEE e operates on one- dimension only (urgency) –Only 4 code points levels are needed to support the a AC. Urgency Importance

doc.: IEEE /0693r0 Submission May 2007 Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks Slide 8 What Happened since then? IEEE have updated the semantics of the UP bits with the approval of IEEE 802.1Qad (Provider Bridges) amendment. –Allows for multiple options to support discard precedence –There is also an update of the traffic classes table

doc.: IEEE /0693r0 Submission May 2007 Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks Slide 9 How Drop Eligibility be Supported in IEEE MAC? Only 4 code points are needed to define the 4 AC. –There are 4 other code points that can be used for discard eligibility Discard eligibility can be supported by changing the semantic of the UP bits –In the same way as IEEE did.

doc.: IEEE /0693r0 Submission May 2007 Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks Slide 10 References “Virtual Bridge Local Area Networks, Amendment 4: Provider Bridges” IEEE Std 802.1ad-2005, May 2005.