Using Rate-Equilibrium Free Energy Relationships to Characterize Protein Folding Transition States I. E. Sánchez and T. Kiefhaber.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enzyme Kinetics C483 Spring 2013.
Advertisements

Jane Clarke May 2004 How do proteins withstand force? Examining the effect of force on a protein folding landscape by combining atomic force microscopy,
Energy, Catalysis and Biosynthesis Metabolism *catabolism *anabolism Complexity of metabolism Review of Energy: Energy *kinetic energy *potential energy.
Correlated Mutations and Co-evolution May 1 st, 2002.
Determination of alpha-helix propensities within the context of a folded protein Blaber et al. J. Mol. Biol 1994.
General Features of Enzymes Most biological reactions are catalyzed by enzymes Most enzymes are proteins Highly specific (in reaction & reactants) Involvement.
Energetics and kinetics of protein folding. Comparison to other self-assembling systems?
Enzymes Chapter 8. Important Group of Proteins Catalytic power can incr rates of rxn > 10 6 Specific Often regulated to control catalysis Coupling  biological.
Determination of alpha-helix propensities within the context of a folded protein Blaber et al. J. Mol. Biol 1994.
Review of “Stability of Macromolecular Complexes” Dan Kulp Brooijmans, Sharp, Kuntz.
Enzymes.
ENZYME KINETIC M. Saifur R, PhD. Course content  Enzymatic reaction  Rate of Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions  Quatification of Substrate Concentration and.
Distinguishing Features Separate the protein from all other contents Sequence and fold give overall properties  Molecular weight  Solubility  Exposed.
Catalysts of Life. Review of Chemical Reactions A chemical reaction is a process that changes, or transforms, one set of chemicals into another Reactants.
ENZYMES - Spesificity Aulanni’am Biochemistry Laboratory Brawijaya University.
Flexible Multi-scale Fitting of Atomic Structures into Low- resolution Electron Density Maps with Elastic Network Normal Mode Analysis Tama, Miyashita,
1 Reaction Mechanism The series of steps by which a chemical reaction occurs. A chemical equation does not tell us how reactants become products - it is.
 Receptors are mostly membrane-bound proteins that selectively bind small molecules called ligands which results in physiological response.  They are.
Part I : Introduction to Protein Structure A/P Shoba Ranganathan Kong Lesheng National University of Singapore.
Transition States in Protein Folding Thomas Weikl Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces Department of Theory and Bio-Systems.
LECTURE 4: Principles of Enzyme Catalysis Reading: Berg, Tymoczko & Stryer: Chapter 8 ENZYME An ENZYME is a biomolecular catalyst that accelerates the.
Paul D. Adams University of Arkansas Mary K. Campbell Shawn O. Farrell Chapter Six The Behavior of Proteins:
Six classes of enzymes.
Chapter 5: The Working Cell. All chemical reactions involve the transfer of energy Metabolism – All chemical reactions of a cell Energy has two forms:
Enzymes speed up metabolic reactions by lowering energy barriers A catalyst is a chemical agent that changes the rate of a reaction without being consumed.
Proteins often consist of multiple domains –Usually different functions (eg. catalysis, regulation, targeting) –Often can be physically separated Non-covalent.
Lab: principles of protein purification
The Folding of a Family of Three- Helix Bundle Proteins: Spectrin R15 Has a Robust Folding Nucleus, Unlike Its Homologous Neighbours J. Mol. Biol. (2014)
6. Lecture SS 2005Optimization, Energy Landscapes, Protein Folding1 V6: Chemical Kinetics & Transition States see chapter 19 in book of K. Dill Aim: describe.
How NMR is Used for the Study of Biomacromolecules Analytical biochemistry Comparative analysis Interactions between biomolecules Structure determination.
IC-1/38 Lecture Kinetics IC-2/38 Lecture What is Kinetics ? Analysis of reaction mechanisms on the molecular scale Derivation.
Lecture 5:Enzymes Ahmad Razali Ishak
Key topics about enzyme function:
Lecture 6 Web: pollev.com/ucibio Text: To: Type in:
Biochemistry Free For All
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
BIO201 SPRING 2018 Introduction to Biochemistry & Biotechnology
Chemical Reactions and Enzymes
Agenda 12/15 Enzyme Demo Properties of Enzymes Explanation
Protein-Protein Interactions I
Protein Engineering Protein engineering Industrial enzymes (Table 8.1)
Can Non-Mechanical Proteins Withstand Force
Chapter 6 CHM 341 Fall 2016 Suroviec.
Difference in kinetic behaviour of catechol 2,3-dioxygenase variants from a polluted environment * 김혜겸 * Howard et al., 2004.
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Directed Mutagenesis and Protein Engineering
Enzymes Lecture #8.
Jen Chao Presentation November 20, 2008
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Enzyme-Substrate Complex
Folding studies of immunoglobulin-like β-sandwich proteins suggest that they share a common folding pathway  Jane Clarke, Ernesto Cota, Susan B Fowler,
Complex Energy Landscape of a Giant Repeat Protein
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Protein Stability N  U K = = = [U] = [U] [N] fU fN 1-fU 1
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Structural Diversity in Integrin/Talin Interactions
The Biological Catalysts
Linkage between ATP Consumption and Mechanical Unfolding during the Protein Processing Reactions of an AAA+ Degradation Machine  Jon A. Kenniston, Tania.
Enzyme Foldable What is an Enzyme? Parts of an Enzyme Enzyme Action
Untangling the Influence of a Protein Knot on Folding
Energetics of Pore Opening in a Voltage-Gated K+ Channel
Multiple Folding Pathways of the SH3 Domain
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Protein Folding and Unfolding at Atomic Resolution
The Influence of Configurational Dependent Diffusion on Fast Protein Folding Dynamics Jin Wang, SUNY at Stony Brook 1. Diffusion coefficients versus Q.
Tural Aksel, Doug Barrick  Biophysical Journal 
Chemistry of Living Things
Presentation transcript:

Using Rate-Equilibrium Free Energy Relationships to Characterize Protein Folding Transition States I. E. Sánchez and T. Kiefhaber

Rate-Equilibrium Free Energy Relationships in Protein Folding Part 1

Experimental Characterization of Reaction Kinetics

Leffler’s Rate-Equilibrium Free Energy Relationships The relative effect of a perturbation  x on the free energy of the transition state of a reaction (compared to the effect on the free energy of the ground states) allows a structural characterization of the transition state for the reaction coordinate probed by  x (Leffler, 1953) (≠ Brønsted: relationship between the rate constant of an acid- or base-catalyzed reaction and the dissociation constant of the catalyst)

Medium-Induced Rate-Equilibrium Free Energy Relationships

Structure-Induced Rate-Equilibrium Free Energy Relationships Measures the normalized energetic role of side chains in the transition state (Matthews, Fersht & co-workers) Can be defined for single residues, secondary structure elements or the whole protein

Analysis of Changes in  x with Changes in Stability (Hammond Behavior) Shifts in  D with increasing denaturant concentration are generally due to a change in the rate-limiting step for folding between consecutive transition states on a linear pathway (Sánchez and Kiefhaber, 2003a) Genuine Hammond behavior is rare (1 of 21 proteins), apparent changes in the position of the transition state are mostly due to ground state effects (commonly, disruption of residual structure in the unfolded state) (Sánchez and Kiefhaber 2003b, c)

 f -Values Vs. Solvent-Induced  x -Values Solvent-induced  x -values: Large number of data points over a broad range of  G 0  f -values: Two-point analysis folding:  f unfolding:  f -1

Two-Point Vs. Many-Point  f -Values Multiple mutations at position 24 of the fyn SH3 domain (data from Northey et al., 2002) Drastic mutations do not affect transition state structure  f = 0.33 (  f -1) Artificially high and low  f -values for |  G 0 |<7 kJ/mol

Two-Point Vs. Many-Point  f -Values (Data from Mok et al., 2001 and Northey et al., 2002) Two-point  f -values match the true  f -values for |  G 0 |>7 kJ/mol

Update: Two-Point Vs. Many-Point  f -Values for Position 53 of RNase HI (Data from Spudich et al., 2004) Drastic mutations do not affect transition state structure Artificially high and low  f -values for |  G 0 |<7 kJ/mol  f = 1.12 (  f -1)

Two-Point Vs. Many-Point  f -Values in the Gating Reaction of the Acetylcholine Receptor A many-point  f -value analysis by Cymes et al., 2002 ln(K eq ) ln(k op ) Artificially high and low  f -values for |  G 0 |<6 kJ/mol Two-point  f -values match the true  f -value for |  G 0 |>6 kJ/mol

Factors Affecting Two-point  -Value Analysis of Protein Folding (Sánchez and Kiefhaber, 2003d) Factors Affecting Two-point  f -Value Analysis of Protein Folding (Sánchez and Kiefhaber, 2003d) A two-point  f -value is inaccurate if |  G 0 |<7 kJ/mol “|  G 0 |-independent noise” in the rate-equilibrium free energy relationship may be due to small changes in transition state structure or in the pre- exponential factor k 0 Drastic mutations instead of small deletions are recommended High-throughput mutagenesis and expression methods may be useful

Implications for the Mechanism of Protein Folding Part 2

 f -value Studies of Protein Folding Transition States There are “polarized” (Riddle et al., 1999) and “diffuse” transition states (Itzhaki et al., 1995)

 f -value Studies of Protein Folding Transition States Most  f -values are low (Goldenberg, 1999) “Nucleus” “Kinetic” The unusual “nucleus” and “kinetic”  f -values are considered most important (nucleation-condensation model)

Selection and Analysis of  f -Value Studies Large number of variants evenly distributed in the structure  G 0 determined from kinetic measurements Rate and equilibrium constants were extrapolated to 0M denaturant Mutants inducing a change in the rate-limiting step for folding (as seen from  D ) or in the structure on one of the ground states (as seen from m-values) were kept out

Unusual  f -values in Diffuse Transition States For all “nucleus” and “kinetic”  f -values |  G 0 |<7 kJ/mol Data for CI2 (Itzhaki et al., 1995)

Unusual  f -values in Diffuse Transition States For all “nucleus” and “kinetic”  f -values |  G 0 |<7 kJ/mol Two-point  f -values match the average  f for |  G 0 |>7 kJ/mol Data for CI2, Im9, Cyt b562, ADA2h, Sso7d SH3 and protein G

Update: Transition State for Folding of c-Myb Data from Gianni et al., 2003 For all “nucleus” and “kinetic”  f -values |  G 0 |<7 kJ/mol Two-point  f -values match the average  f for |  G 0 |>7 kJ/mol

Update: Transition State for Folding of BdpA Data at 2M denaturant from Sato et al., 2004 For most “nucleus” and “kinetic”  f -values |  G 0 |<7 kJ/mol Two-point  f -values match the average  f for |  G 0 |>7 kJ/mol

Update: Transition State for Folding of Engrailed Homeodomain For most “nucleus” and “kinetic”  f -values |  G 0 |<7 kJ/mol Data from Gianni et al., 2003

Unusual  f -values in Polarized Transition States Data for ACBP, fyn SH3, Im7, protein L and src SH3 For 70% of all “nucleus” and “kinetic”  f -values |  G 0 | 7 kJ/mol compared to diffuse transition states

Update: Transition State for Folding of CspB For most “nucleus”  f -values |  G 0 |<7 kJ/mol Data from García-Mira et al., 2004

Update: Transition State for Folding of L23 No “nucleus” or “kinetic”  f -values for |  G 0 |>7 kJ/mol Data from Hedberg and Oliveberg, 2004

Testing for “Kinetic”  f -values in Protein Folding Only 3 sites of 438 may have a strong kinetic role during folding For kinetic “sites”  G 0 should be small -> error in  f would be large -> Kinetic sites are better detected in a  G 0‡ vs.  G 0 plot Diffuse TSPolarized TS

The Properties of Protein Folding Transition States (Sánchez and Kiefhaber, 2003d) Reliable  f -values for structured regions of transition states do not point at a folding nucleus formed by a small number of residues -> all side chains have a similar energetic role (distorted native-like structure)  f -values in structured regions of polarized transition states tend to be higher and more diverse than in diffuse transition states Side chains with a “kinetic” role in the folding reaction are rare -> only few transient non- native interactions

Acknowledgements Thomas Kiefhaber Luis Serrano, EMBL Heidelberg Organizing Committee

Testing for “Kinetic”  f -values in Enzyme Catalysis (Fersht et al., 1987)